Determining the value of draft picks

Report: Mauer agrees to 10-year extension (UPDATE: No he didn't)
Open Thread: Overreactialignment

Every team and every person has a different philosophy about how their team should approach the draft, and to be honest there is no right answer. I’ve always preferred high school players because the sooner you get them into a professional system with professional instruction and conditioning programs, the better. College programs have come a long way, but those coaches can still do lots of damage (especially to pitchers). Oh sure, you’ll have to wait longer for your prize when drafting high schoolers, but that’s life.

In a piece for THT, Alex Pedicini looked at the top 100 draft picks from 1992-1999, and determined the most valuable demographics in terms of WAR. College hitters in the first round are generally the safest group, averaging 1.336 WAR per year during their first six seasons in the bigs (which their original team controls), while college pitchers are the most dangerous at just 0.649 WAR/year. That’s right, taking a high school pitcher in the first round has historically been a safer pick that their college counterparts.

Pedicini also breaks it down by draft pick (the top 20 picks are by far the most valuable) and position (corner infielders and outfielders are the safest, righty pitchers by far the riskiest). Check it out, it’s a short but very interesting read.

Report: Mauer agrees to 10-year extension (UPDATE: No he didn't)
Open Thread: Overreactialignment
  • Slugger27

    teams rebuilding dont need athletically gifted position players or talented righty pitchers with upside

    the pirates and astros should just draft the best 8th inning, 7th inning, and 6th inning relievers in the 1st 3 rounds and win a title already

    • tommiesmithjohncarlos a/k/a Archimedes Torquemada

      Bingo. Shorten the game. Shorter games are easier to win.


      • JMK aka The Overshare’s Garden Apartment Complex

        The Royals have Soria. They know what they’re doing.

        • tommiesmithjohncarlos a/k/a Archimedes Torquemada

          If the Nationals had half a brain, they’d make Strasburg the closer.

          Check off that one from the list. Now there’s only 24 questionmarks left on the team. No matter what happens with everyone else, we know we’ve got a great closer now, and that’s the key to everything.

          Now let’s go vaginatubing.


          • JMK aka The Overshare’s Garden Apartment Complex

            In a shocking new development, we’ve received word that Natinals GM Mike Rizzo was seen driving a beaten-up 1992 Ford Taurus around Georgetown with Royals GM Dayton Moore. Reportedly, the two were quite pleased with the $4,000 stereo system in the car, which according to Kelly’s Blue Books, is presently valued at $600.

            • JSquared


  • Warren

    Will be of interest which MLB Team starts using a standard 5 innning starter, 6th inning guy, 7th inning guy, 8th inning guy, 9th inning guy (Closer)

  • toad

    I don’t think averages are a very useful way to think about draft picks. What you want is upside.

    I’d rather see what characteristics most likely produce an average MLB WAR above whatever number than what the average is. The average draft pick doesn’t even make the majors. Only 338 of the 800 Pedicini looked at did. (Which makes his results not very useful.)

    Variance is your friend. It’s can easily be better to pick from a low-mean high-variance group than a high-mean low-variance one.