May
31

Open Thread: Three out of four ain’t so bad

By

"Can't wew just go home now?" (Photo Credit: Kathy Willens, AP)

The Indians had the look of a team that couldn’t wait to get out of New York today, didn’t they? If it wasn’t for the massive bullpen meltdown on Saturday, this would have been a laughable four game sweep. I’m not going to complain about taking three of four though, that’s a recipe for winning a whole lotta games.

If you’re not out barbecuing it up on this gorgeous Memorial Day, use this sucker as your open thread. The Flyers and Blackhawks resume the Stanley Cup Finals with Game Two tonight, plus you’ve got the Mets in San Diego (10pm ET start) and the Diamondbacks and Dodgers on MLB Network (9pm ET). You’ve done this before, so have at it.

Categories : Open Thread

124 Comments»

  1. Yankees good, A-Rod better, Ubaldo best.

  2. Carlosologist says:

    Anybody catch the Giants-Rockies matchup earlier today? I saw Ubaldo throw a CGSHO and lower his ERA to 0.78. That was insane.

    • Brad Toughy says:

      I know he’s a workhorse and GCSHO’s are nice, but he threw nearly 130 pitches today. It’ll be a shame if he goes down with arm troubles at some point.

    • rek4gehrig says:

      I saw it too..unbelievable. He is in a pitching stratosphere right now

  3. Ubaldo Jiminez pitched another CGSO, lowering his era to 0.78, while playing half of his games in Coors’ field.

  4. So, what are the best ever seasons by a pitcher? How does Ubaldo matchup?

    • Pedro 2000, Gibson 68 (with 15″ mound)

    • JGS says:

      Based on b-ref WAR used as a rate stat and scaled to 250 innings:

      Pedro 2000–the best season ever by a pitcher–11.64
      Ubaldo 2010–12.97, and that is not including today, which will probably put him over 13

      You’re looking at one for the ages here

      • Captain Jack says:

        False? 7.70 K/9 3.30 BB/9 (not including today’s start) 1.8 HR/FB ratio, .222 BABIP, and a 91.7 strand ratem 3.58 xFIP. Compared to other top NL Starters:

        Roy Halladay 7.33 K/9 1.23 BB/9 and a 2.91 xFIP.
        Tim Lincecum (again not including today) 10.95 K/9 3.41 BB/9 and a 2.95 xFIP.

        Ubaldo’s 2010 won’t even top Greinke’s 09, let alone Pedro’s 2000. Phil Hughes has a better K/9 and BB/9 (not that it will last) in the AL East

        • JGS says:

          Pedro’s 2000 had a .253 BABIP and 86.6% strand rate

          xFIP is more useful for relievers–good starters can keep their HR/FB below 10.6%

          I’m not saying he’ll keep this up, I don’t think he will either. At the same time, it’s not guaranteed that he will crash to earth

          • Captain Jack says:

            “xFIP is more useful for relievers–good starters can keep their HR/FB below 10.6%”

            implying good relievers can’t

            http://www.fangraphs.com/stats.....position=P

            Yes, I realize that some starters can keep their HR/FB low, but given the average HR/FB rate of his home park, and his flyball rates I’m pretty comfortable saying that he’ll give up some HRs with runners on base in due time.

    • Carlosologist says:

      The best season by a pitcher is often considered Pedro’s 2000. Comparison of peripherals, go!

      Pedro through 10 starts:

      12.14 K/9
      1.75 BB/9
      0.765 WHIP

      Ubaldo through 10 starts:

      7.7 K/9
      3 BB/9
      0.925 WHIP

  5. YankeesJunkie says:

    I don’t think this start will be that big for Ubaldo even though he threw 128 pitches as most of them are stress free. However, Ubaldo is going back to earth eventually even though his stuff was filthy from the 4 innings I did watch of him today. His BABIP is .226 and his HR/FB% is below 2% both which have to go up eventually. Even though his first 11 starts have been beyond incredible I think Halladay is the best pitcher in the NL at the end of the season, but we should all enjoy what Jimenez has done so far this season.

  6. danny says:

    the yanks are getting healthy at the perfect time, with a light-ish schedule. this is their time to do some damage.

  7. bexarama says:

    Ubaldo Ubaldo Ubaldo Ubaldo. This is my impression of the posts on this thread so far. =P

    Seriously, dude’s a beast. As others have said, his BABIP is low and his strand rate is incredibly high. But he’s been fun to watch. The “GREATEST SEASON EVER????” is probably still a little too early, but even a “regression to the mean” won’t be too painful, I think.

    • Carlosologist says:

      What’s scary is the fact that Ubaldo is only 26. This might only be the icing on the cake, as he could morph into a Pedro like beast within the next two years.

    • JGS says:

      He’s still poised for a ridiculous season even if he doesn’t stay this otherworldly

      As for “he’s due to regress”–Pedro 2000 managed a .253 BABIP for the whole year and stranded 86.6% Is it likely that Ubaldo can do that? No. On the other hand, you can’t predict this game

      • Captain Jack says:

        Pedro also had an incredible K-rate, which allowed him to strand so many batters.

        • YankeesJunkie says:

          In addition with a BB/9 half of Jimenez. Hard to score runs when half of the outs are via the K. Also, Pedro’s FIP was known to dip below 2 in his prime, Ubaldo is still over 3.

          • JGS says:

            For what it’s worth, Ubaldo has walked 6 in his last 32 innings. Then again, that includes outings against teams like Houston and SF

            • YankeesJunkie says:

              Ubaldo has been straight up dominating the NL, if the Rockies make the playoffs they have a chance to win because of him as long as they don’t burn out his arm.

      • bexarama says:

        Yeah. I don’t think BABIP is QUITE the be-all end-all, honestly. Sometimes you give up a ton of line drives that find gloves. Sometimes you give up a lot of weak contact that your fielders don’t have too many issues with, which is probably the case with elite years like Pedro’s.

        A “regression” for Ubaldo might be to an ERA slightly over/under two with great peripherals. I think he’d be pretty fine with that.

        • bexarama says:

          This sounds probably too dismissive of BABIP. BABIPs like .200 and .400 probably won’t last the entire year. But sometimes a pitcher has a BABIP of like .340 and people talk about how they were just getting unlucky… when in fact they were badly locating pitches and getting hit really hard. Here I think of Pettitte’s 2008.

          • poster says:

            But those people who claimed he was unlucky and due for a correction were right. His 2009 was much better and his start this year is unbe-fucking-lievable.

            • Ed says:

              No, they weren’t right. Pettitte pitched through a sore shoulder in the 2nd half of 2008 because the team was already down several players. When Rasner and Ponson both have spots in the rotation, you suck it up and keep pitching if you can. He wasn’t able to throw many breaking balls, and didn’t have good location on his fastball. He got hit up because he just wasn’t physically able to pitch well.

              The “correction” was an offseason of rest so that his shoulder could recover. Luck had nothing to do with that.

              • poster says:

                But the BABIP still corrected itself. So in that sense, they were right.

              • MikeD says:

                Pettitte in 2008 not only pitching with an tired arm, he also was hurt by a poor defense, which was reflected in his BABIP. He was an obvious candidate for a rebound in 2009, although there were many who thought he was done. They were wrong.

        • BABIP must not be looked at in a vacuum. That is, we can’t just say “Oh his BABIP is XYZ therefore, he’s getting (un)lucky.” Instead, we must look at the player’s current BABIP and compare it to his career BABIP to make an accurate judgment of luck and skill. Of course, like all things statistical/baseball, there are other factors we must consider (HR rate, LD/GB/FB percentages, etc).

          • bexarama says:

            You said it a lot better than I did.

          • ZZ says:

            This is not necessarily true. It assumes that a player is performing on the same level or scale at any point in time.

            For young player’s in particular they can often make leaps in their performance that is not only an advancement in their game, but puts them on a whole other track.

            At this point in time it would not be particularly useful to compare Ubaldo’s past statistics and try to use them as predictors of the future. He has greatly evolved as a pitcher over the past year.

            Phil Hughes is a stark example of this. His prior statistics are basically useless right now.

        • JGS says:

          I agree to some extent–I think BABIP for hitters can be a little overrated. Unless it’s Austin Jackson crazy (he is still at .454)

          BABIP for pitchers is very interesting in that you can have the same type of pitcher fluctuating wildly year to year–case in point, Pedro

          1998: .284
          1999: .343
          2000: .253
          2001: .322

          He was the same pitcher, yet he had the third highest BABIP in the majors in 1999 and the very lowest in 2000. That would suggest that this is something that is outside of his control and except for extreme circumstances (knuckleballers, Mariano Rivera) there aren’t really that many examples of pitchers with chronically superlow BABIPS

          • Church of the Perpetually Outraged says:

            Going along with this thought, is Voros McCracken’s work on whether pitchers have any control over their BABIP:

            http://www.baseballprospectus......icleid=878

            As mentioned above, if the pitchers did, you’d question why sometimes guys like Pedro and Maddux were the best, and next season absolutely terrible (respectively so).

          • JGS says:

            Just to build on that, here are the active leaders in IP and their BABIPs

            Jamie Moyer: .290
            Andy Pettitte: .315
            Tim Wakefield: .282
            Livan Hernandez: .309
            Javy Vazquez: .309
            Jeff Suppan: .303
            Kevin Millwood: .306
            Derek Lowe: .299
            Roy Halladay: .299
            Tim Hudson: .287
            Mark Buehrle: .292
            Barry Zito: .274
            CC Sabathia: .295
            Chan Ho Park: .296
            Jon Garland: .289
            Roy Oswalt: .306
            Freddy Garcia: .290
            Jeff Weaver: .308
            Chris Carpenter: .302
            Miguel Batista: .301

            A good mix of the good, the bad, and the mediocre and apart from Zito (I wonder what he is doing right) there really isn’t much variation. The more innings you throw, the more your BABIP will go toward .300

    • YankeesJunkie says:

      No one is going to disagree that he is not fun to watch with all that great stuff, just pointing out the reality that this type of season will not continue.

  8. ultimate913 says:

    Haha. And the Blue Jays take a 2 – 0 lead with a 2-run bomb by Lind. It’s amazing how unpredictable baseball is. I love it.

  9. bexarama says:

    I’m watching the repeat of today’s game and WOW that blown call on the “neighborhood play” in the second. That’s terrible. Fire CB Bucknor immediately, please.

  10. YankeesJunkie says:

    Who else is excited that within the week the Yankees will bring out 8 of the starting 9 hitters that started the year with Miranda and Thames being platooned. Having Jorge back is just going to make the Yankees lineup that much better.

  11. JGS says:

    Dear Lance Barksdale–Ubaldo doesn’t need any help

    Robot umps please

    • Joe D. says:

      I dunno — looks like Ubaldo got screwed out of 5-6 calls while getting 8-9 gift calls. I don’t think he got all that much help after all.

  12. Carlosologist says:

    The Rays cannot avoid being no-hit it seems.

  13. JGS says:

    And Joe West is at it again

    That’s a couple of balls right down the middle

  14. Dirty Pena says:

    So in non-Ubaldo news, how bout those Braves?

    • Carlosologist says:

      They’re the first team to take first place from Philadelphia in three years. It should be a tight race between them, the Phillies, and Florida.

      • Riddering says:

        Weren’t the Mets in first place just one month ago? Or do you mean they are the first team to take first place from Philly while playing a series against Philly?

  15. ultimate913 says:

    I really don’t want to jinx them, but the Blue Jays going through with “this” would be awesome.

  16. Carlosologist says:

    Meh, Morrow’s no-no over.

  17. JGS says:

    ….and it’s gone

  18. Jake H says:

    I really want the Yankees to go HS in the draft. I really am hoping Zach Lee drops in the draft and the Yankees take a flier on him.

  19. Andy_C_23 says:

    Does anybody know if there’s a website where I can find a hitter’s batting average with RISP? I looked on baseball reference but couldn’t find it. Thanks in advance if anyone can help.

  20. Carlosologist says:

    So did everybody hear what went down with Oliver Perez?

    http://www.sportingnews.com/ml.....erez-loose

    • Carlosologist says:

      IMO, I think the Mets should put him on waivers and make him some other team’s problem.

      • Even better, DL him and let him rot away for the next two years since he has no intention to do right by the team that’s paying him 12 mil per year.

        Then you have the best of both worlds. He can’t come back to bite you making MLB minimum on one of your competitors AND you don’t waste a roster spot on his dithering, slack-jawed ass.

    • Players A and B have never slumped or struggled during their careers, so they can say that without fear of being called a hypocrite.

      If that came from management, I’d have no problem. But coming from his teammates is pretty weak on their part, especially off the record.

    • Pasqua says:

      You know, I understand the Mets players’ sentiments, but if those quotes are legit, that’s ridiculously unprofessional. You can’t have leaks like that in the lockerroom. Again, I know they’re saying what everybody is thinking, but leave that mongering to the media. I’m guessing we’ll be hearing about “Operation Lockdown” in the clubhouse pretty soon.

      Imagine if the Yanks were quoted anonymously. Shit would hit the fan. I remember a few shots being taken at Pavano, but it was mostly ball-busting.

  21. Ana says:

    Good day. Good win. Awesome bargain shopping for shoes. And I’m trying to figure out what to do with my new Twitter!

    Yay.

  22. Carlosologist says:

    Lol, like six or seven pitches in, Chad Billingsley has given up a double and a homer.

  23. I just have one word to say to you folks.

    Flotilla.

  24. Captain Jack says:

    I have a friend that tore his labrum playing in an adult men’s softball league…he still wants to keep playing. Should I laugh at him, or should I encourage him to keep playing so I can laugh more later?

  25. bexarama says:

    Do I watch Mariners/Twins or Mets/Padres?

  26. kunaldo says:

    Man, Kruk sure is a douche.

  27. rek4gehrig says:

    What the heck happened to the Mets last nite? They were leading 2-1 and BOOM, lost 18-6. Who was pitching?

Leave a Reply

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

If this is your first time commenting on River Ave. Blues, please review the RAB Commenter Guidelines. Login for commenting features. Register for RAB.