<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A real budget means Wang will move on</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riveraveblues.com/2010/01/a-real-budget-means-wang-will-move-on-23140/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2010/01/a-real-budget-means-wang-will-move-on-23140/</link>
	<description>A New York Yankees Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:34:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: scoopemup</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2010/01/a-real-budget-means-wang-will-move-on-23140/#comment-762263</link>
		<dc:creator>scoopemup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=23140#comment-762263</guid>
		<description>5 Our Fathers and 5 Hail Marys,now,get outta here you knucklehead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5 Our Fathers and 5 Hail Marys,now,get outta here you knucklehead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2010/01/a-real-budget-means-wang-will-move-on-23140/#comment-762223</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=23140#comment-762223</guid>
		<description>One guy is healthy and the other isn&#039;t. Now was that so hard to understand?

Yankee fans have to realize that Wang is basically done. He was a one pitch pitcher. He survived due to a 95 mph sinker like Kevin Brown. But unlike Brown, he never developed any secondary pitches. He fooled around with a slider but never trusted it. Now thanks to his shoulder his sinker is more in the high 80s as we saw last year. That&#039;s why he was getting creamed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One guy is healthy and the other isn&#8217;t. Now was that so hard to understand?</p>
<p>Yankee fans have to realize that Wang is basically done. He was a one pitch pitcher. He survived due to a 95 mph sinker like Kevin Brown. But unlike Brown, he never developed any secondary pitches. He fooled around with a slider but never trusted it. Now thanks to his shoulder his sinker is more in the high 80s as we saw last year. That&#8217;s why he was getting creamed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Juan</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2010/01/a-real-budget-means-wang-will-move-on-23140/#comment-762105</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=23140#comment-762105</guid>
		<description>And thanks TSJC, for realizing all of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And thanks TSJC, for realizing all of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Juan</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2010/01/a-real-budget-means-wang-will-move-on-23140/#comment-762104</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=23140#comment-762104</guid>
		<description>My comment was not intended to be degrading in the first place. I did not call anyone clueless, I was simply making an observation. When I realized I was wrong and I said so.

Then, Pete calls you clueless with no basis for such an insult, I make a post, in essence coming to your defense for being unnecessarily insulted, and you chastise me over the semantics of an earlier post. Doesn&#039;t make a ton of sense to me.

Trust me, if I&#039;m wrong about something when I post on here, I&#039;ll be more than willing to admit it and apologize. I have no reservations about admitting such failures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comment was not intended to be degrading in the first place. I did not call anyone clueless, I was simply making an observation. When I realized I was wrong and I said so.</p>
<p>Then, Pete calls you clueless with no basis for such an insult, I make a post, in essence coming to your defense for being unnecessarily insulted, and you chastise me over the semantics of an earlier post. Doesn&#8217;t make a ton of sense to me.</p>
<p>Trust me, if I&#8217;m wrong about something when I post on here, I&#8217;ll be more than willing to admit it and apologize. I have no reservations about admitting such failures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve H</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2010/01/a-real-budget-means-wang-will-move-on-23140/#comment-762101</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=23140#comment-762101</guid>
		<description>Unless said Wang belongs to Greg Oden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless said Wang belongs to Greg Oden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.D.</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2010/01/a-real-budget-means-wang-will-move-on-23140/#comment-762098</link>
		<dc:creator>A.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=23140#comment-762098</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the budget comes into play here, I think the Yanks are willing to spend X amount on Wang regardless of the rest of the contracts, but with what Nero has been saying, what Wang will receive &gt; X</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the budget comes into play here, I think the Yanks are willing to spend X amount on Wang regardless of the rest of the contracts, but with what Nero has been saying, what Wang will receive &gt; X</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.D.</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2010/01/a-real-budget-means-wang-will-move-on-23140/#comment-762095</link>
		<dc:creator>A.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=23140#comment-762095</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I see the Mets and Dodgers as better fits.&lt;/i&gt;

Especially since Wang could use the haven of the NL &amp; those two teams pitcher-friendly parks to get back on track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I see the Mets and Dodgers as better fits.</i></p>
<p>Especially since Wang could use the haven of the NL &amp; those two teams pitcher-friendly parks to get back on track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Pawlikowski</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2010/01/a-real-budget-means-wang-will-move-on-23140/#comment-762093</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Pawlikowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=23140#comment-762093</guid>
		<description>&quot;But according to most reports, Wang won’t be ready to sign until April or May.&quot;

But the whole point of this post centered on the idea that Wang could sign earlier, based on the Stark report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But according to most reports, Wang won’t be ready to sign until April or May.&#8221;</p>
<p>But the whole point of this post centered on the idea that Wang could sign earlier, based on the Stark report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommiesmithjohncarlos a/k/a Archimedes Torquemada</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2010/01/a-real-budget-means-wang-will-move-on-23140/#comment-762090</link>
		<dc:creator>tommiesmithjohncarlos a/k/a Archimedes Torquemada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=23140#comment-762090</guid>
		<description>They also don&#039;t think Mitre is good.

They think both Wang and Mitre are not good, but they wanted pitching depth and they chose to bring back Mitre and not Wang because... Mitre is easier to fit in a budget.

I&#039;m sure if the Yankees thought Wang wasn&#039;t good but Wang only cost 850k, Wang would still be in pinstripes and Mitre would be out on the street.  They chose the smaller upside depth pitcher for budgetary reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They also don&#8217;t think Mitre is good.</p>
<p>They think both Wang and Mitre are not good, but they wanted pitching depth and they chose to bring back Mitre and not Wang because&#8230; Mitre is easier to fit in a budget.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure if the Yankees thought Wang wasn&#8217;t good but Wang only cost 850k, Wang would still be in pinstripes and Mitre would be out on the street.  They chose the smaller upside depth pitcher for budgetary reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spaceman.Spiff</title>
		<link>http://riveraveblues.com/2010/01/a-real-budget-means-wang-will-move-on-23140/#comment-762088</link>
		<dc:creator>Spaceman.Spiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveraveblues.com/?p=23140#comment-762088</guid>
		<description>Hirsh? Who is that, the guy sitting next to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hirsh? Who is that, the guy sitting next to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

