Yankees talking sense, unlikely to pursue Crawford, Werth


Crawford could round the bases plenty of times in New York, but it doesn't seem likely (Tony Gutierrez/AP)

The Yankees would be a better team with Carl Crawford. Given his pull tendencies, Carl Crawford might be a better player with the Yankees. But that doesn’t mean that the two sides will match up for a free agent contract. Crawford might have concerns other than how many home runs he hits. The Yankees have to look at the overall picture and determine what positions most need an upgrade. This week the team has met to determine a course of action, and according to a report by Mark Feinsand of the Daily News those plans will not include Crawford or the other big name outfielder on the market, Jayson Werth.

One of Feinsand’s sources nails the issue with two crisp sentences:

“We are better with Crawford, but at that price?” a Yankees source said. “I’m not sure it’s that good of an upgrade.”

The biggest difference between Crawford and Brett Gardner is power, and even then the difference might be overstated with this year’s results. Crawford produced a career high .188 ISO, while Gardner barely cracked the .100 mark. There’s a chance that Crawford, 29, could improve on that mark, especially with the move to Yankee Stadium. But considering his .148 career ISO, I’m not sure that the Yankees can bank on that. Gardner has been the better on-base guy, at least in the past two years, while Crawford again produced a career high this year, .356. Even during his first full season Gardner was at .345, and last year produced a .389 OBP.

There are other issues with Crawford, too. While he ranked just below Gardner in UZR, Gardner can take that excellent range into center field. Crawford has expressed a desire to stay in left. He also prefers not to hit leadoff, which is perhaps the best spot for him. There’s a good chance that Gardner will take over the leadoff spot at some time in the next year or two.

The biggest advantage Crawford has is his track record. Gardner fell off in the second half, which has led many to believe that he cannot handle a full-time starting gig. Whether he can or not remains to be seen, though it’s hard to argue with the numbers he has produced in the past two seasons. Crawford, on the other hand, has been in the league since 2002, at age 20, and has had only a few truly poor seasons. He’s more of a sure thing than Gardner, but he’ll also be roughly nine times more expensive.

There is also the matter of need. All three of the Yankees outfielders produced 4 or more WAR this season, the only MLB outfield unit to do so. They can, in other words, stick with the same guys and look elsewhere for ways to improve the team. Upgrading the pitching staff, in other words, will have more of a net effect on the team’s wins and losses, since there is more room for improvement on the pitching staff. Adding an outfielder would provide improvement on the margins.

Feinsand also mentions Jayson Werth, who recently retained Scott Boras to seek out the best possible deal. He’s said to be seeking a Matt Holliday type deal, but that seems out of reach for the soon-to-be 32-year-old. Werth has thrived during his time in Philadelphia both on offense and on defense, but he faces the same issues as Crawford. Adding him provides only a marginal improvement over the current outfield corps, and he will cost more than any of them — even if he settles for a Jason Bay type deal rather than a Matt Holliday one.

There are many ways the Yankees can improve this off-season, but they should be looking to improve areas where they can realize significant improvement. That falls to the pitching staff. There might be concerns about Gardner’s ability to maintain his high OBP, but those are theoretical concerns. The Yankees have actual pitching issues, and adding an arm can provide instant, tangible improvement. We pretty much knew this heading into the off-season, but it’s nice to hear the Yankees come out and say it.

Categories : Hot Stove League


  1. ecks says:

    They should’ve just kept quiet and leaked fake rumors to drive up the price for the team that eventually signs them.

    Half-kidding, but when the opposites happen, no one seems to care.

    • ecks says:


    • dave says:

      Brett ” I can’t hit the ball out of the infield” Gardner a better option than Crawford?
      Sure if you are satisfied with him hitting .230 for the year and killing you with RISP. He is your man.
      He was pulled in 09 as a starter for the same reason he hit the second half of this year. .232
      He is a good bench player as a defensive player and a pinch runner.
      An everyday player you will get what you got in 09 and the second half of last year.
      Anyone that thinks different is crazy.

      • MikeD says:

        Crazy here.

        His MLB numbers this year are in line with his minor league numbers. (He actually has some upside based on his AAA numbers.) In other words, he is capable of .280/.380 line with excellent defense and speed. It’s not that he’s better than Crawford, it’s just that the updgrade to Crawford, with the increase in salary going from 450K for Gardner to $18 million for Crawford is not defensible when the Yankees have needs elsewhere. Read that as pitching.

  2. Buster Olney thinks Crawford is the Yanks’ plan B if we miss out on Cliff Lee. I guess he’s assuming that in that scenario, we’d trade an outfielder for starting pitching and sign Crawford to fill the void.

    • Scout says:

      Or Crawford might be plan B because the Yankees strike out with Lee and cannot find another pitcher at a reasonable value, and decide instead to concentrate on offense instead. Not the way I would go, but not out of the realm of possibility.

    • OldYanksFan says:

      Or maybe it’s just that writers, who really have nothing substancial to write about this time of year, draging out the reliable ‘the-big-bad-Yankees-are-ALWAYS-interested-in-(the-top-3-FAs)-no-matter-the-cost-need-or-fit-because-they-are-the-big-bad-Yankees-and-can-buy-anyone-because-they-have-more-money-then-God-and-always-buy-championships’ line.

      Gritner was not only about the best bang for the buck in MLB, but also one of the Yankees offensive leaders, as well as being their fastest guy and best defender. All at a cost of under $1m. Why would a team already laden with a number of huge contracts replace this guy?

      And while more expensive, Swisher fits into the great ‘bang for the buck’ category also. We are paying a forture for the runs ARod, Jeter, Teix and (to some extent) Posada produce. The only reason we won the WC this year was because of the production of the guys who made ‘under a dozen million per year’.

      It amazes me that this last decade and a half was built and the backs of 5 core Yankee products… and yet many people keep on insisting we trade our current kids for the latest overpriced, shiny toy.

      Thank God Cashman, and not George (RIP) is runnning the show. I was a fan in ’65, when age and bad luck turned a great ’64 team into a crappy ’65 team, and then into a lost decade of Hoss Clarkes and Gene Michaels.

      I’d much rather watch a Yankee Gardner play then an imported Crawford or Werth, and much rather apply to $10+m we save to pitching. It may be Nunez (prolly not), but I think our biggest position need is a guy who can play 3rd and SS (and a little 2nd base) and not be a giant black hole. Imagine if we could rest/DH Jeter and ARod and have their replacement actual be quasi-productive.

      Please Cashman… give Jeter the high end of his real value… 3/$36m, and then give him a TEN MILLION DOLLAR signing bonus ‘BECAUSE YOU ARE DEREK JETER!’. That’s more then enough for a guy who has made over $200m and will barely be able to play his position in 2013.

      • I’m with you, except maybe the Jeter signing bonus. The Yanks’ outfield was solid last season and they’re all relatively young and affordable. If the Yanks do miss out on Lee and have to deal for starting pitching, we have the minor-league chips to do so.

  3. RobC says:

    I was wondering when those two names would come up
    How much better is Carwford’s offense than Granderson?

    Still a pitcher is a better option

  4. larryf says:

    I am curious to know about Gardy’s thumb injury and how that slowed him down this year. I would also like to thank Carl Crawford for giving us a chance to see Greg Golson’s arm. Trying to take 3rd with 2 outs in the 9th inning and losing=not smart.

    • Clay Bellinger says:

      Trying to take third on that play was insane when he’s fast enough to score on almost any single anyway. Even worse may have been Joe Maddon supporting the play afterward.

      You just love Golson don’t you?

      • larryf says:

        I like speed/defense/a great arm and youth. Especially when you don’t have it at lots of other positions.

      • ecks says:

        Indeed. I remember watching that play in slow motion over and over again, because as Crawford’s sliding into third, the ball just zooms in ahead of him, and A-Rod makes a great catch on the one-hopper to get him. Just an amazing play which made me forget (at that time) Granderson’s incredible catch earlier in the game.

  5. Mike Mirabella says:

    Though I totally agree that the Yankees don’t NEED Crawford of Werth, they do need a back-up outfielder.

  6. pat says:

    Last year, Gardner provided 83% of Crawford’s production at 4.5% of the cost. Next year that number is likely going to be around 3%. That’s value, yo.

  7. Juke Early says:

    I want Cliff Lee w/Brett Gardner & Curtis Granderson behind him. No knock on Swish – I wanted him to a Yankee when he was an A (I liked his personality), but another OF & a catcher is what the 2011 needs, if Swisher can be in a package to get somebody -amen.

    • Clay Bellinger says:

      Soooo…why exactly don’t you like Swish?

      • Clearly because there are so many 4+ WAR outfielders out there who hit .288/.359/.511 and make under 10 million dollars per year!

        • Clay Bellinger says:

          haha…yeah exactly. The dude has an OPS of .870 in his 2 years in NY and has outproduced his contract. It just seems like too many people started watching during the ALCS and have irrationally decided “this guy’s no good!”

          • gc says:

            I think you’re reading way too much into Juke Early’s comments. You bring up great points about Swish’s current value to the team, and maybe that’s the point Juke was trying to make…his value is pretty much at its peak right now, so perhaps it isn’t (or shouldn’t be) out of the question to trade that value and get some quality talent in return to fit areas of need. I think most fans like Swish and would love to see him back, but he’s not untouchable. If we can get a talented somebody (or somebodies) for him, now’s the time, as he may not be as valuable ever again. Just thinking out loud.

            • Our farm system is there for making trades though, guys like Swisher don’t grow on trees. If we traded him, yeah, we might get back something good for him. But then you have to turn around and pay another player to play RF. In the end, to me, that ends up being a net loss in terms of return for dollars spent. Plus despite Swisher’s production, he’s going to be on the wrong side of 30 soon and he’s a free agent in 2012. You’re not going to get anything elite for him.

              • Clay Bellinger says:

                Well said. Just about no one is untouchable, but you have to be able to get something back significant enough to help the ballclub to make a trade. Contending clubs typically don’t trade away key pieces of their squad and get proper value back for them. Swish is comign off his best two years and is right in the middle of his prime, his trade value is prob at it’s peak, but the Yanks would have to be blown away to deal him and create a hole in RF that then needs to be filled either by signing a FA or trading a prospect.

  8. Pasqua says:

    This makes total sense. I’ve thought, for a while, that the only way Crawford (or Werth) comes here is if the Yankees clear out one of their outfielders via trade. At this point – unless they’re bringing back a really good pitcher – why try to fix what ain’t broke?

  9. Kurt says:

    Pat’s post says it all. The outfield was very productive for the Yanks last season. The starting pitching fell apart in the second half and in the playoffs. The other glaring weakness is behind the plate.

  10. NextYankeeDynasty says:

    9 times the cost of Gardner??….Crawford will cost at least 30 times more than Gardner next year!!

  11. Yank the Frank says:

    Gardner is still a work in progress who improved greatly in 2010. He just needs to learn to bunt and steal earlier in the count. Brett’s a great bang for the buck, we do not need an overpriced Crawford or Werth. Overpay for pitching, pitching, pitching and maybe a good back-up catcher.

  12. BigLou says:

    I love Swish…he’s a real Yankee…great personality…clutch hitter greatly improved fielder and a huge plus in the club house…we need another backup who can at least play the field..Thames is fine a DH but in the field…Oh a rumor about the X-man..if he can play he would be great on the bench

  13. ledavidisrael says:

    The yankees have gone into each of the past two seasons with four plus starting OF’ers. Relying on 3 guys to shoulder the whole work load is a little far fetched. Especially when swisher is coming off a year where he was banged up almost all year.

    Plus signing crawford would allow Swisher to play DH on most days.

    I can’t believe how you didn’t mention how NASTY the defense out there would be if we lined up Granderson, Crawford, Gardner.

    65 million
    -5 for arbitration players
    15 for rivera
    15 for jeter
    20 for lee
    If we back load some pay/ Pay jeter less we can easily squeeze Crawford in.

    • The yankees have gone into each of the past two seasons with four plus starting OF’ers. Relying on 3 guys to shoulder the whole work load is a little far fetched. Especially when swisher is coming off a year where he was banged up almost all year.

      Swisher played in 150 games in 2010 and was a starter in the field in 135 of them. They’re a perfectly reliable, young bunch why do we need to pay 100 million so we can have 4 starting caliber outfielders? That’s just silly.

      Plus signing crawford would allow Swisher to play DH on most days.

      Which will be occupied 95% of the time by Posada/A-rod and either Thames or a DH type that isn’t on the team yet.

      I can’t believe how you didn’t mention how NASTY the defense out there would be if we lined up Granderson, Crawford, Gardner.

      Not much better than it is now, which is a waste of money considering how much money Crawford will demand.

      65 million
      -5 for arbitration players
      15 for rivera
      15 for jeter
      20 for lee
      If we back load some pay/ Pay jeter less we can easily squeeze Crawford in.

      So… who closes and what happened to Andy Pettitte?

      • ledavidisrael says:

        Rivera closes… forget andy pettite

        and the point is to have 3 STAR outfielders a STAR DH (who can also play 1B, giving Tex needed rest for next year)

        These are human beings there bodies are simply mortal. I m sure there reliable hard working young guys but that doesn’t mean shit.

        also who cares how many games dude played every part of his body was hurt at some point. which means he was playing under stress and should be given time off this year.

        • Forget Andy Pettitte? Okay…

          I just told you that there’s no room on the team for a fulltime DH. Are you going to bench Posada then on days he can’t catch? Not give A-rod any time off? Not use Montero at all later in the season?

          Any way you look at it, signing Crawford means that someone’s talents aren’t being utilized to their full potential, which means wasted dollars. If you want to trade someone to get Crawford a spot, fine, but adding him just to have a 4th outfield option as insurance for injuries is a complete waste of resources.

          If every part of Swisher’s body was hurt how did he play so many games? I told you played in 150 games, meaning he missed only 12 with these “year long” injuries. But hey, don’t let facts get in the way of your narrative.

        • Clay Bellinger says:

          dude you’re being completely irrational. There’s no chance that the stategy you’ve suggested is even considered by the Yanks.

          …and forget Pettitte? The issue in 2010 was pitching…why would they tell their 2nd best SP that he’s not welcome back. So that they could have a “good defensive oufield”?

    • If we back load some pay/ Pay jeter less we can easily squeeze Crawford in.

      No, we can’t.

  14. ledavidisrael says:

    Also pointing at last years production and saying oh they were fine last year they will be fine less is an EPIC FAIL.

    Granderson missed time. Gardner is shouldering a workload that he has never came close to. And Swisher pressed his body all year by playing hurt. Expecting 4 WAR again from each is completely foolish. Not saying it won’t happen. But EXPECTING it or counting on it. Is childs play.

  15. Regis says:

    Obviously, the team should sign Crawford, Werth, Lee and trade for Pujols to be a bench bat.

  16. Matt DiBari says:

    As long as they get Cliff Lee and don’t get any of the other awful FA starters, I’m fine.

  17. kosmo says:

    I´m in the minority but I´d rather NY pursue Crawford than Lee.
    Crawford is a great clutch player.Check his splits.In 2010 he grounded into 2 DP .2 !!
    It would allow NY to unload either Granderson or Gardner my preference being Granderson.Gardner moves to CF.
    Crawford in the 2 hole would put Swisher in the 6 hole where he belongs protecting Cano.

    • Matt DiBari says:

      I don’t think this team has anything close to championship level pitching without Lee. It would be even worse without Pettitte.

      • kosmo says:

        Lee has been in the last 2 WS .Did he help deliver a WS championship ? No
        Believe me I think he´s a excellent pitcher .
        Yanks could easily trade a couple of solid pitching prospects and Granderson for a good number 2 or 3 type SP.
        Also where are all these pitching prospects NY is stockpiling going to pitch,Warren,Phelps,Nova,banuelos,Brackman,Noesi,Stoneburner, etc? CC,AJ,Hughes and maybe Pettitte will be the top 4 next season.It seems to me NY will have to unload a couple of these guys because there ain´t no room at the inn.

  18. Mike M says:

    “There are other issues with Crawford, too. While he ranked just below Gardner in UZR, Gardner can take that excellent range into center field.”

    This may be a true stat by the numbers, but if you watched the yankee games you can clearly see that gardiner does not have the fielding ability that crawford has. His speed is what allows him to cover all that distance. His route to the ball is pretty bad sometimes. Of the games that i have seen of crawford, that man can track a ball down.
    Now, do the yankees need crawford? No Brett gardiner is sufficient. I just wanted to state his fielding is not as great as the numbers depict.

    • The “Gardner takes bad routes to balls” narrative is a bit overplayed. People said the same thing about Granderson earlier in the year, funny how that disappeared after awhile.

      I just fail to see the difference between “Taking bad routes to the ball and catching it anyway” and “tracking a ball down”. Does Gardner miss any fly balls because of the routes he takes? No, because he has incredible speed and closes distances quickly. If you can find me evidence of fly balls that Gardner doesn’t make a play on because of his routes, I’d be happy to listen.

      • JerseyDutch says:

        Gardner could head out to Monument Park and back and still catch most of the balls hit to left field.

      • MikeD says:

        If Gardner is taking bad routes to balls, then we should let him. Whatever routes he’s taking is allowing him to catch more balls than any other OFer, including Crawford.

    • Klemy says:

      I watch the games, but I don’t see this.

    • murakami says:

      Agree on Gardner’s over rated defense, although he is a much better fielder in LF than in CF, where his triple-step poor jumps are far more frequent and his mis-tracking is greater exposed. He’s an excellent fielder going east and west, so LF suits his “style” and allows his range to be a more reliable factor.

      That said, he and Crawford are just worlds apart. Crawford made a play in LF last year, in that start Andy lost, that had to be seen live to be believed. I have to look, but I also think CC’s YS stats are very, very good. I would like to see them sign him, but not holding my breath.

  19. ledavidisrael says:

    your evaluating two players at different parts in there careers. plus im going to assume you see gardner more the crawford, which could greatly skew how you see things. also its safe to say your eyes and mind are not a better metric then UZR

    • nsalem says:

      Having all star players at every outfield position is so NOT the point. This is especially true when you consider that Gardner, Granderson and Gardner together will cost less money next year than what Crawford is seeking. The 1998 Yankees won 114 games with Chad Curtis, Rick Ledee and a 38 year old Tim Raines (plus Shane in September) in left field. 2001
      Seattle Mariners had Al Martin all season and won 118 games. Cleveland
      won 111 in 1954 (154 game season mind you) with Waly Westlake and Al Smith. There were no unbelievable season in the group, save for Spencer’s torrid September and these were the three teams with the highest WP in baseball history.

  20. JerseyDutch says:

    That’s good news. Werth is too old, Crawford is too expensive. Keep the current OF and shore up the pitching and bench. Sounds like a plan. Let’s go…

  21. burbankbogey says:

    Lee needs to be the focus. We need to improve the starting rotation and bring Mo and Jeter back. We weren’t in on Tex or Damon when they were out there until the last minute. Cash knows that Crawford and Werth (Boras) will circle back to him regardless of interest in order to keep their price up.

  22. joe(sit)ragman says:

    Not that I am up with all the “stats” you guys use and I do appreciate your thoughts, I do thonk the Yankees need more help than we talk about. Alodst of success was early on when starting pitching carried the team with some timely hitting from unexpected sources. This didn,t last! Changes are needed somewher, unless many of the big guns bounce back dramatically. Of course pitching, pitching and more pitching.

  23. Opus says:

    Does Scott Boras represent every free agent ever except Carl Crawford?

  24. theyankeewarrior says:

    It’s quite simple, people.

    Crawford = Luxury

    Lee = Necessity

  25. Ajay says:

    I do think the Yankees should sign Crawford and make Gardner the 4th outfielder. You have to think future and once Swisher’s contract is up after next year then you can make Gardner the everyday right fielder.As far as Montero is concerned…he either catches or we need to trade him for pitching while his value is still through the roof. It is simply retarded to bring up your top prospect to have him DH. You can blame that on the lower levels of the organization for not identifying and teaching him a new position if his catching was such an issue.

    • That’s a great idea that I’d be interested in pursuing if we didn’t already badly need to sign Cliff Lee and thus will have a 220M payroll before we consider adding Crawford.

      There’s just simply no room in the payroll.

    • MikeD says:

      They could put him at 1B, but that doesn’t really serve the Yankees all that well since they have Tex. The most value he has to the Yankees is at catcher. If he can’t catch, then they can look at moving him elsewhere, or some other team can look at moving him elsewhere.

      Me? Well, even if he’s not a great catcher, I wouldn’t mind having a DH who hits .300+ with 35 HR power who can also catch thirty or forty games when not DH’ing, and only cost 450K. Call me crazy…again.

      • JAG says:

        Agreed. I don’t know why people are so hard on having your top prospect be a DH. If he is a superb hitter but is poor in the field, it’s very possible his optimum value is as a DH. Why not get the most out of him? Sure, it would be great if Montero could achieve even Piazza-like levels of catching. But, if he’s poor enough that he can’t fake it, I’d rather keep his excellent bat around to hit in the lineup as a DH/1B than trade him just to trade him. If your best prospect is most valuable at DH, then that’s where you should play him. To say it’s wasteful to play your best prospect at DH if that’s where he’s most suited is like saying it’s wasteful to make your star pitching prospect a closer instead of a starter when he can’t swing it as a starter. Sure, you should try, but playing him at his optimum place to get the best value is better than making him play poorly at a position he can’t play.

  26. We need to address the catching situation immediatly. Posada has done a great job over the years but can no longer throw out ANYBODY. He probably should be made the full time DH and we should put our efforts into finding a replacement. Montero? Maybe. He couldn’t be any worse on defense than Posada and his bat would be a great help.

  27. Preston says:

    I think if Petite doesn’t come back and we can’t sign Cliff Lee then maybe we would consider making a deal for a frontline starter. Usually teams don’t want to sacrifice frontline starters unless they are getting young, cheap, talented major league players back. Gardner is the only Yankee that fit’s that mold. So if Gardner and prospects (hopefully not Montero) get us a front of the rotation guy, then I’d be willing to sign Crawford.

  28. MikeD says:

    The Yankee OF trio of Gardner, Granderson and Swisher cost all of $12 million in 2010, represented the youngest part of the team (26-29 years old) and were the strongest defensive unit on the team. Their combined salaries in 2011 will rise to about $18, an incredible bargain considering they delivered over $50 million in value in 2010 (based on Fangraphs).

    The Yankees do have a budget, which has been locked right around the $200 million mark for six years. No way they’re going to pay Crawford more in one season than what they’ll pay the Yanks current trio. If they do, then they have to cut somewhere else, such as signing a pitcher, which they need.

    If they can trade one of the OFers to get a top-flight starter back in return, then it’s worth considering. Yet top starters aren’t available for a single OFer. It’ll take a package of players. So it makes more sense to focus on bringing in Lee and keeping the current Yankee OF together. It’s one of the best in the Majors and one of the most cost effective. That’s a rarity in Yankee-land.

    • Preston says:

      Obviously I’m fine with the outfield we have. But beyond Lee there is nobody on the market that I’d pay 10 million plus a year. I’m fine with Nova getting a shot at five with Noesi in AAA as a backup plan, but if Pettitte (my sincerest apologies I type faster then I think) retires and Lee opts to stay in Texas (a real possibility) then we need at least one top end starter.
      In order to acquire that starter a team will probably want a package of 4-7 players 2 or 3 of which would be major league ready. Montero is ready but maybe not at catcher, Nunez is ready but might not hit, and Nova is ready but then we would need to find another option for our fifth starter. Gardner is more valuable than either Nunez or Nova, he has a proven major league track record and four years left of team control. So if he’s the difference in acquiring a Jubaldo Jiminez or Zach Grienke (I know he said he wouldn’t come but things change) I pull the trigger. Only at that point would I be willing to sign Carl Crawford.

  29. YankeeEVO says:

    Totally agree that Lee is a necessity, Crawford an unneeded luxury. I’m pretty sure I remember reading somewhere that the Yankees had the highest fielding percentage in the AL, maybe even the majors. The OF is young, affordable and productive no need to tamper

  30. cano is the bro says:

    the only concern i have about gardner is that he will be exposed throughout the season kind of like what happened last year. It seemed like all pitchers needed to do was throw strikes to him and risk him getting a hit instead of giving him the free pass

  31. Mike P says:

    Are we seriously discussing the possibility of moderately upgrading a no 9 hitter for the price of a no 2 starting pitcher? If the Yanks have that much money to burn I’ll have two no 2s thank you very much. Oh, and add in 200,000 free beers for the bleachers every home game while you’re at it.

  32. roadrider says:

    More wishful thinking about Brett Gardner. Let’s get real – this guy had two good months and then fell off a cliff as his extremely limited skill set as a hitter was exposed. The infield hits dried up as teams learned how to defense him and the walks will vanish too next year. No one is going to keep walking a guy who can’t hurt you with the bat but can hurt you once he gets on base. There’s no way Gardner will put up a .380 OBP or anything close to that next year. I’m not in love with either Crawford or Werth and I can see passing on them and keeping Gardner until the right deal can be worked out to bring in a legitimate corner outfielder. Ideally, Cashman will figure out a way to sell high on Gardner in the off-season but going with him until the trade deadline is not unreasonable if the right deal can’t be found.

  33. Jonathan says:

    I’m not sure if anyone else said this, but one of my biggest concerns with Crawford would be the turf. I remember another very athletic OFer who played the whole start of his career on turf…Vlad. And look at him now. I’ve had 4 surgeries at the Steadman Hawkins Clinic in Vail (Where Arod/Beltran etc went) and that’s where Vlad had his knees done and apparently they are just a mess. At least Vlad had his power to fall back on. If Crawford loses his speed and defense…there isn’t a lot left. He’ll require a contract that will take him deep enough into his career that those years on turf will most likely become an issue.

  34. joe says:

    Yankees lineup worries me and does not look very good for 2011. Jeter I think is really on the downfall hitting wise. Texiera while he does hit 30+ homeruns every year, he can be pitched to if you make your pitches. A Rod’s opposite field hitting is virtually gone. Very rarely due you see him hit the ball to the opposite field as often as we have seen in the past. Posada hit 16 homers last year, but you wouldn’t know it because most of them came in situations where they were insignificant homeruns. I could see Posada hitting 220 next year and have a season like Jason Varitek for the Red Sox did back in 2009. Swisher had a good season, but it’s highly unlikely that he will be as good next year. Granderson is an easy out. He is too much of an all or nothing hitter. He either hits a homerun or strikes out. Gardner looked good at the beginning of the 2010 season, but it seemed like he was virtually nonexistent on offense since. I think average is more important than what people make it out to be. You can’t only have Cano in your lineup hitting 300 while most of the rest of the lineup hits 260-270. That’s just not going to get it done. Unless the Yankees pitching staff is going to be great, which it probably will not.

  35. Joe J says:

    Bret Gardner fouled off more 2 strike pitches than anyone in baseball… problem i have is he take the first 2 and there right down the pip[e. swing the dam bat. He struck out at least 20 times this year without ever swinging. drove me nuts. and he seems to hit the ball just hard enough to an infielder to be out by a half a step. needs line drives or dribblers and bunts. He has the goods he just has to get his shit together

  36. Tampa clubs says:

    Re: Yankees talking sense, unlikely to pursue Crawford, Werth | River Avenue Blues thanks, I enjoyed reading it, got an insight or two!

Leave a Reply

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

If this is your first time commenting on River Ave. Blues, please review the RAB Commenter Guidelines. Login for commenting features. Register for RAB.