Talkin’ about Aaron Laffey


(Photo Credit: Flickr user BGSU86 via Creative Commons license)

Stop me if you’re heard this before, but the Yankees are looking for a veteran lefty reliever. I know, shocking, but that’s what Jayson Stark reported yesterday. The Yankees dumped J.C. Romero from their Triple-A squad last week (he’s since hooked on with the Rockies) and claimed Raul Valdes off waivers earlier in the week, but he’s a veteran in terms of age (33) only (just 64 IP in the bigs). Another veteran(-ish) southpaw hit the market yesterday when the Mariners cut ties with Aaron Laffey (a former Indian, hence the picture), so let’s see if he’s a guy that makes sense for the Bombers.

The Pros

  • Well, he’s left-handed, and that’s always a plus. Laffey’s got a classic LOOGY repertoire, which means a fastball in the high-80′s and a sweepy slider in the low-80′s that helps generate a ground ball 51.5% of the time. He’ll also mix in the occasional low-80′s changeup and high-70′s curveball, but very rarely.
  • Laffey came into the season with one minor league option remaining, and although he was sent to the minors on July 30th, he was recalled two days later due to an injury. Because it’s already August 18th, any team that acquires him could stick him in Triple-A until September 1st and not burn that option because he will not have spent the required 20 days in the minors. Long story short, he has an option for next year.
  • He’s under team control for three more years after this one, and won’t make much money in his first trip through the arbitration process this winter. Something in the high six-figures is the most likely salary for next year.

The Cons

  • He may be left-handed, but Laffey has never been all that good against same side batters in his big league career. Lefties have tagged him for a .250/.321/.431 batting line (10 K, 7 BB) in 81 PA this year and .271/.339/.388 (77 K, 37 BB) in 488 PA for his career.
  • Laffey’s peripheral stats are terrible. His career overall numbers are an eyesore (4.44 K/9 and 3.42 uIBB/9), and against lefties they’re merely mediocre: 6.15 K/9 and 2.88 BB/9 with a 47% ground ball rate. That hardly screams “valuable reliever in the AL East.”
  • Uh … well he’s not really that much of a veteran, which is what the Yankees are reportedly looking for.

By no means is Laffey great, but we have to remember what we’re talking about here: a potential second lefty reliever. Not the number one guy that will get the big outs in the seventh and eighth innings, just a spare arm for some miscellaneous matchup work. I do like Laffey for that role, or perhaps I should say I like him more than the current in-house options (Valdes and … Steve Garrison?). That’s a better way to put it. That fact the team will be able to send him the minors next year without a problem is great, just because it’s an added level of flexibility and bullpens thrive on that. I wouldn’t give up anything of value to acquire Laffey, I don’t like him that much, but there’s nothing wrong with making a waiver claim and rolling the dice on a young (26), cost-controlled, and optionable southpaw for the rest of the season and next.

Categories : Trade Deadline


  1. Bill says:

    40.5% of the time the slider produces a square ball and 8% of the time a hexagonal ball.

  2. jsbrendog says:

    bring up venditte.

  3. Jeety says:

    Remember when Laffey was a big prospect? Dreaming on prospects sure is fun

    • Accent Shallow says:

      He was never ranked in BA’ top 100. I remember a little buzz, but not a whole lot.

      You know who was a big-time prospect? Derek F. Jeter. That seems to have worked out OK.

      (And for every Jeter, there’s a dozen Eric Duncans. So it goes.)

  4. Eric Duncan says:


  5. Xstar7 says:

    When you say the “Yankees” are looking for a veteran lefty reliever, do you mean Brian Cashman or the front office?

  6. bonestock94 says:

    He seems fairly useless, although he is young and might improve with more work.

  7. Scully says:

    Maybe we could get this guy: to come out of retirement. He’s only 50 :D and i remember him being murder on Paul O’Neill.

  8. MattG says:

    “there‚Äôs nothing wrong with making a waiver claim and rolling the dice”

    Well, the risk is he pitches well in a September audition, well enough to get a chance to face Hamilton in a big spot, and costs the Yankees a playoff game. I don’t like this guy’s numbers, and I’d rather have Soriano against Hamilton.

    • Jerome S. says:

      Except that anyone can spit the bit against Josh Hamilton. Seriously, this is the most senseless comment I’ve read in a long time. That includes the Melky conversation.

    • Accent Shallow says:

      I think it would be earlier in the game, so more like Ayala instead of Soriano. Anyway, Laffey kinda sucks and has poor stuff, so . . .pass.

      Being an LHP only gets you so far.

      • MattG says:

        In the regular season, yes. In the post-season, I would hope Soriano would be available from inning 6, if not 5, on. You have to be willing to extend these guys to 4, 5 outs in October.

        • Jim M says:

          I agree with this point. Think about it – If Hughes goes to the bullpen and is effective – you have Hughes-6/Soriano-7/Robertson-8/Rivera-9. That means Boone Logan/Corey Wade get you thorugh the 5th inning in the playoffs – or come in in extra innings. Second loogy is overblown – replacing ensuring you have a backup for Boone would be a more serious issue.

  9. Jason says:

    Id rather give Banuelos a shot at it

    • MikeD says:

      Agreed, sort of. The weakest part of Banuelos’ game this year is fastball command, which is kind of important for a reliever. The Yankees are also going to look at his overall workload this year and weigh how often he can be used for the lefty-only role. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see him come September or not.

  10. Crime Dog says:

    I think we have enough Steve Garrisons on the 40 man (hint, its one)

  11. Jorge says:

    I’d take a shot on every Andy Cisco/Logan Kensing/Aaron Laffey/CORY WADE (caps for emphasis) type on the right side of 30 I could. Worst that can happen is that you let him go in a couple of months if they don’t show they could be seen as an MLB contributor.

  12. leftylarry says:

    I’d rather try Kramer Sneed.

Leave a Reply

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

If this is your first time commenting on River Ave. Blues, please review the RAB Commenter Guidelines. Login for commenting features. Register for RAB.