The Future of Right Field


(Brian Bissell/Future Star Photos)

Earlier today I wrote about the importance of having Nick Swisher in the lineup, and that got me thinking about the future of right field in general. Obviously Swisher will become a free agent after the season and with the 2014 payroll plan looming, he might not fit into the team’s plans going forward. He’s going to make it very hard for the team to let him walk given his early-season performance, but parting ways with a soon-to-be 32-year-old corner outfielder isn’t the craziest thing in the world.

The problem is that the Yankees don’t have an obvious in-house candidate to step into the outfield. Zoilo Almonte had an outside chance at being that guy, but that looks unlikely at this point. Melky Mesa is another Greg Golson/up-and-down type, ditto Colin Curtis to a certain extent. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the Yankees moved prospects Rob Segedin and Tyler Austin (pictured) to right field on a full-time basis this season, but those two are still in Single-A and are years away from the bigs. Hopefully they become factors down the line, but they certainly won’t help next year or even the year after that.

If the Yankees do let Swisher walk, the best way to replace him probably involved a platoon of some sort until Segedin and/or Austin pan out, if they do at all. Andruw Jones seems like a logical candidate for the right half of that platoon assuming he doesn’t completely fall off a cliff this summer, but finding a lefty to go with him will be easier said than done. I’m partial to Kelly Johnson, who played the corner outfield earlier in his career and has everything the Yankees look for offensively: left-handed power, the willingness to take a walk, and the ability to steal double-digit bases. Would he take a one or even two-year deal to change positions for the Yankees at age 30? I highly doubt it. Heck, he might require a bigger contract than Swisher, but I digress.

The 2014 payroll plan is really going to throw a wrench into the team’s roster plans going forward, but frankly I think there’s a pretty good case to be made for keeping Swisher at say, something a little north Michael Cuddyer money (three years, $31M) and skimping elsewhere (coughsecondbasecough). He already has the “old player skills” that tend to age well and has been very durable throughout his career, which sounds kinda funny after he just sat out a week with a hamstring issue. There’s value in reliability, and it’s hard to find a more reliable and consistent Yankee over the last three years than Swisher. The best bridge from Swisher to the theoretical Segedin/Austin era just might be Swisher himself.

Categories : Musings


  1. Gonzo says:

    The corner OF market after this year is not that great. Do you think that might inflate Swish’s next contract?

  2. Robinson Tilapia says:

    I default to Swisher because I have no other idea what to do and, yes, I believe he can perform at a high level until the next crop is ready, if that’s what happens. I remain concerned as to someone willing to drastically overpay for him and driving up his price.

  3. JU says:

    Yea, they should def prioritize Nick Swisher over Robinson Cano…That is a recipe for future success.

    • Gonzo says:

      Hmmm, not sure which direction this post is meant to go.

    • TheOneWhoKnocks says:

      From 2009-2012 (since Swish joined the yanks) Cano has produced a .374 wOBA and Swisher has produced a .372 wOBA. Obviously Cano has been more valuable doing it from 2B but the point is, with a $189m budget will the yanks be better off spending $12-13m on swisher for 3 years or $20m on cano for 6-7 years? Yanks have a lot of holes to address and I’m not fond of spending the majority of their available funds on Cano.

      • I am not the droids you're looking for... says:

        This. And Cano is very likely to have to be moved off 2B and/or may simply fall off a cliff the way many 2B do in their early/mid 30′s. And maybe he moves to RF and then why not sign swisher for way less?

      • Slugger27 says:

        why does everyone assume cano will get 6/120 or something similar? he only has to make $17M to be the highest paid 2nd baseman in the league, and kinsler only got 5 years. i think 5/90 or 6/100 is much more of a realistic number.

      • Havok9120 says:

        Well said. Even if you assume Cano won’t fall off a cliff in the next 2 or 3 years (which I do, curse of 2nd base be darned) that’s a LOT of years to pure contact hitter.

    • LK says:

      Yeah, they can totally just simply choose between Robinson Cano and Nick Swisher since they’ll cost the exact same amount.

      • Alex says:

        I’m more concerned about swisher’s defense now and for future years. He doesn’t wow me now because he doesn’t have exceptional range and he doesn’t have a spectacular arm.

    • BK2ATL says:

      Not true at all. Our future 3B is currently playing 2B. Our current 3B will be our fulltime DH.

      Cano has more intricate and positional future value than Swisher. Then there’s that best young hitter in the lineup thing that won’t be replaced with Jesus Montero, nor could we count on Sanchez, Bichette or Williams at this point either.

  4. Slugger27 says:

    He already has the “old player skills” that tend to age well

    is this at all true? low avg, high walk guys age well? i thought if anything speedy guys that high for high avg age well, and that the 3 true outcome types aged poorly.

    • Jamie says:

      I think the speedy high average guys tend to age not as well…right? The speed, on the bases, playing defensively takes a toll on their bodies…most recently Carl Crawford. While the 3 true outcome players tend to age better…Giambi, Dunn, etc.

    • Mike Axisa says:

      Speedy guys usually don’t age well at all. Most of their value is shot as soon as they start to lose a step.

      • Slugger27 says:

        this article suggests the opposite. high avg low obp types will get better as hitters in general tend to walk more and K less as they age. but power hitters decline faster. and their walk rate doesnt have any place to really go but down.

        and to jamie: youre using dunn as an example??

        • V says:

          Dunn was absolutely atrocious last year. No ifs, ands, or buts. But are you paying attention in 2012? It’s like 2011 never happened – same old Dunn.

        • Gonzo says:

          From the article it says that “Patience is nice and stable, relatively.”

          Doesn’t that mean a patient hitter is more valuable than an impatient hitter? Seriously curious here.

          • Gonzo says:

            I mean where aging is concerned.

            • Slugger27 says:

              the 2nd link i gave is easier to understand and more relevant to the actual question. basically the first article is saying that plate discipline is usually stable, but power declines pretty quickly and faster than people realize. but if you have a good eye, you’ll probably always have a good eye (like the abreus of the world)

              • Gonzo says:

                Abreu’s BB% resembles Swisher’s more than it does Cano’s.

              • RetroRob says:

                So that would be a vote in Swisher’s favor.

                I expect a farily rapid decline for Cano. I do not want the Yankees to sign him to a new contract, unless it was a four-year deal, which is not going to happen with Boras as his agent. Even without Boras as his agent that would probably be unlikely.

                Let him walk. Redirect resources elsewhere to repace Cano’s value. Move A-Rod to DH and find a better thirdbaseman. Or upgrade a bat in the OF. Or go hard after Cole “Welcome to the Big Leagues” Hamels so the team is upgrading at one of the pitcher slots. If Cano is delivering five WAR, then the team either through a single player, or a combination need to make up for that five WAR.

                I’m okay with a declining player asset as long as he can still be productive. Teams know this too and fully expect the value delivered per win will decrease as the player ages, thus the cost increases, but they will make up for that in other areas.

                Let Cano leave.

      • Slugger27 says:


        the first 2 paragraphs seem to imply the opposite of what youre saying. swisher types decline faster and earlier.

  5. TheOneWhoKnocks says:

    I said it in the previous thread, I’d rather have Swish at 3 for 32-36 than Cano for 6-7 years at around $20m aav.

    I do however think that Swisher has a big season and in a weak market is in a good position to get overpaid by a more desperate team. (thinking 5 years 75m) at which point it doesn’t make sense for us to keep him either.

    The $189 plan is really going to make things interesting and we’re going to have to make some sacrifices, I just hope we make the right ones.
    I agree with Mike that Cano is probably a good candidate to let walk. He has a skillset that doesn’t age well, a reputation that exceeds his production and he’s going to be hitting free agency as what a 32 year old second basemen. Look at the numbers historically for 2B in their age 32-39 seasons, it’s very grim. I know his production will be difficult to replace(you could argue he’s our best hitter) but I don’t want to see the organization tied down to another player long term for big money. I think other big contracts like A-Rod and Tex have put us in a position where we can’t afford to take those risks when under a tight (although still extremely generous) budget

  6. Bonnie Parker says:

    With Mariano coming back next year we don’t have his salary to apply to other players. With Hal’s budget cuts and some of our bloated salaries we won’t be able to keep Cano, Swisher, and Granderson and improve our pitching staff. We can use Kuroda and Garcia’s money but where else do we save?

    • MannyGeee says:

      spend like mad in 2013, and trim the fat on 2014. offer arbitration like a muthafucka.

      • Cris Pengiucci says:

        “With Mariano coming back next year we don’t have his salary to apply to other players.”

        We don’t know what Mariano will ask for. The team offered Pettitte more than $10 Million, yet he’s playing for significantly less. Maybe Mariano will play for less than market value as well. He’s certainly not going to play for a different team. We also don;t know what 2014 looks like. Maybe 2013 is his last hoorah and we don’t have to worry about this in 2014.

    • Alex says:

      Don’t go nuts over the 2014 budget simply because of Mariano contract. I think we can safely say he won’t be back for that year and his huge contract will be off of the books and the Yankees will be a lot closer to the 189 figure that Hal put out there even with a Cano pay increase.

  7. JohnC says:

    Anyone who thinks they should keep Swisher than Cano long term is out of his cotton pickin mind.

    • TheOneWhoKnocks says:

      appears that way on the surface but their production has been very similar the past 3 seasons and while Cano is 2 years younger than Swisher he’s also got a skillset that doesn’t age well (as opposed to swisher’s skillset that does age well) and he’s going to require a 6-7 year commitment while Swisher is likely looking at 3 years.

      I think the Yanks will end up keeping Cano, and paying through the nose for him. I just think it will be the wrong call.

      • Ted Nelson says:

        The production has been similar the last three years, except that Cano plays 2B. So his production has been a lot more valuable. Not saying anything about who to sign going forward, just pointing that out.

      • G says:

        You have it backwards. Players with old player skills age poorly because they have nothing to improve. As their bat speed and power decline, their walk rate isn’t going to improve from an already high rate. As Cano ages he’ll probably mature as a hitter and take more walks. His bat speed and power will decrease as happens with age, but rather than drop from .250-.265 with a constant walk rate, he’ll decline from .300-.320 to .280-.300 with a better walk rate than before which will largely cancel out the regression in ability.

    • viridiana says:

      Have been saying for some time that it may make more sense to keep Swish than Grandy. For one thing, it allows the system another year to come up with an outfielder. I believe there’s a good chance Mason Williams can help by 2014. He likely won’t hit right off but his defense and speed will be assets. And his incredibly low strikeout rate suggests he may adjust more quickly than expected to bigs.
      As to Cano, the numerous casual references to 6 year deals seem like wishful thinking. Unless he seriously tanks, can’t imagine that Boras peddles him for less than 8 years. Every reson to think some one will go that lenth too. Of course, my preference for Swish is dependent on them getting him at reasonable price. I might go a bit higher than Mike– say, three years $36-37 mill.

      • TheOneWhoKnocks says:

        I wouldn’t be surprised if he gets 8 years. It all depends how he performs until then and what the market looks like, but I think unless he’s willing to sign something that is in line with what Kinsler and Utley got, the Yanks need to let him go.

        He’s a Kinsler/Utley level talent, not a Pujols/Arod level talent. Pay him accordingly or let someone else make that mistake

    • Guest says:

      JohnC, I’m not sure if you know that the origin of the phrase “cotton pickin” is. If you don’t, look it up.

      I generally am OK with all kinds of potentially “un-PC” phrases, but that one…bothers me.

      • JohnnyC says:

        Guest (if that’s your real name), I’m very sure you don’t know the origin of the phrase. You should look it up. I cite the Historical Dictionary of American Slang:

        Believe it or not the adjective cotton-picking comes from Bugs Bunny and the Looney Tunes cartoons and is used as a general adjective of disapproval, similar to damned. From a 1952 cartoon:

        Get your cotton-pickin’ hooks offa me!

        Bugs may not have been the first to use it, but he gets credit for first recorded use.

        But the noun cottonpicker is older. It dates to around 1919 and refers to a contemptible person. From Joel Chandler Harris’s Dizzed:

        What are these boys from the South? Are they cotton-pickers, corn-crackers, stump jumpers, ridge-runners or bog-leapers?

        Cottonpicker has also served as a derogatory term for a black person since at least 1930. While cottonpicker has distinct racist overtones, the adjective cotton-picking does not carry them, instead being a reference to the unpleasant nature of the work.

        • Guest says:


          You’re being too cute by half, and I think you know that.

          First, the fact that Bugs Bunny used a term by no means innoculates it from being ridiculously offensive. Now, like just about everybody else, I loved Bugs Bunny cartoons as a kid. But it is pretty much common knowledge that heb used a ton of racist terms meant to disparage both black people and Native Americans.

          Second, you used the phrase “cotton picking mind.” That, to me, does not seem to be referring to the nature of the work. Rather, the phrase seems to be describing the mind of a person who would prefer to have Swisher over Cano. And that description, as applied to a person, is extremely offensive to me…and again, I don’t usually get offended by much.

          We all know who picked the lion’s share of cotton is the country, the circumstances under which they picked cotton, and what someone is trying to imply about the quality of someone’s thinking ability when they use the phrase “cotton picking mind.”

          I obviously don’t think you’re a racist. I certainly don’t think you meant any harm. I just wanted to be clear that phrase stirs up a lot of painful thoughts for many Americans, and I personally would appreciate it if it left our discourse forever…

    • AJavierkei Pavagawnett says:

      Swisher 4/60 >> Cano 6/120

      There’s no question.

      • Havok9120 says:

        4 years of Swish is pushing it, even for me. AND 6 years is on the bubble for me on whether or not to take Cano. In other words, that offer makes me conflicted.

  8. Manny's BanWagon says:

    I wouldn’t have a problem giving Swish a 3/$36 deal at the end of this contract.

    The FA market for corner outfielders is horrible over the next few years as Gonzo mentioned and there are no reasonable internal candidates as Mike stated.

    As for the 2014 budget, I’m starting to think that the Yankees very well might have to decide between getting under $189 for 2014 and 2015 while putting a team on the field the very well might not make the playoffs or saying to hell with the luxury tax and bringing in who they need to win.

    • jim p says:

      might have to decide between getting under $189 for 2014 and 2015 while putting a team on the field the very well might not make the playoffs or saying to hell with the luxury tax

      That’s pretty much the choices. If they are intent on making the $189, with the heart and top of the lineup aging, no position players ready for big impact in the majors, I don’t see how they end up winning things without spending for hitters. Maybe if their young pitchers mostly come through and are outstanding, but that would be the gamble.

      • Ted Nelson says:

        They can spend on hitters and stay under the $189 million… Those options are definitely not mutually exclusive.

    • OldYanksFan says:

      The problem is, as we have proved from 2002-2008, that even spending big bucks to get the right players, doesn’t quarantee a ring. It does however, almost guarantee trouble down the lihe, as most of these contracts cost WAY more then $4.5m/WAR over the life of the contract.

      Robbie’s rep, as well as his age, makes it much more likely he will get a crazy contract. At $20m AAV, he needs to deliver 4.5 WAR/yr over the length of a contract. While I can see that over 4 or maybe 5 years, 7 or 8 years will be suicide.

      When Giambi was a FA in 2001, there was almost no competiton for him. Now, teams have far more money, and many more bidders are driving up contract prices… especially in years. Top tier players are getting contracts that will ultimately hurt their team. For a non-contender type that’s willing to try and make a PS run for 3 or 4 years, and then take a hit for a few years, these contracts might work.

      But the Yankee are trying to Win EVERY year. So sacrificing the future for the present makes no sense. We all know about ARod’s and Teix’s contracts. You can probably add Pujols, Carl Crawford, A. Soriano, Zito, Zambrano, and many, many others to the list.

      The Yankees are going to have to pick and choose FAs very carefully in the future.

  9. Brian S. says:

    Don’t lie. You wrote this article because you saw my comment on your Mariano Rivera piece on fangraphs.

  10. Brian S. says:

    I would hope that we pursue Cole Hamels this winter, even if it means 20 million dollars a year. I want an elite rotation. If that means that Swish has to leave then so be it. Both he and Russ will probably be type A free agents so we should be able to get some nice draft picks from them. I’m thinking we could do what the Sux are doing this year and have a platoon RF with cheap players. Like Cody Ross, Matt Diaz, Torii Hunter, Carlos Quentin etc.

    • Brian S. says:

      Could probably add Ichiro to that list.

    • Need Pitching says:

      there are no Type A free agents anymore.
      Draft pick compensation is contingent on making a qualifying offer (somewhere around 12.5M/ 1 year currently)
      I would think offering that contract to Swisher would be a no-brainer.
      For Russ, he’s really going to have to finish strong this year to make offering him that contract worth the gamble.

  11. DERP says:

    It seems like all of our prospects have tattoos.

    • MannyGeee says:

      I think all athletes do. its a thing

      • Gonzo says:

        I’ve had to have conversations with friends about why they don’t like certain players. I crap you not, someone said they hated Harper because of his hair.

        • FIPster Doofus says:

          I guarantee you a lot of people are anti-Harper for that reason.

          • Gonzo says:

            I don’t get it. When did everyone become Jorge?

            • Slugger27 says:

              while “hate” is a strong word, its pretty easy to be annoyed by someone doing something for attention.

              i cant say i hate any of them for this specifically, but im annoyed by felix hernandez, hanley ramirez, mike napoli, jacoby ellsbury, etc etc etc for not buttoning the top of their jerseys. and every time i see any of them, the only thing in my mind is “button your damn jersey you douche”

              • Gonzo says:

                I guess I just don’t get it.

                • Slugger27 says:

                  i dont get why people would HATE someone for it, but i just explained why i personally can understand them getting annoyed by it. like i said, anyone doing anything strictly to be different or to get attention is annoying. whether its harpers hair or biggio not letting people clean his helmet, or anything else. i dont “hate” them, but all i can think about when i see them is “why are you doing (insert annoying thing)??”

                  • Gonzo says:

                    like i said,anyone doing anything strictly to be different or to get attention is annoying.

                    This, I think, is kind of dangerous. How do you, or anyone else, know they are doing something to be different or if that’s just the way they are. Maybe Harper just thinks his hair is f*cking rad. He is 19.

                    You see what I’m getting at? Why do “these people” try to be so different. Why don’t they fall in line and behave like I want them to…

                    • Slugger27 says:

                      “different” isnt opinion. 99% of all players button the top of their jerseys. these guys dont. me saying theyre being different is fact.

                      i get what your point, that we shouldnt judge what is and what isnt for attention. its hard not to though. and harper may think his hair is just awesome. some examples are better than others. id like you to come up with one reason biggio wouldnt let anyone clean his helmet year in and year out other than just wanting people to pay attention to his dirty helmet. kudos if you can.

                    • Gonzo says:

                      I never said something doesn’t make them different. I said you assuming that you know why is kind of dangerous.

                      I won’t light three on a match, I won’t kill spiders, etc… It might make me different, and I guess it does if the statistics say it does, but how could anyone tell me I’m doing it so that people pay attention to me? They know better than I why I do something?

                      There are 6 billion people in this world. A lot of them are bound to be different. Some are even bound to want attention. Disliking them for that seems a little superficial to me.

              • Sweet Dick Willie says:

                I guess you didn’t like Mickey Mantle.

                • Slugger27 says:

                  way before my time. but yeah, being a superstar doesnt make you immune. felix, ellsbury and napoli were all examples i used of people that annoy me cuz they have 1 annoying thing about them. i didnt get to watch mickey, but i dont see why he wouldve been any different.

                  • Plank says:

                    I always hated Ted Lilly’s stupid face. Randy Kiesler, too. That’s not really related, but I wanted to get that out.

                    I feel much better now.

  12. steve s says:

    Segedin will be 26 at the start of the 2014 season. If he is still “years away” what kind of prospect is he anyway?

    • TheOneWhoKnocks says:

      I think one of Segedin/Austin/Williams will be up by 2014. We sure need one of em so somebody is going to get the fast track treatment.

      • steve s says:

        I agree. That at least should be the plan anyway instead of continuing to re-up aging guys on multi-year deals.

        • Slugger27 says:

          the plan should be to rush a good prospect instead of exploring an extension with swisher?

          • steve s says:

            A good prospect, yes. A non-prospect (as you think may be where Segedin is headed per your reponse below), then no.

            • Slugger27 says:

              they should be treated independently of each other. no way a kid in A ball should have any bearing at all on whether or not the yankees should explore re-signing swisher. if he was 22 and in AAA, then absolutely. but way too far away for him to impact decisions on free agency.

              as far as rushing. if he maintains this performance, then theres no reason not to keep moving him up, but even then. its tampa this year and trenton/scranton in 2013, and youre still looking at 2014 at the earliest.

      • Slugger27 says:

        its hard to lump segedin in with those other 2. segedin is 23 and still in A ball. hes having a solid season, but he was there last year, and again, hes playing against guys hes at least 2 years older than, and in most cases 3.

        not a nonprospect, but getting there.

        • JohnnyC says:

          According to Baseball America, the average age of a player in High A ball (including Tampa in the FSL where Segedin plays) is 22.8. So, no, he’s not playing against guys he’s at least 3 years older than. Of course, BA is using actual birthdates. Maybe you have other means of determining age.

          • Slugger27 says:

            average age? really? we’re talking about PROSPECTS, not org guys. you cant possibly consider this a serious argument.

    • Ted Nelson says:

      I do agree 2014 is not at all unrealistic (A+/AA in 2012, AA/AAA in 2013… AAA/MLB in 2014), but he’s 25 in 2014. Plenty of college guys don’t debut till 25-ish.

      Segadin is not a high-ceiling prospect, but that doesn’t mean he can’t be a serviceable big-leaguer.

  13. JohnC says:

    Where have U gone Melky Cabrera?

    • MannyGeee says:

      you’re only 1/2 kidding, i’m sure. but for real, the MelkMan cometh again.

      • BK2ATL says:

        He’s gotten much better since working out with A-Rod and playing regularly….Probably wouldn’t cost very much either. He knows how to play and deliver in NYC.

        He might be a cheaper, less-power, higher avg, better fielder RF version of Swisher. Just saying…

  14. adjusts batting gloves says:

    I think A-Rod should prove he’s a True Yankee by taking a voluntary pay cut!

    /wishful thinking

    • JohnC says:

      Actually he will. His salary goes down every year for the rest of his deal. He makes 29 mill this year, 28, next, then 25. Then the last 3 years it drops to 21, 20 and 20

      • Manny's BanWagon says:

        4 and 5 years from now when he’s 41 and 42 years old and making only $20 million a year, he’s gonna be a veritable bargain.

        Hank should be caned for signing him to that contract.

        • jsbrendog says:

          the scary thing is i bet you can look back in 10 years and say arods avg value the last 3 yrs of his contract were better than a pujols, fielder, votto, etc. which s mind effing boggling

          • Manny's BanWagon says:

            Prince’s deal takes him to 36 and pays him $24 million the last few years so I don’t think he’ll be as useless as Arod will be at the end but given his body, he could fall off a cliff in his mid 30s and no one would be surprised.

            Votto’s contract takes him to age 40 and pays him $20 million the last few years so he might be close.

            Pujols contract takes him to age 41 (if you believe he is really born in 1980) but pays him $29 and $30 million the last 2 years so I think his is probably the worst of them all.

      • jsbrendog says:

        which is irrelevant because the luxury tax is based on aav

    • Peter North says:

      Don’t think the players’ union would even allow it. Remember his non-trade to the Red Sox?

    • Sweet Dick Willie says:

      I think A-Rod should prove he’s a True Yankee by taking a voluntary pay cut!

      He couldn’t even if he wanted to. The union would never allow it.

      In fact, that why he’s with the Yanks and not the Sux. He offered to reduce his salary to facilitate the trade to Boston and the union said he couldn’t do it.

    • G says:

      A pay cut won’t happen, but I’m still in favor of renegotiating the contract. Add a few years and guarantee him his bonuses. He’d be foolish not to take it, it gives him money he might not actually get under the current contract and gives him a few extra years to break all the records. I know the thought of even more years of A-Rod is painful, but it could be huge in getting under $189M to spread out a little more money over a longer span.

  15. Manny's BanWagon says:

    2014 starting right fielder for the Yankees, 22 year old power hitting Cuban phenom, Jorge Soler.

    Cashman stop screwing around with your hoes and sign this guy as soon as he’s eligible.

  16. Kosmo says:

    I guess because he´s 27 and not considered a prospect that Mustelier gets no love. He´s according to Trenton´s manager a very talented and skilled player who plays 3B,2b and the OF. He´s now at Scranton and if he continues to scald the baseball will be called up in the near future. Keep that name in mind.

    • JohnnyC says:

      Mustelier is 5’6″ and 215 lbs. He’s got somewhat of a hit tool but he’s got negligible power and is not particularly fast. His ceiling is platoon guy or super sub. Problem is he’s not a good infielder and SS is completely out of the question for him.

  17. The Dude says:

    Umm. Yankees would be out of their minds if they would be ok with letting Cano walk. First of all, although his range will only get worse with age, I’d rather have Cano, suspect defense and all, over a Ryan Theriot defense first type who has a noodle for a bat. Unlike Swisher/Granderson who have heirs in the minors (Tyler Austin, Mason Williams) there is absolutely no one in our system who is capable of being a major league 2nd baseman. Unless you’re ok with Kevin Russo, Ramiro Pena, or Corban Joseph being a Starting Second Baseman for a Contender™. If anything I would let Grandy walk and trade for a young CF like Denard Span, Peter Bourjos or even sign a FA like BJ Upton or Michael Bourn who will command a more modest contract. I’m a big Grandy fan but his range out there in center isle aves a lot to be desired whereas Swisher and Cano please average to above average defense at their respective positions.

  18. The Dude says:

    Umm. Yankees would be out of their minds if they would be ok with letting Cano walk. First of all, although his range will only get worse with age, I’d rather have Cano, suspect defense and all, over a Ryan Theriot defense first type who has a noodle for a bat. Unlike Swisher/Granderson who have heirs in the minors (Tyler Austin, Mason Williams) there is absolutely no one in our system who is capable of being a major league 2nd baseman. Unless you’re ok with Kevin Russo, Ramiro Pena, or Corban Joseph being a Starting Second Baseman for a Contender™. If anything I would let Grandy walk and trade for a young CF like Denard Span, Peter Bourjos or even sign a FA like BJ Upton or Michael Bourn who will command a more modest contract. I’m a big Grandy fan but his range out there in center leaves a lot to be desired whereas Swisher and Cano please average to above average defense at their respective positions.

  19. The Dude says:

    Sorry for double post. Mike if you’re reading this delete the first duplicate.

  20. TheOneWhoKnocks says:

    Just sign cole hamels and figure everything else out after that, thanks

  21. ThatstheMelkyMesaWaysa says:

    LET’S GO MELKY MESA YEAHHHHH!!!! Sorry.. I got attached to my handle.. How about we convert Brett Lawrie to an outfielder and sign him?

  22. delshofner says:

    Not sure what the answer is on the Cano deal. Long term deals (Arod and Tex) are killing us as we pay a premium for production that is not there. (At least ARod won a title for us; Tex is an albatross.) Letting him walk may the play considering his age when his contract is up.

    But to position this as Cano vs Swisher and to somehow equate the two is pretty dumb. Swish is 16-100 in the post season with 28ks. He has s**t the bed on the big stage. Cano is a singular offensive force at a premium defensive position that he mans at a very high level. Cano has hit over .300 the last 2 post seasons.

    The one thing I will say about Swish ……. from the left side he’s starting to let the ball travel and drive it the other way. If he can consistently start doing that then I might change my assessment.

    Bottom line is I think these are 2 separate arguments and I hate to see it when we take one new age stat to imply that one obviously superior player is on a level with an average one. And yes, it is about October baseball which, as in a lot of sports, is played at a different level.

  23. Guest says:

    Do people really think that Swish is going to have to settle for a 3 yr, 36 Mil deal? I mean, he’s making 10.25 Mill this year as it is.

    He was obviously very focused in the off-season, came in as prepared as he’s ever been to succeed, and he’s succeeded at an impressive rate so far. It could just be a hot streak, and Swish is known to be streaky.

    But given (1) the added, um, motivation Swish had to work as hard as he could to do well this year (Adrian Beltre says hello),(2)the fact that he clearly worked harder this off-season than he has before, and
    (3) the fact that he appears to be one of the few guys where “being in the best shape of his life” appears to make a difference in his performance, I would guess that its more likely that we are witnessing a “career year” than not.

    And if he has a career year, three years at a little more than he’s receiving goes sprinting out the window.

    • Kosmo says:

      I certainly have no idea what kind of longterm deal Swisher will be asking for but if he hits .280 with 25-30 HRs and 100 rbi the bidding starts at 15-17 million a year.

      • BK2ATL says:

        The Braves want Swisher badly and might spend $15-$18 million per to get him. Then, there’s also the Dodgers, who would probably consider Swisher an all-around upgrade over Ethier. He’ll get paid what he wants.

        • Plank says:

          I feel like the Rangers will go after Swisher and let Josh Hamilton walk. It doesn’t really make sense, just a feeling.

          • BK2ATL says:

            Might be a better and much cheaper move for Texas.

            While Hamilton is very talented, he is a time-bomb, plus the both extreme on-the-field/off-the-field wear & tear on that body….He won’t age well under a long-term deal.

  24. delshofner says:

    I’ve got a right fielder for us. A lefty bat who covers the plate and barrels the ball. I know he hasn’t done it yet in the majors but the guy can hit. Travis Snider. I wonder what it would take. Betances?

    • Kosmo says:

      he hits in the minors.

    • The Dude says:

      Um. No. Although there’s a small chance that Betances reaches his potential, there is a chance he becomes something special. And I’d really hate for him to find it with the Blue Jays and then pitch 8IP w/10Ks against us. As for Travis Snider he’s Mark Teixeira Jr. except for the part where he was good at baseball at one time. I’d kep Betances unless you’re trading him for some more pitching like a Dan Haren type. Worse comes to worst he’s a strikeout middle reliever and there’s no shame in that.

    • yankeegm says:

      LOVE the Snider idea…

      Young, good power/patience, and currently a buy-low candidate…

      That being said, Tor would never trade him to us.

      • Ted Nelson says:

        Yeah, both teams would really have to be at the end of their ropes to deal such high upside within the division for an equally risky guy in return… could fleece a rival, but could just as easily get fleeced. Plus Snider is at least CRUSHING AAA right now. His wOBA is like .500. Betances… is not crushing anything right now.

        Dom Brown seems more like the Betances of OFs right now, and is in the other league entirely.

  25. Tyrone Sharpton says:

    kelly johnson is in no way going to have any chance of getting more money than swisher.

  26. AJavierkei Pavagawnett says:

    I love this because all anyone ever does is scream about ARod and Teixeira and their contracts.

    OK great. So you want to do the same thing with Cano?

    Just be happy with it: You get nine great years out of the guy, let someone else overpay him on the downside of his career.

    If he gets say 130/6 or god forbid 150/7, really you’re paying him 35+ million a year for his prime years before he falls off.

    There’s no way it makes sense to hand out that amount of money when you could have a Cole Hamels – someone likely to perform at an elite level for the life of a contract – for similar money.

    If you can get Cano for something like 5 years for <100, maybe with a vesting option based on productivity for a 6th, maybe it's worth it.

    Swisher's never been considered an "elite player," whatever that means, so maybe he could be had for 4 years for somewhere between 50 and 60.

    I'd rather have Swisher for 4 and the extra $60 million, than Cano at age 36 or 37.

    Here's how the Yankees can gain a competitive edge going deep into the 2010's – don't give atrocious contracts to "franchise players." Let other teams get hamstrung by the Pujols/Votto/Fielder/Crawford/Werth contracts.

    • Plank says:

      Here’s how the Yankees can gain a competitive edge going deep into the 2010′s – don’t give atrocious contracts to “franchise players.” Let other teams get hamstrung by the Pujols/Votto/Fielder/Crawford/Werth contracts.

      That’s how much elite free agents cost now. If the Teix we got had been a FA last offseason, he would have gotten a similar deal to Fielder. One of the few benefits of long term deals for teams is that while they seem bad at the end usually, they seem less bad because of salary inflation.

      20MM for Arod won’t seem as bad in 2017 as it seemed it would in 2007.

      • Ted Nelson says:

        The whole point of the comment you responded to was not to sign elite FAs because of what they cost these days. That they’re overpriced. Agree or disagree, but don’t repeat his point to him like you’re telling him something new.

        • Plank says:

          Such anger.

          They’re not overpriced. That’s the new price.

          • Ted Nelson says:

            Stop with the anger thing. What’s the point?

            Again… you don’t seem to understand the conversation you’ve entered… which seems to happen every thread. AP said that the new market rate for elite players overvalues them. “It’s the new price” is not a counter to that. We all know it’s the new price. The question is whether it should be the new price? Should the Yankees pay the new price, or should they let some other team pay it?

            If I tell you that the new price of a certain car is $50,000… that doesn’t tell you much about whether you’re going to buy it or not. Is that the new price of a ’95 Honda or a brand new Bentley? Is signing Cano through his 30s at huge $ a terrible idea, a great idea, or somewhere in between?

            • Plank says:

              You are ridiculous. You keep pretending I’m an idiot. It’s obviously not true and I don’t appreciate it.

              The money in free agent contracts define how valuable players are. A player signs …

              You know what? I’m not even going to bother. I’m not going down another 2 hour rabbit hole with you so you can call me names and get out your aggression online.

              • Ted Nelson says:

                I’m not pretending anything. I’m responding to your comments. You do come across to me as an idiot. Your comments often miss the point of the comment you’re responding to completely.

                “The money in free agent contracts define how valuable players are.”

                To one team. Not to any other team. Obviously the team that signs a player thinks he is that valuable or more valuable. That doesn’t mean any other team agrees. The Rangers let Lee and then Wilson walk in consecutive years, so it seems they weren’t worth what they got paid to the Rangers… but they were worth it to the Phillies and Angels, respectively. The Rangers have done fine letting those guys walk.

              • Ted Nelson says:

                You know what the saddest thing is? I still try to break things down for you so that you might understand. I went through the whole Honda/Bentley example for your benefit. Yet you never want to learn. Instead you just lash out at me for questioning you.

                • Plank says:

                  What the fuck is your problem? You’re trying to teach me? Are you Glen Beck standing at the chalkboard misinterpreting stuff? That’s a pretty apt comparison actually.

                  Misuse the term marginal for me then tell me I don’t understand what it means, that’s my fave.

                  • Ted Nelson says:

                    How did I misuse the term marginal? If anything, you made it a one word representation of a larger point I was making. Not me.

                    Yes, I am trying to teach you. You clearly didn’t understand what AP was saying, as evidenced by your response. “It’s the new price” was not a legitimate response. Do you really not understand that? Why can you never, ever admit when you’re wrong or don’t know something. No one knows everything.

            • Plank says:

              Again… you don’t seem to understand the conversation you’ve entered… which seems to happen every thread.

              Who speaks to another human being like that?

              • Havok9120 says:

                Darth Vader.

              • Ted Nelson says:

                Plank, I am your father.

                What you quoted isn’t disrespectful at all. Every thread you make comments that seem to completely misunderstand the point you’re commenting on. That’s just an observation. What sort of human points out things they observe? I don’t know… most.

                • Plank says:

                  Not gonna get sucked in. Not gonna get sucked in. Not gonna get sucked in. Not gonna get sucked in. Not gonna get sucked in.

                  • Ted Nelson says:

                    So, basically, I’ve sufficiently proved your point completely wrong?

                    • Plank says:

                      What’s wrong with you?

                    • Ted Nelson says:

                      When I thoroughly undress your argument as wrong, you never simply admit it was wrong. You go on the offensive against me with little one line responses. Why not just admit that you’re wrong?

                    • Plank says:

                      I didn’t have an argument. I was taking his thought and extending from it. It doesn’t surprise me that you are unable to see two people interacting without conflict.

                    • Plank says:

                      Jiminy Christmas. Everything is a heart attack with you.

                    • Ted Nelson says:

                      Whether it was an argument or not… your comment had no validity.

                      That I disagree with you doesn’t mean I’m having a heart attack.

            • Slugger27 says:

              ted, youre the guy that doesnt get it here. the free agents arent overpriced. the market itself has changed. you can argue whether or not theyre worth market value, but you cant argue market value itself. the free agent market sets the price of what guys are worth. its capitalism. its pretty clear the market has changed.

              again, these players arent overpriced. the high price is the new market price.

              • Ted Nelson says:

                Come on, man. If you don’t know what you’re talking about don’t talk down to people who do.

                “the free agents arent overpriced.”
                “you can argue whether or not theyre worth market value”

                If they’re not worth market value… they’re overpriced. Market value can be wrong. The market adjusts. That’s capitalism.

                Say’s market value was $100 per share for a $100 million valuation during the tech boom (totally made up numbers). That’s its market value. That doesn’t mean it wasn’t overvalued.

                • Slugger27 says:

                  i shouldve said if theyre not worth market value TO THE YANKEES. as in, you should argue whether we should pay market value for cano, but you cant argue what his market value is ($80M +)

                  i get what youre saying, you think this past offseason is an abberation. but theres no way you can predict that. fielder, pujols, votto all signed for well more than what we thought. whether you think itll change in the future or not, the market value for a great offensive 1st baseman in his prime is over $200M. that doesnt mean i think those are prudent contracts, but it does mean thats what a team can expect to pay to be the top bidder, which is all that matters, and what we’re talking about when we say “market”

                  • Ted Nelson says:

                    You can argue whether he’s worth “market value.” That’s what I’m saying.

                    AP said that none of these 30-something star FAs are worth market value, basically. Certainly I think you can argue with that comment. Plank’s point that it is market value, though, was not a legitimate argument. It basically tried to argue against AP’s conclusion by pointing out one premise of AP’s own argument…

                    ” it does mean thats what a team can expect to pay to be the top bidder, which is all that matters, and what we’re talking about when we say “market””

                    You’re missing the point as much as Plank here. The question is not whether or not that’s market value. We all know it is market value. It’s a given. The question is whether or not a team should pay market value.

                    Did the example do nothing for you? I’ll try it again. Stocks have very well defined, liquid market values. If a stock is at $100… that’s it’s market value. When deciding whether or not to buy that stock, you have to decide whether the company is worth its stock price, less, or more. When Boras comes to the Yankees or any other team saying Cano was offered 10 years $200 million… that team is in the same position as you are with the stock. “The market” says the asset is worth $x… but you have to decide the actual value of that asset relative to the market value. You don’t have to pay market value… you can simply abstain from buying that particular item or class of items.

                    If stocks don’t work… do the same thing with a house or a car.

              • Havok9120 says:

                Well, siding with Ted while he’s in Rude Mode does leave a sour taste in my mouth, but already agreed that the market price has changed. He’s asking whether or not we should be willing to pay market price. I get the impression that he doesn’t think current market value will stay this high, and he may have a point if so. Depends on if Votto, Fielder, and Pujols cripple their franchises at some point. Or even if they don’t bring back equal value.

                Heck, I would think Boston’s current troubles might give teams pause. That’s a 180 million dollar team with something like 80 million+ on the shelf from injury and ineffectiveness. And if they continue to spiral into oblivion….

                • Ted Nelson says:

                  I’m not stating my opinion on the matter at all. Just saying that Plank misunderstood AP’s comment, and therefore his response was… don’t even know what to say so as not to be rude. It was off-base, I guess.

                  Not even trying to be rude… Plank just makes these arrogant pronouncements even when he has no idea what he’s talking about. I have no patience for it. If you don’t know what you’re talking about, why would you tell other people they’re wrong?

                  (In terms of my actual opinion… Case by case. Depends not only on the guy you’re signing, and also the state of your organization.

                  I don’t think FA prices will come down, but I also would try not to sign too many FAs. To me the very nature of the CBA makes them overpriced. I don’t think that the Yankees have to either sign big FAs or develop guys… I think they can do a little of both and also trade for some guys using just below elite prospects like, say, the Granderson deal. Those prospects pretty much hit their collective ceiling, and the Yankees still got a fair deal.)

    • Gonzo says:

      I read the whole interaction between Plank and Ted Nelson. I seriously think this is a made up argument for sport.

      Ted, is there that much of a difference between your:
      The production has been similar the last three years, except that Cano plays 2B. So his production has been a lot more valuable. Not saying anything about who to sign going forward, just pointing that out.

      and Plank’s:

      One of the few benefits of long term deals for teams is that while they seem bad at the end usually, they seem less bad because of salary inflation.

      When you read them in context to their respective threads?
      Isn’t Ted saying, hey I get your point, but I wanted to add that Cano has a higher value because of position. Isn’t Plank saying, hey I get your point, but I wanted to add that the contracts may not be as bad because of contract inflation.

      Of course, I expect both of you disagree, so f*ck it.

      • Ted Nelson says:

        I just don’t like Plank.

        • Gonzo says:

          So was I right in saying it was for sport? Maybe not sport. Spite?

          • Ted Nelson says:

            I guess I would say that it wasn’t as much about Cano as it was about Plank’s response to AP.

        • Ted Nelson says:

          But, seriously, my problem was just with the point about this being the new market value… the question is not whether it’s been the new market value or not, but whether it should be.

          • Gonzo says:

            I see. There really isn’t a solid answer to that though. Different teams have different values for players based on a bunch of variables. We’ve seen players sign for much less than we thought (Edwin Jackson) and players sign for big bucks (Fielder/Votto).

            • Ted Nelson says:

              Oh, I agree. It’s a very, very difficult question. It’s a big part of what separates GMs on a spectrum of great to terrible.

              My point was just that if someone raises that question, simply saying “well it’s the market price” isn’t a valid response.

              Something like if I asked you “do you like that red car over there” and you responded “that car is red.”

              • Plank says:

                You figured it out. I’m just that simple-minded.

              • Plank says:

                I’m glad you acknowledge it’s a complex issue then assume my brief answer meant the most nonsensical thing you could make out of it.

                Next time I’ll be sure to post at least 2 paragraphs of the obvious so you don’t assume I’m a dummy again.

                • Ted Nelson says:

                  You didn’t even begin to address the issue. You simply restated what had already been said as if you were analyzing it. (“The car is red.”) You did the same thing the other day, forget what the subject was.

                  You’ve had all this time to explain what you meant if I misrepresented your point. How come you have not done that yet? Perhaps because your point was pretty straight forward and not hard to interpret?

      • Plank says:

        I honestly didn’t even bother to figure out what his point was. I could tell he wanted to fight and I was trying to avoid it. I should have just turned the computer off.

        I wasn’t disagreeing or agreeing with anything. I made a pretty innocuous comment about the changing landscape of salary structure in MLB and got barked at incessantly for it.

        Good grief! I wish this site had filters.

        • Ted Nelson says:

          Aw, poor victim :(

          • Plank says:


            • Ted Nelson says:

              You are the biggest thorn in the side on this site, and when someone points out your mistakes you flip and cry victim…

          • Plank says:

            You’re the angriest person I’ve ever encountered. I really hope you never have children. You’re a monster.

            • Ted Nelson says:

              Why do you insist on reading tone into my written words?

              How did you get anger from “Aw, poor victim :(?”

              • Plank says:

                What was the tone you were going for? Bullying?

                • Ted Nelson says:

                  Joking. A joking tone. Ironic I suppose. You constantly belittle other commenters, and then as soon as someone points out where you’re wrong you call foul. Rather than arguing back, you usually just curl up into a ball.

                  • Ted Nelson says:

                    It’s like Ron Artest giving a news conference about how the NBA is too violent and players are hurting him.

                • Plank says:

                  I’m feeling very attacked by you. I really feel like I’m being bullied. It’s preposterous since I’m a successful adult and this is a baseball website, but it’s still how I feel. I’m a human with feelings.

                  What about the other things? Are those jokes too?

                  I belittle other commenters? When do I do that? I said some not nice things to you in this thread, but that’s very out of character for me. Again it was because I felt attacked and you weren’t stopping.

                  Ok, I have to get off the computer and chill.

    • AJavierkei Pavagawnett says:

      I disagree that the prices for Fielder, Votto, or Pujols are necessarily “the going rates.”

      They’re only the going rates because a single team in each case was willing to pay them.

      Clearly, when you have teams extending young players into the early years of free agency, the value for what you are paying is much higher.

      Even before this season began, Matt Kemp’s contract made a hell of a lot more sense given its length and his age then these other guys. If Cano was going to be 27 next year and a free agent, sure why not? But he’s going to already be aging for a 2B.

      I think that the market has not caught to the new reality: without steroids and amphetamines most elite position players are not going to perform on a high level in their mid to late thirties (depending on the position).

      Of the Granderson, Swisher, Cano trio, Cano has the highest probability of getting a huge contract that looks like a disaster on the back end.

      Who knows what the farm system will produce? Who thought Cano was going to end up being who he is?

      I think that because Derek Jeter has been so good so long, we forget what happens to most middle infielders half way through their thirties. Look at Alfonso Soriano, Chase Utley,

      • Gonzo says:

        Is Ted Nelson your PR person or agent?

      • Plank says:

        They are definitely the going rates. I don’t see prices for free agents dropping any time soon.

        The question of whether the Yankees should sign top tier free agents because of the premium you need to pay for top talent is another question entirely.

        I think they should sign stars especially if it is a CC (first time situation) where they are still young.

        • Ted Nelson says:

          I guess I can teach you, huh? You finally understand the topic.

          • Plank says:

            You could have read into the first thing I wrote and assumed I understood the necessary topics (which I did and do) and had a constructive conversation. Instead you attacked me for being a jerk about saying the same thing he wrote (which I didn’t, I added new information to his point). Now you seem to think you are an educator to me or some weird father thing. You called me your son.

            Whatever it is, your behavior has been very odd today, you have said very hurtful and heinous stuff to and about me, and I don’t wish to have any kind of conversation with you regarding baseball or any other topic.

  27. GrandyManCan says:

    If this is a “contract year” for Nick, he’s always given us 25 and 85. Plus he walks. It’s a good fit for him and us.

  28. Reggie C. says:

    This posts in this thread takes an all different bent if Cano was hitting like … Cano.

    He hasn’t done much of anything with the bat this season and until he does, I’m wary to project a $20 million per year contract …

    If cano’s numbers take a significant dive, the man will not get a Crawford sized deal everybody thinks Cano is going to get.

    • Plank says:

      They would have a different bent if Mike had endorsed keeping Cano, too, I think.

      • Havok9120 says:

        To an extent, sure, but nearly all of the regulars are saying almost exactly what they’ve been saying since the end of last season.

    • BK2ATL says:

      Even with Boras as Cano’s agent, I just don’t see him getting the 6 yr, $120 million deal being bandied about here.

      We can use the following recent 2B contracts as a guide:

      Utley (7 yr, $85 million)
      Kinsler (5 yr, $75 million plus options)
      Uggla (5 yr, $62 million)
      Pedroia (6 yr, $40 million plus options)
      Brandon Phillips (6 yr, $72.5 million)

      • Plank says:

        Which of those were in free agency? You can ignore the rest. Also, what years were those signings?

        • Gonzo says:

          None of these contracts was a traditional “Free Market” free agent deals. They were all signed without the player being able to negotiate with other teams.

          • BK2ATL says:

            Well, no, but then those teams don’t adhere to the Yankees’ BS no-contract-extension crap. They all made reasonable, FMV offers to those 2B. So they are or were all in the same boat as Cano. Difference being that they were offered and signed extensions.

            • Gonzo says:

              Isn’t that the point? That we don’t know what the free market price is because no top tier 2b has hit FA recently. We may think it’s market price, but we can’t say that with certainty. It’s possible they signed above market value, at market value, or below market value.

              • BK2ATL says:

                Very true. I see that point.

                But if these top-tier 2B are locked in at a max of $15 million, and the Yanks offer Cano, say 5 yr, $80-90 million (or AAV or $16-18 million, which makes him the highest paid 2B in MLB), and Cano balks, well, I say to him, best of luck in his FA, but this may be where we part ways.

                • Gonzo says:

                  Yeah, I kind of agree. There’s more data to collect on him, but I expect to be in your camp. I might be already.

                • Plank says:

                  Isn’t that how every free agent negotiation works? There still isn’t a recent FA 2B comp available to compare Cano to.

                  • BK2ATL says:

                    That might be true, or you can look at actual 2B contracts right now and go from there.

                    Boras will do the Boras thing in FA and have Cano’s value at $22-25 million AAV. He’ll probably look at A-Rod’s and Pujols contract and start from there. It just takes one idiot to bite. Somehow, I don’t think Cashman is that idiot.

                    In fact, I’m pretty sure that he won’t even play Boras’ game, if it came to it. He’ll probably go to Hal and come back with a number that would be signed off on (probably closer to my guess), and Boras will have his ridiculous number, and Cano will be playing elsewhere, if he doesn’t step in and take Cashman’s offer.

                    It would be best if they extend Cano prior to FA, figure out Grandy’s number, then make a decision on Martin and Swisher.

                    The salary cap/luxury tax implications now dictate that different approaches must be considered, rather than the prior strategy of no-reupping prior to the end of a contract with no implications.

                    If they’re serious about hitting $189 million, then re-upping Cano and Grandy is just the smart move.

      • Reggie C. says:

        I’d take Cano signing a Kinsler-type deal in a ‘caine heartbeat.

        We just can’t underestimate Boras’s ability to create a field of interest. The man did get the Tigers to go $200 million in on Prince Fielder. I wouldn’t underestimate Boras somehow squeezing a 6 year, $120 million dollar deal. Boras’s binders actually produce results.

  29. Alex says:

    I kinda thought about the possibility of the Yankees doing to Grandy what the Angels did to Torii Hunter and sliding him over to RF while sliding Gardy over to CF. Gardy’s defense has come a long way and Curtis has a nice arm for right. It’s a lot easier to find a LF than a RF at the right price. Maybe look into the Nunez as a LF experiment a little more over the offseason (although I’m not too fond of that), maybe a LF in-house option, or (and I can’t believe I’m saying this but…) Melky may be free…

    • OldYanksFan says:

      It’s an idea. Nunez currently has NO OF experience, so if he works hard all offseason, with his speed and athletism, he might be an average fielding OFer. However, I would put him in RF. He has a good arm, and would have a lot less territory to cover.

    • BK2ATL says:

      Very good idea as well. But I think they’d bring Andruw back as the fulltime LF, which definitely wouldn’t be a bad thing. 3 CFs in the OF, even though Andruw is a shell of what he used to be.

  30. Paul VuvuZuvella says:

    What is Zoilo’s injury? How long will he be out?

  31. Ted Nelson says:

    How about trade candidates? We don’t know who will be available for what, but all else equal that could be the best way to fill the spot. Push forward some of that Low A talent a couple of years through a trade for a below market contract.

    I wouldn’t write Zoilo off after 50 PAs this season. Still has the same chance as he did entering the season.

    Segadin could definitely contribute in 2014, or even ’13. Should get to AA this season, maybe fairly soon after 200 PAs there last season. Then start 2013 in either AA or AAA. He’ll be 25 by 2014… so if he’s ever going to contribute that would be a good time to start.
    Austin has a shot at 2014, though 2015 is more likely.

    “The 2014 payroll plan is really going to throw a wrench into the team’s roster plans going forward,”

    Again, this assumes that they were going to re-sign Swisher (and the rest of them) or replace him with a big FA. Last time their OFs started to depart, they replaced them with below-market guys through trades. And it happened to work out brilliantly, which doesn’t hurt the chances it happens again.

  32. Reggie C. says:

    I’ve wavered on this topic In Previous open threads, but we all got to admit that the decision gets pretty clear if Cano ends this season off his numbers across the board. Im not going to play a guess game, but Cano might be pressing given that Boras likely has every intention of pushing for a massive extension after this season.

    It’s far easier to address starting pitching by making the bet Swisher maintains his abilities that produced consecutive solid years in 2010 & 11.

    I love Robbie’s game, but he’ll have to match his best season one more (twice more perhaps) before earning Crawford bucks.

    • Ted Nelson says:

      We’ll have to see, but I think most likely it’s just a hiccup for Cano. His .312 wOBA in April 2012 is similar to his .308 wOBA in May of 2011. Certainly could have a terrible year, but I think it’s more likely just a terrible month plus that he’ll bounce back from.

  33. Dummies Playing With Balls (formerly Rainbow Connection) says:

    I wish the Yanks would be like the Rays and simply say goodbye to past-their-prime-overpaid babies.

    Just let them go.

    • Slugger27 says:

      this is an odd comment. in recent years weve seen the yankees let matsui, damon, giambi, and abreu walk, all because they were 1)past their prime and 2)overpaid. and thats just off the top of my head.

      your point stands, but picking the yankees as an example is just confusing.

      • Dummies Playing With Balls (formerly Rainbow Connection) says:

        “but picking the yankees as an example is just confusing.”

        This is a Yanks site.

        Should I focus on the Astros instead?

      • Ted Nelson says:

        Rainbow Connection is a total troll. Not being rude here, really is. Makes nothing but random disparaging comments about the Yankees and commenters on the site. Wouldn’t waste your time.

  34. BK2ATL says:

    Even with Boras as Cano’s agent, I just don’t see him getting the 6 yr, $120 million deal being bandied about here.

    We can use the following recent 2B contracts as a guide:
    Utley (7 yr, $85 million)
    Kinsler (5 yr, $75 million plus options)
    Uggla (5 yr, $62 million)
    Pedroia (6 yr, $40 million plus options)
    Brandon Phillips (6 yr, $72.5 million)

    • Reggie C. says:

      I’d take Cano signing a Kinsler-type deal in a ‘caine heartbeat.

      We just can’t underestimate Boras’s ability to create a field of interest. The man did get the Tigers to go $200 million in on Prince Fielder. I wouldn’t underestimate Boras somehow squeezing a 6 year, $120 million dollar deal. Boras’s binders actually produce results.

      • BK2ATL says:

        If it gets to that, I think Cashman will call Boras’ bluff and Cano will end up somewhere else with his $20 million/yr contract, but little chance of sniffing team success again.

        Let’s take a look at the teams with the money/need to absorb that…

        Boston – got Pedroia
        Tampa – need offense, no money
        Toronto – possible target, but tax implications, why leave NY?
        Washington – top 2B prospect on the way
        Texas – Kinsler
        Philly – Utley contract
        Florida – money already tied up, and attendance uncertainty
        Tampa – money issues
        Chicago Cubs – possible target
        LA Angels – Kendrick there
        LA Dodgers – possible target
        Seattle – Ackley
        St. Louis – possible target, but don’t see them spending the money
        Detroit – possible target, but again, don’t see the money being spent after Cabrera and Fielder
        SF – possible target, definite need for offense, money to be spent…

        Just off the top of my head. Cashman would be wise to try to extend this year, then start making up contingency plans. Swisher on hold as a backup.

        • RetroRob says:

          Tigers and Dodgers potential. Tigers because their owner will spend money just for the sport of it and has worked well with Boras in the past. Leyland also keeps blowing kissed Cano’s way.

          Dodgers because they look now to be big spenders.

          Yet trying to figure out a market post 2013 is damn difficult.

    • Gonzo says:

      None of these contracts was signed as a “Free Agent” deal. I don’t think they can be used as a hard guideline.

  35. Barbara Booey says:

    This article is nonsense. First it implies that signing Swisher could be worth it (a proven post-season failure), as opposed to trying to retain the best 2B in the game. Secondly it says that Kelly Johnson may command the same money Swisher will. Pure nonsense. And Andruw Jones in RF anytime a lefty pitches? No thanks. We need less guys who K, not more.

  36. CC says:

    I’d rather keep Swisher than Cano. This isn’t in response to Cano’s slow start I just feel like, as mentioned above, Swisher has a skill set that is more inclined to age gracefully as opposed to Cano. The crux of that being Swisher’s insane ability to walk and Cano’s, not lack of the ability but, significantly lesser ability.

  37. yankeegm says:


    Any chance you think Swish takes a 1 year deal to stay? I know he’d be leaving a ton on the proverbial table, but he obviously LOVES it here, we have a definate need, and we could go over market on a 1 year deal to make it attractive…

    • Mike Axisa says:

      I highly doubt it. He may love it here, but he’s good too much lose with a one-year deal. Now’s his chance for a big payday.

    • RetroRob says:

      As Mike noted, this is his chance to cash in. Taking a one-year deal does nothing to help him. Sure, he loves it in NY, but he’ll love it in NY a year later too and he’ll be a year older.

      Swisher may not take top dollar let’s say if Baltimore comes in and if offering maybe two million more than the Yankees. If it was a 3/36 Yankees vs. 3/38 Orioles, then I could see him take a little less, but basically the Yankees will still have to pay market rate.

  38. Tomm says:

    I agree this is nonsense. Swisher is appropriately named, at least when he faces quality big league righty pitching. In three years? He will be even worse.

  39. Jesse says:

    I don’t know if this is in the comments yet, maybe it was before or after the Plank/Ted Nelson battle, but how about trading Dellin Betances for Dom Brown!


    • BK2ATL says:

      I think the Phillies know what they have in Brown, while we still don’t know what we have in Betances. 2012 is a critical year for Betances, one way or another.

    • Gonzo says:

      I’d do it in a heartbeat. IMHO, I think the Phils could get better can get better value than Betances elsewhere.

  40. Mike says:

    Many Yankee fans (and reporters) have advocated signing Russell Martin and letting Swisher walk as a way to keep payroll to $189M in 2014. Frankly, neither Martin’s defensive or offensive process meaningfully exceed Cervelli’s or Stewart’s. Rather than retain Martin and let Swisher walk, the team should retain Swisher and let Martin walk.

  41. MWD1202 says:

    Nick Swisher has been a very solid player for the Yankees, but the fact that he has been non-existent in the playoffs year in and year out needs to be taken into consideration when free agency comes around. The organization can’t afford to lock up a player long term if he has consistently failed on the biggest stage.

  42. Cuso says:

    So keep Swisher, let Cano go.

    ….I think I just had a mini-stroke.

    I’ve waited so long for him to be gone, don’t give me agita.

  43. Fin says:

    If we as fans think Swisher is worth 3 yrs at ~13m per year, he will get more. There are probably several teams that would add a year to get him and maybe 1 team that adds 2. Look at the Jason Werth contract. Cano is complete wild card. All that it would take is one team going wild, which seems to happen with every super star now. It wouldnt shock me to see Cano get an 8yr 160m deal with Boras as his agent, if he hits FA.

    With Arods deal and Tex looking more and more like a bust after every game. I really dont see the Yankees competing for Cano against that one team that wants to break the bank. Cano could be the first home grown Yankee star in his prime that I can ever remember the Yankees loosing to FA.

    At the end of the day, as an objective fan, I have to think the Yankees are better off keeping Granderson and Swisher on shorter term deals than a long term deal for Cano. However, I really cant help but hope the Yankees do whatever it takes to keep Cano as he is my favorite player and I would love for him to be a life time Yankee in the footsteps of Jeter, MO, Jorge and Williams

Leave a Reply

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

If this is your first time commenting on River Ave. Blues, please review the RAB Commenter Guidelines. Login for commenting features. Register for RAB.