Open Thread: Craig Wilson
By
(Photo via www.bestsportsphotos.com)
A lot of things went wrong for the Yankees in 2006, specifically the injuries to Hideki Matsui and Gary Sheffield and the collapses of 2005 saviors Aaron Small and Shawn Chacon. One of the outfield holes was plugged when Brian Cashman stole Bobby Abreu (and Cory Lidle) from the Phillies at the trade deadline, and he also shored up another hole by trading Chacon to the Pirates for Craig Wilson.
Melky Cabrera was doing a fine job as a rookie (.360 OBP), but Andy Phillips wasn’t getting it done as the regular first baseman. Wilson replaced him after the trade, and his versatility was also supposed to be a plus. He was exactly the kind of guy everyone loves to suggest for a bench job these days; he’d hit 29 homers two years prior to the trade and was capable of playing four positions (catcher, first, and both corner outfield spots). Wilson had a dozen hits in his first ten games with New York, but he just stopped hitting after that. A 10-for-64 finish to the season dropped his Yankees’ batting line to .212/.248/.365 in 109 plate appearances.
The Yankees let Wilson walk as a free agent after the season, and he didn’t have much baseball left in him. He hasn’t seen the big leagues since 2007, and hasn’t even played in the minors since 2008. Wilson turns 35 years old today, so he’s younger than I realized. Baseball-Reference says he managed to bank over $10M during his seven-year career, which is a pretty good head start on life after baseball.
* * *
Here is tonight’s open thread. The Devils are the only local sports team in action tonight, so you’re pretty much on your own as far as entertainment goes. You folks now what to do by now, so have at it.
55 Comments»
RAB Info
The Founders
Mike Axisa, Ben Kabak, Joe Pawlikowski
Editor-In-Chief
Mike Axisa Archives | Email
Managing Editors
Ben Kabak Archives | E-mail
Joe Pawlikowski Archives | E-mail
Contributing Editors
Larry Koestler (Archives)
Moshe Mandel (Archives)
Eric Schultz (Archives)
Weekend Writers
Hannah Ehrlich (Archives)
Matthew Warden (Archives)
Special Contributor
J.R. O'Grady (Archives)
Technical Consultant
Jay Gordon
Subscribe to RAB by RSS
Follow @RiverAveBlues
Search RAB
Yankees News from YESNetwork.com
- Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders get back Betances, activate Murton
- Yankees claim left-handed pitcher David Huff off waivers from the Cleveland Indians
- Yankees put Granderson on 15-day disabled list
- Yankees activate Nova from disabled list, send Betances to Triple-A
- Yankees down Rays in series opener, but lose Granderson to broken pinkie knuckle
- Curtis Granderson leaves game after fracturing knuckle on his pinkie finger
- Teixeira to play for Double-A Trenton Thunder on Wednesday and Thursday
- Teixeira plans to play in Minors Wednesday
- Brian Cashman speaks to media about injured Yankees pitchers
- Alberto Gonzalez clears waivers, will report to Triple-A Scranton/Wilkes-Barre
Banner Design By
The Tyler Austin Watch
Banuelos equals Jon lester, Jesus Montero equals someone like Manny, and Betances turns out to be a bust. Perfectly reasonable.
Banuelos takes your girlfriend, Jesus Montero takes her friends, and Bentances get to keep all of them. Perfectly reasonable. Those are the chances of your reasoning becoming reality. If at least one of them becomes a useful piece then the Yankees did a great job.
A stretch on each and every comparison if not a complete hallucination…
Perfectly reasonable dream scenario, yes. Reasonable expectation, no. (although in my dream the first two come true, and betances is Justin Verlander to boot)
Continuation of some point from another thread or something?
I say Banuelos ends up like Ricky Romero, Jesus is close to Miguel Cabrera, Betances gets traded and is an A.J Burnett clone.
My hopes are Man-Ban = Andy Pettitte, the Monstero = Frank Thomas, and Betances (don’t have a catchy nickname, sorry) = Joba Chamberlain-esque.
Dealin’ Dellin?
I sense much AJ Burnett in him. I put him in the bullpen, let his great fastball and curve do the talking, and trade him to someone who sees him as a starter.
I just realized you were offering a nickname and not wondering if I’d trade him since I had low hopes for him, haha. Dealin’ Dellin works.
If this is the game we’re playing…
Banuelos = Johan Santana (2003-2008)
Montero = Miguel Cabrera (minus the pudge)
Betances = Josh Johnson (minus the arm issues)
Banuelos = Lefty Grove
Montero = Rogers Hornsby that stays healthy
Betances = Walter Johnson
Unrealistic,
ManBan will have more Ks.
Montero will have better D than Hornsby.
Betances and The Big Train? That one is okay, I guess.
I’ll play.
Banuelos: Scott Kazmir
Montero: Mike Sweeney
Betances: Josh Beckett or AJ Burnett
Obvious caveat that having one of these outcomes would be awesome. Having two would be unbelievable.
I can do this. Sure.
Banuelos: Andy F’ing Pettitte
Montero: Miguel Cabrera
Betances: Edwin Jackson AND a Yankee
BOOM.
Let’s play the Red Sox version of this fun game:
Ranaudo: Tom Seaver
Iglesias: Ozzie Smith
Lavarnway: Johnny Bench
/Gammons’d
Banuelos = poor man’s Andrew Miller
Montero = poor man’s Lavarnway
Derek Jeter = poor man’s Jose Iglesias
/Eric Ortiz’d
I think even Gammons would grant that Lavarnway is no stalwart at catcher, therefore:
Lavarnway: Mike Piazza
Banuelos = Babe Ruth, converts to outfield and challenges Bonds’ consecutive MVP record.
Montero = Albert Pujols. Loses multiple MVP awards to Banuelos depsite elite playing.
Betances = Justin Verlander. Beats Banuelos and Montero for 2015 MVP with a 27 win season.
In all seriousness:
Banuelos = Francisco Liriano
Montero = Juan Gonzalez
Betances = Daniel Cabrera
Yeah, that’s probably what will happen.
(No sarcasm)
Juan Gone? Where do I sign up for that?
So Angels trade Tyler Chatwood for Iannetta. I’m starting to think the Angels put something in their water over there. Chatwood may have had a rough season (4.89 FIP, 4.59 K/9) as a 21 year old in the majors, but why are they selling so low for a guy that should be a backup catcher?
Idk, I think Ianetta is underrated, and he’s a major upgrade over Mathis no matter how you slice it. Seems like a good case of dealing from depth to meet a need to me.
Anyone is an upgrade over Mathis, but I really have to wonder how his numbers will translate to the AL West, and if the Angels will be happy with his job behind the plate. Doesn’t make sense to me, selling low and not targeting a young catcher instead. Wouldn’t Chatwood for a guy like Romine make more sense for the Angels?
What do you know about Chatwood beyond the cited stats, which, frankly, stink?
Yes, I would agree Romine should be valued higher than Ianetta, thanks to their respective contract status, but for the Angels, Ianetta might hold more value thanks to his project-ability at the ML level.
I know enough about Chatwood, I really liked him going into 2011. Sits mid 90′s and can bring it up to high 90′s. Has a big change in velocity with his changeup. Sharp 12-6 curveball. I’d like it if he added another pitch, but he’s got 3 great pitches. He’s got the ability to control his groundball rate and strike out hitters. Maybe his 5-10 stature scares people, but I think it’ll help him with his control. I really like Chatwood and wish the Yankees made a play. He’s only 21! Iannetta will probably be worth more in WAR next year, but is it worth 5-6 years of this youngster for way cheaper? I say no way.
That’s a glowing scouting report. I can’t argue anymore.
I’ll say this: DiPoto is no dummy, and we know Scioscia will not play a deficient defensive catcher. I believe this trade has much more to do with Chatwood than Ianetta, so, if you care to, why do you suppose the Angels would give up on such a prospect?
I’d say, they have a jam packed farm system, a good immediate starting rotation, and most of all, they want to compete now. They probably saw Chatwood as the weakest top prospect they have and were most willing to part with him in their desperation to find a catcher. I’d say it would be smarter to take a chance on a catcher on the same prospect-level as Chatwood, but instead they decided to compete harder in 2012.
Yes different GM’s, but this front office isn’t known for their logic. Vernon Wells can tell you that.
Chatwood walks way too many, and hasn’t struck anybody out since A ball. Getting a starting catcher for that is a steal for the Angels.
You mean 2008 (11.4 K/9), 2009(8.2 K/9), and the majority of 2010. (7.7 K/9 in 81.1 IP)
His walk rate has been miserable, fair enough there.
yes, like I said, A ball
his best K/9 above A ball was a mediocre 6.19 in a very small sample size in triple A
other than that, his K/9 against advanced competition has been in the 4.69 – 4.74 range
his overall K/9 AA and above is 4.82
He may improve, but he’s far from a sure thing or elite prospect
I absolutely agree with you, he’s far from a sure thing, and depending on how you rank things, yes he’s not an elite prospect. But when he was ranked #76 overall last year, his peripherals really speak to that ranking. He’s spent too little time outside of single A to base a scouting report on his numbers. If anything, his 4.75 ERA in the majors isn’t bad for a 21 year old who was still in single A last year.
I have the exact opposite view. Here’s what MLBTradeRumors wrote about Chatwood:
“Chatwood, 21, posted a 4.75 ERA with 4.7 K/9, 4.5 BB/9 and a 47% ground ball rate in 142 innings as a rookie for the Angels this past season. The 2008 second round pick entered the season as the 76th ranked prospect in MLB, according to Baseball America. He has a 3.40 ERA with 7.6 K/9 and 4.9 BB/9 in parts of four minor league seasons.”
Ugh. I’d gladly take a 29 year-old catcher with a .357 OBP, even Coors-aided, for that.
Why would you trade one of you top prospects one 1 year (plus $5.5m option) of someone who barely qualifies as a starting catcher. Sure the walks are there, but the defense is mediocre, he has very little power in Coors, and can’t hit for contact. He’s moving to a pitchers league now.
You know, I didn’t consider the contract at all. If your facts are true, then I suppose this trade makes a lot more sense for Colorado.
Contact rates? 16% walk rate vs 20% strikeout rate looks pretty good to me. I don’t know about his defense, but this does not appear to be someone that barely qualifies as a starting catcher. Pitcher’s league? Wasn’t he just in the division with Kershaw, Lincecum, Kennedy, etc.?
Calling Chatwood “one of your top prospects” seems gratuitous. I don’t know about Chatwood either, but his performance doesn’t cry ‘top prospect.’
Then again, he is 21. Maybe your more right than me.
The issue I have with the leagues is that Iannetta faced Kershaw, Lincecum, and Kennedy in Coors field where he hits .262/.377/.492. His away splits are a horrendous .208/.338/.369.
In 2011 Coors ranked #2 in runs scored, now Iannetta has to play in Angel Stadium, ranked #27.
agreed. Chatwood may bounce back, but I still think the Angels win this deal.
I just spent almost 30 minutes reading through that Mark Montgomery thread…I don’t even have words for it…
Haha, this made me laugh.
Yeah, I cam home late this evening and started flipping through the postings, and immediately noticed that a prospect profile, posted in the middle of the day, during one of the most quiet times of the year, was registering nearly 100 messages. Hmmm, I wonder what’s going on in there.
I greatly enjoyed when he simply ended his note with, “I really greatly dislike you.” : -)
If there was a signature line on RAB that quote would be mine.
My favorite part was when he actually shared his SAT scores. It would have been better if he complied with my request for a scanned copy.
My second favorite part was after it was over, someone came to the defense of Mickey Mantle.
Just another good ol’ Ted Nelson vs Plank weekday battle! haha.
Since when did they have a verbal section on the SATs? Was that supposed to be a joke or just stupidity.
There used to be just two sections of the SATs, math and verbal. Recently, they split it into 3 sections.
Or were you making a joke?
I got a 550 on the verbal section of the GRE. Is there any hope for me? How will I win arguments on the internet!?
You need at least a 720 to win arguments on the internet.
Alright, I guess I’ll go back to digging ditches now. Stupid Brendan, thinking you could be somebody!
I would gladly pay $50 for a picture or a short bio on Ted Nelson. At first he used to just annoy the hell out of me but now after his thousandth argument with various RAB commenters I find myself strangely fascinated by the pathology behind his constant attacks on our fellow RABers.
We should start a dossier on him.
Took the SATs once and never took one of those prep classes so I don’t really know what they’re called, but I do know they don’t get the verbal anymore. Apparently they changed it to critical reading.
Epic, isn’t it?
The real question is, did you score at least a 720 and do you have a physical copy of the results to prove it?
It has been quite a while since I laughed that hard at an internet pissing contest.
I always kinda liked Craig Wilson. He did a lot for the community in Pittsburgh.
It was injury that did him in. He and Bubba Crosby had similar post-Yankee careers. They both had their shoulders roto-rootered after they left the Yankees, and they both never recovered. That is apparently quite common.