Apr
22

Holliday willing to play in NY

By

Via MLBTR, it turns out that Matt Holliday is willing to play in New York, which is Boras’ way of getting the Yankees and Mets involved for leverage purposes. Back in November we heard from Holliday’s father Tom, who wants his son to play for the Yankees. Me? I’d pass. I don’t want to see the team sign another player to a huge contract and be locked in at first, third and left field for the better part of the next decade. I prefer Carl Crawford, who’s nearly two years younger and a much more well-rounded player. Not to mention the fact that he’d probably come cheaper in both dollars and years.

Fun Fact: Matt Holliday has hit one homerun since August 20th of last year, including Spring Training.

Categories : Asides, Hot Stove League

70 Comments»

  1. Also, check out Holliday’s home/road splits and his numbers away from Coors…

  2. Drew says:

    Crawford would be sick.

  3. Joey H says:

    He can stay put. That’s all I have to say.

  4. Thomas A. Anderson says:

    I’m pretty confident that Cashman is setting his sights on Crawford. In the hopes that Tampa doesn’t pick up his option.

    • Mike Axisa says:

      I’m worried Tampa will pick up his option and then trade him, like the Yanks did for Sheff. I’d rather have Crawford for just money instead of players, obviously.

      • Thomas A. Anderson says:

        Damn, you’re right. Forgot about that. Let’s just hope the Tampa FO falls asleep at the switch on this.

        Not likely, but hey it’s better than nothing.

      • radnom says:


        I’m worried Tampa will pick up his option and then trade him, like the Yanks did for Sheff. I’d rather have Crawford for just money instead of players, obviously.

        $10 mil though? For one year? What will you really get back for that…considering how many free agents OFers there are going to be next offseason, and the state of the market.

  5. Nate says:

    Crawford! I remember playing with him in MVP 05 (and 06, 07, 08 & 09). I’d love to see him in pinstripes

  6. I’m not a huge Holliday fan, but Crawford is significantly overrated. Just look at his wOBA.

  7. Andrew says:

    Carl Crawford is a much better player than Matt Holliday? False.

  8. Brian says:

    Considering that signing ANYONE to play LF prevents us from moving Jeter out of the infield, I think it’s a horrible idea.

    • Joey H says:

      Who says Jeter is moving out of the infield?

    • Darth Stein says:

      I really don’t see that happening until his current contract is up.

    • A horrible idea is moving an above-average offensive short stop to a position that requires more of a bat with no guarantee that he can actually play that position. So you’d have a below-average offensive bat and potentially a below-average defensive player clogging up a spot in your lineup.

      You go with the better player. That’s roster construction.

      • And yet, Jeter’s defensive skill-set (good overall footspeed for ranging on popups but poor lateral movement for getting down on grounders, good strong arm but somewhat inaccurate) profiles well for the outfield.

        Meaning he may well turn himself from a good offensive SS/bad defensive SS into an average offensive LF/good defensive LF. I don’t think he’d be an overall negative in the OF.

        It all depends on whom we can get as replacements either at SS or LF who would be playing in whichever position he’s not in. But, independent of the rest of our team’s roster construction, Jeter moving from SS to LF is probably a positive, because the detriment of moving his bat down the defensive spectrum to a more offense-intensive position may well be smaller than the gain of turning him from a poor-defender into a good defender. Jeter may be a -10 player at SS and a +10 player in LF.

        • Jack says:

          Right, he may be a plus outfielder. May.

        • Accent Shallow says:

          Unfortunately, as Jeter ages, this argument makes less and less sense. A 35 year old SS is less likely to turn into a plus defender in the corner OF than a 30 year old one.

          Sure, Jeter’s skill set tends to make sense for an outfielder, but when was the last time he actually played a game out there? High school? Little league? This isn’t to suggest that the Yankees shouldn’t consider moving Jeter if the opportunity arises, just that him becoming a plus defender isn’t even close to a guarantee.

  9. Joey H says:

    If Crawford his the market, how much is reasonable in terms of years and money? And now separately of course, what would the Yankees spend?

  10. Joey H says:

    Marte has to throw him down on the 0-2 1-2 pitch.

  11. Sal says:

    I hope your fun fact doesn’t bite us in the ass

  12. Tom Zig says:

    Only two players have come out and said they’ll never play in NY.

    One was John Rocker and the other was Johnny Damon.

    We all how those stories went.

  13. rick james says:

    Carl Crawford is not a free agent this year..so why even bring his name up??

  14. Alex from The Bronx says:

    Please no more Boras clients.

    Damon
    Tex
    Nady
    Al

    Besides, Holliday might want a BIG contract. Let the Mets get him although they prefer latinos. ;-)

  15. Stuart says:

    the guy fields like Manny also.

    Pass he is a very good hitter but a terrbile fielder with zero speed and is about 30 yrs old.

    JUST SAY NO.

  16. Cozimoto says:

    Crawford to replace Damon in left and bat leadoff..sign me up!

  17. godfather says:

    i’d be willing to play in ny, too; i’m 75 with no perceptible power

  18. godfather says:

    no way, holliday

  19. MLK says:

    Swisher,AJax,Bay is the OF for next year with ManRam the DH for one year and an option ofcourse.
    Matsui,Nady,Damon all waiving bye bye.

  20. MLK says:

    How is that out of the question?
    AJax will be ready
    Swisher is here
    Jason Bay is a free agent.
    ManRam has a player option that he would likely drop.
    Bay will not command a crazy contract like Holliday would.

  21. Andy In Sunny Daytona says:

    Here comes the curse of Mike Axisa.

  22. ShawnT says:

    The Melk Mannn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  23. Januz says:

    There is no question that Boras wants to get the Yankees involved with Holliday. Boras will be looking for dollars in the Teixeira range, and he may very well get it, because every other just about every other possible quality free agent (Lackey, Nady, and Vlad), are currently injured, or there is a team option on them like Crawford.
    I think that waiting until after 2010, when you clear quite a bit of salary space (Nady, Matsui, Damon, and yes, Jeter and Rivera), they will be in position to land a prime A free agent or 2. Here are some of the players who could be available: Lance Berkman, Albert Pujols, Jimmy Rollins, Jose Reyes, Joe Mauer, Cliff Lee, and Brandon Webb (Cot’s Baseball Contracts). Does this mean that all will be available? Of course not. But the idea of Joe Mauer in the Bronx would be really appealing.

    • Reggie C. says:

      I say … if Holliday’s talent comes through (its early , so i think he’ll still hit 25-30 hrs), then the Yanks should be suitors.

      Holliday will likely hit .300. He’ll likely get on base at a +.350 clip. These are very good numbers for a corner man. Since we’re devoid of corner OF talent in the minors, Holliday makes sense.

      I’m not saying we give out a 150 million dollar contract. No way. Recession + foreseeable disappointing revenue from stadium seating sales = no mega contract. But we should kick the tires on this one.

      Of course they’ll be cheaper alternatives in FA ..

  24. Andrew says:

    Let’s be real: Carl Crawford is consistently one of the biggest underachievers in baseball, while Matt Holliday has put up some of the best numbers of any OFer in the past 3-4 years. With presumably Damon on his way out, I can see why someone would want Crawford, but to say he’s more well rounded than Holliday? Well, Crawford is more well rounded than Manny, too, I wonder who would’ve helped us more over the past half decade?

    • Carl Crawford had one bad year.

      2008.

      Before that, he was a well above average player who put a lot on the table, took nothing off the table, and had all his trendlines pointing up. He’s entering his prime.

      Yes, he’s not as good as Holliday, but to call him “consistently one of the biggest underachievers in baseball” is inaccurate.

  25. Corey (Nord-Podberesky) says:

    Hey TSJC, for my history final paper im writing about the ’68 olympic games sooooo, do u know any good books about that black power salute?

  26. Andrew says:

    Crawford is one of the biggest underachievers in baseball…ask anyone who has owned him in fantasy over the past 5 years how much they like him :)

    • Captain Bawls says:

      He has very little power and he doesnt draw many walks, but he’s got god-like speed, amazing range and a cannon. Not a fantasy stud, but definitely worth a look as our left fielder

  27. RollingWave says:

    I think it’s a bit early for that.

    a. Holilday have been pretty darn bad so far. let’s see a full year of no Coors Matt before making a decision.

    b. Crawford’s also been pretty bad so far. while that might help in Tampa not paying him the option, it doesn’t bold well for his next suitor if he’s comming off two strait bad season.

Leave a Reply

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

If this is your first time commenting on River Ave. Blues, please review the RAB Commenter Guidelines. Login for commenting features. Register for RAB.