Mar
07

Open Thread: The Boss and Mr. October

By

There’s really no rhyme or reason to it, but I found that picture to be pretty cool. It was taken during yesterday’s game by RAB’s (un)official Spring Training photographer, Kathy Willens of the AP. It’s a shame George isn’t around as much as he used to be, but in the end I guess it’s good, because the team is run much more intelligently and efficiently than before.

Anyway, use this sucker as your open thread tonight. The Ranger and Devils are both in action tonight, but feel free to talk about whatever you want. Just don’t be a dick.

Categories : Open Thread

494 Comments»

  1. bexarama says:

    ugh… ABC and Cablevision are having a tiff so ABC isn’t airing here, so no Oscars. Grrrr >:(

    • Hughesus Christo says:

      I think they’re streaming on oscars.com

      • Johan Iz My Brohan says:

        So I decided to stream the Oscar red carpet, and the first thing I see is Miley Cyrus <3

        (don't hurt me)

    • Jose says:

      I wish the award ceremony was more condensed. It seems like every year they add more filler and give me more reasons to watch only the last hour or so.

      • bexarama says:

        I absolutely love the Oscars. I love the filler, I love all the stupid BS about the dresses and whatnot, I love making fun of it all. What can I say.

      • Poopy Pants says:

        The entire ceremony is filler.
        Now they’re blatantly doing a commercial for each film.
        Just read about the results the next day and skip them patting themselves on the back for doing unimportant and irrelevant things.

  2. Johan Iz My Brohan says:

    “Just don’t be a dick.”

    Let the dickery begin!

  3. Even the Boss has to wear an ID tag? That made me chuckle.

  4. Shits and Giggles says:

    Anyone else excited about the Oscars? Hurt Locker all the way!

  5. Jose says:

    Oscar Winner Predictions:
    Best Picture – The Hurt Locker
    Best Director – Kathryn Bigelow
    Best Actor – Jeff Bridges
    Best Actress – Sandra Bullock
    Best Supporting Actor – Christopher Waltz
    Best Supporting Actress – Mo’Nique
    Best Cinematography – The Hurt Locker

    • JGS says:

      gotta figure Avatar will take cinematography, along with anything visual-related

      • Jose says:

        I think Avatar will get best art direction and visual effects. It shouldn’t win the cinematography award.

    • bexarama says:

      that’s pretty much what I think, but Avatar over The Hurt Locker. They always go for the big film, especially when Oscar’s ratings have been soooo low these past couple of years.

      If I could even SEE THE FREAKING AWARDS.

  6. 5-4-3 says:

    I never had the warm fuzzies for Stein-grabber as the Daily News used to call him. The man is a convicted felon who should have gone to jail if not for his father’s influence.

    The dickery has begun.

    • pat says:

      Love when people throw around the “convicted felon” tag. He made illegal campaign contributions, he’s not a murderer. Without him the Yanks could be the Mets….UGH

  7. Riddering says:

    I spent all day spring cleaning. The conclusion I came to is that I have way too much shit. Now that I’ve boxed and bagged all my surplus possessions the problem becomes who to spring it on.

    The only film I saw that’s nominated for any major Oscars is Up. How sad is that?

  8. Steve H says:

    Clay Buchholz’ first start of the spring was no walk in the park as the 25-year-old righthander allowed three runs on five hits in a game the Sox rallied to win, 5-4.

    So when is ESPN going to say he belongs in the pen?

    • JGS says:

      when they say Price and Wainwright should go back

    • bexarama says:

      not only that, but the Sox pitcher that got the win? Casey Kelly.

      • JGS says:

        why is that surprising?

      • Steve H says:

        Do you know who else won today?

        All of us, for being alive in a world where Casey Kelly exists.

        • @GordonEdes It’s a good sign when a veteran plate umpire, John Hirschbeck, lets it be known that he’s impressed with a kid, which he did with C. Kelly

          Oy vey.

          • bexarama says:

            Boston writers, most delusional to least delusional:
            CHB
            Edes
            Gammo (that’s right, he’s the LEAST delusional)

          • Zack says:

            @BBWA: We’re pleased to announce that the only member of the HoF Class of 2011 is Casey Kelly, who gained 110% of the vote.

            • Boston Globe-Were sorry to announce that Casey Kelly has just been traded to the Padres as a centerpiece in an Adrian Gonzalez deal. It’s just as well, since we now know that Kelly is a drug dealer, was found to be in possession of child pornography by a local librarian, and Homeland Security is investigating him for having connections to Al Quaeda.

          • ROBTEN says:

            @GordonEdes It’s a good sign when a veteran plate umpire, John Hirschbeck, lets it be known that he’s impressed with a kid, which he did with C. Kelly

            What’s the protocol on this? I assume that Hirshbeck didn’t run around asking everyone “How old is this kid?” in the kind of spontaneous way that Edes is reporting it, but rather was offering a comment in response to a question from either Edes or some other reporter. But, should an umpire be offering their opinions about any prospects? [Especially if it wasn't a response to a question.] I mean, regardless of whether it is Kelly or Montero, is this something that the umpires should respond to when asked about?

            Yes, I understand that umpires are just people and are certainly entitled to their opinions, but it doesn’t make sense to me that they should be giving public commentary on the performance of the players in a game that they were just officiating since they also play a part in determining the outcome of said game. I can understand responding to questions about calls, decisions, etc., but not the performances of prospects or any other players. It seems like a conflict of interest.

  9. Jose says:

    Is George wearing credentials around his neck? Who working there doesn’t know who he is?

  10. turn it says:

    I was 10 yrs old when the Yanks signed REG-GIE, REG-GIE, REG-GIE and he was the man. I was a kid but not long after he left, I knew he wasn’t one of the all time Yanks. The recent Yanks they need to make sure are a part of the fold for years to come would be Randolph, Mattingly (might have burned that bridge), Gator, O’Neill, Tino, Wells (damn right Wells). Others?

  11. Did anyone see Zach Galifianakis on SNL last night? He is one funny bastard.

  12. YankeesJunkie says:

    So I decided to create a fantasy baseball league through Yahoo and looking for people to join. It is a 20 team league and you guys should check it out and hopefully join if you are serious about it.

    League ID: 411990
    Password: Yankees28

    (Capital letter is important)

  13. In the above pic, who’s that shadowy figure in the background?

  14. Jake H says:

    There is nothing on tonight. So boring!

  15. If The Hurt Locker doesn’t win Best Picture, I’ll murder people.

  16. bexarama says:

    YAAAAY ABC is back and so are the Oscars!!! (girly squeal)

  17. Steve H says:

    So I have the #5 pick in my draft, assuming Pujols/Hanley/A-Rod (though the league is full of Sox fans), do I take whomever is left between Braun and Utley?

      • Steve H says:

        Yeah, I’m hoping he falls there but I know the guy picking in front of me loves him. I don’t want to take an OF with my first pick. I’m just hoping the A-Rod hate allows him to drop to me. The 5th pick really sucks, I’d rather be at 8 or 9 and then get a quick pick on the way back.

        • Big Juan says:

          Yea 5th is a shitty spot.

          Is it a roto-league? If it is and Utley is gone, I may reach for Crawford…not that taking Braun is a bad pick by any means. However, Crawford would give you a pretty big edge in SB’s for a roto-league.

          Just a thought.

  18. Alex S says:

    was it just me or was ryan reynolds trying to make a joke there?

  19. bexarama says:

    Hey Cameron Diaz looks really nice. Maybe she dressed up for Alex?

  20. YankeesJunkie says:

    Does anyone know who is going to be starting the next three days?

  21. My Best Picture ballot:

    1.) The Hurt Locker

    (decent-sized gap)

    2.) Up In The Air
    3.) Precious
    (small gap)
    4.) Inglorious Basterds

    (hard-to-define gap)

    5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.) Some ordering of Avatar, The Blind Side, An Education, A Serious Man, and Up, which are probably all awesome films that I regrettably didn’t see

    (gigantic, titanic, gargantuan, epic, incredibly, almost impossibly large gap)

    10.) District 9

  22. Alan says:

    I love Robert Downey Jr.

    • bexarama says:

      Ugh, he’s amazing. He was always so talented but obviously quite troubled. I’m glad that he seems to have everything under control now.

  23. T-Dubs says:

    We have any accountants that are also Yankee nerds? I have a simple question about the 1st time homebuyer’s credit.

    • Steve H says:

      Not an accountant, but I did buy a house and have all of you taxpayers gift me $8000, so thanks for that. If your question is somewhat easy I might be able to help.

    • Drew says:

      I have an accounting degree.. Unfortunately, this shat job market has me unemployed and I can give you no help.

    • T-Dubs says:

      It says for the federal that I need a “settlement statement.” but I don’t think I have any paperwork labeled as that. Is it called something else? I have the deed transfer that has the dollar amount and all the signatures on it but says nothing about settlement.

      • Steve H says:

        It should be the HUD settlement statement.

        Here’s a sample one. http://bit.ly/bEopkl

        • T-Dubs says:

          would I have gotten this at my closing? or is this something that I need to get from HUD now? Also, if I was supposed to get this at closing, can I still get a copy from HUD now to file with my federals?

          • Steve H says:

            Yeah, you should have gotten it at your closing. If you can’t find it I would probably contact HUD. I took the credit for my 2008 taxes (but bought house in 2009), so I didn’t have to really do anything extra when I filed. I’m not exactly sure what the process is now. I literally just checked a box that said I bought a house.

  24. Molly Ringwald?

    Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?

  25. Alan says:

    Molly Ringwald and Matthew Broderick announcing an award together? The 1980′s called, they want their poster children back.

  26. “Ladies and Gentlemen, please welcome Molly Ringwald and Matthew Broderick!”

    I literally was like “WTF, is it 1985?” before it clicked for me that it was a John Hughes tribute. I was lost for half a second.

    Also, Molly Ringwald looks like a redwood tree. Which is fitting, because she acts like a redwood tree.

  27. OOOOOOOOH, JUDD NELSON!

    He was f#$&%in’ harsh.

  28. Anthony Michael Hall has the constant smarm of a child molester.

  29. I don’t exactly root for Cablevision or the Dolan family, but outside of Lost (which I regrettably am many seasons behind on), is there a single thing worth watching on that entire network? Like…anything?

    To me, unless the deal was very favorable for Cablevision, they should have kept their strong-arm tactics up. ABC sucks.

  30. Alan says:

    You know, at first I was trying to figure out why Macauley Culkin looked so smarmy. But then I remembered, he’s banging Mila Kunis.

    Kudos, Macauley.

  31. I love some Zoe Saldana, but… no. This is not a solid choice. Overly busy, and not flattering.

  32. I must be really out of the pop culture loop. I have no idea who most of these people are, particularly the presenters. Most of them seem very unnatural up there.

    Your job for a living is to read off prompters or memorize scripts. And you somehow still managed to stammer and choppily mumble through three lines? HOW THE FUCK DID YOU GET A JOB?!

    Lastly, who the fuck are you (the presenters of the shorts)?

  33. I’m pretty disappointed to say I haven’t seen any of those documentaries. They didn’t get much attention. A real shame.

    Anyone see any of them?

  34. WTF!?
    That guy looks seriously confused right now.

  35. bexarama says:

    Ben Stiller always tries to do some weird gimmicky thing at the Oscars that always fails really badly.

    • Agreed. He’s like the always-tries-too-hard guy from college no one ever expected to do anything with a damn with their life. Inexplicably, he becomes famous and everyone loves him. Baffling. Dude is the same stupid stock character in EVERYTHING. He, along with Will Ferrell, are on my boycott list.

    • Pasqua says:

      Apparently they had a shot a Sacha Baron Cohen short that was supposed to parody Avatar but it was cut due to poor taste (or something to that effect). This might have been Plan B.

  36. What did everyone think of Star Trek? I enjoyed it, but I was never into the films/TV shows when I was younger.

  37. In the words of Chris Rock: take off that silly ass hat.

  38. That dude with that hat just had that “When will this dumb bitch shut the fuck up so I can say something about my marriage so I can get some pussy tonight?” look.

  39. bexarama says:

    that’s a loooootta dress.

    Rachel McAdams looks so much prettier as a brunette.

  40. Holy shit Rachel McAdams is talking quickly.

  41. Oh, look! It’s Tommie’s favorite movie!

  42. Since we’re on a movie theme here, I think the worst movie I’ve seen of late was the Ricky Gervais flick “The Invention of Lying”. It was horrid.

  43. Hobs says:

    Suck it up dammit.

  44. Pasqua says:

    I’m more understanding of “behind the scenes” people bringing the affect to their speeches, but spit it OUT, man!

  45. That was maybe the most heartfelt acceptance speech I’ve seen in a while. Kudos to that guy.

  46. Queen Latifah’s stylist >>>>>>>>>>>>> Zoe Saldana’s stylist

  47. Pasqua says:

    I have great respect for Steve Martin, but I heard somebody make a great point about him: thirty years ago the whole “I’m great, be in awe of me” schtick was hilarious because he was young and unproven, but now that he’s old and proven it comes off as stale and a little to sincere.

  48. bexarama says:

    WTF is Vera Farmiga wearing? It looks like a sofa.

  49. Alan says:

    If Up in the Air doesn’t win Best Actress in a Supporting Role I’m turning off the Oscars.

  50. Pasqua says:

    Uh-oh. Here comes the affect.

    • Pasqua says:

      Great performance or not, it’s that self-important bullshit that I can’t stand. You made a movie. You were good. Congratulations. Let’s not make it out to be more than it is.

  51. Steve H says:

    What does everyone think about The Wrestler? I finally saw it last night and was disappointed based on everything I had heard about it. It was decent, and I loved the soundtrack, but wasn’t what I was hoping for.

    Though I’m sure George Costanza loved it.

    • Pasqua says:

      I agree with you. I thought it was kind of flimsy and just followed the “down and out protagonist” formula. When I heard “You Don’t Know What You’ve Got ‘Til It’s Gone” blaring out of Rourke’s cassette player 5-minutes into the movie I realized it was going to be more trite than expected.

  52. Wow, Nancy Pelosi looks almost human.

  53. Ivan says:

    Big ups to Mo’Nique for winning a oscar.

    • Poopy Pants says:

      Did anyone else interpret her speech as a shot at Halle Berry? “Thanks for giving the award based on talent, not politics.” Halle didn’t deserve for Oscar. The guilt ridden liberals gave it to Halle for being black and doing a serious role, even though she wasn’t great in it.

  54. Ugh. Shut up about “survival”, say thanks and leave.

  55. Why is Keanu there?

    And SJP will always look like a horse.

  56. bexarama says:

    Some of the ladies tonight have rather tragic outfits.

  57. What the hell is that man doing wearing that shimmery dress?

    /SarahJessicaParkerJoke’d

  58. The irony of this woman winning an award for costume design should not be lost on any of us.

    • bexarama says:

      Heh, as someone who was a costume geek for a few years, she really knows what she’s doing when it comes to costume design though. The stuff from The Aviator is just drool-worthy.

      • Pasqua says:

        Out of curiosity, how does one become a costume geek and then, more importantly, un-become a costume geek?

        • Hard drugs, rehab, relapse.

          amiriteorwut?

        • bexarama says:

          I used to be really into theater when I like came out of high school, and I worked in the costume shop at my college for a while to make some money. I just really liked it. I still love costumes and stuff. But then, pretty much everyone involved in the theater stuff at my school – the professors, the other adults, and especially the other kids – were just soooo awful (I wrote another word there originally that was a lot stronger than awful) that they pretty much turned me off theater entirely.

  59. Hobs says:

    Woah that was a bomb.

  60. Pasqua says:

    Wow, you already have two of those statues? You poor baby. Your shelf space situation must really be a problem for you.

  61. Why do they take up valuable time by showing things like Best Costume Director? I don’t see Best Boy Grip or Best Production Intern up there.

    Actors, directors, screenwriters, special effects, film categories. No more makeup, costume, producers, etc. These awards shows are always bloated with too much crap.

    You want to recognize them? Fine, but don’t televise it and subject the viewer to it.

  62. Ooooh, a tribute to whore movies! This oughta be good.

  63. Jaws? Jaws is a “horror” movie?

    (goes to dictionary, looks up word ‘suspense’)

  64. How many of these are actually horror movies? A third of them? Stupid montage.

  65. Ivan says:

    You know I would love to see host the Oscars? Paul Mooney. Just so I want to see how offensive he’ll be.

  66. bexarama says:

    did they just try to sneak in one of the Twilight movies as a horror film????

    (The Shining kinda rules)

  67. JobaWockeeZ says:

    I traded Matt Cain for Ben Sheets and Joba. Good trade or bad?

  68. /waits for Steve H. to make a comment about Jaws being on there.

  69. You can always spot the sound guys a mile away, can’t you?

    He’s got a face (and a haircut) made for radio.

  70. It’s like Martin Sheen and the bad guy in Die Hard had a lovechild.

  71. Reggie C. says:

    The Hurt Locker is a good movie.

    But its not a better film than Inglorious Basterds. Or Avatar. Or District 9. Or UP in the Air. Or UP.

  72. bexarama says:

    Isn’t there some sound mixing guy that’s been nominated like 23 times without winning? Is he nominated this year?

  73. It’s a shame his son died and he didn’t.

  74. Saw that guy on a 60 Minutes special. Amazing stuff.

  75. Shouldn’t they show, you know, clips for this award?

  76. bexarama says:

    yay awkward In Memoriam segment

  77. Controller: Er, some good news, gentlemen. We have quite a treat for you. We’ve been able to coax superstar James Taylor in here to Mission Control to wish you well and play you a little bit of his own brand of laid-back adult contemporary music.
    Homer: Wow, former president James Taylor!
    Taylor: How ya doin’, fellas?
    Buzz: With all due respect, Mr. Taylor, this isn’t the best time for your unique brand of bittersweet folk rock. We have a potentially critical situation here. I’m sure you’ll understand.
    Taylor: Listen, Aldrin, I’m not as laid back as people think. Now here’s the deal: I’m going to play, and you’re going to float there and like it.

    [sings]
    When you’re down, and troubled,
    And you need a helping hand,
    And nothing, oh, nothing is going right…

  78. Wah, wah, wah. Dead people. Get on with it!

  79. Pasqua says:

    What I have always found darkly humorous about the “in memoriam” segment of the Oscars is the fluctuation of applause throughout the montage. Some get huge applause, others get nothing. So, more applause sort of equals more meaningful death. It’s bizarre.

  80. Steve H says:

    Buster Olney:Heard this from a talent evaluator: Cole Hamels’s body language on the mound is much different than last year — he’s more assertive.

    Seriously Buster, SERIOUSLY!!!!!

    Are you fucking with me?

    • bexarama says:

      Mitch Williams said on MLB Network that the reason Cole Hamels was so “bad” in 2009 was that he became a celebrity after 2008 and “couldn’t say no” and didn’t get his work done.

      • Steve H says:

        I expect it from Mitch Williams.

        Mitch Williams has a job because he was a major league player, and an eccentric one at that.

        Buster Olney has a job because someone thought he knew what the hell he was talking about.

        • bexarama says:

          your point: it is a good one.

          Olney’s generally not an idiot, too, while Mitch Williams is… uh… Mitch Williams.

    • His arms weren’t akimbo=better ERA. That shit’s practically written in stone. C’mon Steve, get with it. Buster knows what’s up.

    • I wonder what made Cole Hamels less successful last year. Was it his control? No, everything there was almost exactly the same as the year before. In fact, he had better a BB/9 than in 2008. Was it lack of strikeouts? No, he had the same K/9 and K/BB numbers. Then it must have been a lack of assertiveness. Either that or a .325 BABIP, up from .270 in ’08.

  81. Don’t be fooled by the asymmetric haute couture dress that she’s got
    She’s just, she’s just Jenny from the block

  82. What in the red fuck is this? Have I been drinking?

  83. I’m about as entertained as I’d be watching The View.

  84. JLO looks pretty pale. Has she been dating Sammy Sosa?

  85. I’m quite sick of both of these guys.

  86. I hope D-9 wins just to piss Tommie off.

  87. bexarama says:

    God Up in the Air was so good. I know it has no chance though.

  88. Luis Polonia says:

    Hey guys, does anybody know what time the gates open at GMS field for 1:05 games? I’m in Tampa and plan on attending tomorrow and Wednesday’s games. Thanks in advance.

  89. Oh, hey, Alec Baldwin is there.

  90. Steve H says:

    Hey, did gritty Brett Gardner’s cousin in a law ever send in the picture of Brett holding up something RAB related?

  91. Fisher Stevens was on my subway train when I left the World Series last year. I took a picture. That is all.

  92. Tyler Perry should be placed a raft and sent out to sea. Horrible.

  93. Once again, shouldn’t they show clips for this?

  94. A.D. says:

    Just me or Tyler Perry, not funny?

  95. Hangoverologist says:

    Given how the talk of Hamels is going on in this thread, would anybody want to get him if the Phils don’t extend him when his deal expires? He’ll be 30 and will likely have bounced back from 2009 and established a new norm for himself.

    • A.D. says:

      Just like with anyone, for the right contract, Hamels is an incredibly talented pitcher

    • He’ll be way overpaid for #3 starter production. Pass.

      • Steve H says:

        Agreed and I hope we don’t need him. Keep stockpiling the young arms and avoid overpaying pitching in the FA market.

      • Except he’s likely not going to be producing at a third starter level. He had a shitty year BABIP wise last year (and maybe he gives up a few too many homers), but everything else (BB/9, K/9, HR/9, FIP) was exactly the same as 2008.

        • Ok, maybe number two. He’s better than he was in 2009, but I wouldn’t spend $18 mil. per year + on him, which is what he’ll cost. He’ll be marketed as an ace. He isn’t.

          Prediction: In the AL East, he’d put up an ERA of 3.65-3.80 with a WHIP around 1.260

          • If that’s your number three starter in the A.L. East, you’re gonna be pretty happy.

            • I corrected myself and said #2. He’s a good pitcher, but will a guy with a really weak fastball age well? He’d need top-notch control, a really tight curve and an excellent changeup. Now, his change is among the best and his curve is mediocre. If he relies a lot on deception and a great change, that’s a big risk to toss a huge deal at. Would I be shocked at all if the guy continued to be excellent? No, not at all. He was hurt by a high BABIP last season. Still, I’d be hesitant to throw big cash at a guy with workload concerns and an already-weak fastball as he ages.

    • He’ll only be 28 (B. 1983) when his deal is done (2011).

      And, yes, I’d love to get him.

      • Hangoverologist says:

        He still has an arb year after that, so he’s a free agent in 2013.

      • Steve H says:

        How well do you think his stuff would play in the AL East for 30 starts a year though? Average FB is right around 90 MPH. As he ages it’s likely to slow down. I can see him becoming Barry Zito II.

        • True, but he misses more bats than Zito did and his changeup is top notch.

          Obviously, we’ll have to see what he does in ’10 and forward, though.

          • Steve H says:

            Over Zito’s 1st 536 innings he was getting 7.8 k/9. Transport him to the NL and he’s well over 8 if not in the 9′s. Of course the huge red flags were with Zito by the time he was a FA (yet ignored). We’ll see where Hamels ends up the next few years, maybe he doesn’t regress.

  96. bexarama says:

    this has been a pretty boring ceremony (though I’m happy I got to see it at all) but the stage is really pretty.

    /pointless comment’d

  97. Re: that Dancing With the Stars ad:

    Shannon Doherty looks like she ate the cast of whatever the hell show she was most recently on.

  98. Mmmm…milk…from babysitters from Peru. Mmmm…

  99. bexarama says:

    this is… a strange group of people.

    Oh God are they doing that awkward “talk to the nominee” BS they did last year? Noooooo

  100. Vera Farmiga just looks ridiculous. Flat out ridiculous.

  101. Colin Farrell re: Jeremy Renner:

    Yeah, I hit that.

  102. bexarama says:

    I love you Kate Winslet <3333

  103. (looks it up out of curiosity)

    Lloyd Bridges died over 12 years ago.

    (feels old)

  104. Let’s fucking go, Jeff.

  105. Have you guys seen The Squid and the Whale?

  106. Oooooh, I wonder which nominee Oprah is gonna introduce!?!

  107. Drew says:

    Sean Penn needs to get back on the juice.

  108. Wait a Sean Penn speech without some political message? Where am I?

  109. Ivan says:

    Congrates Sandra Bulluck

  110. Frankly, Sandra Bullock having an Oscar for acting is just as shocking as Monique having an Oscar for acting.

    We’re through the looking glass, people.

    • bexarama says:

      haha

      I thought everyone got over the “OMG! ____ has an Oscar!” when Julia Roberts won (except Julia Roberts was really good in the movie she won for, though not better than a few other people she was nominated with, and I didn’t see The Blind Side so I can’t comment on it).

    • Poopy Pants says:

      Hollywood LOVES the guilt-ridden white liberal character who ‘rescues’ the helpless, lazy, dumb minority character. It extremely racist and makes them feel good about themselves.

      • That’s a massive boversimplification. What Hollywood loves about Sandra Bullock and The Blind Side is the $250,000,000 it raked it. When the movie was released Michael Lewis distanced himself from it and it wasn’t seen as a serious Oscar contender or expected to do well other than with Sandra Bullock fans. That movie wasn’t exactly a darling of the “Hollywood elites” you speak of, it was the darling of Middle America.

        Middle America loved the theme of that movie, not Hollywood. You have to be careful when you throw around those generalizations.

        • Drew says:

          No offense but.. Do you really have a tap on Hollywood? Can you honestly say Hollywood didn’t love it?

          • I can say that honestly, but not definitively. But you can say the same thing about anyone else’s opinion, so you can say the same thing about people who hold the opposite opinion.

            We’re all dealing in opinion in this conversation. Your point is irrelevant.

          • Drew says:

            You say Hollywood didn’t like it. I question it because every channel I turned on raved about The Blind Side for a feel good story.

            • When you filter the reviews for “top critics” on rottentomatoes.com, The Blind Side gets a 58% positive rating. That’s not a ringing endorsement, so clearly just because every review you saw was positive doesn’t mean they all were.

              I’m not saying Hollywood didn’t like the movie, you’re either misunderstanding or misrepresenting what I’m saying and what I said. I said above that Hollywood liked the movie, I just disagree with the reason why.

              • Drew says:

                Okay, I don’t know what rotten tomatoes is..

                When you say;

                “Middle America loved the theme of that movie, not Hollywood.”

                That comes across to me that Hollywood wasn’t particularly in favor of this movie’s theme. If you’re saying Hollywood “liked it,” they just didn’t really “love it,” I think you should have differentiated.

                The only reason I agreed with Poopy Pants is that from all the reviews I heard on the news, I heard “Great feel good story.” Literally, every one. I think people(Hollywood Elites) in Hollywood would have loved to be part of the aforementioned 250 million dollar ride.

                • “Okay, I don’t know what rotten tomatoes is..”

                  It’s a very popular website that collects movie reviews and other movie-related information. They have a TV show and everything.

                  “When you say;
                  ‘Middle America loved the theme of that movie, not Hollywood.’
                  That comes across to me that Hollywood wasn’t particularly in favor of this movie’s theme.”

                  Right. The THEME. As in, I don’t think “Hollywood” (I’m not sure what the posters above really meant by “Hollywood” anyway, but I’ll roll with the term) loved the movie because of its patronizing racial overtones (which I think many of the fans of the movie probably enjoyed), I think Hollywood loved the movie because it made a shitload of money.

                  “If you’re saying Hollywood ‘liked it,’ they just didn’t really ‘love it,’ I think you should have differentiated.”

                  That’s not what I was saying, at all. I don’t know where in this conversation anyone mentioned a matter of degree. I think what I was saying was pretty clear, and I’ve explained it again in this comment.

                  “The only reason I agreed with Poopy Pants is that from all the reviews I heard on the news, I heard ‘Great feel good story.’ Literally, every one.”

                  Again, as I already showed above, you clearly didn’t encounter enough reviews of the film, because almost half the reviews by respected sources were negative. Not just ‘not glowing,’ but negative.

                  “I think people(Hollywood Elites) in Hollywood would have loved to be part of the aforementioned 250 million dollar ride.”

                  You’ve completely lost the script, man. Do you think I disagree with that statement – do you think I don’t think Hollywood loved the $250,000,000 the move made? Because in my first comment in this conversation I said the following:

                  “What Hollywood loves about Sandra Bullock and The Blind Side is the $250,000,000 it raked it.”

                  I’m sorry, but I think you’re a little confused.

                • Drew says:

                  What confused me was the fact that you said it was a darling of Middle America, not the Hollywood Elite. Personally, I thought Hollywood loved it. Again, citing the reviews I saw/heard. If what you say is true then I’m incorrect there, I’m not much of a film connoisseur.

                  However, we do disagree with the fact that I believe Hollywood liked the story(partially) because of the racial overtones. I think that was a huge selling point. That’s where we disagree.

                  No problema.

                • “What confused me was the fact that you said it was a darling of Middle America, not the Hollywood Elite. Personally, I thought Hollywood loved it.”

                  And, like I explained, you clearly just misunderstood what I said. I said Hollywood loved it for the money it made.

                  “Again, citing the reviews I saw/heard. If what you say is true then I’m incorrect there, I’m not much of a film connoisseur.”

                  What I said is true, I didn’t make it up. You can check rottentomatoes yourself.

                  “However, we do disagree with the fact that I believe Hollywood liked the story(partially) because of the racial overtones. I think that was a huge selling point.”

                  Ok… If it was a huge selling point… Then who exactly loved the racial overtones? Hollywood, or the audience? Read my initial comment again. What I said was that the audience loved the themes in the movie, including what I would consider to be a patronizing racial tone, but what Hollywood loved about the move was the money it made.

                  There’s a distinction here I don’t think you’re catching. If you think the patronizing racial undertones of the movie were a selling point… Then the people who bought the movie liked that aspect, not necessarily the people selling the movie. The people selling the movie liked the money, the people buying the movie liked the story and theme.

                  I don’t even think you really disagree with me, I think you’re just kinda missing the point of what I’ve been saying.

                  (Just btw, I’m ducking out of this convo, so I won’t be responding any more.)

                • Drew says:

                  heh, I was agreeing with you, I said I was incorrect. I trust that you weren’t making the stuff up from rottentomatoes.

  111. Drew says:

    How long can she talk for? I thought they had a limit.

  112. Reggie C. says:

    Is it me … or is Kathryn Bigelow kinda of a MILF.

  113. Hughesus Christo says:

    Kathryn Bigelow is 58?!?!?!?

  114. bexarama says:

    ZOMG A LADY WON!!!!!!

  115. Ugh, I’m tired of hearing that she won because she’s a woman and she sees herself as a ground-breaker. She directed a good movie; it’s not about her being a woman.

  116. Alex S says:

    Cameron must be seething

  117. Poopy Pants says:

    Tom Hanks has terrible hair plugs.

  118. Alex S says:

    wanna hear something funny?

  119. Reggie C. says:

    Wow. That was quick. Running up against the midnight hour. Too bad, i enjoy Tom Hanks whenever he takes the stage.

  120. NY Post headline:

    “Huge Hurt Locker Explosion”

  121. Hangoverologist says:

    Hurt Locker wins Best Picture. Jorge!

  122. Did Alec Baldwin just slap Kathryn Bigelow on the ass?

  123. Hughesus Christo says:

    Good job, Academy.

    No complaints with the winners, at least with the winners considering these nominees.

  124. I feel like best picture this year was like the A.L. MVP race:

    THL was Joe Mauer–clearly the best and most deserving–but I had a nagging fear the voters would go for the big name with the recognizable stats–Avatar/Tex. I’m glad both voting parties got it right.

  125. There is not one thing at Duncan Donuts anyone could respectably call “delicious”

  126. Drew says:

    I saw about 10 minutes of the Oscars. It’s not my scene. Was The Hangover nominated for anything?

    -Serious question. IMO Avatar sucked, I;ve seen the hangover about 10 times, makes me laugh every time.

    • Cecala says:

      Really? The first time I saw the Hangover I thought it was hysterical. I saw it again and did not find it as funny. I felt like a lot of the humor was due to the random factor, ie the asian in the trunk, so I knew it was coming the second time.

      • Drew says:

        Heh, it gets me every time.

        Since no one answered me, I’m going to assume the Oscars do not recognize comedies as respectable film. This I do not understand. Make a kid’s movie or a movie about something Sci-fi/horrible, otherwise, you’re not nominated. Is that how it works?

Leave a Reply

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

If this is your first time commenting on River Ave. Blues, please review the RAB Commenter Guidelines. Login for commenting features. Register for RAB.