Archive for August, 2009
When will Damaso Marte return?
Posted by: | CommentsOn May 4, the Yankees placed Damaso Marte on the 15-day DL, retroactive to April 26, after seven pretty poor performances. The injury was termed tendinitis and weakness in his left shoulder. That’s never good news, especially for a guy who came back from the WBC nursing an injury. The outlook grew a bit bleaker when Marte took a trip to Dr. Andrews’s office in Alabama, but the good doctor didn’t find anything wrong. That was in mid-June. We’re now in mid-August, and we still haven’t heard anything about Marte returning any time soon.
Marte’s rehab assignment began on July 16 when he pitched an inning for the GCL Yankees. He then moved up to AAA Scranton, where he’s made 10 appearances so far. In his last 5.1 innings he’s allowed two hits, walked three, and struck out four, allowing no runs. It would seem from the results that he’s near a return. But, again, we haven’t heard anything to that effect from anyone. Just how long will Marte stay on this rehab assignment?
MLB rules allow for rehabbing players to play in the minors for 30 days. Since Marte first appeared on July 16, his clock started then. Today marks Day 27, so unless the Yankees pull him off the assignment for some reason, he’ll have to rejoin the team by Monday, in Oakland. It’s strange that he’s so close, yet the Yankees have been tight-lipped about his return.
If they were so inclined they could pull the same move they did with Humberto Sanchez last year. When his rehab clock was almost up they shut him down with another injury. When he finally got back into games, his clock re-started. Marte, of course, is a different situation. He’s a major league vet, and unlike Sanchez last year, the Yankees would be bringing him right back on the 25-man roster, whereas Sanchez would have been optioned to the minors. The move doesn’t seem likely, but it can’t be ruled out.
Assuming Marte does come back on Monday, as per his rehab clock, what move would the Yankees make to free up a roster spot? Would they dare option David Robertson while he’s pitching so well? Phil Coke? Would they go with 13 pitchers until rosters expand on September 1 and option Ramiro Pena? Those seem like the only three possible moves, and for one reason or another neither seems particularly palatable.
We’ll soon find out the Yankees plan. Until then all we can do is wonder. It sure would be nice to finally see some productivity out of the reliever to whom the Yanks committed three years and $12 million. If he can produce at anywhere near his previous levels, he’ll be a tremendous asset to the Yankees down the stretch.
The rise of David Robertson
Posted by: | CommentsAfter starting the season in a downright dreadful fashion, the Yankees’ bullpen has righted itself and become a legitimate weapon. Most of the credit goes to the arrival of Al Aceves and the awesomeness of Phil Hughes, and rightly so, but they’re not alone in the bullpen’s revival. Since the start of June, David Robertson has pitched in 25 games for the Yanks, striking out 37 batters in 26 innings, contributing to his AL-best 12.69 K/9. Opponents are hitting just .204 off him in that time, and his groundball-flyball ratio is a studly 1.90. Sure, Robertson’s 5.13 BB/9 is too high, but he’s walked just four batters in his last 12 innings, so he’s improving. He’s also added velocity throughout the season.
Robertson absolutely annihilated the minors after signing for $200,000 out of The University of Alabama as a 17th round pick in 2006, and it looks like he’s starting to get over that rookie hump. As far as non-setup middle relievers go, it doesn’t get much better than David Robertson right now.
Early Heritage Park plans lacking heritage
Posted by: | Comments
Despite efforts, Heritage Park will not incorporate much of old Yankee Stadium. (Image via Save the Yankee Gate 2)
New York City is one of the oldest towns in the nation. Founded by the Dutch in 1624, it was the capital of the nation for five years and has been the country’s biggest city since 1790. Despite this legacy, though, the city is shockingly lacking in history.
Stroll around Lower Manhattan, some of the longest continuously settled lands in North America, and the history is from the late 1800s and not the mid-1700s. Instead of historic preservation mixed in with modern development, New York City has continually built over and on top of its history.
More immediately, our city’s ballpark history is marked with gone and nearly forgotten stadiums. All that remains of Ebbets Field is a housing project in Flatbush. The Polo Grounds is also a housing project, and Shea Stadium, no one’s favorite place to watch a game, is a parking lot.
Across the street from the current Yankee Stadium sits the old House that Ruth Built, an 85-year-old Baseball Cathedral. Sure, it was gut-renovated in the 1970s, and many old-time fans feel it lost its character then. But the truth remains that Yankee Stadium after the renovation saw its fair share of historic games.
When the Yankees announced plans to build a new home, the old stadium was to be turned into a park called Heritage Field. Supposedly, this new field would incorporate Yankee baseball history and serve as a living monument to the stadium. Now, though, as details about the city’s plans for the park come into view, little of Yankee Stadium will remain, and the park may serve more as a monument to what could have and should have been than to what was.
In the current issue of The New Yorker, Paul Goldberger penned a Talk of the Town piece on the future of Heritage Field. The Parks Department and the Yankees convened a summit to discuss ways to incorporate the stadium, but the outcome was less than appealing:
Now that the Yankees have moved to their new $1.5-billion ballpark, the question has arisen as to whether their former home ought to disappear as completely as Shea did. The city has promised to turn the site into a park, complete with three ball fields. But the current design calls for the entire stadium to be demolished, its history recalled mainly through a series of panels and plaques in the pavement…
[Park designer Gary Sorge] explained that one of the three ball fields would be set in roughly the position of the old Yankee Stadium diamond, but shifted slightly, so that second base would be atop the original home plate. The plans also called for the reuse of two thirty-foot-long panels of the old Stadium’s famous scalloped frieze. And the designers proposed painting two of the park’s field light posts to resemble foul poles.
[Bronx borough historian Lloyd] Ultan, the historian, was the first to respond. “What is missing from the design is the architecture of the Stadium itself,” he said, holding up a souvenir cookie tin shaped like the old Stadium. “Some people came to see me recently who were trying to save Gate 2, which has not been altered. Couldn’t we preserve that as a monument?”
“Our research showed that Gate 2 had been altered,” one of the planners said. “It would have to be restored.”
So then restore it, I say.
Later on during the meeting, Sherida Paulsen, a former head of the city’s Landmarks Preservation Committee, posed a good question. “Putting second base at home plate doesn’t make sense,” she said. “Why can’t home plate just be at home plate?”
In the end, the city should do more than create a park that sort of resembles Yankee Stadium while telling a story through staid plaques and panels in the pavement. They should be able to create a monument to a great ballpark while keeping the essence of the park alive. It is a challenge in urban planning, but after decades of tearing down history, it is one the city should meet.
Parks Department head Adrian Benepe would seem to agree. “Yankee Stadium has had papal Masses, Billy Graham’s crusade, championship boxing matches, and the rally when Nelson Mandela was freed,” Benepe said. “Why can’t we create a great new park that acknowledges all of this?”
Why can’t we, indeed.
The case for, and against, Vicente Padilla
Posted by: | Comments
If you ask Brian Cashman, on the record, if he thinks the team needs another starting pitcher, he’ll probably say no. He and Joe Girardi have stood at Sergio Mitre‘s back after each of his starts this season, even the last three. He’s the fifth starter going forward, they say, and he won’t lose that spot just because of a few bad outings. No one’s really buying it. They just brought in Chad Gaudin, and are thinking about starting him on Sunday. It suggests that the Yankees might still be on the lookout for someone to fill that fifth spot, allowing Gaudin to pitch out of the pen and give the big starters some rest in September (if they can put some more distance between themselves and the Sox).
August is scrap heap time in baseball, a period when teams place most if not all of their players on waivers to gauge interest around the league. Players of significance usually don’t change teams at this time of year, but it does happen. General managers, for the most part, are searching out pieces to fill in the puzzle, rather than someone to anchor the team. That’s exactly what the Yankees should be doing right now. Instead of remaining content with Sergio Mitre, they should be looking around to see if there are any viable alternatives.
One name that immediately comes to mind is Vicente Padilla, recently designated for assignment by the Texas Rangers. That would seem to raise a red flag — after all, the Rangers don’t have the best pitching, right? It’s not the best, but this year they rank fifth in the AL in starter’s ERA, and fourth in the AL in overall ERA. This isn’t like picking up a starter the Indians or Orioles released. So let’s take a little look at Vicente.
A 1998 amateur free agent signing by the Arizona Diamondbacks, Padilla landed in Philadelphia in the Curt Schilling trade. There he posted two very good seasons, in 2002 and 2003, before missing some time in 2004 and 2005. The Phillies dished him to Texas for a song, and after something of a bounceback season the Rangers signed him to a three-year, $33.75 million deal before the 2007 season.
For the past three years Padilla has been something of a disappointment. His ERA and WHIP have been far above acceptable levels for a pitcher making that type of money. His strikeout rate has been up and down, and his walks have been above the level he established in Philly. There’s been little to like about Padilla, especially his propensity to hit batters, apparently unprompted.
So what would the Yankees see in this guy? For starters, his woes this year might be partly a product of his home ballpark. His ERA on the road is two full runs lower than at home. Get him out of Rangers Ballpark in Arlington, and perhaps you have a useful pitcher. Then again, his strikeouts are higher at home and his walks are lower, so there’s no guarantee that he can find a home in a new ballpark. In addition, one of Padilla’s few poor road starts this year came at Yankee Stadium.
Padilla also pitches well against righties, a .676 OPS vs. a .862 OPS against lefties. Since the league has more righties than lefties, that’s not a bad thing. Then again, the Yankees have that quality in Gaudin, so Padilla could be redundant. So far, the case for him isn’t looking too strong.
The case against him is far stronger. Padilla has never been a front line starter, and it’s questionable whether he can hold down even the fifth spot in a rotation. The Rangers might have improved their staff this year, but even so they wouldn’t jettison a useful pitcher just because. They let him go for a reason — just like they placed him on waivers in June for a reason. Mike Maddux is considered one of the best pitching coaches in the game, so if he can’t reclaim Padilla, can any coach?
Strangely, even with all signs pointing to Padilla’s ineffectiveness carrying over to a new club, a team might be willing to pay more than the minimum for Padilla by working out a trade with Texas. That should put the Yanks right out. Even if they sign him for the prorated league minimum, he could be ineffective and redundant. The Yanks could use a guy to help fill in the back end of the rotation, but if they’re going to pick someone up it might as well be someone better than what they already have.
Mariano hits annual snag
Posted by: | CommentsIt seems like every year in August Mariano Rivera is unavailable for a few games due to some ailment or another. In the past it’s been little things, like a tight forearm or back spasms — one year, I remember, Mo hurt his back while sneezing. It sounds strange for a guy who keeps himself in such impeccable physical shape, but those seem to be the only bumps Mo hits for the season. Considering the injury rates of other closers, the Yanks should consider it a blessing.
We learned yesterday that Mo was unavailable due to a sore shoulder. “He was feeling a little cranky today,” said Girardi, though there was no indication of whether this related to Mo’s shoulder or his mood. We did see Mo snap at someone while warming up in the bullpen on Saturday, after Jeter’s home run, so who knows. Maybe Mo is actually cranky. Still, the more important part is the shoulder soreness.
This year’s malady is understandable. Not only did Mo not really have one last year, but he underwent off-season shoulder surgery. While he’s bounced back nicely this season, it’s natural for the shoulder to weaken a bit. It’s like pitchers who undergo Tommy John surgery having a dead arm period the year they come back. Combine the effects of off-season surgery with Mo’s propensity for minor spats later in the season, and it’s inevitable that he misses some time.
Even so, Girardi thinks Mo will be set to go if the Yanks have a lead to protect in Seattle tomorrow. All considered, perhaps the Yanks offense should rally behind their closer and give Mo a few more games off via a couple of blowouts. He saves them, so maybe it’s time for them to save him.
Clean sweep
Posted by: | CommentsJimmy Paredes, Zoilo Almonte, Neil Medchill, DeAngelo Mack, Francisco Rondon, and Adam Warren are all headed to the NY-Penn League All Star Game. The game is being held on the campus of my alma mater, so if there’s any RAB readers out there kickin’ it at Penn State, make sure you check the game out next Tuesday. Boston’s Ryan Westmoreland is by far the best prospect elected to the game.
Triple-A Scranton was washed out. I’m assuming they’ll play two tomorrow since they aren’t scheduled to play Norfolk any more this year.
Double-A Trenton (3-2 win over Reading)
Austin Krum, PJ Pillitere, James Cooper & Edwar Gonzalez: all 0 for 3 – Krum drove in a run & K’ed twice … Edwar K’ed
Matt Cusick: 2 for 4, 1 R
Eduardo Nunez: 1 for 4
Chris Malec, Marcos Vechionacci & Justin Snyder: all 1 for 3 – Malec homered & drove in two … Vech doubled … Snyder doubled, scored a run & K’ed
Jeremy Bleich: 5 IP, 6 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 3 BB, 5 K, 9-1 GB/FB – 20-4 K/BB ratio in his last 17 IP
Kanekoa Texeira: 2 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 1 BB, 5 K, 1-0 GB/FB – 86.1 IP is a career high … by like, a lot
Wilkins Arias: 0.1 IP, zeroes, 0-1 GB/FB
Humberto Sanchez: 0.2 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 1 K – picked a runner off first
Jose Valdez: 1 IP, 1 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 0 BB, 1 K, 1-1 GB/FB
Trusting the Yanks’ Joba plan
Posted by: | CommentsWhile we spent the morning speculating about the Yanks’ plans for Joba, the team let slip shortly before their afternoon affair with the Blue Jays exactly what they have in mind for Chamberlain. It is apparently a plan with an innings cap higher than we all expect and with some flexibility as to use. It is one that will not limit his post-season appearances and will not send him back to the bullpen. It is also one we should learn to trust.
For the immediate future, Joba will now get a week off until his next start. Andy McCullough of The Star-Ledger reported that Chamberlain will next pitch on Wednesday against the A’s. He will not face the Red Sox in Fenway next weekend. The Yankees are not sure if Chad Gaudin or Sergio Mitre will take Joba’s turn. I believe both will have to pitch this weekend, unless the Bombers are preparing to throw Al Aceves instead of Mitre.
Beyond that, things are up in the air. Sometimes, Joba will go on five days’ rest; sometimes, he will get a few extra days off. The Yankees, though, are keeping their eyes on both the immediate goal of winning the World Series this year and the long-term goal of keeping Joba healthy. “This is part of the plan,” Joe Girardi said. This is what we have to do because this is not just about the next two months. This is about years and years to come.”
Once the regular season ends, Joba will be a part of any potential playoff rotation. “All hands on deck,” the Yankee skipper said. It is also worth noting that, per Peter Abraham, Joba’s limit is “more than people think. [The Yankees] based it on the entirety of his career, not just last year.”
The entirety of his career is less than helpful. Joba threw 100.1 innings last year and just over 110 innings in 2007. What that means for this year is anyone’s guess. The Verducci Rule would cap Joba at 130 innings, but the Yankees are prepared to go past that mark. According to the Daily News, the Yanks are eying 160 innings as Joba’s cap. That probably doesn’t include pitching deep into October, if need be.
With this news, many Yankee fans will be up in arms. “How can they risk Joba’s health?” they will scream. “Why can’t they just put him into the pen?” None of us really know what the Yankees and their pitching coaches, a group of baseball professionals, know. They know the health risks, and they know Joba Chamberlain‘s make up. For now, I’m willing to trust that. Hopefully, that trust will not be misplaced.
Addendum: For a different look on pitching injuries, take a read through this recent New York Times Magazine article on teenagers facing overwhelming innings loads. These things definitely matter, and that article is a prime example of why the Yanks need to — and are — being careful with Joba.
Game 114 Spillover Thread III
Posted by: | CommentsNasty pitch.
I wonder if they realize they have a flight to Seattle after the game. End this shizz already.


