<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Davidoff: Wang all but non-tendered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riveraveblues.com/2009/12/davidoff-wang-all-but-non-tendered-20850/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/12/davidoff-wang-all-but-non-tendered-20850/</link>
	<description>A New York Yankees Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 16:32:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Davidoff: Yanks will not tender Wang &#124; River Avenue Blues</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/12/davidoff-wang-all-but-non-tendered-20850/#comment-714940</link>
		<dc:creator>Davidoff: Yanks will not tender Wang &#124; River Avenue Blues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=20850#comment-714940</guid>
		<description>[...] Yankees will not tender Chien-Ming Wang a contract. Davidoff initially reported this development six days ago via Twitter and confirms it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yankees will not tender Chien-Ming Wang a contract. Davidoff initially reported this development six days ago via Twitter and confirms it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tab Chen</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/12/davidoff-wang-all-but-non-tendered-20850/#comment-708194</link>
		<dc:creator>Tab Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=20850#comment-708194</guid>
		<description>and Ni from DET Tiger shows up, too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and Ni from DET Tiger shows up, too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/12/davidoff-wang-all-but-non-tendered-20850/#comment-708014</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=20850#comment-708014</guid>
		<description>The man with ski mask is Hong-Chih Kuo from Dodgers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The man with ski mask is Hong-Chih Kuo from Dodgers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ting</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/12/davidoff-wang-all-but-non-tendered-20850/#comment-707927</link>
		<dc:creator>Ting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 06:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=20850#comment-707927</guid>
		<description>Wang, just go ahead! I am sure all Taiwanese are on your side. Keep pitching amazing sinker to confuse the best MLB batters!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wang, just go ahead! I am sure all Taiwanese are on your side. Keep pitching amazing sinker to confuse the best MLB batters!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YankeesVine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wang Gone?</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/12/davidoff-wang-all-but-non-tendered-20850/#comment-707700</link>
		<dc:creator>YankeesVine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wang Gone?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 03:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=20850#comment-707700</guid>
		<description>[...] Ken Davidoff is reporting what we all figured - the Yankees are likely to decline arbitration with Chien-Ming Wang, making him a free agent once the Dec 12th deadline passes.&#160; Peter Gammons points out that if Wang doesn&#8217;t sign with another team, the Yankees would still be able to re-sign him after May 1st.&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ken Davidoff is reporting what we all figured &#8211; the Yankees are likely to decline arbitration with Chien-Ming Wang, making him a free agent once the Dec 12th deadline passes.&nbsp; Peter Gammons points out that if Wang doesn&#8217;t sign with another team, the Yankees would still be able to re-sign him after May 1st.&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mason</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/12/davidoff-wang-all-but-non-tendered-20850/#comment-707253</link>
		<dc:creator>Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=20850#comment-707253</guid>
		<description>Wang will be missed. But he, like most MLB players, is replaceable. I would love to see the Yankees acquire Curtis Granderson and Edwin Jackson to fill up 2 holes with a single move. The problem, however, is who the Yankees would be willing to give up in such a trade. Detroit&#039;s asking price will probably be too high for both, but I wouldnt be suprised to see the Yankees trade for one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wang will be missed. But he, like most MLB players, is replaceable. I would love to see the Yankees acquire Curtis Granderson and Edwin Jackson to fill up 2 holes with a single move. The problem, however, is who the Yankees would be willing to give up in such a trade. Detroit&#8217;s asking price will probably be too high for both, but I wouldnt be suprised to see the Yankees trade for one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Stone</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/12/davidoff-wang-all-but-non-tendered-20850/#comment-706645</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=20850#comment-706645</guid>
		<description>I agree with your sentiment.  It gives too much downside protection to a player that underperforms.  And, it hurts a team by forcing them to lose control over a player because they do not want to overpay for poor performance.  There should be a fairer middleground in the rule.  I guess you just chalk this up as a win for the MLBPA in the last CBA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your sentiment.  It gives too much downside protection to a player that underperforms.  And, it hurts a team by forcing them to lose control over a player because they do not want to overpay for poor performance.  There should be a fairer middleground in the rule.  I guess you just chalk this up as a win for the MLBPA in the last CBA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/12/davidoff-wang-all-but-non-tendered-20850/#comment-706627</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=20850#comment-706627</guid>
		<description>Plenty of guys flameout after a few good yrs.  Hard to remember someone losing it as fast as him though. Tough to maintain it when you have one above avg pitch and cant stay healthy.

He&#039;ll be better off in the NL anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plenty of guys flameout after a few good yrs.  Hard to remember someone losing it as fast as him though. Tough to maintain it when you have one above avg pitch and cant stay healthy.</p>
<p>He&#8217;ll be better off in the NL anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CountryClub</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/12/davidoff-wang-all-but-non-tendered-20850/#comment-706508</link>
		<dc:creator>CountryClub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=20850#comment-706508</guid>
		<description>I believe part of the reason for this was that the Yanks were forcing him to throw different pitches.  They didnt want him to be a &quot;sinker all the time&quot; guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe part of the reason for this was that the Yanks were forcing him to throw different pitches.  They didnt want him to be a &#8220;sinker all the time&#8221; guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slugger27</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2009/12/davidoff-wang-all-but-non-tendered-20850/#comment-706370</link>
		<dc:creator>Slugger27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 05:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=20850#comment-706370</guid>
		<description>you make good points.

i guess whats bugging me is the fact that they lose control over him.... as in, they HAVE to pay him 4 million (knowing he certainly isnt worth that) or he becomes a FA and can sign with any team

i understand its intentions, it just kinda bothers me... i also think its not fair the rays are gonna have to let go of navarro just cuz of one bad year

i guess i can see why the rule is in place, just doesnt sit well with me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you make good points.</p>
<p>i guess whats bugging me is the fact that they lose control over him&#8230;. as in, they HAVE to pay him 4 million (knowing he certainly isnt worth that) or he becomes a FA and can sign with any team</p>
<p>i understand its intentions, it just kinda bothers me&#8230; i also think its not fair the rays are gonna have to let go of navarro just cuz of one bad year</p>
<p>i guess i can see why the rule is in place, just doesnt sit well with me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/3 queries in 0.002 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 395/395 objects using memcached

Served from: riveraveblues.com @ 2012-05-28 12:50:55 -->
