George Steinbrenner not elected into Hall of Fame by Today’s Game Era Committee


Earlier tonight, the Today’s Game Era Committee announced former commissioner Bud Selig and longtime executive John Schuerholz have been voted into the Hall of Fame. George Steinbrenner was one of eight others on the ballot who did not receive enough votes for induction.

The Today’s Game Era Committee is one of four new Hall of Fame committees. They’re the descendant of the old Veterans Committee. Each of the four committees — Early Baseball (1871-1949), Golden Days (1950-69), Modern Baseball (1970-87), Today’s Game (1988-16) — meets every few years.

Each committee consists of 16 members (Hall of Famers, executives, media) and 12 votes are needed for induction into the Hall of Fame. Steinbrenner received five. For shame. Schuerholz, the long time Royals and Braves general manager, was voted in unanimously. Selig received 15 votes.

Steinbrenner was been up for Hall of Fame induction several times over the years. He purchased the Yankees in 1973 and brought the franchise back to prominence. There’s no doubt Steinbrenner was polarizing. He was also a key figure in baseball for over 30 years. Is that enough to get into the Hall of Fame? Apparently not.

Harold Baines, Albert Belle, Will Clark, Orel Hershiser, Davey Johnson, Mark McGwire, and Lou Piniella were also on the Today’s Game ballot this year. The BBWAA’s Hall of Fame selections will be announced next month.

Weekend Open Thread

TGIF, for real. I’m looking forward to the Winter Meetings next week, but I’m mostly just happy this week is over. This was a long one for me. Anyway, as you wait for all hot stove hell to break loose next week, here are a few links worth checking out this weekend. A couple of these pieces are a few weeks old. Sorry. I didn’t get around to reading them until this week.

Friday: This is tonight’s open thread. Not a whole lot going on in the world of sports this evening. Just the Knicks and one college hoops game. It’s Friday night though. Go out and get some fresh air.

Saturday: Once again, this is the open thread. The Rangers and Devils are playing right now while the Nets will be in action a little later. There’s also a boatload of college basketball and football. Have at it.

Sunday: Here is the open thread for the last time. The Islanders and Knicks are on, plus there’s all the day’s NFL action and college hoops as well. Talk about all that stuff and more right here.

Update: Jacob Lindgren signs with Braves after non-tender


Sunday: Well, so much for that. Lindgren has signed a one-year Major League contract with the Braves, the team announced. They’ve had a thing for hoarding ex-Yankees the last few years. I’m guessing the Yankees wanted to retain Lindgren on a minor league deal, but once Atlanta offered a big league contract, that was that.

Friday: Prior to tonight’s deadline, the Yankees non-tendered left-hander Jacob Lindgren, the team announced. He’s now a free agent. All other pre-arbitration and arbitration-eligible players received contract offers. The Yankees now have one open spot on the 40-man roster.

Lindgren will miss the entire 2017 season following Tommy John surgery, and his non-tender is not entirely unexpected. Chances are the Yankees will look to re-sign him to a minor league contract now, which allows them to keep him in the organization as a non-40-man player.

The Yankees have made the non-tender/re-sign move several times in the past, most notably with Slade Heathcott, Vicente Campos, and Domingo German. They were all hurt at the time too. The non-tender allows the Yankees to remove Lindgren from the 40-man without exposing him to waivers.

Lindgren, 23, threw only seven innings this past season, during which he walked nine and uncorked six wild pitches with High-A Tampa. He landed on the disabled list shortly thereafter and had Tommy John surgery later in the summer. Sucks, but what can you do?

The open 40-man roster spot means the Yankees will be able to make a selection in the Rule 5 Draft next Thursday. They haven’t made a Rule 5 Draft pick since 2011. Odds are against it, but who knows. Maybe they take a flier on a bullpen arm or a Josh Phelps type for first base depth.

Premature Lineup Questions

Ellsbury. (Presswire)
Ellsbury. (Presswire)

Considering it’s not even mid-December yet, the questions that follow are way too premature. To make up for that, I’ll try to avoid things that aren’t likely to stay the same. For example, I highly doubt the Yankees are going to go into the season with, say, Tyler Austin as the number one DH candidate just because they missed out on Carlos Beltran.

Let’s start at the top with two questions:

Will Jacoby Ellsbury keep batting second?

In early July, Joe Girardi made a bit of a lineup switch and had Ellsbury bat second behind Brett Gardner. Taco didn’t sparkle in the two hole, hitting just .244 with a .310 OBP. His walk rate was near 9%, which is encouraging, but it was mostly a forgettable performance. Might it make sense for them to flip places again, especially given Gardner’s shyness with regards to running lately? Granted, Ellsbury isn’t exactly bold on the basepaths anymore, either.

Will Aaron Hicks be platooned more aggressively this season? 

Towards the end of the year, Aaron Hicks woke up and showed flashes of why the Yankees traded for him last offseason. Given that the Yankees have two lefty hitting outfielders in Ellsbury and Gardner, and Hicks is a switch hitter, capable of playing both positions those guys do, how often will he start in one of their places when a lefty is on the mound? Of course, if one of those two is traded, that question is answered a lot more easily.


What happens if (when) Gary Sanchez struggles? 

Gary Sanchez was a monster in 2016 and we all hope he can be successful again in 2017; he gave us all the reasons he possibly could to believe. But that performance is hard to live up to and he’s going to take some sort of a step back over a full season. If Sanchez struggles behind the plate but maintains his solid hitting, you can always move him to DH. What, though, if the unlikely happens and Sanchez pulls the hitting version of 2008 Phil Hughes/Ian Kennedy? The answer for him is easy: send him back down and let him get right. For the Yankees, though, unless they sign a veteran back up, is less appealing, as it means giving the every day job to Austin Romine.

Who’s going to carry this lineup? 

Perhaps that question is unfair; it’s unlikely that one person on a team will carry a lineup. The right question might be, who’s going to lead this lineup? With Sanchez, the return of Greg Bird, and (hopefully) improvement from Aaron Judge, there’s the potential for big contributions from the young players. Will Didi Gregorius and Starlin Castro continue their mild improvements at the plate? Will Ellsbury and Gardner bounce back? Which Chase Headley is going to show up? Depending on the answers to these questions, the Yankees could either be a reasonably solid offense, or they could be a disaster. Likely, they’re somewhere in the middle, but there don’t seem to be any sure things in the lineup.

Update: Carlos Beltran signs with Astros, not Yankees

(Greg Fiume/Getty)
(Greg Fiume/Getty)

Arguably the best DH option for the Yankees is off the board. According to multiple reports, former Yankee Carlos Beltran has agreed to a one-year deal worth $16M with the Astros. He gets a full no-trade clause as well. Carlos and Brian McCann, together again.

The Yankees reportedly had interest in re-signing Beltran to replace McCann at DH, but Mark Feinsand says they never made him a formal offer. That doesn’t mean much though. It just means they didn’t put a piece of paper in front of him to sign, not that they didn’t talk money.

Beltran, 39, hit .304/.344/.546 (135 wRC+) with 22 home runs in 99 games with the Yankees before being traded away as part of their deadline sell-off. He wasn’t quite as good with the Rangers after the trade, hitting .280/.325/.451 (103 wRC+) with seven homers in 52 games.

Interestingly enough, Beltran’s contract is worth less than the qualifying offer this offseason ($17.2M). A few days before the trade I said the Yankees shouldn’t consider Beltran a qualifying offer candidate because he’d probably accept it, and while it wasn’t a given, the money suggests it was a possibility.

There is no shortage of DH bats available in free agency. The big name is Edwin Encarnacion, but geez, I can’t imagine the Yankees would pay huge money and forfeit their first round pick to sign a soon-to-be 34-year-old DH. They got rid of like four old and expensive DHs this year. Why rush to sign another?

Other free agent DH candidates include Matt Holliday, Mike Napoli, Chris Carter, and Brandon Moss. I suppose we shouldn’t rule out Jose Bautista or Mark Trumbo either, though they’re cut from the same “expensive and forfeit a pick” cloth as Encarnacion. That’s not something the Yankees should be doing right now, I don’t think.

When in doubt, bet on the Yankees targeting the lefty pull-hitter. That’s their go-to demographic when looking for short-term roster fillers. Think Travis Hafner and Raul Ibanez. I guess that makes Moss the likely target? Ryan Howard, Colby Rasmus, Pedro Alvarez, and Michael Saunders are other possibilities.

DotF: Rosa dominating out of the bullpen in winter ball

Two weeks ago the 2016 Arizona Fall League season came to an end, though other winter leagues around the world are still in the middle of the season. Here are the final AzFL stats, and before we get to the rest of the winter league updates, here are some minor league notes:

  • Minor league hitting coordinator James Rowson has left the Yankees to join the Twins as their Major League hitting coach, the team announced. Rowson served two stints in New York’s farm system (2006-11, 2014-16) and worked closely with all the team’s top prospects. He helped OF Aaron Judge make some adjustments last offseason, for example.
  • Both Baseball America (no subs. req’d) and posted their top Arizona Fall League prospects lists. SS Gleyber Torres was No. 1 on both. RHP James Kaprielian was No. 7 for Baseball America while both Kaprielian (No. 12) and 3B Miguel Andujar (No. 21) made the list.
  • In other Fall League news, Torres landed at shortstop on’s All-AzFL team, and his performance was also one of Mike Rosenbaum’s top ten storylines of the AzFL season. Gleyber became the youngest batting champion and MVP in league history, so yeah.
  • Jeff Sullivan wrote about RHP Jonathan Holder, who was arguably the most dominant reliever in the minor leagues this past season. Jeff takes a deep dive on Holder’s stuff and finds some similarities to Alex Colome, who is pretty damn good. That’d be a heck of an outcome for Holder.
  • J.J. Cooper put together a Rule 5 Draft preview, if you’re interested in such things. LHP Tyler Webb is listed as one of the best players available. Webb has pretty good stuff and a history of missing bats at Triple-A, so he’s a lock to be picked in the Rule 5 Draft. He might stick next year too.
  • Also, Cooper wrote about RHP Albert Abreu, who the Yankees received in the Brian McCann trade. The timing of the trade means Abreu won’t show up on Baseball America’s top ten prospects list for either the Yankees or Astros, so Cooper posted the scouting report in his weekly mailbag.
  • And finally, there was a ton of talk about the Yankees’ farm system on Wednesday’s episode of the Effectively Wild podcast, so check that out. The Yankees stuff starts at the 6:13 mark.

Australian Baseball League

  • RHP Brandon Stenhouse: 2 G, 2 IP, 5 H, 6 R, 5 ER, 2 BB, 2 K, 1 WP (22.50 ERA and 3.50 WHIP) — the Yankees gave the 20-year-old Australian a six-figure bonus out of high school three years ago … he has a 3.49 ERA (3.50 FIP) with 27.0% strikeouts and 12.3% walks in 38.2 rookie ball innings in his two pro seasons

Dominican Winter League

  • IF Abi Avelino: 14 G, 6-20, 3 R, 1 RBI, 3 K, 1 CS (.300/.300/.300)
  • SS Jorge Mateo: 20 G, 7-42, 8 R, 1 2B, 1 3B, 2 RBI, 3 BB, 10 K, 5 SB, 1 CS, 1 HBP (.167/.239/.238) — he’s not hitting, but the fact he’s still playing regularly tells you how highly he’s regarded … winter leagues are super competitive, they play guys who can help them win without regard for prospect status, and Mateo’s still in the lineup
  • RHP Anyelo Gomez: 2 G, 1.2 IP, 2 H, 2 R, 2 ER, 1 BB, 3 K (10.80 ERA and 1.80 WHIP) — he was one of ten current Yankees farmhands to hit 100 mph in the minors this year
  • RHP Adonis Rosa: 5 G, 1 GS, 12 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 4 BB, 6 K (0.00 ERA and 0.42 WHIP) — Rosa turned 22 last month and he had a 2.19 ERA (3.03 FIP) with 23.0% strikeouts and 4.7% walks in 78 innings with Short Season Staten Island and Low-A Charleston in 2016 … he was a low-profile signing back in 2013, but he throws strikes and has three pitches (low-90s fastball, curveball, changeup), so he’s not someone to completely overlook

Mexican Pacific League

  • OF Tito Polo: 18 G, 15-66, 13 R, 4 2B, 1 RBI, 5 BB, 19 K, 8 SB, 1 CS, 4 HBP (.227/.320/.288) — he got hurt three weeks ago, came back a few days later, played three games, and hasn’t played since … not sure what’s going on here, exactly

Venezuelan Winter League

  • IF Angel Aguilar: 13 G, 4-20, 5 R, 8 K, 1 SB (.200/.200/.200) — he was actually traded in the VWL … played ten games for Navegantes del Magallanes before being shipped to Aguilas de Zulia … Aguilar is still Yankees’ property, the trade just means a new team controls his winter ball rights
  • C Francisco Diaz: 31 G, 20-90, 9 R, 4 2B, 2 3B, 3 RBI, 9 BB, 16 K, 1 SB, 1 CS, 1 HBP (.222/.300/.311)
  • RHP Luis Cedeno: 4 G, 2 GS, 11.1 IP, 13 H, 9 R, 7 ER, 6 BB, 7 K, 2 HR, 2 HB, 2 WP (5.56 ERA and 1.68 WHIP)
  • RHP David Kubiak: 9 G, 3 GS, 22 IP, 21 H, 15 R, 13 ER, 10 BB, 16 K, 1 HR, 3 HB, 3 WP (5.32 ERA and 1.91 WHIP)
  • RHP Mark Montgomery: 5 G, 3.2 IP, 4 H, 3 R, 3 ER, 3 BB, 3 K (7.36 ERA and 1.91 WHIP) — hasn’t pitched in a month now, which is probably bad news

The new Collective Bargaining Agreement is kinda good, but mostly bad for the Yankees

(Mike Stobe/Getty)
(Mike Stobe/Getty)

Earlier this week, MLB and the MLBPA worked out a new Collective Bargaining Agreement, which will cover the 2017-21 seasons. The owners will reportedly vote on the new agreement on December 13th, which is merely a formality. Once they give the thumbs up, the new CBA will be ratified and everything will be good to go.

The new CBA won’t have any direct impact on this offseason. Teams are operating under the old rules, so they still have to give up their first round pick to sign a qualified free agent. The new luxury tax rules will affect decision-making for sure, though that’s only a matter of degree. The luxury tax threshold went up, so here’s the new payroll target. That sorta thing.

Looking over the details, it sure seems like the owners got the better of the players’ union this time around. This is the second straight CBA that appears to favor the owners. Not a great decade for MLBPA leadership, I’d say. The Yankees do benefit from the new CBA, at least somewhat. There are definitely some negatives as well, however.

The Good

1. The revenue sharing savings are significant. The new CBA removed the Performance Factor from the revenue sharing system, which will save the Yankees a ton of money. Long story short, the supplemental revenue sharing pool, which is based on market size, has been eliminated. Because the Yankees are in the largest market and generate the most revenue, they were contributing the most to the supplemental pool.

The Yankees and every other team still have to pay into the basic revenue sharing pool — each team dumps 34% of their net revenue into the pot, which is then paid out to the 30 teams equally — so they will still be forfeiting a big chunk of change to small market clubs. The supplemental pool, which is determined through the Performance Factor, is gone now. The Yankees get to keep that money, which likely measures in the tens of millions. Simply put, the Yankees now have a lot more money available to them. It’s not going to revenue sharing anymore.

2. The draft pick compensation rules aren’t as harsh. The free agent compensation rules are a little convoluted — they’re tied to revenue sharing and the luxury tax now — but they guarantee teams will be able to keep their first round pick when signing a qualifying free agent. Because the Yankees don’t receive revenue sharing money, they’ll have to give up their second highest pick to sign a free agent. If they paid luxury tax in the most recent season, they have to give up their fifth highest pick too.

Those terms are much more favorable than the current system. First round picks are mighty valuable, both in terms of expected return and the associated draft pool money. The second highest pick, which will usually be a second rounder, is not going to be something that stops a team from signing a qualifying free agent. The Yankees tend to spend in bunches. When they sign qualified free agents, they sign several at once, a la the 2008-09 and 2013-14 offseasons. They can do that and still keep their first rounder. Pretty cool. (Or they could sign one qualified free agent each offseason and still keep their first rounder. That’s pretty cool too.)

The Bad

1. The luxury tax threshold didn’t go up that much. The luxury tax threshold did not rise until year three of the current CBA, the one expiring this offseason. The threshold was $178M in 2011, the final year of the old CBA, and it remained $178M in both 2012 and 2013 as well. It wasn’t until 2014 that it jumped to $189M, where it has remained since.

Under the new CBA, the luxury tax threshold will rise to $195M in 2017, so right off the bat that’s a $6M increase. By the end of the new CBA, the threshold will be $210M. That’s a $21M increase over five years. The expiring CBA featured an $11M increase over five years. Compared to the current CBA, the new one provides a much larger long-term luxury tax threshold increase. Hooray!

The problem is the threshold still isn’t rising as quickly as payrolls around the league. In 2012, the first year of the current CBA, the average payroll was $95M, or 53% of the $178M threshold. Only one team was over the threshold that year (the Yankees, duh). The Phillies were the only other team within $15M of the threshold. By 2016, the final year of the current CBA, the average payroll rose to $131M, or 69% of the $189M threshold. Six teams were over the threshold (Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, Tigers, Cubs, Giants) and another (Angels) was within $10M.

See the problem? Payrolls are growing at a faster rate than the luxury tax threshold. Nathaniel Grow explained last year that the players are receiving a smaller piece of baseball’s total revenue right now than they have at any point in the last two decades. I can’t imagine that’ll change with the new CBA, especially since it comes with such high tax rates — a first time offender that is at least $40M over the threshold gets hit with a 62.5% tax rate — that the luxury tax effectively acts as a soft cap.

I could be wrong, but it seems a lot of people are assuming that once the Yankees get under the luxury tax threshold and reset their tax rate, they’ll spend big again and go back over. I’m not entirely convinced that’ll happen. Hal Steinbrenner insists the Yankees don’t need to spend $200M to field a winner, and it wouldn’t surprise me if staying under the threshold is a long-term goal. If it is, all that revenue sharing money the team is saving won’t go into the roster. Payroll will remain essentially unchanged.

2. The international free agency system is awful. Gosh, how badly does the new CBA screw over international players? As is, the new agreement effectively prevents Shohei Otani from coming over until 2019, when he’ll be 25 and no longer subject to the hard cap. How impossibly stupid. MLB and the MLBPA should want players like Otani in the league. Instead, they put together a deal that actively pushes him way. So dumb. So very dumb.

Anyway, the international hard cap takes away New York’s ability to flex its financial muscle in that market. One of the reasons the Yankees went on that massive spending spree during the 2014-15 international signing period was because it might have been their last chance to spend huge, and sure enough, it was. Rumblings of an international draft are not new. They’ve been around for years. We got a hard cap instead of an international draft, which is just as bad.

Because the hard cap isn’t enough, teams will also have to forfeit a chunk of their spending pool to sign qualifying free agents. So yeah, the Yankees only have to give up their second highest pick, but they also have to give up at least 10% of their bonus pool to sign a player. That stinks. It stinks for the teams because they can’t spend freely, and it really stinks for the kids trying to get signed. Their earning potential is so limited now. It’s a shame.

* * *

The owners go into CBA talks every five years with the same goal: cut costs. They accomplished that this year with the international hard cap, and also by giving teams less of a reason to increase payroll thanks to the harsh luxury tax rates. Mission accomplished for the owners.

The new CBA helps the Yankees because they’re going to save a boatload of revenue sharing money behind the scenes. An absolute ton. It also hurts them by marginalizing their financial might, both internationally and on the MLB roster with the luxury tax. Depending on which side of the table you sit, the new CBA is either really good (owners) or really bad (pretty much everyone else) for the Yankees. Each new CBA keeps whittling away at their financial advantage.