Feb
10
THT on pitch sequences
ByOver at The Hardball Times, Josh Kalk used PITCHf/x data to take a look at pitch sequencing and tries to figure out why guys with great stuff might not get the results a guy with fringy stuff does. That data reinforces the old adage that everything in baseball revolves around the fastball, and shows just how devastating the splitter can be. Make sure you check it out, very interesting stuff.
Google+
10 Comments»
Keep up with RAB
Yankees News from YESNetwork.com
- Yankees drop series finale in Texas
- Jeter receives presidential farewell in Texas
- How Robertson compares to Rivera in each pitcher's first season as Yankees closer
- Jeter records milestone hit in Monday's loss
- Three stars for Yankees against the Blue Jays
- Captain's Log: Derek Jeter's career against the Texas Rangers
- Chase Headley quickly adapting to the Yankee way
- Torre inducted into Baseball Hall of Fame
- Yankees Postgame Notebook: 'Today just wasn't our day'
- Yankees fan returns lost World Series ring
Banner Design By
The Eric Jagielo Watch
Masthead
The Founders
Mike Axisa, Ben Kabak, Joe Pawlikowski
Editor-In-Chief
Mike Axisa Archives | Email
Managing Editors
Ben Kabak Archives | E-mail
Joe Pawlikowski Archives | E-mail
Technical Manager
Jay Gordon
Beloved Alumni
Larry Koestler (Archives)
Moshe Mandel (Archives)
Eric Schultz (Archives)
Matthew Warden (Archives)
Man, I love this stuff. The closer to the raw data, the better.
Word of the day: fringy. Learn it. Use it. Love it.
i surprised by the effectiveness of “doubling up.” that is, following a curve with another, for example. fascinating stuff.
I liked the part about how the change up leaves you with no really good followup pitch, and how mysterious the pitch is in general.
Of course, so much depends on the quality of the pitch being thrown. Very few pitchers have really good change ups. It’s typically a 3rd or 4th pitch for most pitchers.
I’m curious what Johan Santana’s follow up pitch data looks like for his change-up.
I was just reading the same article when you posted this. Interesting stuff, but High Fatsball/Curve isn’t a rule by any stretch, as the article shows. Its just one of the tools in the toolbox. If you fell into the pattern of High Fastball/Curveball away, hitters will adjust and be ready for the curve. The predictability will work against you.
Its really an art, as the opening line implies.
One thing to factor in is when pitches tend to be thrown in a count. Take the change up for example. That’s usually a 3rd or 4th pitch, one that a pitcher will use when ahead in the count as a put away pitch, throwing it out of the zone for a swing and miss.
If you have to throw another pitch, you know it didn’t work. You were ahead in the count, and just threw a pitch out of the zone. Maybe he fouled it off, but chances are the count is evened up. Now the batter is in a better position and the pitcher needs to come back with a strike. Most often that will be a fastball, and the hitter will be expecting it.
So the change isn’t a bad pitch, the inability to follow it up has more to do with when its used.
Josh Kalk = Awesome.
I am glad you guys liked the article. Stay tuned as some more interesting stuff will be unveiled next week.
What an amazing article. I also enjoyed “Searching for the game’s best pitch” and I’d love to see the results for the 2008 season.