<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 UZR Projections and the Yankees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riveraveblues.com/2009/11/2010-uzr-projections-and-the-yankees-19964/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/11/2010-uzr-projections-and-the-yankees-19964/</link>
	<description>A New York Yankees Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 15:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking at defensive stats &#124; River Avenue Blues</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/11/2010-uzr-projections-and-the-yankees-19964/#comment-746768</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking at defensive stats &#124; River Avenue Blues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=19964#comment-746768</guid>
		<description>[...] and four years data to create UZR projections for 2010, which project the Yanks&#8217; to be a below average defensive team next year (disclaimer: this was long before any major moves were made this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and four years data to create UZR projections for 2010, which project the Yanks&#8217; to be a below average defensive team next year (disclaimer: this was long before any major moves were made this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/11/2010-uzr-projections-and-the-yankees-19964/#comment-688702</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=19964#comment-688702</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;How in the world can something like UZR be predicted&lt;/i&gt;

http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2009/3/3/774477/determining-a-player-s-tru</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How in the world can something like UZR be predicted</i></p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2009/3/3/774477/determining-a-player-s-tru" rel="nofollow">http://www.beyondtheboxscore.c.....ayer-s-tru</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tank Foster</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/11/2010-uzr-projections-and-the-yankees-19964/#comment-688608</link>
		<dc:creator>Tank Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=19964#comment-688608</guid>
		<description>How in the world can something like UZR be predicted, especially such small differences....seems stupid to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How in the world can something like UZR be predicted, especially such small differences&#8230;.seems stupid to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost of Scott Brosius</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/11/2010-uzr-projections-and-the-yankees-19964/#comment-688481</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost of Scott Brosius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=19964#comment-688481</guid>
		<description>I like this alot. Keep matsui to DH, take the fantastic defense, keep melky or gardner around as the fourth OF, use the other as trade bait either for dejesus himself or someone else. If its melky that stays, he can fight it out with cameron and dejesus for an OF spot. hot hand plays, the odd man out is an above average fourth of</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this alot. Keep matsui to DH, take the fantastic defense, keep melky or gardner around as the fourth OF, use the other as trade bait either for dejesus himself or someone else. If its melky that stays, he can fight it out with cameron and dejesus for an OF spot. hot hand plays, the odd man out is an above average fourth of</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/11/2010-uzr-projections-and-the-yankees-19964/#comment-688470</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=19964#comment-688470</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;

No, that&#039;s not true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i></p>
<p>No, that&#8217;s not true.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Honorable Congressman Mondesi</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/11/2010-uzr-projections-and-the-yankees-19964/#comment-688419</link>
		<dc:creator>The Honorable Congressman Mondesi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=19964#comment-688419</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s fine, but that&#039;s not the point you made in the comment I responded to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s fine, but that&#8217;s not the point you made in the comment I responded to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuckey</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/11/2010-uzr-projections-and-the-yankees-19964/#comment-688383</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuckey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=19964#comment-688383</guid>
		<description>Again, I&#039;m responding specifically to someone who called Cabrera a 4th outfielder and Gardner a 5th outfielder, which is not at all the same has notching them BOTH back a grade from that. 

That said, given their production at C, 1B, 2B, SS 3RD, RF, and DH, do I think the Yankees could have on the World Series with Gardner and Cabrera in the OF. 

Yeah, I think it&#039;s possible. I don&#039;t think they&#039;d they&#039;d have lost 16 games in the standings (which is what stood between them qualifying for the WC and we all know the Postseason is unpredictable from there. 

So to summarize. 

- Carbera is NOT a 4th outfielder, which is what I was responding to.

- All off teams, the Yanks could carry an average and below average CF and LF together and still be a factor for a title. 

- I agree, if an upgrade is available, you consider/pursue it, but it&#039;s not an imperative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, I&#8217;m responding specifically to someone who called Cabrera a 4th outfielder and Gardner a 5th outfielder, which is not at all the same has notching them BOTH back a grade from that. </p>
<p>That said, given their production at C, 1B, 2B, SS 3RD, RF, and DH, do I think the Yankees could have on the World Series with Gardner and Cabrera in the OF. </p>
<p>Yeah, I think it&#8217;s possible. I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;d they&#8217;d have lost 16 games in the standings (which is what stood between them qualifying for the WC and we all know the Postseason is unpredictable from there. </p>
<p>So to summarize. </p>
<p>- Carbera is NOT a 4th outfielder, which is what I was responding to.</p>
<p>- All off teams, the Yanks could carry an average and below average CF and LF together and still be a factor for a title. </p>
<p>- I agree, if an upgrade is available, you consider/pursue it, but it&#8217;s not an imperative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/11/2010-uzr-projections-and-the-yankees-19964/#comment-688380</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=19964#comment-688380</guid>
		<description>But if we sign Damon, we still don&#039;t have a DH. My plan - in this case - would be to sign Damon and Cameron, let Matsui walk and then have Damon DH with Melky in LF. I wasn&#039;t clear. I didn&#039;t really say much at all before</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if we sign Damon, we still don&#8217;t have a DH. My plan &#8211; in this case &#8211; would be to sign Damon and Cameron, let Matsui walk and then have Damon DH with Melky in LF. I wasn&#8217;t clear. I didn&#8217;t really say much at all before</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/11/2010-uzr-projections-and-the-yankees-19964/#comment-688370</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=19964#comment-688370</guid>
		<description>Cameron wasn&#039;t even good 5 yrs ago let alone now at 38yrs old.

They are much better off getting Damon back and letting the kids battle for CF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cameron wasn&#8217;t even good 5 yrs ago let alone now at 38yrs old.</p>
<p>They are much better off getting Damon back and letting the kids battle for CF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/11/2010-uzr-projections-and-the-yankees-19964/#comment-688369</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=19964#comment-688369</guid>
		<description>Even with a new addition in CF Melky would still play 120+ games and get 450+ at bats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even with a new addition in CF Melky would still play 120+ games and get 450+ at bats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 395/395 objects using memcached

Served from: riveraveblues.com @ 2012-05-28 11:37:31 -->
