<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Draft Link Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riveraveblues.com/2009/06/2009-draft-link-roundup-12699/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/06/2009-draft-link-roundup-12699/</link>
	<description>A New York Yankees Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:17:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: news bytes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; mlb draft 2009 tracker</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/06/2009-draft-link-roundup-12699/#comment-422926</link>
		<dc:creator>news bytes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; mlb draft 2009 tracker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12699#comment-422926</guid>
		<description>[...] AtlantaBraves.comWritten By: Heads22 on June 9, 2009 No Comment FutureSoxFayette Daily News&#160;- River Ave. Bluesall 933 news [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AtlantaBraves.comWritten By: Heads22 on June 9, 2009 No Comment FutureSoxFayette Daily News&nbsp;- River Ave. Bluesall 933 news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Axisa</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/06/2009-draft-link-roundup-12699/#comment-416435</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Axisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12699#comment-416435</guid>
		<description>Oppenheimer&#039;s extremely smart, and I&#039;ve heard that from the few people I know in the industry. However, I do think the Yanks have gotten a little too cute the last few years, especially with the injured players. 

Melancon in the 9th round? Fine. Brackman in the first? Eh, you mean to tell me another team was going to grab him before they picked again? Doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oppenheimer&#8217;s extremely smart, and I&#8217;ve heard that from the few people I know in the industry. However, I do think the Yanks have gotten a little too cute the last few years, especially with the injured players. </p>
<p>Melancon in the 9th round? Fine. Brackman in the first? Eh, you mean to tell me another team was going to grab him before they picked again? Doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/06/2009-draft-link-roundup-12699/#comment-416432</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12699#comment-416432</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not Mike, but inertia from the barren farm system years as well as the fact that the Yankees&#039; first pick is either at the end of the first round, or a sandwich pick, has a lot to do with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not Mike, but inertia from the barren farm system years as well as the fact that the Yankees&#8217; first pick is either at the end of the first round, or a sandwich pick, has a lot to do with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/06/2009-draft-link-roundup-12699/#comment-416409</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12699#comment-416409</guid>
		<description>Mike. I am curious about your take on Damon Oppenheimer. He seems to have an  unlimited budget each year (even though they are saying 2009 is an exception) to sign players. Plus, he probably has a bigger scouting budget than most teams. With that said, shouldn&#039;t the Yanks minor league system be better than middle of the road? In fact, shouldn&#039;t it easily be one of the top year after year? It just seems like the Yanks have a bunch of fodder at each level (there are exceptions of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike. I am curious about your take on Damon Oppenheimer. He seems to have an  unlimited budget each year (even though they are saying 2009 is an exception) to sign players. Plus, he probably has a bigger scouting budget than most teams. With that said, shouldn&#8217;t the Yanks minor league system be better than middle of the road? In fact, shouldn&#8217;t it easily be one of the top year after year? It just seems like the Yanks have a bunch of fodder at each level (there are exceptions of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daneptizl</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/06/2009-draft-link-roundup-12699/#comment-416256</link>
		<dc:creator>daneptizl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12699#comment-416256</guid>
		<description>Tate is an elite football prospect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tate is an elite football prospect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie C.</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/06/2009-draft-link-roundup-12699/#comment-416251</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12699#comment-416251</guid>
		<description>a 5 tool guy like Donovan Tate is the #4 prospect in the system.

1. Ajax
2. Montero
3. Brackman
4. Tate
5. Betances (but likely to drop b/c of continuing injury concerns - potential TJ cand
    McAllister makes more sense in the 5 spot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a 5 tool guy like Donovan Tate is the #4 prospect in the system.</p>
<p>1. Ajax<br />
2. Montero<br />
3. Brackman<br />
4. Tate<br />
5. Betances (but likely to drop b/c of continuing injury concerns &#8211; potential TJ cand<br />
    McAllister makes more sense in the 5 spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie C.</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/06/2009-draft-link-roundup-12699/#comment-416249</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12699#comment-416249</guid>
		<description>I like the way you think but it would be the ultimate roll of the dice.   

Tate is probably the most likely guy NOT to sign if his demands aren&#039;t met, and even then there&#039;s just as good a chance that his family could persuade him not to sign even if he got his $4/5 million.   Essentially the Yanks would be selecting a player most likely to repeat the Cole stone-wall.   Is that really the smart play when you dont have any insurance on having a 1st rounder next season??

As much as Tate entices, i&#039;d much rather go for a Purke or Scheppers. 

And we&#039;re not even going into the likely budget restrictions facing Opp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the way you think but it would be the ultimate roll of the dice.   </p>
<p>Tate is probably the most likely guy NOT to sign if his demands aren&#8217;t met, and even then there&#8217;s just as good a chance that his family could persuade him not to sign even if he got his $4/5 million.   Essentially the Yanks would be selecting a player most likely to repeat the Cole stone-wall.   Is that really the smart play when you dont have any insurance on having a 1st rounder next season??</p>
<p>As much as Tate entices, i&#8217;d much rather go for a Purke or Scheppers. </p>
<p>And we&#8217;re not even going into the likely budget restrictions facing Opp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James K</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/06/2009-draft-link-roundup-12699/#comment-416224</link>
		<dc:creator>James K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12699#comment-416224</guid>
		<description>Has anyone seen video of Purke? That guy throws seemingly all from the waist up. With his arm-slot being closer to a 3/4, does this give anyone cause for concern regarding injury? Are there other successful pitchers who have had good, lengthy careers without serious injuries pitching like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone seen video of Purke? That guy throws seemingly all from the waist up. With his arm-slot being closer to a 3/4, does this give anyone cause for concern regarding injury? Are there other successful pitchers who have had good, lengthy careers without serious injuries pitching like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/06/2009-draft-link-roundup-12699/#comment-416223</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12699#comment-416223</guid>
		<description>Tate is not worth anything near 6 million.  3 million is much more accurate, and i would rather spend that on Purke if for some fate he falls to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tate is not worth anything near 6 million.  3 million is much more accurate, and i would rather spend that on Purke if for some fate he falls to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/06/2009-draft-link-roundup-12699/#comment-416222</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=12699#comment-416222</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t they just do it for everybody? why only two sport athletes? Did we do it with ajax?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t they just do it for everybody? why only two sport athletes? Did we do it with ajax?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

