Feb
08

No team for old outfielder

By

The off-season woes of Bobby Abreu have been well-documented around here. Showing signs of a steep decline but still managing to turn in a 120 OPS+ last season, Abreu has been a free agent fielding few phone calls this season. With a week left until Spring Training, Nick Cafardo’s sources tell the Boston Globe columnist that Abreu may have to settle for a one-year, $3-million deal. For that money, the White Sox, Mariners, Angels, Dodgers, Braves and Mets could all get in on the bidding. I can’t imagine Abreu is too thrilled about the prospects of an 80 percent paycut.

Categories : Asides, Hot Stove League

33 Comments»

  1. Tom Zig says:

    Good thing we didn’t offer him arbitration.

  2. gxpanos says:

    At what point will it no longer be topical to do the whole “No ___ for old ___” thing? Because I was under the impression that it was like eight months ago.

    Kidding, kidding!

    Too bad for Bob, always liked him and his boring-ass ab’s. I did not, however, like his fly ball adventures.

  3. Manimal says:

    At that point, why don’t the yankees trade swisher or nady and give him 4 mil to platoon with the other OF’s

    • Rafi says:

      As much as we’d all like that, why would any GM(non-Sabean division) make such a deal? Why not just go out and sign Abreu themselves and keep the prospects and spend less money?

    • E-ROC says:

      Swisher and Nady are defensive upgrades and younger so I’m more inclined to keep those two than re-sign Abreu.

      • Manimal says:

        I never said he has a starting job, he could pinch hit for Brett gardner/melky late in games. His defense is subpar, but for a one year/3 million deal i think its worth it.

  4. Matthew says:

    Fuck, get value for Swisher, and give Bobby 4 million, why the fuck not? He’s a good stick…

  5. Doug says:

    If this truly what he’s gonna get, trade nady or swish for a prospect and sign abreu. you’re getting a better player AND saving $

    • mtt says:

      I imagine that all 29 other teams are also aware of this.

    • Matt says:

      1. Defense included, Swisher and Nady are better than and equal to Abreu.
      2. Why would you give up anything other than money when you could just sign Abreu?
      3. There is no pressing need for the Yankees to trade Nady and Swisher. They could use the OF depth and trading away Swisher would be trading away the only veteran OF who’s signed beyond the ’09 season.

      • Doug says:

        1. i agree w u that they’re all about equal. but i personally think that abreu fits our lineup better, batting 3rd
        2. for better defense; an NL team especially may want swish or nady for their D
        3. agree w this. and, yes, swish is important b/c he’s signed for another 2 yrs.

        not saying we have to make a deal and sign abreu. but to me, if you can trade nady and get a prospect, and then sign abreu to $4-5M, you do it.

        • Matt says:

          With his declining walk rate, Abreu isn’t a good fit for the lineup anymore, especially the third spot. He’s no longer the kind of hitter whose defense can get outweighed by his offense. He can’t DH because of Matsui and I don’t want him anywhere near the outfield. He cost the Yankees a lot of runs last year with his awful play in right, and his arm is declining as well. Swisher also adds a third switch hitter to the lineup, which provides much more balance.

          Neither Swisher nor Nady will be moved unless the Yankees are one thousand percent blown away and Nady and Swisher aren’t the kind of guys you blow teams away for.

    • Tom Zig says:

      At their respective points in their careers, Abreu is not a better player than Nady

  6. Steve H says:

    Remember how much Cash got killed for not offering arb? Fans, media, etc. were all crucifying him for it. I doubt he’ll go for $3 mil now, but no matter what it’s a far cry from the $16+ he would have gotten. I’d say Cash made the right call on that one.

    • Tom Zig says:

      Although imagine if Abreu rejected arbitration, no one would sign him, and he would have more egg on his face than v-tek

    • Doug says:

      agreed.

      but serious question here. back in december the baseball economy wasn’t as bad as it is now. or at least it wasn’t as obvious. are you really sure that abreu wouldn’t have turned down arbitration similar to varitek. i still think many players and agents were unaware how bad the baseball economy would get.

  7. Andy In Sunny Daytona says:

    “No Country For Old Men”

    Yeahhhh! I win the prize!!!!1!!11

    Please be something good.

  8. kSturnz says:

    make bobby a catcher!!!

  9. Tom says:

    I’m surprised a team like Kansas City, Pittsburgh, or Minnisotta haven’t stepped up for Abreu. He still is a .280+, 25+ HR, and 100+ RBI type player.

    Why not sign him to 2 or 3 years???

    For the Yanks, we are better off with the younger and better defensive players in Nady and Swisher

Leave a Reply

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

If this is your first time commenting on River Ave. Blues, please review the RAB Commenter Guidelines. Login for commenting features. Register for RAB.