Dec
16

Yanks upgrade car sponsorships

By

The beleaguered General Motors decided today that they will not be remaining as in-stadium sponsors of the Yanks next year. They’ve decided to maintain their New York baseball presence by sticker with the cheaper option in Queens. In response, the Yanks announced deals with Audi and Toyota as the car sponsors of the new Yankee Stadium. On the road or in the ballpark, that’s an upgrade.

Categories : Asides

123 Comments»

  1. LeftyLarry says:

    Unfortunately, lack of patriotism and caring about American jobs and industry is part of the problem.

  2. A.D. says:

    Well we know where Toyota is spending that money that they don’t have to pay as benefits to their workers

    • Steve says:

      Yes, on giving the general public more car for their money.

      And not going broke.

      • benefits to workers –> workers have to miss days b/c they are sicker b/c they have less access to quality medical care –> less productive workers –> less wealth –> LESS PROFIT

        Workers are essential to the business model. No workers, no wealth. That simple.

        • RollingWave says:

          your saying that Toyota doesn’t give it’s worker health care? that would be illegeal I’m fairly sure. unless this was Indonisia or something.

          you know what would solve this problem? GLOBAL HEALTHCARE.

          • Steve says:

            Hahahahaha.

            When that plan fails, I suppose we’ll go for interplanetary health care.

          • I’m saying they give fewer benefits and, yes, less health care coverage. Underinsured folks here are a big problem. No, it’s not illegal by any stretch of the imagination–that’s a danger of capitalistic societies. I agree with you that universal health (French style) care is the way to go.

        • Steve says:

          If you think workers are the reason why businesses exist, then you have a fundamental misunderstanding of free markets and capitalism. Businesses exist to serve a need in the marketplace ie the customer. Everything else comes second in any well run business. Anything that gets in the way of serving customers is damaging to the business. Union work rules that make it take years to respond to changing conditions in the marketplace and build different cars are a major reason why the car companies are in DC begging for money.

          The Auto companies are failing (in part) because other car companies are serving the customer better than they do. Its not any more complicated than that.

          • I understand capitalism/free marketeering. Competition is its chief principle:

            1) Two business make rival products
            2) Customers have a choice of the one they like best
            3) The losing business must make changes if they seek to survive
            4) If changes are made, the competition continues; if not, one company goes bankrupt, leaving a vacuum filled by either monopoly or an upstart business

            I never said that businesses exist b/c of workers; I said wealth exists b/c of workers. Reasons why the auto industry is failing include: 1) a lack of incentive, from the CEOs’ perspective, to adapt (apparently sales were solid?), 2) failure of government regulation of the industry, 3) failure of government intervention in fuel efficiency standards (related to 2).

            Unions keep the worker happy. A disgruntled worker produces little b/c he is disgruntled. A happy worker produces more b/c, you guessed it, he’s happy. Unions make fair wages for their workers as well as fair working conditions for their workers. They take a lot of power away from sometimes-oppressive bosses. Why is this bad?

            • A.D. says:

              government regulations should have nothing to do with GM success or failure, they weren’t defrauded

              • they weren’t defrauded, but the government should have regulated GM such that it set higher fuel economy standards, which is better for the environment while also making it more attractive to the changing consumer. but this makes too much sense for George Bush and the right-wing.

                • Clayton says:

                  So its the governments’s fault that GM didn’t realize customers want better fuel economy?

                • A.D. says:

                  The government should not be responsible for somehow regulating to force GM to make attractive cars… one could argue SUVs & trucks are the only thing that has kept GM afloat recently

                  And frankly no one does that

  3. Tommy S says:

    HAHA. just another company that’s getting a bailout from the taxpayers that will be sponsoring the Mets.

  4. pat says:

    On the road or in the ballpark, that’s an upgrade.

    Sounds like jeters new audi commercial.

  5. planet says:

    I don’t get why yankees fans think its their god given right to just go and sign all of these top car companies, they are ruining the game.

  6. Mister Delaware says:

    OMFG I DRIVE A HIGHLANDER!!!!!!!

  7. Januz says:

    I am totally opposed to Toyota, and their non-union plants. I really hope the new administration makes right to work laws illegal, and strengthens unions in this country (Including allowing sympathy strikes, and requiring all companies with 10 or more people to be unionized).
    They Yankees should have chosen Ford, Chrysler, or no company instead of a Japanese and German company.

  8. pat says:

    Whats more american that outsourcing?

  9. Ben K. says:

    Little did I know that some four-sentence post about stadium sponsorship would turn into a debate over organized labor in the U.S.

    • Ivan says:

      Come on Ben, you knew it was bound to happen.

    • A.D. says:

      ehhh the unions have been far too much in the news, and there is far to big a divide on how people think of them, solid chance people would have remarks

    • Steve says:

      I wasn’t going to go there, but when you posted this

      “The American workers in Toyota’s US-based plants all seem to have jobs. Produce a better quality product and the market share and jobs won’t disappear.”

      I figured all bets were off.

  10. al says:

    GM owns the controlling interest in toyota so wtf..

  11. Steve says:

    Guess what, your Yankee tickets will have a new tax on them, thanks to Gov Patterson

    “State sales tax at movie theaters, sporting events, taxis, buses, limousines and cable and satellite TV and radio.”

    http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_....._york.html

    Something tells me Ben will make this into a thread.

    • Ben K. says:

      Probably in the morning. Fun times. Let’s tax everything. I’m going to sit at home and watch my, um, taxed…cable…?

      I guess the state has no choice, but that sucks.

    • VO says:

      is there anything thats not getting taxed?

      • Ben K. says:

        It seems that the East River crossings may still wind up being free.

        Which is a sore subject on my other site and also one that is not uncontroversial.

        • Brooklyn Ed says:

          I’m guessing you live in 2nd ave?

          • Ben K. says:

            Nah. I live in Brooklyn. That site’s named after the Second Ave. subway.

            • Brooklyn Ed says:

              lol oh cool, where in brooklyn you in ? i’m down in Bensonhurst.

            • Steve says:

              Named that because ‘Moby Dick’ was taken? (Another great white whale)

              I’ve been hearing about the 2nd Av subway since I was a kid, and I’m almost 40. The Upper east siders always kill it.

              • Ben K. says:

                They’re actually building it now though: three stops — at 96th, 86th and 72nd — as a northern extension of the Q. It will open in a few years (2015ish). Whether they actually build the other parts of it is up in air.

                • Brooklyn Ed says:

                  you should really make a post on how dumb it is putting up tolls for bridges?

                • Ben K. says:

                  Except I completely disagree. That’s for over there though. I’ve written plenty about why the East River tolls are a fine idea and why they would actually benefit the overwhelming majority of people who live in the outer boroughs because all the money would go toward ensuring we don’t suffer massive subway service cuts.

                • Brooklyn Ed says:

                  if there are tolls for the manhattan and brooklyn bridges, then its going to be really expensive for people going in and out of manhattan.

                • Ben K. says:

                  Well, yes, but both of those areas are served extensively by public transit, and the vast majority of people going into and out of Brooklyn do so by public transit. Some will pay, and businesses can pass the costs off to their customers.

                  Would you rather be paying $2.50 a ride every time you ride the subway or a few bucks every time you pay to cross the Manhattan or Brooklyn Bridges? Considering how many times I’ve actually crossed the Manhattan or Brooklyn Bridge in a non-taxi car over the last three years — once — and how many times I’ve taken the subway — about 70 in the last 30 days — I know what I’d choose.

                • Brooklyn Ed says:

                  good point. i would use the subway as well. I guess that would be the only way to decrease the traffic on the FDR.

    • Brooklyn Ed says:

      well isn’t that whack. gives me another reason of not going to games. :x

    • I hate regressive taxes, but you can’t make a progressive tax out of this one–to messy. NY’s gotta balance the budget somehow; loans from China can’t pay for everything.

    • A.D. says:

      good old consumption tax… which means they’ll probably still have a shortage

  12. Mike R. says:

    I am very much neutral when it comes to labor relations, but on more than one occasion we’ve heard that MLB’s Player’s Union is one of the most powerful unions in the world and MLB isn’t exactly hurting for cash.

    • pat says:

      Well people aren’t exactly beating down the doors to get tickets to watch people put cars together so it’s a little different situation.

      • Mike R. says:

        I would counter your argument by stating that nobody needs Yankee tickets to get themselves to and from work. Baseball games are a luxury. Cars are somewhat necessary to a large group of people.

  13. VO says:

    Heyman believes the Yankees will resume discussions with Lowe if they fail to sign Andy Pettitte. However, he says they expect Pettitte to accept their $10MM offer. ——MLBTR

  14. Tom Zig says:

    Our rotation is TEH ROXORZZZ. PEAVY AND LOWE ARE SO ROXORZZ.

Leave a Reply

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

If this is your first time commenting on River Ave. Blues, please review the RAB Commenter Guidelines. Login for commenting features. Register for RAB.