We’re number one

18 Comments»

Mike A. says:
November 2, 2007 at 5:28 pm
Allow me to correct you Ben:
“We’d like to thank Pete Abe’s new server and all of our readers for making that possible. A-Rod, you can get bent.”
There, much better.
Reply
dan says:
November 2, 2007 at 5:47 pm
Was Watching? I feel so depressed every time I open that page.
Reply
alex says:
November 2, 2007 at 6:02 pm
you guys deserve it, a good balance of reporting, and analysis, and i love mike’s prospect stuff. keep it up fellas.
Reply
Mike says:
November 2, 2007 at 7:01 pm
Mine is up to 17!
Reply
• dan says:

  November 2, 2007 at 8:08 pm

  17?

  Reply
Cam says:
November 2, 2007 at 7:04 pm
Congrats! Keep it up!
Reply
Count Zero says:
November 2, 2007 at 7:25 pm
RAB rulez!
How is WW second? Seems unfathomable…
Keep up the good work guys!
Reply
Sky says:
November 2, 2007 at 7:33 pm
Congrats, guys. There’s only so much time I spend reading about the Yankees and I spend some of it with y’all.
Reply
Mike says:
November 2, 2007 at 8:18 pm
Yea Dan 17! He listed the top 8. Last week my blog was 19th.
Reply
• dan says:

  November 2, 2007 at 8:39 pm

  Wow, I completely missed the fact that your name didnt say have the “A.” in it. My bad.

  Reply
NYFan50 says:
November 2, 2007 at 10:12 pm
Congratulations, guys. The best Yankee blog deserves the top spot.
Reply
Jeteupthemiddle says:
November 2, 2007 at 10:36 pm
I’m amused that In George We Trust is also on the list.
Wasn’t that site abandoned over a year ago?
Reply
• Mike A. says:

  November 2, 2007 at 10:49 pm

  I dropped it just after the 06 draft because Blogger was being a piece of crap. The prospect profiles still catch some links (which is dumb because they’re nearly 2 years old now), which keep the rating up.

  Reply
Jeteupthemiddle says:
November 2, 2007 at 10:47 pm
To go off topic a bit because I didn’t think this link warrants an email, but here it is specifically for Mike A.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7400932
“The Giants have even let it be known that Tim Lincecum, their No. 1 pick in 2006, can be had for a quality bat.”
That can’t possibly be accurate, can it?
Reply
• Mike A. says:

  November 2, 2007 at 10:56 pm

  I can’t see how that would be true, they’d be going backwards if they dealt him. Think about it, he’s under control for another FIVE years. Pitcher’s with that type of stuff and that kind of cost control just don’t get moved.

  If they were looking to move him, a) I would think he’s hurt, and/or b) they could get a real nice player back, like a Miggy Cabrera or Matt Kemp.

  Reply
• dan says:

  November 2, 2007 at 10:56 pm

  There’s a little mini-discussion on that topic starting here:

  http://tinyurl.com/yqb29o

  Reply
Patrick says:
November 3, 2007 at 9:30 am
Congrats guys.
Reply
barry says:
November 4, 2007 at 3:27 am
See I’m not really wasting my time checking your site religously for updates.
Reply

Leave a Reply