<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stark: Yankee Stadium HR controversy overblown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riveraveblues.com/2009/05/stark-yankee-stadium-hr-controversy-overblown-12021/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/05/stark-yankee-stadium-hr-controversy-overblown-12021/</link>
	<description>A New York Yankees Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 08:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Fan Confidence Poll: May 25th, 2009 &#124; River Avenue Blues</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/05/stark-yankee-stadium-hr-controversy-overblown-12021/#comment-397931</link>
		<dc:creator>Fan Confidence Poll: May 25th, 2009 &#124; River Avenue Blues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 13:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12021#comment-397931</guid>
		<description>[...] The New Stadium continues to be a hot topic, as one pitcher on the team expressed his frustration. It&#8217;s been just 23 games, so this bandbox stuff is a bit overblown. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The New Stadium continues to be a hot topic, as one pitcher on the team expressed his frustration. It&#8217;s been just 23 games, so this bandbox stuff is a bit overblown. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TLVP</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/05/stark-yankee-stadium-hr-controversy-overblown-12021/#comment-393808</link>
		<dc:creator>TLVP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12021#comment-393808</guid>
		<description>The sample size issue is more complex than most people here seem to understand. 20 games is too few to make an assessment of a players capabilities since we&#039;ve got far too few observations - in effect maybe 80 PA&#039;s

20 games is also far too little so assess the quality of any team&#039;s winning record

Based on that baseball fans are used to disregard statistics based on 20 games.

However to assess a stadium the issue is less clear. We&#039;re talking about maybe 1200-1400 PA&#039;s - twice that of any normal players normal season. If we had a player that hit 75 homeruns in 2 seasons i doubt anyone here would say the sample size is too small to say that he would be a very good homerun hitter.

The counter argument would be that we&#039;ve only experienced 20 types of weather and that is a fairly small sample size. Same thing with the number of picthers, etc, etc. That is true and a few days with homerun friendly weather can impact the figures but not this much if you ask me.

It is also so that people fail to understand what it means when statistics reject an hypothesis. That would mean that the statistical confidence is not high enought to accept it as proven. The hurdle is normally set at 5% uncertainty. For instance, if it was 94% probable to be true that the new YS was highly HR friendly a statistical analysis would call the theory as &quot;not proven&quot;. In the real world however, 94% probability is pretty darn impressive. Please note 94% is an example and not based on any real calculation.

In its current form the new park is most likely one of the 5-6 most HR friendly parks in baseball and that hurts the team especially if/when we get to post season (attrition of pitchers arms will be much worse for us than for our opponents). Pitching 200 innings in a season will be much tougher for the
 Yankees&#039; pitchers than for the league average. The BP would be taxed much harder. The stadium as is, is probably a major threat to WS win no 27...

As for why there are more &quot;real&quot; long HR&#039;s that can not be explained by dimensions and or weather, that can instead easily be explained by psychology. If a fly ball is much likelier to become a HR, more batters &quot;swing for the fences&quot; and that would in turn lead to more &quot;real&quot; HR&#039;s. Batters are good at playing the percentages, and it is clear that all the players really belive that the new park is more HR friendly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sample size issue is more complex than most people here seem to understand. 20 games is too few to make an assessment of a players capabilities since we&#8217;ve got far too few observations &#8211; in effect maybe 80 PA&#8217;s</p>
<p>20 games is also far too little so assess the quality of any team&#8217;s winning record</p>
<p>Based on that baseball fans are used to disregard statistics based on 20 games.</p>
<p>However to assess a stadium the issue is less clear. We&#8217;re talking about maybe 1200-1400 PA&#8217;s &#8211; twice that of any normal players normal season. If we had a player that hit 75 homeruns in 2 seasons i doubt anyone here would say the sample size is too small to say that he would be a very good homerun hitter.</p>
<p>The counter argument would be that we&#8217;ve only experienced 20 types of weather and that is a fairly small sample size. Same thing with the number of picthers, etc, etc. That is true and a few days with homerun friendly weather can impact the figures but not this much if you ask me.</p>
<p>It is also so that people fail to understand what it means when statistics reject an hypothesis. That would mean that the statistical confidence is not high enought to accept it as proven. The hurdle is normally set at 5% uncertainty. For instance, if it was 94% probable to be true that the new YS was highly HR friendly a statistical analysis would call the theory as &#8220;not proven&#8221;. In the real world however, 94% probability is pretty darn impressive. Please note 94% is an example and not based on any real calculation.</p>
<p>In its current form the new park is most likely one of the 5-6 most HR friendly parks in baseball and that hurts the team especially if/when we get to post season (attrition of pitchers arms will be much worse for us than for our opponents). Pitching 200 innings in a season will be much tougher for the<br />
 Yankees&#8217; pitchers than for the league average. The BP would be taxed much harder. The stadium as is, is probably a major threat to WS win no 27&#8230;</p>
<p>As for why there are more &#8220;real&#8221; long HR&#8217;s that can not be explained by dimensions and or weather, that can instead easily be explained by psychology. If a fly ball is much likelier to become a HR, more batters &#8220;swing for the fences&#8221; and that would in turn lead to more &#8220;real&#8221; HR&#8217;s. Batters are good at playing the percentages, and it is clear that all the players really belive that the new park is more HR friendly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClayBuchholzLovesLaptops</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/05/stark-yankee-stadium-hr-controversy-overblown-12021/#comment-393074</link>
		<dc:creator>ClayBuchholzLovesLaptops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 22:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12021#comment-393074</guid>
		<description>That reminds me: When &quot;Nails Krzyzewski&quot; first came up on RAB, I wasn&#039;t around so I just googled it and the first 5 or so links were all to RAB. 

We really need this dictionary that was mentioned on the chat today. If you are not around for one or two days, you get the feeling these comments are in some obscure foreign language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That reminds me: When &#8220;Nails Krzyzewski&#8221; first came up on RAB, I wasn&#8217;t around so I just googled it and the first 5 or so links were all to RAB. </p>
<p>We really need this dictionary that was mentioned on the chat today. If you are not around for one or two days, you get the feeling these comments are in some obscure foreign language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clayton</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/05/stark-yankee-stadium-hr-controversy-overblown-12021/#comment-393059</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12021#comment-393059</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but in fluid dynamics of this size, the little differences in the jet-streams inside a stadium will have little effect on the distance a ball is going to travel because the speed of the ball itself as well as the wind speed coming into the stadium will be the determining factors. 

And I never said anything about the average flow field and it has little to do with this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but in fluid dynamics of this size, the little differences in the jet-streams inside a stadium will have little effect on the distance a ball is going to travel because the speed of the ball itself as well as the wind speed coming into the stadium will be the determining factors. </p>
<p>And I never said anything about the average flow field and it has little to do with this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsbrendog</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/05/stark-yankee-stadium-hr-controversy-overblown-12021/#comment-393049</link>
		<dc:creator>jsbrendog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12021#comment-393049</guid>
		<description>Krzyzewski

the power of google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Krzyzewski</p>
<p>the power of google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/05/stark-yankee-stadium-hr-controversy-overblown-12021/#comment-393042</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12021#comment-393042</guid>
		<description>Nothing says gritty like Nails!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing says gritty like Nails!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/05/stark-yankee-stadium-hr-controversy-overblown-12021/#comment-393041</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12021#comment-393041</guid>
		<description>Ahh yeah the first name is right, I think the last was spelled differently, but close enough!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh yeah the first name is right, I think the last was spelled differently, but close enough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve H</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/05/stark-yankee-stadium-hr-controversy-overblown-12021/#comment-393040</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12021#comment-393040</guid>
		<description>While he has some good points on this, he&#039;s still a B-Jobber.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While he has some good points on this, he&#8217;s still a B-Jobber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsbrendog</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/05/stark-yankee-stadium-hr-controversy-overblown-12021/#comment-393036</link>
		<dc:creator>jsbrendog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12021#comment-393036</guid>
		<description>nails krysecski?

i dont remember how to spell the last name, its like mike kryshcehski lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nails krysecski?</p>
<p>i dont remember how to spell the last name, its like mike kryshcehski lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/05/stark-yankee-stadium-hr-controversy-overblown-12021/#comment-393033</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12021#comment-393033</guid>
		<description>Hey what is Arods gritty nickname? I remember Gritt Gritner, but I can&#039;t remember Arods!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey what is Arods gritty nickname? I remember Gritt Gritner, but I can&#8217;t remember Arods!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 395/395 objects using memcached

Served from: riveraveblues.com @ 2012-05-28 05:18:42 -->
