Nov
12

Yankees tidbits we missed yesterday

By

I would guess that maybe 5 percent of people who read this site don’t read MLB Trade Rumors at least once a day. It’s such a quick, easy source of information on anything remotely hot stove related. This time of year, though, it gets a bit dense. Thirty-nine posts went up yesterday, most of them not Yankee-related. But there are some minor tidbits among them, so we’ll aggregate the aggregator.

  • Joel Sherman caught a vibe, and it said that the Yankees will not only non-tender Wang, but they will “not even offer him a small base with incentives to return.” Good thing it’s just a vibe.
  • Sherman, who has been all over these GM meetings, hears that Yanks “plan to tender arb-eligibile Brian Bruney because his price (about $1.5M) will be reasonable.” That’s less than 1 percent of total payroll.
  • Buried in this Joe Strauss article about Matt Holliday, the Cardinals “expressed interest” in Xavier Nady. I always wonder what denotes an expression of interest.
  • The Royals foolishly jumped on Kyle Farnsworth early last off-season, and this off-season they’re after another former Yank. Via Ken Rosenthal/Jon Paul Morosi, the Royals signed Wilson Betemit to a minor league deal. I’ll always appreciate Betemit for bringing us Nick Swisher.
  • Not that the Yanks were going to sign him anyway, but Charley Walters reports that the Twins and Joe Mauer have begun discussing a new deal. The Yanks will just have to hope that one of their 18 catching prospects works out.

Categories : Hot Stove League

59 Comments»

  1. dan says:

    HOPE??!?! you mean they’re not all locks?

  2. pat says:

    For the sake of the game I’d like Mauer to stay in Minnesota.

  3. Every time I think about how Wilson Betemit landed us Nick Swisher, I laugh.

  4. JGS says:

    Dayton Moore is going after Betemit?

    I think his next move is to trade their third best prospect for Jason Varitek

    • Shhhhh! Don’t give the man any ideas. I also laugh at the thought of the Red Sox paying $3 million for their backup catcher to walk around with a giant C on his chest.

      • Dela G says:

        word is that they will be giving the C to Youk or the midget

        i was listening to WEEI on monday and people were talking about it

      • JGS says:

        not worried–Tek has 10-5 protection and no way in hell is he going to KC, even should Moore lose whatever mental faculties he is rumored to still have

        it’s even better than the Sox paying him $3M to be the backup catcher–this means Martinez will have to catch Wakefield (presumably Varitek will catch Beckett), or they will have to waste a roster spot on a third catcher

        and Dela–probably Pedroia, but you don’t have to have a captain

  5. bonestock94 says:

    I really hate letting Wang walk. They really must think theres no helping him.

    • Slugger27 says:

      me too… the guy had an FIP of 3.91, 3.79, and 3.74 in his 06-08 seasons

      even in his DISASTROUS 09 season, his FIP was still only 5.38… which is only .08 higher than sergio mitre (not that that’s saying anything, but if theyre willing to spend 1.25 on mitre, i think a small base with incentives for CMW is definitely worth the gamble)

      also:

      2008 LD rate = 22.1% … BABIP = 287
      2009 LD rate = 19.7% … BABIP = 397 (!!!)

      now he was definitely lucky regarding his LD rate in 2008, but even with regression hes still a pretty damn good pre-2009 pitcher

      http://www.fangraphs.com/stats.....battedball

    • A.D. says:

      Yeahh, thats not a good sign on the Yanks opinion on his medicals

      • Or on the organizational belief that he can get that sinker back up to 94/95. If he can’t throw that hard, he’s not effective pitcher unless he drastically improves his secondary pitches.

        It’s also worth noting that he’ll be 30 on Opening Day. He’s not that young anymore.

  6. Januz says:

    Joe Mauer staying in Minnesota helps two teams: First and foremost the Twins. But after that it is the Yankees, because he will not be playing in Boston.
    As for Wang and Nady, it is no big deal, letting them go. They essentially won the World Series without them (And besides they ae having a bit of trouble with the 40 man roster (Which is why I am shocked about keeping Brian Bruney, considering how bad he was)).

    • Bo says:

      Under 2 mill for a guy who throws in the mid to high 90′s is what the Yankees are supposed to do. They can take chances on a guy like Bruney for 2 mill.

      • The Honorable Congressman Mondesi says:

        I’m with Bo on this one. Sure, Bruney is a lightning-in-a-bottle type, and the Yanks didn’t get that lightning from him in 2009, but guys with his ability don’t grow on trees and aren’t always under team-control the way he is. He’s relatively cheap (in years and dollars) and he’s got talent. I want the Yanks to bring him back in 2010, I think it’d be a mistake to let him go.

        • jsbrendog says:

          does he have an option? if he stinks can he be sent down?

          • The Honorable Congressman Mondesi says:

            I don’t know… Even if he does, though, is that such a big concern, given current roster construction, that the Yanks should cut him loose? You’ve only got 2 guys out there (Mo and Marte) who can’t be sent down, right? And those guys aren’t in danger of being in that conversation anyway. I don’t think having one borderline guy out there who doesn’t have any options (if, in fact, he doesn’t) is going to hurt the Yanks’ flexibility so much that it makes the argument to cut him loose stronger than the argument to hold onto him, does it?

            • jsbrendog says:

              oh yeah of course, i don’t think it matters iw as just curious. It would be nicer if he does but if he doesn’t there’s no way you don’t bring him back at 1.5 mil with the flashes of brilliance he has shown.

              if he bombs you trade him a la veras last year somewhere for a couple hundred thou

              • The Honorable Congressman Mondesi says:

                Yeah… Honestly, I hadn’t thought much about Bruney before this conversation, so I wasn’t arguing against the idea that his options (or lack thereof) don’t matter so much as I was thinking out loud. If I’m missing something here, I’m more than open to hearing it. After quick analysis, though, it doesn’t seem to me like letting him walk is the smartest move.

        • Yeah, sure, why not. It’s not a super huge cost… maybe he bounces back and either pitches well for us or we spin him off for something midseason if he becomes superfluous.

          • The Honorable Congressman Mondesi says:

            Right. Also, I don’t love the idea of saying goodbye to a guy (with his abilities) when he’s at his nadir. Someone with his talent is bound to bounce back at some point, I just don’t like the idea of getting his bad performance and then giving his good performance to someone else. There’s a decent chance he bounces back and has a decent-enough run in 2010.

            And, like you said… If he doesn’t bounce back, relievers with big arms and relatively cheap deals aren’t impossible to move, if the Yanks need the added flexibility. Or they can just take the 1-year hit, it’s not like we’re talking about a multi-year deal here.

  7. If Saint Louis has interest in Nady, is there any chance the Yankees do a little sign and trade type thing like they did with Sheffield? Or is that not possible because they were picking up an option with Sheff?

    • Bo says:

      hes a free agent. they dont have options on him

      • I know that. I’m wondering if they would offer him arb/sign him anyway and then trade him.

        Oh wait. Nevermind. 99.9% sure they can’t do that. I remember last year hearing that signed FAs can’t be traded til June or something anyway. My bad.

        • A.D. says:

          They can’t be traded until June….without their permission, therefore if it was all part of the deal Nady could agree.

          But otherwise the only way the Yanks could do that is offer arb, he accepts, thus he’s overpaid, in which case St. Louis may not want him.

          • Hm, okay. Thanks for the clarification, A.D.

          • The Honorable Congressman Mondesi says:

            “They can’t be traded until June….without their permission, therefore if it was all part of the deal Nady could agree.”

            Which is why I think speculation that something like this could happen is unrealistic. Nady has absolutely no reason to sign with the Yanks just so they can trade him to the Cardinals, it’s in his best interest to just sign directly with St. Louis. From the Yanks perspective, if they don’t actually want Nady back, they’d be taking a risk by signing him just to trade him since the Cards could just say ‘F that, why should we trade for a guy when he could have just signed with us directly two days ago instead of screwing us’. So, in the end, I think you’re left with an idea that really doesn’t make much sense for any of the three interested parties.

          • jsbrendog says:

            plus why would st louis want to give up a player and $$ for an injury risk? as of now it’d just be $$

            • Jedi mind trick by Cashman.

            • A.D. says:

              Yeah they wouldn’t, Nady doesn’t have enough actual interest in him.

              The sign & trade made sense in a situation last year where a player would only cost the Yanks a 4th round pick, but the team that wanted him a 1st or 2nd rounder, therefore there was opportunity for everyone to win.

  8. JohnC says:

    Regarding Curtis Granderson, I would pass. While he is a talented player, he strikes out a ton, and is terrible against lefties, and not that good a baserunner despite having plus speed. I’d rather give Austin Jackson a chance first. If you’re gonna deal Jackson, include him in a package for Halladay.

Leave a Reply

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

If this is your first time commenting on River Ave. Blues, please review the RAB Commenter Guidelines. Login for commenting features. Register for RAB.