Jan
11

Open Thread: Startin’ hot (or cold)

By

Last week during his press conference Mark Teixeira said something that caught my attention. He said that as a switch hitter, it takes him longer to get going because he basically has two swings to find during Spring Training, and has to put twice as much work in. It makes perfect sense, but I had never really thought about it like that.

Anyway, that got to me wondering how other players on the team have hit in April compared to the rest of the season during their careers. So, without further adieu…

Jorge Posada, C
April
: .280-.371-.502
Rest of Season: .276-.381-.472

Mark Teixeira, 1B
April
: .256-.346-.442
Rest of Season: .295-.383-.558

Robinson Cano, 2B
April
: .237-.282-.328 (not so funny now, huh Robbie?)
Rest of Season: .311-.341-.488

Derek Jeter, SS
April
: .306-.386-.441
Rest of Season: .318-.383-.461

Alex Rodriguez, 3B
April
: .311-.391-.611
Rest of Season: .305-.388-.572

Johnny Damon, OF
April
: .273-.344-.410
Rest of Season: .291-.354-.439

Xavier Nady, OF
April
: .285-.341-.493
Rest of Season: .279-.332-.450

Nick Swisher, OF
April
: .253-.370-.481
Rest of Season: .242-.351-.446

Hideki Matsui, DH
April
: .268-.363-.416
Rest of Season: .300-.372-.491

I went with Swisher over Brett Gardner/Melky Cabrera in the third outfield spot just because he has a much bigger data sample, that’s all. Feel free to draw your own conclusions from this, there’s not really much of a point to it. Just FYI, I suppose.

Oh, and use this as your open thread for tonight. The Steelers are leading the Bolts, and all local teams are off except the Devils, who are out on the west coast. The season premiere of 24 starts at 8pm, don’t miss it. Talk about whatever, just be nice to each other.

Categories : Open Thread

134 Comments»

  1. A.D. says:

    Figures that A-Rod would be better in April than the rest of the season, more unclutchiness, after all April wins are worth far less than those in May or September

    • anonymous says:

      No its because he is a stud.

    • celerino says:

      1) Why didn’t the Giants establish the power running game with Jacobs? If he was hurt why did they keep running him outside? Pound the ball!!

      2) Carney….Carney, Carney, Carney. Tynes to kick off, but no Tynes to kick long field goals?

      Still hurting, can’t think about Yanks yet.

      • steve (different one) says:

        how can you blame them for going with Carney? guy was MONEY all season. it sucks that he shit the bed today, but i can’t see any reasonable argument for replacing him with Tynes before today’s game.

        • celerino says:

          They had to carry another kicker because of his lousy kickoffs. Tollefson was inactive today, due to injury? I don’t know. A football player wasn’t active today because they were losing so much field position that they felt they had to carry two kickers. The irony? He misses two and gives up field position. Second guess? absolutely. He killed them today.

  2. Brooklyn Ed says:

    Could this trade happen?

    Yes, and the Nationals would probably trade Austin Kearns or Nick Johnson, who would be backups in New York. They would also have to give up two or three, maybe four minor leaguers as well.

    Who?

    I have no clue.

    My guess is that it would have to be one player from the Jordan Zimmermann class, one from the Leonard Davis class, and one from the Justin Maxwell class.

    Maybe even more than that.

    http://bleacherreport.com/arti.....her/page/3

    —————

    Jordan Zimmerman and Justin Maxwell for Nady and Swisher? The Nationals are that deseprate?

  3. Mike R. says:

    http://www.newsday.com/sports/.....5293.story

    Do we want to sign these guys? I say yes to both. Opinions?

  4. Manimal says:

    Even if there is a slim chance that Gomez can preform better than our tandem of Melky and Brett then I think we should go for it.

  5. Shamus says:

    Who said anything about trading Nady AND Swisher?

    I read they wanted to move One of the two, not both.

  6. A.D. says:

    With lack of near term outfield prospects, any chance a guy like Malec moves to a corner outfield spot for a shot at the majors?

  7. pat says:

    Does anybody know.. can Dukes actually play a good CF? I don’t think I’ve ever even seen a nationals game.

    • A.D. says:

      he was pretty good in RF last year for the nats, bad in CF for the Rays… but not a great sample sizes.

      • pat says:

        So he wouldnt really be a candidate to hold down CF for a year or so (1.5 ideally IMO) until austin is ready?

        • A.D. says:

          If you are the Yankees, and you just acquired him, you might get by in CF for a year (or send him to the minors), and then play him in a corner OF spot going forward.

          • pat says:

            yea thats what I would be thinking, stick him in CF for a year ot two then let him become a fulltime corner outfielder in 2010

  8. Artist formerly known as 'The' Steve says:

    Mike, there’s a wild card to keeping Swisher. Steroids. Any player who saw a significant drop off last season with no apparent injury has to be worrisome, especially one from the Bay area (and specifically the A’s) in this era. Throw in the fact he’s been traded twice in 2 years. Trading teams always know their players better than you do, so that has to be a red flag as well.

    I’ve also posted previously how I think Nady is clearly a player coming into his own, whereas I just don’t know what to make of Swisher at this point. I view each players 2008 season as the baseline in the post steroid era, since we have no idea which number before that were real and which were enhanced. I agree we should keep both, but to win this year I’d rather have Nady.

    • pat says:

      Homeruns were in line with his career average. Career high 20.9% LD average, career low .249 BABIP. Looks like extremely bad luck

      • Artist formerly known as 'The' Steve says:

        When you’re not confident and not swinging the bat well, you have a lot of what looks like “bad luck”.

        I heard all last April about how Cano was “just unlucky”. Yet if you watched his ABs and saw how poorly he was driving the ball you could see clearly that he wasn’t the same hitter. Stats like the ones you cited don’t distinguish between a soft line drive and a scorcher, yet that’s often the difference between a base hit and an out. Also, bad luck tends to even out over the course of a season, if you’re hitting the ball well. If it doesn’t, I have to assume something else is going on.

        BTW-BABIP is more useful for pitchers than hitters.

        • I somewhat agree with this point. You’re right, not all LDs are created equal.

        • pat says:

          I dunno man, when you hit more line drives in a season than you ever have and you have a career low in average of balls in play, I’d say alot of that is attributable to bad luck.

          • pat says:

            Ignoring the LD stat he his HR totals by the year
            2005-21
            2006-35
            2007-22
            2008-24

            Pretty uniform, he had a slight bump in 06 but not a brady anderson-type bump in power.

            • A.D. says:

              if you combine doubles + HR then you see the 2008 downturn.

              • Artist formerly known as 'The' Steve says:

                Or just look at the 35 point drop off in OPS+ or the 40 point drop in SLG.

                • A.D. says:

                  well yes, the root of those were lack of hits & lack of doubles. You brought up the steroids issue, and pat looks to dismiss it with the HR totals, but the doubles totals show the power down turn.

        • Matt says:

          Cano had some pretty crappy luck in the first half but at the same time, he had a career low ground ball rate and career high fly ball rate. So it’s part his fault.

    • Moshe Mandel says:

      I’m pretty certain steroids testing came about prior to 2006, so why would only 2008 count?

      • Artist formerly known as 'The' Steve says:

        Because there are ways around those tests, but after the Clemens fiasco it was shown that you could test clean for years, and still get busted down the road. And the price Clemens and Bonds have paid have made it no longer worthwhile to take the risk anymore. There’s too much heat nowadays.

        Also, the Bonds case has had samples seized by the Feds which were supposed to be confidential, but in the end they weren’t. That has to put the fear of God into any player.

        • Moshe Mandel says:

          I dont buy it. I dont think the Clemens thing is going to make anyone have any added fear over last year. Look at the other players who were exposed and now its forgotten- no one cares anymore. Pettitte, Roberts, Giambi- bunches of players were named in the Mitchell report, and pretty much anyone not named Clemens is forgotten.

          • Artist formerly known as 'The' Steve says:

            You don’t have to buy it, but if one man named Swisher was using and got scared off then that’s all that matters. The fact of the matter is run scoring was down across Baseball last year by 20 runs per team from the previous year. That’s not just some statistical blip, that’s significant.

            Acting like steroids don’t matter is to ignore two congressional investigations, IRS and FBI probes, the Bond’s indictment, and the Clemens congressional hearing and 60 Minutes piece. Hope you like it out on that limb of yours, it must be lonely out there.

            • Moshe Mandel says:

              I meant that fans are starting to not really care that much anymore. Pettitte will sign, and one sentence will be written about steroids. Giambi signed and it wasnt mentioned. I have not seen it brought up about Roberts since Mitchell. And you are making an entirely unfounded assumption based upon an arbitrary cut-off point that you created based upon your feelings as to how much fear there is among the players to decide that Swisher took a steroid related dive. Oh, and one year of data does not a trend make. Even two years isnt enough. But runs scored went up between 2005 and 2006 about the same amount as it went down this season. So did players start shooting up once the formal testing schedule was introduced?

            • Moshe Mandel says:

              And of course, the question begs to be asked, what about Robbie Cano? A-Rod? Even Jeter! They all saw drop-offs. Are they all guilty until proven innocent?

              • Artist formerly known as 'The' Steve says:

                Back to my original post

                “Any player who saw a significant drop off last season with no apparent injury ”

                Jeter-Hand injury after the Daniel Cabrera HBP

                A-Rod-Missed a month with a quad injury

                Cano-Missed the entire 2008 season with Idontgiveashit-itis.

                And for the 3rd time, I’m not assigning “Guilt” to Swisher involving steroid use. I’m simply saying that we shouldn’t give him a starting job over Nady until he proves himself here, since we don’t know which numbers were real and which were enhanced in recent years. The drop off raises a “RED FLAG”, that’s all.

                • Mike A. says:

                  Well, how do you know Swisher take a pitch to wrist that screwed him up? Did you watch all of the White Sox’s games last year? Because I can assure you 95% of ChiSox fans have no idea Jeter took that pitch to the wrist and instead think he’s just washed up.

                • Artist formerly known as 'The' Steve says:

                  What I do know is Nady’s numbers were up last year and Swisher’s were down. Both are young enough where age isn’t a factor. I go with Nady, and think giving the everyday RF job to Swisher coming off last year is foolish. If he repeats last year’s .742 OPS, it will be a disaster.

                • Moshe Mandel says:

                  Exactly. Its not fair to make statements about Swisher when there is no way that you know all the factors behind his poor performance.

                • Mike A. says:

                  What I do know is Nady’s numbers were up last year and Swisher’s were down.

                  Right, but maybe that means Nady started taking some new cosmetic PED that they can’t test for yet.

                • Artist formerly known as 'The' Steve says:

                  Nope. Nady has improved every year he’s been in the bigs, especially vs Rightes. That’s the steady progression of an improving player.

                  Swisher on the other hand, posted career lows in BA/H/RBI/SLG/OPS/OPS+. Other than that, he was great.

    • E-ROC says:

      When has Swisher been linked to steroids?

      • steve (different one) says:

        he played for the A’s!!

      • Artist formerly known as 'The' Steve says:

        He hasn’t, but for the reasons I stated above in this environment its tough to know what was real and what wasn’t. Any player that saw a big drop off last year has to raise an eyebrow, that’s all.

        To be clear, I don’t want to trade either player. I like Swisher as a 400 AB 4th OFer type. If he performs, give him Nady’s job next year. I just don’t think its smart to give him a STARTING job coming off a bad year in this environment.

        • E-ROC says:

          Players are innocent until proven guilty, no? I understand your suspicions but I think they are misplaced in this instance. Swisher didn’t have a role with White Sox last season. Guillen didn’t like him and vice versa. There are stats that suggests he was unlucky last year. I didn’t see any noticeable weight or size loss that results when players come off of steroids.

          • Artist formerly known as 'The' Steve says:

            Even if you want to put the recent environment aside, it still smart to not give him a starting job coming off a bad year. Let him prove himself here.

  9. kenthadley says:

    does anyone have any scouting intel on the 2 Cubans who are posting?

  10. BigBlueAL says:

    Off-topic quickly, can you imagine a Cardinals-Ravens Super Bowl???? BORING.

  11. Steve O. says:

    Maybe the Yankees can pry one of Florida’s position prospects for Nady, as they want to compete next year. I know he’s arbitration elgible but maybe it can work. Maybe Stanton or Skipworth.

  12. jim p says:

    Thanks for this info. I’m worried that Tex & CC, who tend to start slow, would get hammered by impatient fans & writers, and hopefully this kind of thing getting around will lessen that.

    Year after year I’d see people thinking Bernie’s poor April & May meant he was done. They’d forget that come June or July he’d carry the team for 4 or 6 weeks. And then do it again in Aug-Sept for another 2-3 weeks?

  13. Matt says:

    Heath Ledger, ftw.

  14. I don’t know who linked to my post last night, but thanks =D

    Anyway.

    I wonder if the team starts slow in April because the players start slow or if it’s the other way around…and how much the weather has to do with it.

  15. Artist formerly known as 'The' Steve says:

    Another teacher accused of having sex with one of her students. This one’s pretty good looking.

    http://www.inquisitr.com/14856.....m-teacher/

    Where were all these teachers when I was 13?

  16. Steve O. says:

    I’ve been feeling like the guy on the treadmill of that fantasy football commercial since the aftermath of the Carolina-Arizona game.

    [ Jake Delhomme Is A Worse QB Than Tim Couch Name Drop #1 of 100 ] h/t to TSJC

  17. Reggie C. says:

    Anybody think the Giants are in play to land a WR in the 1st round? G-men need a DeSean Jackson type. Jeremy Maclin perhaps?

  18. C.Panella says:

    Just saw on MLBTR that mike young requested a trade how about a cano for young swap help both sides? Just something to talk about….

  19. Reggie C. says:

    you can wish it. 90% sure its not happening.

  20. A.D. says:

    it wasn’t true the first time you posted it

  21. DP says:

    you are banned

Leave a Reply

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

If this is your first time commenting on River Ave. Blues, please review the RAB Commenter Guidelines. Login for commenting features. Register for RAB.