Jag asks: Is Dean Anna any good? I know he’s been a career minor leaguer, but his stats seem to be solid. Why didn’t the Padres hold onto him?
The Yankees acquired Anna from the Padres for Single-A reliever RHP Ben Paullus last month. San Diego had no room for Anna on their 40-man roster, so rather than potentially lose him for nothing in the Rule 5 Draft, they flipped him for a low level minor leaguer. The Yankees needed the infield depth, so here we are. The obligatory stats:
Year | Age | Tm | Lev | PA | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 | 21 | 2 Teams | A–Rk | 181 | 30 | 35 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 24 | 11 | 1 | 21 | 31 | .232 | .341 | .351 | .692 | 5 |
2009 | 22 | 2 Teams | A–A | 239 | 31 | 56 | 15 | 1 | 5 | 31 | 7 | 6 | 30 | 41 | .280 | .380 | .440 | .820 | 4 |
2010 | 23 | Fort Wayne | A | 272 | 42 | 61 | 14 | 2 | 6 | 32 | 5 | 1 | 39 | 40 | .271 | .381 | .431 | .813 | 3 |
2011 | 24 | 2 Teams | AA-A+ | 423 | 70 | 96 | 28 | 3 | 5 | 41 | 5 | 0 | 60 | 41 | .277 | .391 | .419 | .810 | 8 |
2012 | 25 | San Antonio | AA | 510 | 75 | 115 | 16 | 3 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 4 | 66 | 76 | .271 | .377 | .393 | .770 | 11 |
2013 | 26 | Tucson | AAA | 583 | 90 | 165 | 38 | 5 | 9 | 73 | 3 | 7 | 61 | 65 | .331 | .410 | .482 | .892 | 11 |
6 Seasons | 2208 | 338 | 528 | 114 | 14 | 40 | 248 | 37 | 19 | 277 | 294 | .286 | .386 | .428 | .815 | 42 | |||
AA (2 seasons) | AA | 756 | 120 | 165 | 34 | 4 | 12 | 70 | 9 | 4 | 107 | 95 | .265 | .380 | .390 | .770 | 14 | ||
AAA (1 season) | AAA | 583 | 90 | 165 | 38 | 5 | 9 | 73 | 3 | 7 | 61 | 65 | .331 | .410 | .482 | .892 | 11 |
Anna, who turned 27 a few days after the trade, was the Padres’ 28th round pick in the 2008 draft out of Ball State, which isn’t exactly a baseball powerhouse. He hit .319/.464/.628 with 17 doubles, 11 homers, 46 walks, and 17 strikeouts in 52 games as a junior but was only ranked as the 14th best prospect in Indiana prior to the draft by Baseball America (subs. req’d). Anna was never a highly regarded prospect and he’s had to earn his way up to Triple-A and onto the 40-man roster. Here’s a recent (as in right after the trade) scouting report from Baseball America (no subs. req’d):
Anna, drafted out of Ball State, is coming off his best pro season, winning the Pacific Coast League batting title while playing for Triple-A Tucson. He hit .331/.410/.482 and walked (61) almost as much as he struck out (65), a career-long trend. Anna lacks physicality and pop at 5-foot-11, 180 pounds and fits the utility profile as a lefthanded hitter. He’s played second base, shortstop and third base as well as the outfield corners, with a fringe-average arm and solid infield actions. He’s a reliable defender who made just 23 errors the last two seasons. He’s a below-average runner, the biggest hole in his utility profile. Anna has earned high marks in his career as a grinder and good teammate. He spent two weeks playing for Estrellas in the Dominican League but returned home after going 8-for-34 (.235) with four walks in nine games.
So what the Yankees have is an undersized 27-year-old middle infielder who has little power, doesn’t steal a ton of bases, isn’t a standout defender, and, until this past season in the hitter-friendly Pacific Coast League, hasn’t hit for a high average in pro ball. That’s … not much of a prospect at all. That’s a spare part. An up-and-down bench player. The 25th man on the roster. Sure, the K/BB ratio(s) is sexy but there is more to life than walks and strikeouts.
Now, that said, Anna is certaintly a useful piece to have lying around, especially for a team with a thin big league infield like the Yankees. He’s something like the 38th or 39th man on the 40-man roster and will open the year with Triple-A Scranton awaiting the call when someone inevitably gets hurt or plays themselves off the team. The various projection systems are quite bullish about Anna — Oliver (2.0 WAR), ZiPS (1.6 WAR), Steamer (0.4 WAR) — but that is always the case with high-walk, low-strikeout players. You could make a case that playing him at second over the old and so very injury prone Brian Roberts make sense.
The Yankees were going to fill their 40-man roster prior to the Rule 5 Draft deadline one way or the other — either with one of their minor league relievers or someone like Anna. They opted for Anna, who was easily available and filled a very obvious need (they had not yet signed Kelly Johnson at the time of the trade). Since only one (Tommy Kahnle) of their many relievers was taken in the Rule 5 Draft, it’s tough to argue with the decision. Anna is an interesting enough player but the odds of him contributing in a meaningful way at the MLB level are small. In fact, if he’s starting for the team at some point next year, it likely means something went very wrong.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.