Dec
21

Yanks hit with $25.69 million payroll tax

By

For the Yankees, winning the World Series came with a hefty price tag this year as MLB announced on Monday that the Yankees were the only team to be levied a tax on its payroll in 2009. The team must pay its $25.69 million to the Commissioner’s Office by Jan. 31. This marks the seventh straight year that the Yanks have had to pay the tax, and of the $190 million in luxury tax payments collected by baseball, $174 million of that has come from the Yanks. Considering that the idea of the luxury tax was to rein in the Yanks’ spending ways, I’d say it’s been a stunning failure for baseball. At least the other teams can to benefit in form of added revenue earnings when the Yanks’ money is redistributed.

Categories : Asides, News

23 Comments»

  1. JM says:

    Racist against winners.

  2. Monotonousblob says:

    and all those fans of other teams will gladly accept it while asking for a salary cap with a bottom lower than their teams payroll

  3. SteveD Fla says:

    The Yankees have the money and they spend it. unlike some owners who put it in their pocket.

  4. Johan Iz My Brohan says:

    With that $25.60 million the owners of the Marlins, Royals, Pirates, and others can buy a nice Christmas dinner… YAY!

  5. 5th Starter says:

    How exactly does the tax work? Does the money truly get divvied up the the other 29 teams?

    • Ed says:

      Nope. It doesn’t go to the other teams. I’m not sure, but I believe it goes to thinks like the player’s pension fund and programs to promote baseball to kids.

  6. ledavidisrael says:

    Young money arm!

  7. Head Scratcher says:

    I suppose John Henry will start complaining that the revenue is not shared among small market teams such as Boston.

  8. Pasqua says:

    Perhaps Johnny Damon will inform the Yankees that he will personally eat the $25 million luxury tax, thereby playing in 2010 for -$5 million dollars.

  9. Theo Epstien says:

    At least the other teams can to benefit in form of added revenue earnings when the Yanks’ money is redistributed.

    In theory, more than in practice.

  10. crawdaddie says:

    I thought the amount would be higher than that at the 40% tax rate. Is it 40% tax rate for all salary after the threshold amount and if so what was that amount in 2009?

  11. Whitey14 says:

    I think it’s high time that MLB forced it’s owners to open their books to a non-partisan individual or panel who would determine their actual income and then each team should be required to spend a minimum pre-set percentage of that income, or more.

  12. Ed says:

    Considering that the idea of the luxury tax was to rein in the Yanks’ spending ways, I’d say it’s been a stunning failure for baseball.

    Eh, I think it works, it’s just that the Yankees make a ridiculous amount more than even the second highest revenue team does. They do have to at least pretend it’s not just a tax on the Yankees, so there’s only so far they can go.

    Without the luxury tax, the Yankees probably would’ve just spent an extra $25.69m on payroll instead. That’s good for another 1-2 big free agent signings.

  13. Angelo says:

    Cuz Im the Taxman, yeaaaah im the taxman.

    /Beatles’d

  14. THE KID says:

    Amazing stat, $174 of the $190 million came from the Yankees. I assume this is another great Bud Selig idea…

    While i love our teams willingness to spend to try and put together a winning team, i’d not be totally opposed to some type of salary cap (realizing the players union would never let that happen).

    But then you’d better damn sure have a salary basement as well so direct revenues and especially shared revenue like this doesn’t just go into the pockets of the Royals & Pirates & Padres, etc. who it doesn’t appear even try to win.

  15. lichmd says:

    This is a travesty. The Yankees spend 53% of revenue on salary (for the 40 man, not counting coaches), teams like the Pirates and Marlins are in the low to mid teens. The Twinkees spend 43% of revenue on salary, even though Carl Polhad is vastly richer than the Steinbrenners. We need a minimal salary, as a floor, to ensure that teams are making a good faith effort to put together winning teams, otherwise these welfare checks are just a travesty of a mockery of a sham.

  16. [...] Yankees have paid $13.9M, $18M, and $25.69M in luxury tax in the three previous seasons. Since the tax was implemented in 2003, New York has [...]

  17. [...] will have paid just $32M or so. The Steinbrenners have shelled out $19.3M, $13.9M, $18M, and $25.7M in luxury tax in the three previous [...]

Leave a Reply

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

If this is your first time commenting on River Ave. Blues, please review the RAB Commenter Guidelines. Login for commenting features. Register for RAB.