<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Thread: Happy Mo Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riveraveblues.com/2008/11/open-thread-happy-mo-day-6093/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2008/11/open-thread-happy-mo-day-6093/</link>
	<description>A New York Yankees Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 03:12:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben K.</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2008/11/open-thread-happy-mo-day-6093/#comment-215393</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=6093#comment-215393</guid>
		<description>Cry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike G.</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2008/11/open-thread-happy-mo-day-6093/#comment-215392</link>
		<dc:creator>mike G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=6093#comment-215392</guid>
		<description>so what the hell are we going to do when mo retires?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so what the hell are we going to do when mo retires?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Ranger</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2008/11/open-thread-happy-mo-day-6093/#comment-215330</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Ranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=6093#comment-215330</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d sign on for that, Andy is better then last year. 27/09.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d sign on for that, Andy is better then last year. 27/09.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Ranger</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2008/11/open-thread-happy-mo-day-6093/#comment-215329</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Ranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=6093#comment-215329</guid>
		<description>CC and Tex with out a doubt. 27/09.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC and Tex with out a doubt. 27/09.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2008/11/open-thread-happy-mo-day-6093/#comment-215154</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=6093#comment-215154</guid>
		<description>I dont understand rosenthal&#039;s comments. It seems that he is under the impression that if pettitte is offered arbitration and accepts that the yanks will be forced to pay pettitte more than the 16 million he got last season. Couldn&#039;t they pay him as low as a 20 percent decrease from last years salary which would be about 13 million? That is high but I was thinking the lowest they would re-sign him for would be 10 million no matter what the circumstances. They could potentially get two excellent draft picks and only run the risk of paying pettitte 3 million more - i think they would do that over running the risk of losing pettitte and getting absolutely nothing from the dodgers. Particularly because the dodgers have such high draft picks and pettitte&#039;s type A status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont understand rosenthal&#8217;s comments. It seems that he is under the impression that if pettitte is offered arbitration and accepts that the yanks will be forced to pay pettitte more than the 16 million he got last season. Couldn&#8217;t they pay him as low as a 20 percent decrease from last years salary which would be about 13 million? That is high but I was thinking the lowest they would re-sign him for would be 10 million no matter what the circumstances. They could potentially get two excellent draft picks and only run the risk of paying pettitte 3 million more &#8211; i think they would do that over running the risk of losing pettitte and getting absolutely nothing from the dodgers. Particularly because the dodgers have such high draft picks and pettitte&#8217;s type A status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RollingWave</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2008/11/open-thread-happy-mo-day-6093/#comment-215098</link>
		<dc:creator>RollingWave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 06:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=6093#comment-215098</guid>
		<description>errr no, Biggio was a pretty solid case with or withour 3000H, you have to look at the middle infielders actually in the hall, aside from the best of the best (Ripkin, Hornsby, Wagner etc) he&#039;s better than almost everyone else, he&#039;s peak was remarkable, he lasted long enough at a good rate. Jeter&#039;s better than him, but that says a lot more about Jeter&#039;s obvious accomplishment than Biggio&#039;s lack of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>errr no, Biggio was a pretty solid case with or withour 3000H, you have to look at the middle infielders actually in the hall, aside from the best of the best (Ripkin, Hornsby, Wagner etc) he&#8217;s better than almost everyone else, he&#8217;s peak was remarkable, he lasted long enough at a good rate. Jeter&#8217;s better than him, but that says a lot more about Jeter&#8217;s obvious accomplishment than Biggio&#8217;s lack of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manimal</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2008/11/open-thread-happy-mo-day-6093/#comment-215094</link>
		<dc:creator>Manimal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 05:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=6093#comment-215094</guid>
		<description>Man, Ace Ventura is a classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, Ace Ventura is a classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VO</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2008/11/open-thread-happy-mo-day-6093/#comment-215087</link>
		<dc:creator>VO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 05:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=6093#comment-215087</guid>
		<description>I understand that YANKEE fans know this but not many other baseball fans do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that YANKEE fans know this but not many other baseball fans do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lacock</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2008/11/open-thread-happy-mo-day-6093/#comment-215080</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lacock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 05:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=6093#comment-215080</guid>
		<description>Better than even chance he&#039;s soon unemployed albeit quite rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better than even chance he&#8217;s soon unemployed albeit quite rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2008/11/open-thread-happy-mo-day-6093/#comment-215064</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=6093#comment-215064</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say CC and Tex.

I love Dunn, but Tex is the better player. I say sign Dunn if Tex signs elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say CC and Tex.</p>
<p>I love Dunn, but Tex is the better player. I say sign Dunn if Tex signs elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 395/395 objects using memcached

Served from: riveraveblues.com @ 2012-05-27 23:14:49 -->
