<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THT&#8217;s Five Questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riveraveblues.com/2009/04/thts-five-questions-9760/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/04/thts-five-questions-9760/</link>
	<description>A New York Yankees Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:32:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: DCR</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/04/thts-five-questions-9760/#comment-317349</link>
		<dc:creator>DCR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 04:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=9760#comment-317349</guid>
		<description>This mediocre stuff you talk about with Okajima has lead to ERA+ of 214 and 177 with good strikeout numbers. But yeah, I guess he will suddenly stop being deceptive. Not sure what you are trying to imply with Delcarmen so I will just ignore it. And even without Saito, there is still Masterson. 

I never said that I expected our entire bullpen to fail. I said that it was valid for someone to question the stability of the bullpen due to Marte&#039;s health issues and Bruney having a poor spring to go with a track record of inconsistency. How is any of that incorrect? Its also laughable when people start talking about Jackson, Kroenke, Dunn, and Giese as viable replacements. Oops, I also forgot about Tomko. My bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This mediocre stuff you talk about with Okajima has lead to ERA+ of 214 and 177 with good strikeout numbers. But yeah, I guess he will suddenly stop being deceptive. Not sure what you are trying to imply with Delcarmen so I will just ignore it. And even without Saito, there is still Masterson. </p>
<p>I never said that I expected our entire bullpen to fail. I said that it was valid for someone to question the stability of the bullpen due to Marte&#8217;s health issues and Bruney having a poor spring to go with a track record of inconsistency. How is any of that incorrect? Its also laughable when people start talking about Jackson, Kroenke, Dunn, and Giese as viable replacements. Oops, I also forgot about Tomko. My bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/04/thts-five-questions-9760/#comment-317344</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 04:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=9760#comment-317344</guid>
		<description>Those are five good points but the last two aren&#039;t questions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are five good points but the last two aren&#8217;t questions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellis</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/04/thts-five-questions-9760/#comment-317254</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=9760#comment-317254</guid>
		<description>Jeter&#039;s O-Contact percentage over the last three years:

2006: 52.8%
2007: 63.8%
2008: 68.6%

I&#039;m assuming this stat means the percentage of balls outside of the zone that he actually made contact with.  So this just means he&#039;s expanding his strike zone, like freakin&#039; vladimir guerrero!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeter&#8217;s O-Contact percentage over the last three years:</p>
<p>2006: 52.8%<br />
2007: 63.8%<br />
2008: 68.6%</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming this stat means the percentage of balls outside of the zone that he actually made contact with.  So this just means he&#8217;s expanding his strike zone, like freakin&#8217; vladimir guerrero!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimT</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/04/thts-five-questions-9760/#comment-317235</link>
		<dc:creator>JimT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=9760#comment-317235</guid>
		<description>Hughes is the best 6th starter in baseball based on what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hughes is the best 6th starter in baseball based on what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/04/thts-five-questions-9760/#comment-316999</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=9760#comment-316999</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never quite understood why Wang doesn&#039;t seem to be negatively impacted by Jeter&#039;s defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never quite understood why Wang doesn&#8217;t seem to be negatively impacted by Jeter&#8217;s defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/04/thts-five-questions-9760/#comment-316994</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=9760#comment-316994</guid>
		<description>But last year wasn&#039;t a nagging injury.  He was hit on the wrist and played through it.  I think this year is very important for him.  If he returns to form and matches his 2007 numbers, then the reports of his demise are premature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But last year wasn&#8217;t a nagging injury.  He was hit on the wrist and played through it.  I think this year is very important for him.  If he returns to form and matches his 2007 numbers, then the reports of his demise are premature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whozat</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/04/thts-five-questions-9760/#comment-316956</link>
		<dc:creator>whozat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=9760#comment-316956</guid>
		<description>BUT I HAVE NEVER HEARD ANY OF THOSE NAMES ON BASEBALL TONIGHT!!!!  How could they POSSIBLY be as good as A Proven Setup Man like Tom Gordon!?!?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BUT I HAVE NEVER HEARD ANY OF THOSE NAMES ON BASEBALL TONIGHT!!!!  How could they POSSIBLY be as good as A Proven Setup Man like Tom Gordon!?!?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whozat</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/04/thts-five-questions-9760/#comment-316951</link>
		<dc:creator>whozat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=9760#comment-316951</guid>
		<description>The point, though, is that bullpen arms tend to be very volatile.  Do I think Marte is more likely to continue being very good than Okajima is likely to continue being very, very good?  I do.  Why?  He&#039;s been doing it against big-leaguers for years AND his stuff is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point, though, is that bullpen arms tend to be very volatile.  Do I think Marte is more likely to continue being very good than Okajima is likely to continue being very, very good?  I do.  Why?  He&#8217;s been doing it against big-leaguers for years AND his stuff is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Generalissimo</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/04/thts-five-questions-9760/#comment-316944</link>
		<dc:creator>El Generalissimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=9760#comment-316944</guid>
		<description>Does no one realize we had the #7 bullpen in the league last year with no Coke, Bruney, albaladejo or Marte for 3/4 of the year. Does no one realize who Mark Melancon is? 

This argument is getting old fast. And yes bullpens are volatile that&#039;s why our farm is filled with 10 RHP who could fill in this year in the MLB pen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does no one realize we had the #7 bullpen in the league last year with no Coke, Bruney, albaladejo or Marte for 3/4 of the year. Does no one realize who Mark Melancon is? </p>
<p>This argument is getting old fast. And yes bullpens are volatile that&#8217;s why our farm is filled with 10 RHP who could fill in this year in the MLB pen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whozat</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/04/thts-five-questions-9760/#comment-316943</link>
		<dc:creator>whozat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=9760#comment-316943</guid>
		<description>If his bat doesn&#039;t rebound, it could be a contributing factor.  I mean, two groundball-heavy pitchers in the rotation would benefit from a SS with better range than Jeter.  As long as hit bat is a big plus for his position, you deal with it.  If his bat ISN&#039;T a plus...then he&#039;s actually just an average player and no longer an asset to the team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If his bat doesn&#8217;t rebound, it could be a contributing factor.  I mean, two groundball-heavy pitchers in the rotation would benefit from a SS with better range than Jeter.  As long as hit bat is a big plus for his position, you deal with it.  If his bat ISN&#8217;T a plus&#8230;then he&#8217;s actually just an average player and no longer an asset to the team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

