Comments on: Getting in on the Jackson action

By: steve (different one)

steve (different one) — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:47:15 +0000

this is easily the most intriguing rumor i’ve heard this entire deadline.

By: Kiersten

Kiersten — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:42:02 +0000

I was gonna say, I thought I read earlier that the Nats don’t want Jackson.

By: Steve H

Steve H — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:37:58 +0000

Per Kurkjian Sox are not flipping Jackson for Dunn.

By: dsadw

dsadw — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:37:50 +0000

3 W – b i g b o o b f r i e n d s . C -O- M}) Interracial dating or relationship is not a problem there, but a great merit to cherish!
You are guaranteed to be your r the one of them.

By: tommiesmithjohncarlos a/k/a Ridiculous Upside the Elder

tommiesmithjohncarlos a/k/a Ridiculous Upside the Elder — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:31:49 +0000

Possible, but not quite. Skaggs and Colvin have great upside (Hudsonesque), and Saunders fills a need for that team.

By: Steve H

Steve H — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:31:43 +0000

I’m sure we could have gotten one of those guys if necessary though. My main point is, seriously, Edwin Jackson can get you Adam Dunn (+2 picks)?

By: mikebk

mikebk — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:31:16 +0000

ok, cause i have also seen Hudson described as a middle reliever. thanks for the info.

By: tommiesmithjohncarlos a/k/a Ridiculous Upside the Elder

tommiesmithjohncarlos a/k/a Ridiculous Upside the Elder — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:30:44 +0000

Perhaps.

By: tommiesmithjohncarlos a/k/a Ridiculous Upside the Elder

tommiesmithjohncarlos a/k/a Ridiculous Upside the Elder — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:30:25 +0000

Yes. A considerable one. Hudson has been described as a potential #2/#3. Nova’s strictly back-end.

By: tommiesmithjohncarlos a/k/a Ridiculous Upside the Elder

tommiesmithjohncarlos a/k/a Ridiculous Upside the Elder — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:29:40 +0000

Bingo.