Jan
15
Joba or Laptop Boy? You decide.
ByJerry Crasnick hosted an ESPN.com chat this afternoon in which he facilitated something of a discussion on the Joba vs. Buchholz debate. It’s your typical back-and-forth bluster with most folks coming down, rightly, on the side of Joba. But the fun is in the poll. Joba’s got over 60 percent of the vote right now. I like that.
21 Comments»
RAB Info
The Founders
Mike Axisa, Ben Kabak, Joe Pawlikowski
Editor-In-Chief
Mike Axisa Archives | Email
Managing Editors
Ben Kabak Archives | E-mail
Joe Pawlikowski Archives | E-mail
Contributing Editor
Matthew Warden (Archives)
Technical Manager
Jay Gordon
Beloved Alumni
Larry Koestler (Archives)
Moshe Mandel (Archives)
Eric Schultz (Archives)
Subscribe to RAB by RSS
Follow @RiverAveBlues
Search RAB
Loading
Yankees News from YESNetwork.com
- Yankees make roster moves ahead of series finale
- Teixeira back in the lineup in finale vs. Rays
- Yanks lose another to Rays as Nova leaves game
- Nova removed early due to elbow soreness
- Yankees DFA LHP Cabral, recall RHP Daley
- Yankees fall to Rays in late innings, 11-5
- Teixeira plays in 2nd extended spring game
- Joe Girardi still 'in the dark' on new home plate rules
- Yankees win behind seven strong from Sabathia
- Sizemore earns redemption in Yankees' doubleheader sweep of Cubs
Banner Design By
The Eric Jagielo Watch
both are really good prospects.
but a more interesting debate is Hughes vs. the Dell Dude.
the hype around buchholz makes me wonder…you see a first round pick of the sox throw a no-hitter, at home, in his second ever major league start. then you look at the hype phil hughes could have had if he threw a no-hitter, on the road, in his first ever major league start at texas. add that to the original hype and expectations that are through the roof, and phil was one hamstring pull away from being included in this debate instead of joba.
to be completely fair, we have small sample sizes of both joba and clay…both with great success. my bias leads me towards joba, but i also think phil hughes will be a better year as a starter than joba. i see no reason why phil can’t emerge as our number 3 this year
Reading some comments on the chat about Joba and his stuff can get a fan pretty excited.
Phil was tremendous in his last several starts and in the playoffs.
Ian put up numbers equal to or better than the above.
This will be a very interesting year.
I like this part the best:
“We talked to nine non-Red Sox or Yankees personnel people, and the verdict was decidedly pro-Joba.”
I can’t wait for the “Where’s my lap-top? clap, clap, clap clap clap, Where’s my lap-top?” chants at the Stadium.
Ah shit I was just about to write that. Speaking of…. when do individual game tickets go on sale?
Oh man — I have that stuck in my head all afternoon now.
Hughes will be better than both.
I tend to agree.
Sci, UT: Are people down on Clay because of his size, stuff, make up, or what?
Jerry Crasnick: Sci,
Buchholz had an off field issue at McNeese State where he was arrested for stealing some computers.
I thought it interesting how it mentioned the scouts little love for IPK. Wonder if they watched the game he pitched in Toronto. Anyways, I think IPK could be a young Mussina. He is just so crafty.
As far as Joba being a started it is going to be awesome to see that one. I really can’t wait.
I want to point everyone (especially the melky haters) to this article
http://www.baseballprospectus......cleid=7053
Scroll down to the 2 paragraphs about Melky (towards the bottom).
he’s going to pop 80 extra-base hits and slug .500 in a season very, very soon.
We don’t hate Melky. We hate below average players.
I hope that’s right, but seriously it’s laughable.
From what I’ve read in various comments sections, fans of other teams are pretty much counting the Yanks out this season if they go ahead with the young rotation (including Chamberlain, Hughes, and Kennedy plus Wang and Andy). I guess they don’t think the youngsters can bring it. I would say to that that the Yanks have had inconsistent and sometimes downright terrible pitching for a few years now and they’ve still contended because of the offense.
Kennedy is the sleeper. I saw all three pitch in the mil. Kennedy is a very young Mussina. Phil is just an all around good, thinking tough pitcher with good control of his pitches. Joba is, well, Joba! A young Roger, with better or as good stuff. Everyone will see good things from them, if no one gets hurt. I hate comparing Joba to roger…roger was sometimes very mean, like Sal the Barber… I don’t think Joba is that way. But he will come inside to anyone that pushes it…see last year.
Is it me or that the Mussina Comparison for Kennedy a little off here.
I like Kennedy, and I think he has a chance to be a good pitcher, and he’s better than what people think he is. That said interms of stuff, he’s no Mike Mussina I am sorry.
I understand that Mike for the last couple years relies on control and smarts and guile but did people for get his baltimore O’s days or even his early yankee days. Mussina had sick stuff with a very good fastball, nasty knuckle curve and a good change up. Kennedy’s stuff right now doesn’t match that and hell even Kennedy would like have stuff like that.
I think you guys are underrating Moose.
Ivan
I respectively disagree with your assessment of IPK. His fast ball gets up to 91/92 (at times) and hitters don’t center the ball very well. He gets a lot of swinging s/o…just like moose. In other words, don’t over remember how fast the moose was…91/93. I believe what my eyes have seen, rather then going with what someone may read. Maybe only me, but he looked good to me. And this from a old Eddy Lopat type pitcher.
The most interesting thing for me was that some people like Marquez better than IPK. We all talk about Horne, but maybe we should be talking more about Marquez!
i believe Joba AND Hughes will be better than Buchholz.
My favorite Buchholz Booster line was, “Besides his fastball, Joba doesn’t have any other pitches as refined as Clay”
So Joba is just a fastball? You have to try to say something like that.