River Avenue Blues

  • About
    • Privacy Policy
  • Features
    • Yankees Top 30 Prospects
    • Prospect Profiles
    • Fan Confidence
  • Resources
    • 2019 Draft Order
    • Depth Chart
    • Bullpen Workload
    • Guide to Stats
  • Shop and Tickets
    • RAB Tickets
    • MLB Shop
    • Fanatics
    • Amazon
    • Steiner Sports Memorabilia
River Ave. Blues » Analysis

Gleyber Torres is in a slump, but it’s not a cause for alarm

April 24, 2019 by Derek Albin

(Sean M. Haffey/Getty)

Gleyber Torres ran into the rookie wall last September. He started slumping right around the time the typical minor league season ends, which is fairly common for new big leaguers. Through August 31, Torres had an impressive .282/.351/.507 (130 wRC+) batting line. In 101 September plate appearances, Torres recorded a paltry 82 wRC+. His postseason performance was unremarkable as well. Now, Torres’s slump has continued into this season.

In his last 191 regular season trips to the plate dating back to September 1, Torres has a .236/.286/.402 triple-slash. Through Monday’s play, he was in the midst of a 2-for-24 skid to boot, which dropped his 2019 wRC+ from 135 to 82. That recent string is why it can be so perilous to analyze early season performances; I would have never written this article a week ago. But now, after looking at his year-to-date line with a recollection of a slow finish to last season, my curiosity was piqued. At the risk of getting burned by arbitrary endpoints, Gleyber hasn’t been hitting well for a while now. Should we be concerned?

Even though Torres’s results didn’t falter until September, his expected stats were a leading indicator of trouble ahead a month before. His exit velocity was down in August, hence the lower xwOBA, but it was no matter. He still slugged six homers and reached base nearly 37 percent of the time.

Then came September. His expected numbers tumbled further, but this time, poor results caught up to him. This has carried into 2019.

What’s hampering the 22 year-old budding star?

Perhaps his right hip, which he strained last July, slowed him down a bit. Remember, he spent about three weeks on the shelf that month, returning just before the calendar flipped to August. That’s convenient timing for a sudden downtick as I just highlighted, but difficult to assign blame to. Whether or not it lingered in any way is a mystery, despite the timing.

It’s also possible that Torres has been trying to do too much. After he was promoted last season, one of his most impressive traits that was quickly apparent was his at-bat quality. He never seemed overmatched or anxious at the plate. Torres was aggressive, swinging a bit more often than the typical hitter, but he wasn’t constantly chasing unhittable pitches. Even as pitchers began to show him more respect by throwing fewer pitches in the zone, Torres became a bit more patient. Then, in September, the infielder’s approach changed.

Gleyber began swinging at roughly 52 percent of offerings that month, and is up to 54 percent this year. Opposing hurlers are giving him more pitches to hit, but even so, Torres wasn’t this aggressive last season against similar in-zone rates. Further, his chase rate climbed from August to September, and though it’s a tad down this month, it’s still above his norms from when he was going good last season.

The gameplan to get Torres out has changed slightly too, albeit nothing drastic. He is seeing fewer fastballs this season, which happens to any respected hitter. Plus, pitchers can throw more junk to Torres since he’s one of the few regulars to avoid the injured list.

Although pitch type allocation has changed a tad, it doesn’t appear that pitchers are trying to exploit a particular area of the plate. I won’t post a bunch of location heatmaps here, but they all look pretty similar. It’s not like other teams have discovered something like an inability to turn on pitches down and in.

Now that we’ve examined a few potential root causes, I want to circle back to Torres’s expected numbers with a focus on contact quality. Interestingly enough, he’s still in a good position when it comes to exit velocity and hard hit percentage early this season. Those two metrics are up over last season, 1.6 MPH and 6 percent respectively. However, because of a lower launch angle (16.8 degrees vs. 18.8 last year), his expected stats and results are suffering.

Ultimately, this kind of rut happens to all players in some shape or form. Not much is going in Torres’s favor right now, but it’s nothing to be concerned about just yet. Perhaps a little more selectivity and lift can get Torres back on track.

Filed Under: Analysis Tagged With: Gleyber Torres

What’s wrong with Chad Green’s fastball?

April 23, 2019 by Derek Albin

(Steve Ryan/Getty)

Not much has gone right for Chad Green early this season. After emerging as one of the team’s essential bullpen arms over the last two years, a few bad outings have pushed Green down in the pecking order. Unfortunately, it only got worse on Sunday. Up 5-0 against Kansas City, Green was handed a low leverage opportunity to help himself right the ship. After three hitters and no outs recorded, enough was enough. Adam Ottavino eventually allowed those inherited runners to score, but the performance ballooned Green’s ERA to 12.27 in just over seven innings of work.

Green’s problems generally boil down to hard contact and a lack of whiffs, as Bobby wrote about recently. Interestingly, as Bobby noted, hitters have historically been able to clobber Green’s trademark fastball, but only when they actually are able to make contact. As last season wore on, hitters gradually became more successful at putting bat on ball against the pitch, and this season that phenomenon has hit Green like a freight train.

Logically, it makes sense that major league hitters will eventually figure a pitcher out with enough looks, but this still seems weird to me. It’s not like the league suddenly figured out Green threw a ton of fastballs late last season. He’s been doing it for a couple of years now. Perhaps the pitch is simply more hittable now.

A few things that make any given pitch hittable are velocity, spin rate, movement, and location. Let’s see what’s going on with Green’s fastball. It’s his bread and butter, after all, and what made him successful in the first place.

Yikes. His fastball velocity has fallen significantly since last May. Maybe he’s still building up velocity, like many hurlers do early in the year, but that’s still an alarming trend.

Green’s fastball spin rate has dropped, albeit slightly, since 2017. It’s at 2434 RPM this season, down 10 RPM from 2018 and 50 from 2017. Probably within the margin of error, so I don’t think there’s much to make of this. He’s still comfortably above league average in that department. Movement-wise, Green’s fastball has always been pretty straight. Yet, because of his spin, it’s deceptive and has a rising quality (even though that’s physically impossible). Simply put, it just doesn’t drop as much thanks to backspin. And unsurprisingly, his movement on the pitch hasn’t altered. All good news here, at least.

What about location? Green’s never been a command guy, and hasn’t needed to be.

As you can see, Green pours fastballs over the heart of the plate, and that hasn’t changed early this season.

So really, the only thing that has changed is Green’s fastball velocity. Is that really enough to result in this?

I don’t know. I mean, surely a slightly slower fastball makes for a little more contact. But, it’s not like Green has gone from a mid-90s heater to high-80s. It’s still humming in there at 95 miles per hour with great spin to boot.

Maybe it really is just a matter of hitters growing accustomed to Green’s patented offering. It took some time, but perhaps opponents have finally adjusted to Green’s approach. It’s never been a secret that Green was going to attack hitters with the fastball, but even knowing that didn’t hinder his success. That’s a testament to how effective the pitch has been for him historically, as it took a long time for hitters to finally start improving against it.

If Green can make something of his slider or re-introduced splitter, perhaps his fastball can return to its former glory. He’s certainly trying to incorporate those pitches, as his fastball usage has decreased this year (albeit still at a very high 72 percent clip). Still, they aren’t even average options at this time, which ostensibly makes it easier to key in on the fastball.

Last but not least, it’s still really early in the year. Green’s not going to run a 30 percent home run to fly ball rate, .375 BABIP, and 50.9 percent strand rate all season. He’d have to be truly broken to do that. Some regression to the mean must be coming, even if he remains a one-pitch pitcher.

For the time being, it makes sense for Aaron Boone to deploy Green in low leverage situations like Sunday. It’s incredibly frustrating that he couldn’t get the job done then, but those are also the only spots he really deserves at this point. Let him earn his way back into important situations. His fastball is still good enough to get hitters out, but perhaps he needs to work out the kinks in low stress situations. Whether that’s refining command by aiming for the corners a bit more or getting a better feel for his secondary stuff, Green will have to counter the rest of the league’s adjustment to his fastball. Hopefully that’s sooner rather than later, because this bullpen needs help.

Filed Under: Analysis Tagged With: Chad Green

Clint Frazier’s breakout and his early season success against breaking balls

April 23, 2019 by Mike

(Presswire)

If there is a silver lining to all these injuries the Yankees have suffered this season, it is Clint Frazier getting an opportunity to play every single game. His own injury problems (oblique in 2017, concussion in 2018) cost him big league time the last two years, and the Yankees initially planned to send him to Triple-A for regular at-bats this year, but injuries forced their hand and Frazier is now hitting in the middle of a their depleted lineup.

“(My confidence is) already high when I wake up in the morning,” Frazier told Brendan Kuty over the weekend. “But when we’re having results and the team is going out there and we’re fighting through things, hopefully it rubs off on everybody because everyone else’s confidence is rubbing off on me right now, too.”

Going into last night’s late West Coast game Frazier was hitting .339/.358/.661 (163 wRC+) with six home runs and a .341 BABIP that isn’t so high that we should expect a big crash at some point. Clint has always had a lightning quick bat and, right now, he is squaring the ball up on the regular:

(Statcast defines Sweet Spot as a batted ball with a launch angle between 8° and 32°. That launch angle range tends to produce the best results.)

Frazier has trimmed his overall strikeout rate from 30.6% with the Yankees in 2017-18 to 20.9% in the early going this year. He hasn’t walked a whole bunch yet (4.5%), but Frazier has a much better than league average 25.2% chase rate, so he’s swinging at the right pitches. Give it time and I expect his walk rate to tick up. It’s not unusual for a young player to sharpen his approach with experience.

“We’ve never questioned the ability or the talent,” Aaron Boone told Kuty. “… He’s come up here and obviously shown to be a really good Major League hitter. The way he controls the strike zone, the way he can impact the ball with his talent and his bat speed, he’s a dangerous man when he walks up to the plate.”

April is an awful time for baseball analysis because everything is a small sample and it’s close to impossible to know what’s legit and what’s noise. What we do know right now is Frazier is having much more success against breaking pitches in the early going this season than the last two years. Here are the numbers against curveballs and sliders:

% AVG (xAVG) SLG (xSLG) wOBA (xwOBA) Whiff Chase EV LA
2017-18 30.3 .231 (.235) .431 (.457) .294 (.309) 41.4% 28.6% 89.5 10.5
2019 38.2 .304 (.285) .696 (.589) .385 (.353) 38.8% 23.1% 93.7 20.0
MLB AVG 28.9 .217 (.215) .375 (.362) .278 (.276) 35.1% 30.1% 87.1 12.1

In the early going Frazier’s actual results and expected results (based on exit velocity and launch angle and all that) against breaking balls are well above the MLB average. When he has swung, he has missed more than average, but he’s not chasing out of the zone and his contact is very good. I don’t buy Frazier (or any player) as a true talent .300 hitter and near .700 slugger against breaking balls. The underlying data is strong though.

Of course, we are not even four weeks into the new season, and this could all be small sample noise. I wish I could give you assurances it is not but I can’t do it. I do know Frazier looks very confident at the plate, and he seems very disciplined in that he is swinging at the right pitches, so that’s good. He is definitely passing the eye test. Clint also has the pedigree as a former high draft pick (fifth overall in 2013) and top prospect.

Another thing we know: Frazier adjusted his setup at the plate this season. Specifically, he worked with hitting coach Marcus Thames to widen his stance in Spring Training, which helps him see the ball longer and let it travel deeper in the zone. Clint’s bat speed allows him to still get those pitches. Here is Frazier’s stance over the years:

A new setup at the plate, as well as improved confidence and the fact Frazier was a slightly above-average producer against breaking balls in his limited big league time the last two years suggests this year’s performance may be for real. This isn’t a terrible hitter against breaking balls suddenly becoming a great hitter against breaking balls. It’s an already good hitter with talent and some mechanical adjustments becoming an even better one.

Because it’s still so early in the season, we have no choice but to take a wait and see approach. Eventually pitchers will adjust to Frazier and find a weakness, and try to exploit it, and it’ll be up to him to adjust back. Perhaps that adjustment will be even more breaking balls because damn, Clint is hammering fastballs (.353 AVG and .588 SLG), and breaking balls are generally more difficult to hit, this year’s results notwithstanding.

For now, Frazier has helped the Yankees stay afloat through all the injuries, and he’s giving the team a reason to keep him in the lineup once everyone gets healthy. Left field is wide open long-term and the Yankees have a highly regarded young player who sure seems to be breaking out. It’s exciting. It would be more exciting without all the injuries, but it is exciting nonetheless. Frazier looks like the impact player he was projected to be when he first joined the organization three years ago.

“He got pushed into a position where we’re counting on him and others, and he’s stepping up, and you have to give him real props. That’s the stuff he lives for,” Brian Cashman said during a recent radio interview. “He’s the one right now that I think people are gonna be careful to pitch around, because he’s got a good mojo going and he feels good about what he’s doing. He knows he’s impacting us, so his confidence is sky-high right now.”

Filed Under: Analysis Tagged With: Clint Frazier

J.A. Happ’s mid-game adjustment vs. Boston and what’s next

April 19, 2019 by Derek Albin

(Presswire)

J.A. Happ’s last start began like a familiar tune. He surrendered two home runs in the first two innings, tacking on to the four he had already allowed in just over twelve frames to begin the year. Yet, Happ settled down and was able to reach the seventh inning without much issue. Maybe the struggling Red Sox were the reason he managed to soldier through after appearing to be on the ropes early on. Or, perhaps an in-game adjustment kept him alive.

It’s been well documented that Happ relies heavily on his fastball. He’s made a career of throwing his hard stuff about three quarters of the time. Although Happ has never lit up a radar gun, he’s been particularly successful with his four-seamer because of his command and the pitch’s high spin rate.

On Wednesday, Happ may have reached a breaking point with the four-seamer. To date, all six dingers the veteran has allowed have been against that pitch. It sure seems like that swayed him to make a change right away. Beginning in the second inning, Happ ramped up on his sinker and slider and eschewed the four-seamer.

For dramatic effect, take a look at the comparison of his four-seam and sinker usage by game since 2017:

It’s generally not a great idea to make sweeping conclusions about results over just a few innings, especially against a scuffling Boston team, but the data here is pretty convenient. Happ pitched much better once he ditched his trademark offering. That doesn’t make this approach a panacea for his early season woes, however. Really, the more important aspect of Happ’s game to analyze is his four-seamer. After all, it’s what made him a good pitcher in the first place. Does he really need to abandon it now?

Four-Seamer 2018 2019
Velocity 92.3 91.4
Spin Rate 2334 2363

The good news is that his spin rate is steady. He’s never been a hard thrower, rather, deception has always been the key for the pitch. Throwing high spin rate fastballs up in the zone generally makes for plenty of pop-ups and whiffs. He’s still targeting that section of the zone this season, similar to last year.

The not so good news is his pitch speed. It’s down a hair under one mile per hour compared to last year. Granted, it’s April, so there’s time to build that back up as the weather warms up. That being said, while Happ usually adds velocity as the season goes on, this year’s starting point is lower than ever before.

He may be able to approach the velocity he had at the very end of last year (which was already trending downward!), but approaching 93 MPH on the gun reliably seems out of the question.

Velocity may not be the name of the game for Happ, but losing a tick certainly can sap some of the offering’s effectiveness. Spin rate can only do so much, and ostensibly, is not as helpful when other pitch traits decline.

We already know that Happ’s slider and changeup are mediocre at best, so he’s not going to morph into the left-handed version of Masahiro Tanaka. But, if he can’t find his lost four-seam velocity, he may need to adapt like he did in his past outing against the Red Sox. Fortunately, he could learn a thing or two from his teammate, CC Sabathia, who’s made a living throwing sinkers and cutters over the last couple of years. Maybe Happ was serious when he asked this question to Sabathia:

CC Sabathia was holding his media session when a loud voice popped up from the back of the crowd.

“CC, J.A. Happ here, asking for a friend. How were you able to paint the corners in your first start back?”

(Happ was using a can of Red Bull as a microphone)

— Bryan Hoch (@BryanHoch) April 13, 2019

I can’t tell you if Happ can be successful as a sinkerballer going forward. It certainly worked over the course of a few innings, but perhaps that just caught the Red Sox off guard. Furthermore, there’s no assurance that he’s going to continue that approach his next time out. Even if he does, opponents should be better prepared for it. Either way, Happ is going to have to figure out one of two things: how to pitch with diminished four-seam velocity, or how to regain a mile per hour on it.

Filed Under: Analysis Tagged With: J.A. Happ

DJ LeMahieu’s Weird Batted Ball Profile

April 14, 2019 by Matt Imbrogno

(Sarah Stier/Getty)

With literally half the projected Opening Day lineup on the Injured List, it’s been a struggle for the Yankees to find consistent performance from their hitters. Emerging from the pack has been infielder DJ LeMahieu. Predictably, he’s shined with the glove, whether at second or third. On offense, he entered Saturday’s action hitting .439/.489/.561, good for a .448 wOBA and a 186 wRC+. He’s done it, as evidenced by the .122 ISO, with little power, though, which led me to remark the other  night that a flyball to deep center was probably the deepest ball he’s hit all year. Regardless, what he’s doing has worked, so let’s take a look.

The first thing that sticks out is the .500 (!) BABIP. Per FanGraphs, that’s second highest in baseball, behind Tim Anderson’s insane .581 (!!) BABIP to start the year. The gap between DJLM in second and Elvis Andrus in third (.475) is higher than the gap between LeMahieu and Anderson. That’s obviously not sustainable, even for a high BABIP guy like LeMahieu (career .345 BABIP). Maybe he’s just hitting the ball really hard, right? That shows up in his profile, but even that’s a bit strange. His LD% is up, but so are his FB% and IFFB%, two things that would likely kill BABIP. Let’s check out Statcast and see what we can find.

My initial hunch about LeMahieu not hitting the ball too far appears to be correct. Among players with at least 30 batted ball events, he ranks 88th out of 171 in average distance at 174 feet. His max–375′–has him in 148th place. While it’s nice to have my ideas confirmed, it doesn’t tell us a whole lot about that high BABIP. Is he stinging the ball?  It appears that he is. He’s got 21 balls hit at 95+ MPH, good for 12th in the league. His percentage of hard hit balls (95+MPH) has him even higher at 6th place: 58.3%. His 92.5 average exit velocity puts him in the top 30 of MLB (28th place) as well, though his max exit velocity of 107.2 puts him 112th. So, basically, he hits the ball very hard, very often, but just not at the upper reaches of velocity and without hitting the ball all too far. It doesn’t seem, as a high BABIP sometimes suggests (or always suggests, according to broadcasters who still can’t grasp even the most basic of advanced stats…), that LeMahieu is getting overly lucky, even with those fly ball/IFFB increases. According to Statcast, his xWOBA is .367. There’s a pretty big difference between that and his actual wOBA, but .367 is still a damn good number–especially for someone as good in the field as he is–and, to me at least, suggests he’s just squaring things up right now, not running into a bunch of seeing-eye singles or dying quails.

I was skeptical of the LeMahieu signing, but so far, I’ve been flat out wrong about it. I’m glad to be, frankly, given how badly the Yankees need their healthy players to step up. DJLM is not going to keep this up all year, of course, but it’s nice to ride this hard contact wave while it’s happening.

Filed Under: Analysis Tagged With: DJ LeMahieu

The Yankees Need Chad Green to Step Up

April 13, 2019 by Bobby Montano

(Presswire)

The beginning of the season has been a struggle for the Yankees, who have won only 5 of their first 13 games. A large part of those struggle is that the players currently on the IL would likely win the AL Central if healthy and surrounded by replacement level players—turns out it’s tough to win games when 5 regulars, your ace starter and ace reliever are simultaneously out. The Yankee bullpen has yet to pick up the slack, with both Chad Green and Zack Britton not performing to expectations.

There is still quite a bit of noise in the data at this point in the season—seriously, it’s been only 13 games even if it feels like it’s been a lifetime—and early-season small sample size has a way of making one look like a fool by the time the weather warms up. But we can still discern trends and identify areas to watch as the season grows older, and that does have real analytic value. Regarding the Yanks bullpen, I am considerably more concerned with Green’s struggles than Britton’s over the long-run, so let’s take a look at what could be going wrong for the Yankees once-fireman.

Fastball Reliance

We’ve covered this quite a bit at RAB before, so you should all be familiar by now: Green really, really relies on his fastball. Check this out:

Since Green fully became a reliever, and a good one in that, in 2017, he has essentially used only two pitches: his four-seam fastball and his slider. The slider is more for show, as it’s not that effective. That’s why he ends up using the four-seamer more than 75% of the time. Last year it was even higher than that, peaking at 93% of the time last June. That’s because his slider isn’t all that effective. He’s hovering at about 75% fastballs so far in 2019, though it’s worth noting he’s re-added his splitter to his arsenal, which Mike covered a few weeks ago. It’s too early to worry about how effective it is—but it’s interesting that Green is trying the splitter again.

Green really needs his fastball to be effective for him to be successful, and while he was still very good last year, there are clear signs that his hitters were adjusting to his fastball. Take a look at this table, comparing his fastball in 2017 and 2018:

Those are still good numbers, sitting comfortably above-average to elite, but that doesn’t mean that there aren’t red flags here, especially for a fastball only pitcher. Hitters started squaring Green up a lot more in 2018, as evidenced above and by an increased HR/9 and reduced K%. It was a lot harder for Green to blow fastballs by MLB hitters in 2018, and that has been so far again this year. That’s probably why he’s trying to fold in more splitters: by introducing that pitch, he hopes to keep hitters off balance and regain that four-seamer’s elite effectiveness.

Existing Red Flags

Relievers are notoriously fickle and unpredictable—that’s why those who are predictable usually tend to be well-paid—and one pitch guys like Green are more susceptible to quick, ugly backslides. (Remember the relievers are fungible days? That was all the rage in the analytic community a few years back.) In fact, there have already been a few existing red flags, even from Green’s dominant 2017. To the data:

Good grief, those 2019 numbers. But leaving those aside, there are interesting data points there in both 2017 and 18, when Green was extremely effective: hard hit % and exit velocity. What those graphs show is that it was really, really hard to make contact against Green but when batters did, they tended to hit the ball fairly hard. His fastball was just so overpowering that it generated a lot of swings and misses, and its spin-rate was so high that it looked even faster than it was.

As Mike has said repeatedly, though, when you only rely on a fastball at the Major League level, batters will eventually start to square you up unless you can keep them honest. That’s why Green dropped off a bit last year. This year, Green hasn’t been able to get the fastball by anyone: he is striking out only 11% of batters compared to about 35% in the last two seasons.

That means more batters are making contact, and, as we’d expect, hitting the ball hard. They’re waiting for the fastball. Hopefully, that’s just a small-sample-size, early-season noise—but as the earlier chart showed, his velocity and spin-rate are trending downward since 2017, in concert with his effectiveness. That trend has continued this year, but I didn’t include 2019 figures because it’s still way too small of a sample to really matter. With that said, however, it should be clear by now how troubling these trends are for a guy with Green’s arsenal.

A Way Forward?

All is not lost, however. Again, it’s extremely early in the year, with the Yankees playing in some cold, rainy conditions recently, including his rough appearance last night. Maybe Green’s velocity increases as the weather warms up and it gives him that extra edge again. That’s just Something To Watch for now, as is his ability to generate swings and misses at the top of the zone.

But what if the velocity doesn’t come back? In that case, it’s going to be extremely important for Green to develop a secondary pitch that is there for more than show. Even in its diminished state, his fastball is an above-average pitch. He can be a very effective reliever and a key part of the Yankee bullpen with it, but that will be considerably easier with a pitch with movement, so keep an eye on that splitter. If batters start biting, that will be a good sign for Green and the Yankees in the long-term.

The problem is that he’s never been able to develop that pitch before in his career, and his MLB success has always been buoyed by his fastball. Given the depleted state of the roster and general ineffectiveness of the bullpen so far in 2019, the Yankees had better hope that’s about to change.

Filed Under: Analysis Tagged With: Chad Green

What do the Yankees have in Mike Tauchman?

April 9, 2019 by Derek Albin


Who? That was my reaction when the Yankees acquired Mike Tauchman in an eleventh hour deal before the regular season began. I’m sure I wasn’t alone. The trade was a result of need with Aaron Hicks’s recovery dragging out. Tauchman snagged the team’s final roster spot, much to Tyler Wade’s chagrin. As a 28 year-old yet to shed the Quad-A star reputation, the deal was a tad surprising. Tyler Wade had all but made the roster, and if the Yankees wanted to go off the 40-man for a true outfielder, they could have gone with non-roster invitee Billy Burns. Instead, they turned to the Rockies in order to get Tauchman.

Tauchman has “Voit-like” qualities. In other words, the Yankees think the outfielder could be a diamond in the rough, just like Luke Voit was last summer. As a left-handed hitter with modest power numbers in the minors, it’s not difficult to envision why the Yankees might like Tauchman.

The former tenth rounder has spent three full seasons with Albuquerque, Colorado’s Tripe-A affiliate. That team is part of the batter-tilted Pacific Coast League. Nonetheless, Tauchman’s statistics are impressive even with the PCL boost. In 1,473 plate appearances, he recorded a 126 wRC+. The combination of contact, discipline, and decent power propelled Tauchman to that comfortably above average all-in number. Still, he couldn’t replicate that performance in his stints with the Rockies. The outfielder got to hit 69 times for the Rockies over the past two seasons and posted a paltry 17 wRC+. Obviously, small sample size and all, the Yankees aren’t writing him off based on his performance in Colorado.

In an era dominated by strikeouts, and with a lineup already featuring a few strikeout prone batters, Tauchman’s bat to ball skill was undoubtedly part of the Yankees’ attraction. His 14.9 percent punchout rate in Triple-A is remarkably low. Further, it’s not like Tauchman makes a bunch of contact by avoiding deep counts. His walk rates have gradually improved in Triple-A, reaching as high as 12.7 percent last season. He sounds a bit like Aaron Hicks, strictly in terms of plate discipline: high contact with patience. Unfortunately, that skillset hasn’t translated to the majors yet. He’s fanned 36.6 percent of the time in limited opportunities.

Decent power is another one of Tauchman’s positives, and it’s fairly new to his game. Prior to 2017, Tauchman had almost no pop. He hit only one home run in 527 plate appearances in his first season at the minors’ highest level. Then, in 2017, that jumped to 16 in 475 (and a .224 ISO). In 2018, he hit 20 in 471 (.248 ISO). Where’d the power come from? He credited Glenallen Hill, his Triple-A manager and former Yankee (great excuse to relive this).

Even though Tauchman has developed some power, there’s still one thing hindering his ability to tap further into his six-foot-two, two hundred pound frame: his propensity to hit grounders. He’s started to minimize that weakness over the last few years, but could still do better. In 2016, 57.5 percent of his batted balls were grounders. The next season, he dropped that mark to 46.7 percent. It fell a bit further to 43.5% last year. In limited time in the majors, he’s really struggled to lift the ball: 28 of 41 balls in play have been hit into the ground.

With few balls in play, there’s not much to glean from Statcast. To no surprise, he has a very low launch angle, which is why he hits the ball into the ground so frequently. I don’t think there’s anything to read into in terms of exit velocity (from what’s publicly available). I’d bet that his minor league Trackman numbers indicate good contact quality, though. And that’s where we can induce why the Yankees view him as potentially the next Voit.

We’ve heard about the launch angle revolution ad nauseam. Teams are hoping to dig up guys who with a swing change can unlock better offensive performance, and this is yet another case of it. Tauchman has already made improvements with Colorado over the past couple years, as evidenced by additional power and lower ground ball rates. Perhaps the Yankees feel that he can take the next step in the Bronx, especially with Hicks and Giancarlo Stanton out.

All told, Tauchman fits the mold of the type of player the Yankees have sought out in recent seasons. The aforementioned Hicks and Voit are other recent examples. Chances are that Tauchman won’t blossom into a significant contributor, but at the same time, the Yankees aren’t counting on him for much more than depth. The easy call would have been to bring Billy Burns north, but instead, the team took a more thoughtful approach. If Tauchman thrives and forces his way into regular playing time, great. Otherwise, it’s not a big deal. The team has enough outfield depth (when healthy) to stash Tauchman in the minors.

Like many others, I’ve been highly critical of the Yankees roster construction this offseason. Putting the past aside, Tauchman is an intriguing acquisition. At worst, he’s a decent up-and-down outfielder when needed this year. Once Stanton and Hicks return, Tauchman won’t be needed in the Bronx (barring future injury). At the same time, he appears to have some untapped potential that the Yankees have been good at snuffing out.

Filed Under: Analysis Tagged With: Mike Tauchman

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 117
  • Next Page »

RAB Thoughts on Patreon

Mike is running weekly thoughts-style posts at our "RAB Thoughts" Patreon. $3 per month gets you weekly Yankees analysis. Become a Patron!

Got A Question For The Mailbag?

Email us at RABmailbag (at) gmail (dot) com. The mailbag is posted Friday mornings.

RAB Features

  • 2019 Season Preview series
  • 2019 Top 30 Prospects
  • 'What If' series with OOTP
  • Yankees depth chart

Search RAB

Copyright © 2023 · River Avenue Blues