It’s fitting that we follow a post about Phil Hughes’ much discussed velocity with one about the hardest throwers in the minors. I didn’t do the legwork, BA did. We’ve heard alot about the high success rate of Tommy John surgery, but the #4 pitcher on the 2002 list is a prime example of a guy who’s stuff never returned to pre-TJ levels. Having two of the three hardest throwers in the minors is pretty badass.
A few among us are skeptical of Phil Hughes because of his decrease in velocity following first a hamstring injury and then an ankle injury. Yankee fans are indeed demanding. But worry not, says Phil, in a Q-and-A on his blog:
After coming back from my injury last season my mechanics were a little out of whack. This led to a little loss of velocity and command. When Dave arrived in September we were able to work out some things and I think that had a lot to do with the success I had at the end of the season. It was nice to finish off the year on a good note so I have something to work toward to get back to my normal self in 2008.
So there you go. Hughes looked great in September and October, and a strong start should put all of you velocity-doubters to rest. · (54) ·
Scott Boras – at least in the pre-opt-out days – loved to talk about his client’s overall value. Forget the .300/.400/.600 MVP seasons that A-Rod produces on a routine basis. His real value comes from his mere presence on the team.
With A-Rod around, Boras argues, the Yankees see year-to-year increases in their record-setting attendance levels, a sustained spike in their YES Network ratings, enjoy increased merchandise sales and generally have a steady stream of revenue due solely to the fact that Alex Rodriguez is a great player and on the Yankees. The same argument, proponents of the deal have said, could apply to Johan Santana as well. But is it true?
In an interesting thought piece on the Biz of Baseball site, Maury Brown goes in depth and determines that Boras’ claims aren’t totally accurate. They may not be inaccurate, but it’s just too hard to tell. Allow me to quote at length:
Ratings for Yankee games have increase 47 percent since he arrived in pinstripes. Now, is that because of A-Rod? The return of Clemens? The fact that the Yankees are the Yankees? Or, winning? It is, of course, all of the above…
It’s not as if the day Alex Rodriguez was resigned with the Yankees..that an increase in ratings immediately translates to big bucks based on the deal for carriage. One would certainly see an uptick in terms of advertisement, but in terms of the television deal, by itself, the player would not impact it. That revenue comes by way of subscriber fees from cable operators that carry the RSN. In the case of YES, according to the SBJ, YES pulls in about “about $2.25 per subscriber per month from operators.” For YES, that means that rate is locked in over the next 7 years. To try and determine how much a player’s value is worth in 7 years would mean trying to dissect that single player out of the winning and losing of the team, the cycling in and out of other possible players with star draw, and factoring brand draw, as but a few examples.
As I said, it’s all this background noise that makes claims of being able to define a distinct value to a player’s worth, outside of their win values on the field, anything but a way to sell books and articles. In some senses, you’re double counting. If the player is adding wins (which increases interest in the team), and has marquee draw, then how do you define whether it was the player’s win value, or marquee draw? Could be both. Could be one or the other.
Brown’s piece is interesting in that it doesn’t come down on one side of the debate or another because we just can’t know. Baseball teams enjoy revenue streams from all over the place, and many of those streams are subject to stringent revenue-sharing deals. MLB.com takes in merchandising revenue from their sales; teams enjoy exclusivity in merchandising deals up to a certain distance from their home ballpark; cable deals are convoluted; and revenue sharing leads to a divvying up of resources.
So when Scott Boras or some other agent starts talking about a player’s perceived value, it’s well worth it raise an eyebrow. There’s no doubt that A-Rod puts fans into the seats and draws eyeballs to the screen, but beware the exaggerating agent. It’s doubtful that A-Rod is worth $500 million to the Yankees over the course of his deal. But right now, we just don’t know.
As news of Chuck Knoblauch’s disappearance in the face of a subpoena rolls around the Internet, let’s turn our steroid-minded attention to another story. This one involves everyone’s favorite class act Jose Canseco. It’s a shocker.
According to a report in Thursday’s Times, Jose Canseco is willing to omit names from his next book in exchange for cash. Classy. Michael S. Schmidt and Duff Wilson (great name) have more:
José Canseco, the former major league slugger and admitted steroid user who exposed other players in his 2005 best-selling book “Juiced,” offered to keep a Detroit Tigers outfielder “clear” in his next book if the player invested money in a film project Canseco was promoting, according to a person in baseball with knowledge of the situation.
Four people in baseball confirmed that referrals were made from Major League Baseball to the F.B.I. regarding Canseco’s actions relating to the six-time All-Star outfielder Magglio Ordóñez, who was not mentioned in Canseco’s earlier book or in any other report on performance-enhancing drugs in baseball. All four insisted on anonymity because they said they did not have authority to speak about the events.
The FBI, Schmidt and Wilson say, did not investigate because Ordóñez didn’t want any part of it. “I didn’t want to press charges against him,” Ordóñez said. “I don’t want any problems. He is probably desperate for money. I don’t understand why he is trying to put people down.”
Scott Boras also filed a complaint after Canseco reported spoke to a Boras associated and demanded $5 million for a movie project.
For his part, Canseco says this report isn’t true, but do you really believe him? I don’t.
Right now, all best are off with Canseco. Not only is this, if true, very despicable behavior, but it throws into doubt anything he has written or will write no matter what any other report says. Rumors have been circulating for months, fueled on by Canseco and WasWatching’s attention to them, that A-Rod will be in Canseco’s next book.
But who cares? It’s not reliable. It’s a disgusting attempt to drum up more money. Lest we forget, Canseco isn’t quality. He’s been accused of domestic violence on multiple occasions and had his fair share of other legal problems. This is just one more nail in the coffin, and as far as I’m concerned, if Canseco is asking for bribe money, he should be investigated, and we shouldn’t listen to him again.
Joe pointed me towards this site earlier today, and I thought it was worth a mention. Mike Ashmore’s Thunder Thoughts is a relatively new site chronicling the adventures of the Double-A Trenton franchise. Mike’s already taken a look back at what happened to the Yanks’ best prospects from 2004 and 2005, and he’s currently in the middle of counting down the 20 best moments of the Thunder’s 2007 season. This site looks like it could become the Double-A equivalent of Chad Jennings’ brilliant site. Ch-ch-check it out. · (4) ·
The Yankees have broken their own record. In 2007, they spent $218.3 million on their payroll, shattering the 2006 mark of $207.5 million. We can thank Roger Clemens for that one. Meanwhile, the Red Sox came in a far second at $155.4 million. Boston outspent the next closest team by nearly $30 million, and no team has ever spent as much as the Red Sox did to win a World Series. If you tell a Red Sox fan they bought the trophy, that fan’s head will explode. · (9) ·
Yankees prospect Alan Horne sat down with Trentonian staff writer Josh Norris recently, and the result is an interesting and exhaustive Q and A. Horne touches on everything from his Spring Training invite and EL Pitcher of the Year Award to his off-season training and his potential 2008 role in the Bronx bullpen to Roger Clemens and the Mitchell Report. It’s good stuff. (Thanks to RAB fan Bill for this tip.) · (1) ·
Over at Rays Anatomy, they’re having a debate regarding Robinson Cano and BJ Upton. Anatomy’s writer Eric SanInocencio takes on Pending Pinstripes author EJ Fagan. They each make strong cases, so I’d consider the initial round a toss-up. However, the debate raging in the comments is all Cano. Someone actually said they’d rather have Brandon Phillips than him. Pass that crack pipe this way, please. · (18) ·