Comments on: From the Archives: Doubts about Montero http://riveraveblues.com/2009/07/from-the-archives-doubts-about-montero-15059/ A New York Yankees Blog Mon, 28 May 2012 10:24:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: pericles http://riveraveblues.com/2009/07/from-the-archives-doubts-about-montero-15059/#comment-506910 pericles Sat, 01 Aug 2009 17:43:20 +0000 http://riveraveblues.com/?p=15059#comment-506910 Made Laugh for real!!! Made Laugh for real!!!

]]> By: Bo http://riveraveblues.com/2009/07/from-the-archives-doubts-about-montero-15059/#comment-500938 Bo Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:05:25 +0000 http://riveraveblues.com/?p=15059#comment-500938 It's real easy with Montero. If they think he can catch full time they won't trade him. If they think he is a DH-1b and not a catcher he should be traded while his value is highest which is now. It’s real easy with Montero.

If they think he can catch full time they won’t trade him.

If they think he is a DH-1b and not a catcher he should be traded while his value is highest which is now.

]]> By: Bo http://riveraveblues.com/2009/07/from-the-archives-doubts-about-montero-15059/#comment-500937 Bo Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:04:01 +0000 http://riveraveblues.com/?p=15059#comment-500937 Untouchable? If he was offered straught up for Halladay Montero would be packing his bags for Torontos Double A team. There is no untouchable prospect out there Untouchable?

If he was offered straught up for Halladay Montero would be packing his bags for Torontos Double A team.

There is no untouchable prospect out there

]]> By: Ed http://riveraveblues.com/2009/07/from-the-archives-doubts-about-montero-15059/#comment-500931 Ed Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:02:23 +0000 http://riveraveblues.com/?p=15059#comment-500931 But no one is saying we actually could get Cain for Montero straight up. It's just us talking about whether we'd do it or not if we could. The Giants have Posey, so they wouldn't do it. Even without Posey, I think it'd still have to be Monetero + 1 until he gets close to getting promoted to the majors. But no one is saying we actually could get Cain for Montero straight up. It’s just us talking about whether we’d do it or not if we could.

The Giants have Posey, so they wouldn’t do it. Even without Posey, I think it’d still have to be Monetero + 1 until he gets close to getting promoted to the majors.

]]> By: Jack http://riveraveblues.com/2009/07/from-the-archives-doubts-about-montero-15059/#comment-500761 Jack Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:53:45 +0000 http://riveraveblues.com/?p=15059#comment-500761 I feel like this fits here. http://www.bobandtom.com/gen3/baseball_flash/baseball.htm I feel like this fits here.

http://www.bobandtom.com/gen3/.....seball.htm

]]> By: Tank Foster http://riveraveblues.com/2009/07/from-the-archives-doubts-about-montero-15059/#comment-500752 Tank Foster Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:51:26 +0000 http://riveraveblues.com/?p=15059#comment-500752 Gosh well that's a constructive comment! Gosh well that’s a constructive comment!

]]> By: Jacob http://riveraveblues.com/2009/07/from-the-archives-doubts-about-montero-15059/#comment-500652 Jacob Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:33:10 +0000 http://riveraveblues.com/?p=15059#comment-500652 I don't think that's the case if you can get Matt Cain for him straight up, which is where we began. I don’t think that’s the case if you can get Matt Cain for him straight up, which is where we began.

]]> By: Tank Foster http://riveraveblues.com/2009/07/from-the-archives-doubts-about-montero-15059/#comment-500609 Tank Foster Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:20:12 +0000 http://riveraveblues.com/?p=15059#comment-500609 I like that way of looking at it...sensible. I like that way of looking at it…sensible.

]]> By: V http://riveraveblues.com/2009/07/from-the-archives-doubts-about-montero-15059/#comment-500596 V Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:15:54 +0000 http://riveraveblues.com/?p=15059#comment-500596 Montero is as untouchable as a prospect can be. He's a Joba in 2007 prospect. He's a Phil Hughes in 2006 prospect. Players you trade him for: Lincecum, Pujols, Braun, Longoria, Felix Hernandez, etc. Not happening. Nope, he's untouchable. Montero is as untouchable as a prospect can be. He’s a Joba in 2007 prospect. He’s a Phil Hughes in 2006 prospect.

Players you trade him for:

Lincecum, Pujols, Braun, Longoria, Felix Hernandez, etc.

Not happening.

Nope, he’s untouchable.

]]> By: Ed http://riveraveblues.com/2009/07/from-the-archives-doubts-about-montero-15059/#comment-500582 Ed Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:13:06 +0000 http://riveraveblues.com/?p=15059#comment-500582 I think the difference is as a AAA player he could headline a deal, but while he's still in AA (and not even there for that long yet), you'd still need Hughes or Joba as the headliner. I think the difference is as a AAA player he could headline a deal, but while he’s still in AA (and not even there for that long yet), you’d still need Hughes or Joba as the headliner.

]]>