Jul
17

Fixing the All-Star Game: A Battle of the Ages

By

This is a guest post from RAB Shop extraordinaire Tyler Wilkinson. So read it, then go buy something.

Baseball’s mid-summer classic, once an avenue for die-hard fans to catch a glimpse of cross-country superstars, has descended into a watered down exhibition featuring all of the players we watch every night on MLB.tv and every morning on Sportscenter. With the appeal fading, several years ago Commissioner Bud Selig took the radical step of turning this meaningless event into the deciding factor for home-field advantage in the World Series. Yes, crazy. Believe it or not, the possibility of Aaron Crow influencing home-field advantage hasn’t yielded the results Selig was looking for. With that in mind, I have an unrealistic crackpot idea to drive up interest.

A battle for of the ages.

Problem 1, the rosters are too damn big. Peace out Aaron Crow. Royals, you want an All-Star, trade Hosmer and Moose Tacos to the Yankees for A-Rod. Picking on Aaron Crow is fun. Kidding aside, trying to include a member of every squad is diluting the talent pool and lessening the experience. Solution: 25 man rosters. Done.

Problem 2, Joe Buck & Tim McCarver. Do the right thing, Fox.

Problem 3, people aren’t tuning in to watch AL vs. NL anymore. We need a twist. How about a battle of old vs. new? Jeter vs. Cano? Lester vs. Gonzalez? Good vs. Good? Evil vs. Evil? Taking this year’s injury-riddled lineups and splitting them into the 25 youngest players I find interesting and the 25 oldest players I find interesting, let’s see how the rosters fill out.

Young Punks

C:  McCann
1B: Fielder
2B: Cano
3B: Sandoval
SS: Reyes (we’ll roll with the fan vote)
OF: Braun
OF: Kemp
OF: Upton
DH: Votto

SP: Lincecum
SP: Hernandez (F-Her, don’t forget to spread the nickname)
SP: Lester
SP: Price
SP: Hamels
RP: Weaver
RP: Cain
RP: Kershaw
RP: Pineda
RP: Jurrjens
CL: Robertson (shut up, it’s my list!)

BN: Avila
BN: McCutchen
BN: Tulowitzki
BN: Martin (3 catchers to swap out in the ASG seems reasonable)
BN: Bruce

Thoughts: Relievers not named Mo probably don’t belong in the ASG, apologies to Aaron Crow. That is a ridiculous pitching staff. I hope Lester hits Youkilis in his ugly ribs.

Old Geezers

C: Molina (I double checked. It’s not Gustavo)
1B: Gonzalez, Ad.
2B: Phillips
3B: Rodriguez
SS: Jeter
OF: Bautista
OF: Granderson
OF: Hamilton
DH: Holliday

SP: Halladay
SP: Sabathia
SP: Lee
SP: Verlander (the youngest of the old geezers & the exact middle point)
SP: Beckett
RP: Shields
RP: Wilson, Brian (have to break the no relievers rule)
RP: Valverde (and again, gross)
RP: Bell  (and again)
RP: Wilson, CJ
CL:  Rivera (forever and ever)

BN: Montero, Mig.
BN: Beltran
BN: Berkman
BN: Kendrick (someone’s gotta backup the middle infield)
BN: Youkilis (gross)

Thoughts: While the youngsters have a ridiculous pitching staff, the old folks have some big guns of their own up front with a familiar face closing it down. There’s a lot of pop in the old guys’ lineup.

While not perfect (Valverde survived the cut), I still believe the new format would increase interest. Baseball would have an avenue to market their phenomenal young stars to a national audience and the fat of the current system would be trimmed right off.  Plus, the novelty of seeing a Reyes/Cano double play combo is probably more appealing than the standard AL/NL lineups that people have grown accustomed to.  The one thing I think we can all agree on is that home-field advantage being decided in an exhibition game three months before the World Series is ridiculous and unnecessary.  While a radical alteration like the one I proposed is unrealistic, correcting home-field advantage is a simple step that needs to be fixed yesterday. That and Joe Buck.

52 Comments»

  1. Tony says:

    cutting the roster to 25 is to radical for me. This IS an exhibition. This game is just for Fun. Every team should have an All-Star so each teams fan can have a small sense of pride regarding their player tipping a cap.

    As for a solution – I propose that you keep the rosters the same – but let the players have a vested interest. The home run derby is interesting because the players actually want to be their. I propose you have a veteran player act as a manager & select his player coaches. If the player has clout it make for an interesting game.

    Another option is the NHL option of a player draft – that is also appealing.

    • Jerome S. says:

      Yeah, but you can’t tell me that every team has a good player. Case in point: The Orioles. They have TALENTED players, players who are certainly capable of being All-Stars, but for the most part none of them have achieved that level.

      And I think that rosters should be cut because it’s an exhibition; to wit, the fewer players, the better. The starters for each team sucked in the first place, but after the first two innings no one cared because non-stars were playing at that point. Less players, more stars.

      • I mean, as an Orioles fan, can you really take that much pride in Ty Wigginton’s selection to the All Star team in 2010 when everybody knows that he’s only there to fill a quota?

        If I’m a Pirates fan (which I am, a little bit), I’d be proud of Andrew McCutchen’s inclusion this year, he’s awesome.

        Evan Meek in 2010? Not so much.

        • Agreed. For those of us who remember it I doubt anyone felt much pride in Scott Sanderson’s selection as the required lone Yankee in the ’91 ASG. Just my opinion, but getting one guy in the ASG just because it’s required, as opposed to it being earned, really isn’t a point of pride so much as it is a little embarrassing.

          • Yeah, what’s more embarrassing: Not having any players good enough to make the ASG, or being so bad that they have to give you pity with a token selection?

            What’s worse, getting blown out, or having the other team stop trying because they don’t want to hurt your feelings with a true blowout?

          • DCBX says:

            The ’91 season as a whole was a painful and embarrassing experience. Better Sanderson than to have Eric Plunk or Bob Geren repping the pinstripes. Ew.

            I personally think the ASG needs an East v. West format… fans are more likely to be engaged by geographic rivalries like CA/NY than by AL v. NL.

            The player from every team rule… isn’t optimal, but if Jeter is going to be voted in 2-5 more times when obviously not the best player at his position…. the least we can do is let Aaron Crow get an inning or have Butler and Wigginton pinch hit.

  2. AaronGuielWithASmile says:

    I definitely think they should go with the NHL’s idea of deciding the rosters by fantasy draft. Let each manager select a team captain, and have that guy select the roster.

    • Mike HC says:

      Unless they literally pick the team on the field grade school gym class style (not sure if they do that in the NHL), I don’t know how much better randomly selected teams would be over NL vs AL.

      I always thought the NHL did America vs the World. I actually think that would be the way to go for MLB. That would add some interest for me for sure.

      And agree with the article that home field advantage and Joe Buck have to go.

      • Mike HC says:

        Also, the, the young vs old is definitely an upgrade on the current format. Although, it seems like being picked for the old all stars is like a backhanded compliment.

      • John says:

        you didn’t watch the drafting special?

        the two captains took turns picking a player from the pool of voted players.

        so its not like gym or recess, but its just like a true draft with each team getting the jersey and such.

        It made things interesting to see teammates face each other, when going by league/conference you know that’s not possible.

        • Mike HC says:

          Not a hockey fan. I think I am most in favor of changing it around every couple of years. NL vs AL, then picked by captains, USA vs World, Young vs Old, and whatever other ideas they come up with throughout the years. You can even have fan votes some years on what set up they want as well.

      • DCBX says:

        America getting F$%*in waxed by the DR on an annual basis? Meh. Not so much.

  3. Ryan says:

    I have thought that a new way to do the All-Star game is to eliminate it completely and replace it with a World Baseball Classic Tournament. The fans vote for players to represent the US (combine both AL & NL players for 1 team). Have the All-Star break be about a week long, and have a single elimination tournament using various baseball stadiums around the country.

  4. Monteroisdinero says:

    Since winning the ASG means home field advantage that year for the WS, how about giving it to the league whose team has the best record in baseball at the allstar break? That team may not get to the world series and use it but it gives a bit more incentive to the first half of the season. Tiebreakers etc. as needed. Then the ASG is truly for fun and pride and nothing of WS consequence.

  5. Love it. Short of eliminating interleague play (and rolling back all the technological advances that allow us to see players in both leagues and in every city whenever we want) I don’t think interest in the ASG can ever really be brought back to where it used to be, but I do think this idea would generate some more interest in the game.

    • I think it’s alright, I’m not crazy about it, but I think it’s better than the current format. Maybe they could try to change it up every year, within limits, of course, because they could start doing some ridiculous stuff. The age thing one year, US/World the next, let captains (leading vote getters) pick, do it geographically (East/West? North/South?), former college players vs. former high school players/International signees.

      • Yeah I’m fine with changing the format – not sure if every year is the best idea, since it generally takes people a little while to get used to/into something new. But the NHL changes it up every few years, I could see MLB doing something like that and I wouldn’t have any problem with it.

  6. Pasqua says:

    LOVE the Old vs. Young match-up. As a matter of fact, with all of the “controversey” about the fan vote, I think the game stipulation should be controlled by the fans. So, give them a choice. Something like, “Do you want to see: A) AL vs. NL; B) Young vs. Veteran; C) Signs of the Zodiac, or; D) New Contracts vs. Expiring Contracts?” That’ll shake it up!

  7. Owen Two says:

    I’d like to see the All-Star weekend replaced by two home-and-home series of inter-league play against a ‘natural’ rival (Yankees-Mets, Jints, A’s, etc.). I realize some of the rivalries would have to be manufactured, but that’s life.

    Every other year, I’d use vistor’s rules: no DH in Yankee Stadium, DH in CitiField.

    /just my 2 cents

  8. Jonathan Harker says:

    No no no. Old vs. Young? No. The best way to make the ASG better is to eliminate interleague play. Just get rid of it as it has run its course. Nobody cares about Mets-Yankees or White Sox-Cubs anymore. Get rid of HFA at stake in the game.

    People always say, well why isn’t the game as important as the 70s? Because baseball is everywhere now. There’s more than one game on tv per week. You can get all the games on radio. Internet. It will never be like it was back then so stop trying the stupid gimmicks like HFA at stake in the ASG.

    • Nobody cares about Mets-Yankees or White Sox-Cubs anymore.

      The premium prices that those tickets go for on the secondary market would tend to disagree with you.

      Interleague play has flaws, yes, but it hasn’t “run its course”. For cities with natural interleague rivalries (Cubs/White Sox, Mets/Yankees, Angels/Dodgers, A’s/Giants, Reds/Indians, Cardinals/Royals, O’s/Nationals, Rangers/Astros), those matchups are still tremendously popular and tremendously profitable.

      You may not give a shit about White Sox/Cubs, but Chicagoans who speak with their wallets do, and both of those franchises would much rather play each other 6 games a year instead of 6 more dates with the Royals/Twins/Mariners/Brewers/Pirates/Nationals/what have you.

  9. Mattpat11 says:

    I didn’t find Aaron Crow’s inclusion nearly as appalling as Brandon League.

  10. Matt Warden says:

    Very creative solution, Tyler. Haha, well done!

  11. Levi says:

    Lol at Fielder playing 1st and Votto DHing.

  12. Favrest says:

    Here’s a great solution: make the All Star break an intermission instead of a game. Turn an all star status into an award like a silver slugger.

    If Bud Selig really wanted to make the all star game meaningful he would have never allowed it to end in a tie. Hopefully, he’ll retire soon. Or die, whichever is great for the game.

    • Mike HC says:

      I give Selig some credit for at least trying something to get more interest going in the all star game. Obviously, it didn’t work, and it was not a good idea. But the fact that the all star game and weekend is boring is really not his fault.

      • Mike HC says:

        Along with a shortened home run derby, I would add an obstacle course type event for some of the quicker, more athletic guys. Kind of like what the NBA has for the point guards.

        Maybe something like set up areas where the players have to throw a ball from the outfield into a bucket at home Tom Emanski style. Run around the bases once, and tehn hit one batting practice home. Maybe add one more thing. And time them. That would be pretty cool to watch I think.

  13. Frigidevil says:

    Seeing how this is the only all star game that ‘counts’, and this is the one sport where it’s hard to determine anything from a single game, why not make it an all star series? Best of 3. The games will seem like actual games, starters will get actual starts, and you can extend it to all star week with more events like the NHL skills competition. Have a MLB version of those impossible boardwalk games.

    Yeah I know, injury risk yadda yadda but if you’re gonna go unorthodox, why not go all out?

  14. SodaPopinski says:

    Sounds fun.
    I’d watch old vs young.
    Great Idea.

Leave a Reply

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

If this is your first time commenting on River Ave. Blues, please review the RAB Commenter Guidelines. Login for commenting features. Register for RAB.