Comments on: Project Prospects’ Top 200 Prospects List

By: erik

erik — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:10:03 +0000

Bos- had only 7 on the list
we should have had nine no melancon/brackman?!

By: Adam Foster

Adam Foster — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:02:19 +0000

You can call it two years if you want. A sample of 75 total batters faced isn’t something that I feel very comfortable with.

By: Zack

Zack — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:37:04 +0000

Tim Beckham is #31 on this list, he’s TB “shiny new toy” and is 5 years away from the majors.

By: Zack

Zack — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:35:16 +0000

All young pitchers struggle with walks, and all pitchers coming off TJ surgery have control issues.

By: Zack

Zack — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:32:53 +0000

So it requires 2 years of AAA to make this list now?

By: Mulls

Mulls — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:41:15 +0000

kleenex!!!!!!!!!!

By: tommiesmithjohncarlos a/k/a Ridiculous Upside

tommiesmithjohncarlos a/k/a Ridiculous Upside — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:29:26 +0000

My bad for ruining your joke. Here, let me make it up to you:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_4ow2.....B-%2B1.jpg

By: steve (different one)

steve (different one) — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:00:16 +0000

i know, i was joking.

By: A.D.

A.D. — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:49:29 +0000

Yeah I’m sure there are others in the same situation, such as Hughes, that aren’t full time major leaguers yet. But the line has to be drawn somewhere, and that makes the most sense

By: whozat

whozat — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:48:47 +0000

That’s when most “prospect rankers” stop putting them on lists and such, yes, but the reality of it is that it’s not so cut-and-dry.

Kennedy is definitely still a prospect