Archive for May, 2009
Lonn Trost opens mouth, inserts foot
Posted by: | CommentsFor nearly the entire life of RAB, I’ve been a vocal opponent of the new stadium. “Because we won’t tear down Yankee Stadium” was once in our banner. Personally, I have never felt the Yanks absolutely needed a new stadium to stay financially competitive, and it was clear early on that the Yankees were building it as a cash cow.
This morning, in the comments to my post on the various seats for sale from new and old Yankee Stadium, one of our readers accused me of critiquing the Yankees with no perspective or evidence. The perspective I offer is mine. I grew up in Manhattan and have been going to Yankee games with my parents for as long as I can remember. For all of its faults, I loved the old stadium and thought the Yanks could have spent far less to renovate it and maintain its charm than it would cost to build their new park.
As for evidence, I’ve offered up critiques backed with quotes, numbers and first-hand observations. Today, though, Lonn Trost delivered me a golden egg on a silver platter. During a press conference to announce the sale of old stadium merchandise — more on that in a minute — Trost grew defensive over the new stadium.
Now, this isn’t the first time one of the Yankee officials has taken to speaking before thinking. Today, though, Trost showed exactly how and why the Yankees are committed to those fans who are willing to shell out the dough, but not to others. The Yankees have come under fire for their security policies at the new ballpark. They don’t allow fans who don’t have tickets to approach the field level seats during batting practice. That generally means no autographs, fewer baseballs and less of a stadium experience.
In defending that policy today, Trost showed exactly why the Yanks need to revamp at least their public relations efforts, if not their overall attitude toward fans. “There’s an area by the Legends Suite which is not an area that fans can get into,” he said. “If you purchase a suite, do you want somebody in your suite? If you purchase a home, do you want somebody in your home?”
That statement just gets one giant facepalm, and I’ll allow it to speak for itself. In my opinion, that is all the evidence I need to know how the Yankees feel about their new stadium. I will continue to root for the players, and the Front Office continues to make that as hard as possible.
Meanwhile, the Yankees unveiled the memorabilia sale info. Details after the jump.
2009 Blue Jays reminiscent of recent AL East team
Posted by: | CommentsThe story of the young 2009 season has been the Toronto Blue Jays. With the powerhouse Rays, Red Sox, and Yankees in the division most pundits wrote off the Jays chances this season — and that was before they sustained a number of pitching injuries, including the loss of Jesse Litsch, who started the season second to Roy Halladay in the rotation. Yet the Jays have soared out of the gates and on May 12 lead the AL East with a 22-12 record. The question everyone now asks is, are they for real?
ESPN’s Jerry Crasnick thinks that the Jays could continue their winning ways. He notes their impressive win totals over the past year (impressive in relation to the competition), including their record since Cito Gaston took over as manager last year. They also have a number of pitchers out with injuries, and when they return the team could have the favorable problem of not having enough innings for everyone. Combine this with a league-leading offense, and Crasnick believes the Jays could have some sustainable success.
The 2009 Blue Jays, for me, conjure up memories of 2005. At some point around now-ish that year I had a conversation with a friend who thought the Orioles could be for real. That scared him, since the Yankees were off to a putrid start (they would soon be resurrected by Tino Martinez, however). I told him not to worry, that the Orioles would come back to earth. That they did, finishing the season 74-88, fourth place in the AL East.
On May 12, 2005, the Orioles had a record of 22-12.
On May 12, 2009, the Blue Jays have a record of 22-12.
This isn’t to say the Jays will collapse in a similar manner. They have a good team, after all, and they could be even better once they get some of their injured pitchers back. However, there are certain trends that, like the Orioles in 05, the Jays will not be able to maintain. We can start with the Jays offense, which has scored 204 runs and is the most in the majors by 20 runs. This would extrapolate to 972 runs over 162 games, which is just not likely to play out in reality. They’ll end 2008 scoring fewer than six runs per game. Similarly, the Orioles were averaging 5.4 runs per game in 2005, but ended having scored just 4.5 per game.
Plenty can happen between now and the end of the season, so to proclaim the Blue Jays “for real” at this point is a bit absurd. That’s not to say that they’re not. They have a good collection of players who are all doing rather well right now, and if they can sustain that and take advantage of returning pitchers, they could turn the AL East into an enormous dogfight. Yet they still haven’t done it against the powerhouses in the division. Tonight marks the Jays’ first game against the Yanks, and they have yet to play the Sox and Rays. By May 12, 2005, the Orioles were already 5-1 against the Yanks and 2-2 against Boston, 16-6 against the whole AL East.
Remember, too, that even at the end of May 2005 the Orioles were still atop the division, by three games, and the Yanks were in fourth place. In September, the Yanks had claimed yet another AL East crown. Also, the Orioles were still at 43-35 on June 30, 3.5 games ahead of the Yanks. It wasn’t until the end of July that the Yanks had surged ahead. Baltimore, by the way, won eight games the entire month of July. So even if the Jays do keep up this torrid pace for a little longer, it’ll really take an entire season to prove that they’re for real.
Are the 2009 Blue Jays a better team than the 2005 Orioles on paper? I think so. That’s what separates these two cases. Even when they’re battered the 2009 Blue Jays pitching looks better than that of the 2005 O’s. This is why the league needs to take the Jays seriously. However, given what we’ve learned about them from the past few years, their early-season surge could very well play out similarly to the Orioles in 2005.
When hearing how awesome a team is on paper, people often reply by noting the obvious, that the game is played on the field and that results are what matter. That’s obviously true, but that paper can catch up to you. Teams can play way over their heads for considerable portions of the season, just like others can play like crap for a month and a half before hitting the thrusters. Baseball plays a 162-game schedule so most of these flukes can run their course and the best teams can come out on top. It’s the advantage of a large sample. Let’s not forget that when evaluating the Yankees — and the Blue Jays — right now.
Manny’s story raises more PED questions
Posted by: | CommentsFor starters, apologies for a second-straight PED post. We try to keep these topics to a minimum, but since Manny Ramirez was suspended last week, a number of issues have come to light. These issues are important in preventing future PED usage, not in any past witch hunts, which is why I’m going to run with this.
As you can see in the above-linked post, reports ran rampant upon the announcement of Manny’s suspension. It’s pot; no, it’s an ED drug; no it’s a fertility drug. Mark Fainaru-Wada and T.J. Quinn of ESPN have laid out the whole story, from Manny’s failed test to the ensuing investigation, even covering the planned appeal and its eventual dropping. If you’re interested in how Manny actually got caught, give it a read. It explains everything rather succinctly.
Just as it is difficult to believe that A-Rod stopped using steroids after the 2003 test, it’s equally difficult to believe this was the first time Manny used. There’s no use speculating exactly how long he used, so we’ll skip that part. Let’s just take it for granted that both A-Rod and Manny used outside of the timeframe when they were caught. How, then, are they skirting the tests? This is the most important question to arise from the collective incidences.
Major League Baseball’s drug testing program, while not the strictest on the books, trumps those of the three other major American sports. Yet the Manny issue highlights its deficiencies. Unfortunately, it’s going to take plenty more research to determine how these players are skirting tests. Are they only using in the off-season? Manny’s case could point to that. MLB found synthetic testosterone in his system, and his medical records revealed a prescription for hCG, a drug taken by steroid users coming off a cycle, in order to kickstart natural testosterone production. Does this indicate that players are using in the off-season, cycling off just before the round of Spring Training tests, and using drugs like hCG to restore normal testosterone levels?
The use of masking agents is another possibility. Steroid tests compare the ratio of testosterone and epitestosterone in a urine sample, with a 1:1 ratio being normal and a 4:1 ratio signaling foul play. A masking agent, then, could simulate epitestosterone in order to make the test look normal. This could be a problem for the testing program, since they’d then have to figure out what kind of masking agent would produce such an effect. Then they’d have to create a test for it which could be determined from urine alone, since we know blood testing isn’t an option at the moment.
While the current drug testing policy works well to keep normal steroid use in check, MLB still has a ways to go in further combatting PED use. If they’re truly committed to eradicating the sport of steroids and amphetamines, they’ll do whatever it takes to understand how players are beating tests. I’d expect many PED-related issues to arise when the PA and owners sit down for the next collective bargaining agreement. Unfortunately for the players, they’re not going to have a ton of leverage on this issue.
Saunders: A-Rod shouldn’t be an All-Star
Posted by: | CommentsReader LC pointed this out in the open thread last night, but I wanted to expand on it a bit. First, here’s what Halos’ lefty Joe Saunders had to say about Mr. Rodriguez:
Following an offseason of steroid revelations and confessions, Saunders said he would not vote for Rodriguez [for the All Star Game], regardless of whatever compelling numbers he puts up.
As Saunders put it to the Los Angeles Times, “It’s over for him.”
Speaking following Saturday night’s game against Kansas City, flush with his 1-0 victory over previously unbeaten sensation Zack Greinke, Saunders didn’t buy that fans are greeting the returning Rodriguez with a “forgive-and-forget” attitude.
“I think the fans do care,” Saunders said. “Pretty much everybody wants a game without cheating.”
This isn’t the first time an opposing pitcher has blasted A-Rod publicly about his admitted steroid use; back in February Astros’ ace Roy Oswalt said he wanted to see A-Rod’s numbers erased from the record books. I certainly understand the disdain people feel for steroid users, but opposing players coming out like this are walking on thin ice.
Joe Saunders made the All-Star team last year with Gary Matthews Jr. (linked to HGH) on his team. Roy Oswalt has been – or still is – teammates with Roger Clemens, Miguel Tejada, and Stephen Randolph, all of whom were named in the Mitchell Report. Are these two really naive enough to think that they’ve never benefited from a teammate that was using PEDs? We’re talking about a very slippery slope here.
I’m not saying that players who used steroids aren’t cheaters or anything like that, because they obviously are. I’m not even saying that A-Rod should make the All-Star team, chances are he won’t have the numbers after missing over a month with his hip injury. It’s just that people who come out and blast known users need to realize there’s two coins to this PED stuff, and chances are they’ve been impacted in a positive way (stats wise) by a teammate on something they shouldn’t have been. The grass isn’t always greener.
A pair of ostentatious Stadium tales
Posted by: | CommentsYesterday afternoon, I dropped in a story about the impending sale of Yankee Stadium memorabilia. After nearly a year of negotiations, the City and Yanks had come to terms on an $11.5-million deal that transfers memorabilia rights to the team. At 11 a.m., the Yankees and Steiner Sports will announce the terms of the sale.
We though know the prices are going to be shocking. Yesterday, reports indicated that seats — the blue plastic seats that always seemed to be falling apart — would sell for around $1500. Today, The Times offers us a correction. “The Yankees,” Ken Belson writes, “are selling pairs of seats for $1,923, a nod to the year the original Yankee Stadium opened.”
As a comparison, the seats from Shea Stadium were offered up at $869 a pair. The Mets weren’t able to sell all of them, and now the Yankees are going to try to sell theirs for more than twice that amount in a worse market. I, a lifelong fan of the team, could go out and buy a pair of seats from the old stadium or I could pay this month’s rent and credit card bill.
As they’ve done across the street, the Yankees are pricing these seats well above the level most fans would consider paying for them. My dad owns a seat from the original Yankee Stadium. He got it because his mother bought two cartons of cigarettes and paid $7.50 for it. At $1923 for those Yankee Stadium II seats, I can only imagine how much the Monument Park bricks are going to cost.
Meanwhile, another seat pricing issue has continued to be a thorn in the Yankees’ side. Yankees season-ticket holder Keith Olbermann did what many reporters and bloggers didn’t do: He read and parsed the Yanks’ cryptic press release on the refunds for the über-expensive seats that remain empty. He writes:
As it is, the Yankees are actually not giving refunds or credits to almost any of their fans. A Yankee source did say that as many as four ticket-buyers – literally, four customers, in the suites hanging from the upper deck in left and right fields – would wind up with some extra perks. But the source added they weren’t certain: it might only be three customers.
The understandable confusion seems to owe to the first subheading… It reads “the full season Legends Suite and Ticket Licenses in the first row in Sections 15A, 15B, 24B and 25 will be reduced from $2,500 to $1,250 per regular season game. All fans who have purchased such full season Suite and Ticket Licenses will receive, at their choice, a refund or a credit.”
The thing is, sections 15A and 15B are at the far end of the Yankee dugout – most are behind the camera well beyond the dugout – and sections 24B and 25 are their opposites behind the visiting dugout…I’m reliably informed that the Yankees didn’t manage to sell any of those seats, so there’s no refund to be had. Reality here reads like something out of “Catch-22″: you can get a refund on those tickets, but only if you haven’t bought them. And you can now buy many of those high-end tickets at half the original price, except you can’t, because the Yankees gave them away as make-goods…
But there was a certain apparent inequity to the way the Yankee ticket adjustment was framed – an inequity caused mostly by that blasted press release – that the franchise didn’t deserve. It was not offering a fifty percent rebate to the highest of the high rollers, and a token handful of tickets to the next group down. It was giving the people who did buy tickets, all the rest of the tickets that nobody had bought.
The Yankees refused to comment for a Times reporter poking around this story. “We’re kind of done talking about this,” Alice McGillion, a spokeswoman for the team, said to Ken Belons. “I have no idea if it’s true, and it’s not the kind of question I’m going to go ask about.”
I too am “reliably informed” that the Yankees didn’t manage to sell those seats to which Olbermann refers. I’ve been to two regular season games, I’ve received e-mails with pictures and first-hand accounts from fans at other games, and I’ve watched nearly every home game on TV. Every time, those seats are mentioned are completely devoid of fans.
So again, the Yankees are seemingly thumbing their noises at, well, everyone. George Steinbrenner got his stadium and lost his health and team. We’re living an era in which Yankee officials want power and money without realizing that the fans give them both. These prices — $1923 for old seats and a phony refund/discount program — are the proof that the men in charge do not recognize what George, despite his flaws, always knew: The customer — the Yankee fan — should be respected.
Two years ago on RAB: We call for Todd Linden
Posted by: | CommentsFunny how things work out. Two years ago years ago the Giants released then-27-year-old outfielder Todd Linden. Given the state of the team at the time, I thought the Yankees would do well to make a waiver claim. They never got the chance. The Marlins stepped in and picked up Linden, who went on to hit .271/.347/.364 over 144 plate appearances after destroying AAA. Not bad for a backup outfielder.
This was on May 11, 2007. The Yanks were 16-17 and were about to get blanked by Jarrod Washburn. Miguel Cairo had been put in as a defensive sub for Johnny Damon the night before. Melky Cabrera had an OPS of .593. Bobby Abreu had gone from OPSing .820 on April 14th to .634 heading into the day (and it would get down to .602). The team, and specifically the outfield was in tatters. Linden could have helped out there.
After putting up respectable numbers for Sacramento of the PCL (A’s) and more impressively Buffalo of the IL (Indians) in 2008, the Yanks signed Linden to a minor league contract this winter. He’s picking up where he left off last year, destroying the International League to the tune of .331/.406/.548. At this point he could be a better option at fourth outfielder than Brett Gardner, as Mike said on Thursday. In any case he’s a good guy to have in your system.
In other two-year-old news, Mike was excited for Roger Clemens to be working with our young pitchers. It seemed everyone was. Now most of us would like him to just stay away. It was also a good day in the minors, with both Joba Chamberlain and Alan Horne allowing zero earned runs. Jon Hovis put up a lot of zeroes, too. Hopefully he can keep that up in Trenton.
Brackman dominates, but Charleston loses in extras
Posted by: | CommentsCouple of low level roster moves: Brian Baisley and his .460 OBP & league leading 23 RBI were promoted to High-A Tampa, as was utility infielder Walt Ibarra. Their spots on the Low-A Charleston roster will be filled by Addison Maruszak (demoted from Tampa because of a .383 OPS … yes, OPS) and ’09 fourth rounder Corban Joseph (promoted from Extended Spring Training).
RAB reader and commentor JP chimed in on Ian Kennedy’s aneurysm. Unlike us, JP actually knows what he’s talking about, so give it a read.
Triple-A Scranton (3-0 loss to Louisville)
Doug Bernier & Todd Linden: both 1 for 4 – Bernier K’ed twice, Linden once
John Rodriguez: 0 for 1, 1 K, 1 HBP – left in the 3rd after being hit by a pitch
Eric Duncan: 0 for 2 – 1 for his last 35 (.029)
Justin Leone & Chris Malec: both 0 for 4 – Leone K’ed twice, Malec once
Juan Miranda & Chris Stewart: both 1 for 3 – Miranda drew a walk & K’ed … Stewart K’ed twice
Austin Jackson: 2 for 4, 1 2B, 1 K - third straight 2 for 4 games
Josh Towers: 4.1 IP, 5 H, 2 R, 2 ER, 0 BB, 1 K, 5-7 GB/FB – 40 of 60 pitches were strikes (66.7%) … I’m assuming he was on a pitch count since he hasn’t made a start in a while
Zach Kroenke: 1.2 IP, 2 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 1 BB, 1 K, 1-3 GB/FB – 13 of 25 pitches were strikes (52%)
JB Cox: 1 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 2 BB, 0 K, 2-0 GB/FB – just 6 of 15 pitches were strikes (40%)
Jason Stephens: 1 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 3 K – 10 of 13 pitches were strikes (76.9%)
Open Thread: Updating the 2009 Pledge Drive
Posted by: | Comments
Back in early April we announced our plans for The 2009 RAB Pledge Drive, which we’re using to raise money for Joe Torre’s Safe At Home Foundation. The basic idea is that readers pledge a certain amount of money for every run the Yanks score this year, then at the end of the season we would collect all the pledges and donate every cent to Safe At Home. We ran a similar pledge drive last year, raising $1,050 for The Jorge Posada Foundation.
To date, we’ve had twenty kind readers agree to pledge, good for $1.19 per run scored. Even though they’ve only had Alex Rodriguez for just three games this season, the Yanks have scored 172 runs, tied for the fifth most in all of baseball. That means we’ve already raised $204.68 for Safe At Home through just 31 games. We’re currently on pace to raise just about $1,070 over the course of the season.
If you haven’t pledged yet but want to do so, just shoot me an email at mike (at) riveraveblues (dot) com, and make sure you put Pledge Drive or something to that affect in the subject line. Most people are pledging five cents per run, but you’re more than welcome to pledge more or less. Every penny helps. Regardless of your feelings towards Joe Torre, I think we can all agree that domestic violence is something no child should have to endure. This is a chance for you to do something and help some poor unfortunate kid out there. Thanks to everyone who’s already pledged, and thanks in advance to anyone who plans to pledge in the future.
On a much lighter note, feel free to use this as your open thread since we have no Yankees baseball. The Mets-Braves game is on ESPN, and you’ve also got a pair of potential elimination games in the NBA playoffs on TNT. I’ll be kickin’ it with House and 24. Whatever your flavor, feel free to chat about whatever you like here. Just be nice.
Yanks to announce Stadium memorabilia sale tomorrow
Posted by: | CommentsYesterday afternoon, I caught a glimpse of a news item in Darren Rovell’s Twitter stream for which many Yankee fans have been waiting. The team and Steiner Sports will announce details of the Yankee Stadium memorabilia offerings tomorrow afternoon. Tomorrow’s announcement follows today’s news that the Yankees have purchased the rights to sell Stadium memorabilia from New York City for $11.5 million. While no details have been announced, PeteAbe says seats will sell for $1500 a pair. That’s a far cry from the amount my grandmother paid for the seat my dad owns from Yankee Stadium I.
Damon named AL Player of the Week
Posted by: | CommentsI like to call this award the Small Sample Size Award, but there’s no doubt that Johnny Damon deserves. For the week ending May 10, Damon walked away with Player of the Week honors. He hit .419/.455/1.032 with 5 HR and 15 RBI. Despite the home run barrage, he scored just two other runs the whole week as the Yanks went 2-5. It is the second time in his career that Damon has taken home the award.


