Determining the value of draft picks
ByEvery team and every person has a different philosophy about how their team should approach the draft, and to be honest there is no right answer. I’ve always preferred high school players because the sooner you get them into a professional system with professional instruction and conditioning programs, the better. College programs have come a long way, but those coaches can still do lots of damage (especially to pitchers). Oh sure, you’ll have to wait longer for your prize when drafting high schoolers, but that’s life.
In a piece for THT, Alex Pedicini looked at the top 100 draft picks from 1992-1999, and determined the most valuable demographics in terms of WAR. College hitters in the first round are generally the safest group, averaging 1.336 WAR per year during their first six seasons in the bigs (which their original team controls), while college pitchers are the most dangerous at just 0.649 WAR/year. That’s right, taking a high school pitcher in the first round has historically been a safer pick that their college counterparts.
Pedicini also breaks it down by draft pick (the top 20 picks are by far the most valuable) and position (corner infielders and outfielders are the safest, righty pitchers by far the riskiest). Check it out, it’s a short but very interesting read.
Google+
8 Comments»
Keep up with RAB
Yankees News from YESNetwork.com
- Yankees place Kelly Johnson on 15-day DL
- Headley shines in debut with walk-off hit in 14th
- Brian Cashman relieved to finish a "long journey" towards acquiring Chase Headley
- Yankees acquire 3B Headley in trade with Padres
- Yankees Postgame Notebook: 'This one hurts a little bit'
- Yankees complete sweep with walk-off win
- Yankees sign 26 of 39 draft picks before deadline
- McCarthy quiets Reds in Yanks' 7-1 win
- Yankees react to news of Sabathia's season-ending knee surgery
- Yankees Postgame Notebook: One down, 67 to go
Banner Design By
The Eric Jagielo Watch
Masthead
The Founders
Mike Axisa, Ben Kabak, Joe Pawlikowski
Editor-In-Chief
Mike Axisa Archives | Email
Managing Editors
Ben Kabak Archives | E-mail
Joe Pawlikowski Archives | E-mail
Technical Manager
Jay Gordon
Beloved Alumni
Larry Koestler (Archives)
Moshe Mandel (Archives)
Eric Schultz (Archives)
Matthew Warden (Archives)
teams rebuilding dont need athletically gifted position players or talented righty pitchers with upside
the pirates and astros should just draft the best 8th inning, 7th inning, and 6th inning relievers in the 1st 3 rounds and win a title already
Bingo. Shorten the game. Shorter games are easier to win.
/Idiot’d
The Royals have Soria. They know what they’re doing.
If the Nationals had half a brain, they’d make Strasburg the closer.
Check off that one from the list. Now there’s only 24 questionmarks left on the team. No matter what happens with everyone else, we know we’ve got a great closer now, and that’s the key to everything.
Now let’s go vaginatubing.
/doingitwrong’d
In a shocking new development, we’ve received word that Natinals GM Mike Rizzo was seen driving a beaten-up 1992 Ford Taurus around Georgetown with Royals GM Dayton Moore. Reportedly, the two were quite pleased with the $4,000 stereo system in the car, which according to Kelly’s Blue Books, is presently valued at $600.
Ballers…
Will be of interest which MLB Team starts using a standard 5 innning starter, 6th inning guy, 7th inning guy, 8th inning guy, 9th inning guy (Closer)
I don’t think averages are a very useful way to think about draft picks. What you want is upside.
I’d rather see what characteristics most likely produce an average MLB WAR above whatever number than what the average is. The average draft pick doesn’t even make the majors. Only 338 of the 800 Pedicini looked at did. (Which makes his results not very useful.)
Variance is your friend. It’s can easily be better to pick from a low-mean high-variance group than a high-mean low-variance one.