Sep
04
News on Cashman remains the same
ByEd Price checks in to tell us that Brian Cashman still hasn’t decided on the future and won’t until after the season ends. Which is the same thing we’ve heard since, oh, Spring Training. The Day of Reckoning draws nearer.
18 Comments»
RAB Info
The Founders
Mike Axisa, Ben Kabak, Joe Pawlikowski
Editor-In-Chief
Mike Axisa Archives | Email
Managing Editors
Ben Kabak Archives | E-mail
Joe Pawlikowski Archives | E-mail
Contributing Editor
Matthew Warden (Archives)
Technical Manager
Jay Gordon
Beloved Alumni
Larry Koestler (Archives)
Moshe Mandel (Archives)
Eric Schultz (Archives)
Subscribe to RAB by RSS
Follow @RiverAveBlues
Search RAB
Loading
Yankees News from YESNetwork.com
- Yankees, Rays play to a 3-3 tie in Tampa
- Yankees top Tigers on walk-off balk
- Yankees mourn the passing of Carmen Berra
- Baseball reacts to the passing of Dr. Frank Jobe
- Sports medicine pioneer Jobe dies at 88
- Yankees top Phillies on rainy day in Clearwater
- Army, UConn to face off at Yankee Stadium
- Rivera rescues, renovates NY church
- Rays ride long ball to 5-4 win over Yankees
- Yankees fall to Orioles in first spring night game
Countdown to Opening Day
Just 22 days 'til Opening day! Click here for the Spring Training broadcast schedule.Banner Design By
I’d be the greatest GM of all time if they hired me. But they won’t.
Guaranteed numerous Titles. I’m that good.
Hal and Hank are nowhere near as “high maintenance” as George was…..no reason why he’d leave now…..every reason to stay, among them family, the building of the minors, and the fact that the Yanks pretty much pay the most…..he already has most of the power he wanted……
could go to Seattle clean that team up in a worse division with less expectation and look like a genius, when Seattle can’t get much worse
why do that when he can be the man that brought the Yanks back….with the resources to do it quickly……and not move the family?
$2.5 million, a raise of @ 25% over his current deal over 3-4 years with complete autonomy as before – in writing should possibly do it.
If you fail at your job, repeatedly, would you get a 25% raise? I had a great year and I work for a fortune 500 company that posted record growth, and profits, and I still got 4%.
If they offer Cash anything, and I still think they shouldn’t, it should be a long the same lines as what they offered Torre. Lower the base and raise the the incentive package. Win and get paid.
If you give the GM an incentive-based contract, you create, artificially, a situation in which that GM has incentive to treat every year like the final year of his contract. By that I mean – the incentive to win now will always be greater than the incentive to build the strongest organization possible for the long-haul. I’m not saying the incentive to win now should be marginalized, but there is certainly a balance there that an organization should attempt to maintain. When someone comes to the GM with a trade proposal like “I’ll give you X (veteran player in last year of contract) for Y and Z (top 2 prospects),” the GM’s decision shouldn’t be disproportionately influenced by a few extra dollars that may appear in his bank account.
but then Brad wouldn’t be able to draw any more analogies to his own job working for a Fortune 500 company!
Insightful, as always……..but wrong as usual. I suppose that’s why you like here as much as you seem to. You know what they say about stupid people? Never argue with a stupid person. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. You really got me there!!!!
This is the Yankee’s we’re talking about. Like it or not the emphasis is always on “winning now”. Obviously that won’t happen this year and while some of the things that transpired this season were out of the control of the GM, next year the emphasis will be the same.
When working with $175-$200 million dollar payroll you really can’t justify 3-5 year rebuilding plans. If this year taught Cashman anything it should have taught him that “youth” can’t be rushed. I don’t see an incentive laden contract changing the way the Yank’s approach trades and free agents. What I would like to see from an incentive based contract is better moves on the farm. You know like actually developing some positional players. Maybe Cashman would be less willing to sign one injury prone pitcher after another.
The Yankees must walk a fine line between rebuilding and reloading. It would be very hard to sustain the types of payroll the Yanks have if you can’t put 3-4 million people in those seats. String together a few bad years and watch your revenue shrink as consumers find other places to spend their sports/entertainment dollars.
String together a few bad years and watch your revenue shrink as consumers find other places to spend their sports/entertainment dollars.
luckily for Cashman and the Yankees, they were intelligent enough to time the “rebuilding” around the 2-3 years when they were basically guaranteed 4 million in attendance no matter what.
the last year in Yankee Stadium and the first year or two in the new stadium will reap huge ticket sales almost independent of team performance.
couple that with the $80M+ freed up this offseason, tons of potential draft picks in the 2009 draft, the best FA class in years, and a decrease in their revenue sharing bill, i don’t think it’s a coincidence that the Yankees chose 2008 as a year to “transition”.
don’t get me wrong, they still went into this year thinking they would be at least the Wildcard, and in that respect, they failed.
but they were also content to use this season to break in some young pitchers, let some contracts expire, break in a new coaching staff, and give the farm system one more year to mature.
“This is the Yankee’s we’re talking about. Like it or not the emphasis is always on ‘winning now’.”
Yeah, well, you know, that’s just, like, your opinion, man. The Yankees’ track-record the last couple of seasons shows that they are balancing “winning now” against building the farm system for the long term. You may want the philosophy to be “win every year at all costs and the future be damned,” but the Yankees don’t seem to agree with you and just because it’s your opinion doesn’t make it so.
And who said anything about a 3-5 year rebuilding plan? What the Yankees have been doing is much more akin to a reloading on the fly, they’re not selling off parts and saying “hey, it’ll be a tough 5 years and we’ll probably be in last place for a while, but in the end it’ll be worth it.” They’re in a transition period, yes, but this is certainly not a 3-5 year rebuilding plan we’re witnessing.
“If you fail at your job, repeatedly, would you get a 25% raise?”
You would, if you weren’t failing.
95% of cashmans decisions have been disastrous……the 5% is pure luck…….this man is without question one of the dumbest human beings to ever get involved in MLB
This might be my favorite comment on RAB ever.
is “Berto” just “Alberto” trying to disguise himself?
the guy who tried to argue that HRs are bad…
I agree.
sure, but you don’t believe in dinosaurs either.