Archive for Nick Swisher
Does Nick Swisher vanish against good pitching?
Posted by: | CommentsOne of the commenters in my post about Nick Swisher last month suggested that Swish’s struggles in the postseason were due in part to the fact that hitters are facing their opponents’ best pitchers, or something to that effect. While it’s probably true that an offensive bludgeoning is less likely to occur during a postseason game than, say, in August, I also think it’s a convenient excuse for teams that aren’t hitting. We’ve frequently seen the Yankee bats run the gamut from laser-hot to ice-cold during the postseason, though we tend to remember the games in which the bats didn’t show up more often than not, given how accustomed we’ve become to fielding a powerhouse offense.
Unfortunately one of the primary issues when judging both a player’s and team’s postseason performances is that the samples are almost always too small, and the very nature of baseball dictates that any player, no matter how good, is going to suffer through a slump at one point or another. That’s not to minimize the impact of facing elite pitching in the postseason; but on the flipside not even pitchers are infallible and even the best ones have less-than-great days. CC Sabathia had a 6.23 ERA in 8.2 innings in the 2011 ALDS; Justin Verlander a 5.00 in 9.0 IP.
The point of all this is that, based on what we know of Nick Swisher’s offensive abilities over the course of a 162-game season, it’s crazy to to assert that he “can’t hit in the postseason.” Unless Swisher has actually demonstrated a distinct inability to hit so-called “good” pitching, the only explanation that really makes sense as far as his struggles have gone is the recurrence of several ill-timed slumps.
Prior to embarking on this post I’d initially hoped to be able to segment batches of “good” (which I would have defined as being 10% better than league average) and “bad” pitchers, and then tally Swisher’s stats against them in an effort to see how exactly he performed against these pitcher types, but B-Ref won’t allow me to export Play Index results to Excel, and there was no way I was going to manually re-enter all of the data.
Instead, below is a table showing all of the starting pitchers Swisher has faced during his three-year Yankee career (including the postseason), minimum 10 PAs. While 10-plus PAs isn’t anywhere near a large-enough sample, if we’re going to castigate Swish for small-sample failure in the playoffs, we also have to accord him respect for small-sample success.
| PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SH | SF | IBB | HBP | GDP | missG | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Beckett | 40 | 35 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 12 | .171 | .275 | .343 | .618 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Jon Lester | 36 | 30 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 9 | .300 | .400 | .533 | .933 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Ricky Romero | 30 | 23 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | .217 | .400 | .348 | .748 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| David Price | 29 | 22 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 4 | .455 | .586 | .682 | 1.268 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| John Lackey | 27 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | .250 | .333 | .375 | .708 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Felix Hernandez | 24 | 23 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | .217 | .250 | .391 | .641 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| James Shields | 23 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 8 | .174 | .174 | .435 | .609 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Brandon Morrow | 23 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | .136 | .174 | .273 | .447 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Francisco Liriano | 23 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | .143 | .174 | .190 | .364 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Jeremy Guthrie | 22 | 20 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 7 | .450 | .500 | 1.000 | 1.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Cliff Lee | 22 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | .211 | .273 | .579 | .852 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| C.J. Wilson | 21 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | .222 | .333 | .444 | .778 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Brett Cecil | 21 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | .235 | .381 | .235 | .616 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Brian Matusz | 19 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | .063 | .211 | .250 | .461 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Justin Verlander | 19 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | .111 | .158 | .167 | .325 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Matt Garza | 17 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | .538 | .647 | 1.308 | 1.955 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Jason Vargas | 17 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | .357 | .412 | .857 | 1.269 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Derek Holland | 17 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | .286 | .412 | .429 | .840 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Brian Tallet | 16 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | .231 | .375 | .538 | .913 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Kevin Millwood | 16 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | .286 | .375 | .500 | .875 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Brett Anderson | 16 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | .231 | .375 | .231 | .606 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Joel Pineiro | 15 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | .462 | .500 | .846 | 1.346 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Andy Sonnanstine | 15 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | .385 | .467 | .846 | 1.313 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Rick Porcello | 15 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | .231 | .333 | .462 | .795 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Clay Buchholz | 15 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | .273 | .429 | .364 | .792 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SH | SF | IBB | HBP | GDP | missG | |||||
| Scott Kazmir | 15 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | .167 | .286 | .417 | .702 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Fausto Carmona | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 0 | .400 | .500 | 1.000 | 1.500 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Gio Gonzalez | 14 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | .333 | .429 | .667 | 1.095 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Brad Bergesen | 14 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | .273 | .429 | .455 | .883 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Daniel Bard | 14 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | .214 | .214 | .429 | .643 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Jason Frasor | 14 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | .167 | .286 | .167 | .452 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Jeff Niemann | 14 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | .071 | .071 | .071 | .143 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Jake Arrieta | 14 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Trevor Cahill | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 2 | .333 | .538 | 1.111 | 1.650 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Brian Duensing | 13 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | .455 | .538 | .909 | 1.448 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Ervin Santana | 13 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | .250 | .538 | .750 | 1.288 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| Jason Berken | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | .300 | .462 | .600 | 1.062 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Wade Davis | 13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | .200 | .385 | .600 | .985 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Mark Buehrle | 13 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | .400 | .538 | .400 | .938 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| John Danks | 13 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | .273 | .385 | .545 | .930 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Tim Wakefield | 13 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | .250 | .308 | .333 | .641 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Darren Oliver | 13 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | .000 | .231 | .000 | .231 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Chris Tillman | 12 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | .400 | .500 | .800 | 1.300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Marc Rzepczynski | 12 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | .400 | .417 | .800 | 1.217 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Sean O’Sullivan | 12 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | .273 | .333 | .636 | .970 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Doug Fister | 12 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | .273 | .333 | .545 | .879 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Max Scherzer | 12 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | .222 | .417 | .222 | .639 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Joe Saunders | 11 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | .300 | .364 | .300 | .664 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Tommy Hunter | 11 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | .182 | .182 | .455 | .636 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Carl Pavano | 11 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | .182 | .182 | .273 | .455 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SH | SF | IBB | HBP | GDP | missG | |||||
| Gavin Floyd | 11 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | .182 | .182 | .182 | .364 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bruce Chen | 10 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | .500 | .600 | .500 | 1.100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Matt Harrison | 10 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | .444 | .500 | .444 | .944 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Mark Hendrickson | 10 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | .400 | .400 | .500 | .900 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Luke French | 10 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | .222 | .300 | .556 | .856 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Lance Cormier | 10 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | .286 | .500 | .286 | .786 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Zach Britton | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | .000 | .300 | .000 | .300 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
David Price and Jon Lester are two of the best pitchers in the American League. Swisher has killed ‘em both. Cliff Lee? .852 OPS against. Matt Garza doesn’t stand a chance against Swisher. Gio Gonzalez, arguably the most-sought-after pitcher on the trade market, may as well be throwing Swish batting practice. Same with Trevor Cahill and Ervin Santana. RAB favorite John Danks? Swish has hit him to the tune of a .930 OPS in 13 PAs.
The naysayers in the audience will undoubtedly point out Swish’s struggles against Josh Beckett and James Shields (though among the Yankees that’s far from a Swisher-only issue), but on the whole, I’m not sure one could reasonably conclude that Nick Swisher routinely struggles against good pitching.
(Ed. Note: Keep in mind that while .641 OPS against Felix over the last three seasons looks bad, Hernandez has held all hitters to a .616 OPS during that time. We’re referencing a very different baseline when talking about top pitchers. Context is everything.)
For the folks who want to pin his postseason struggles on something tangible, there really is no better explanation than Swish happening to slump on three separate occasions, with each unfortunately coming at one of the worst possible times for the Yankees. This doesn’t make his regular season contributions — which have helped the team get to the playoffs in each of his three pinstriped years — any less valuable, nor does it mean that he is forever doomed to postseason failure (see Rodriguez, Alex).
Cole Hamels, Curtis Granderson and the tough choices ahead
Posted by: | CommentsOne of Larry’s objections to the Pineda/Montero swap is the future availability of Cole Hamels on the free agent market. If the Yankees can pick up Hamels to slide in behind Sabathia, the argument goes, then perhaps they should have kept Montero to provide cheap production out of the designated hitter slot over the next few seasons. I wrote about Hamels last week, speculating that the Yankees might be preparing to make a run at him next winter.
Last Friday’s trade radically altered the landscape of the Yankees roster. In acquiring Michael Pineda from the Mariners, the Yankees acquired a potential number one or two starter with five years of cheap team control. According to well-sourced reporter Joel Sherman, the price was particularly important because the team is serious about getting under the $189M luxury tax threshold in 2014. With the new roster in place, it seems reasonable to wonder whether the team will be able to afford Hamels, or their own Curtis Granderson, Robinson Cano, and/or Nick Swisher, all of whom hit free agency in the next few years.
In projecting precisely whom the Yankees will be able to afford, it helps to have a handle on a reasonable estimate of future prices. Towards that end, I asked Joe, Mike, Ben, Moshe and Larry to all provide me their best estimates for what they expect Swisher, Granderson, Cano and Hamels to pull in in their new contracts. These were the results of our inputs:
Robinson Cano: AAV of $22.0M, high of $23M, low of $20M.
Nick Swisher: AAV of $12.67M, high of $15M, low of $12M.
Curtis Granderson: AAV of $17.0M, high of $18M, low of $15M.
Cole Hamels: AAV of $21.67, high of $23M, low of $20M.
I’ll be using these figures going forward, and also making a few assumptions about the future Yankees payroll. The first one is that the Yankees won’t allow Robinson Cano to leave via free agency. He’s a homegrown star at a difficult position to fill, and he’ll only be 31 when he hits the free agent market after the 2013 season. It’ll hurt, but I expect the Yankees to resign Cano at $22M per year, the average listed above. The second assumption is that Alex Rodriguez will hit his 660th home run this season, and will hit his 714th home run in 2014, thus triggering his second $6M bonus. The third assumption is that Russell Martin does not sign an extension with the Yankees, and that they’ll use Austin Romine by 2014. With this in mind, this is what the roster would look like heading into the 2012-2013 offseasons:
The specific names attached to the $500k salaries aren’t all that important, but the idea that a cheap player will occupy the fifth starter’s spot and most of the bullpen. Banuelos, Betances, and Warren are interchangeable with whatever young player your heart desires. The cost is important.
The Yankees will have roughly $40M to spend on their rotation, bullpen, center field, right field and designated hitter positions. If they pay Granderson $17M and Swisher $12M, they’ll have around $10M to fill out the final rotation spot and the bullpen. They could go with a cheap arm in the fifth starter position, fill out the back end of the bullpen with minimum salary guys, and sign a decent set up reliever. If they choose to let Granderson walk and sign Hamels and Swisher, they’d have about $7M left over for the center field position (or left field, if they shift Gardner to center), bullpen and DH. This would be difficult to pull off. If they chose to forgo both Granderson and Swisher and sign Hamels, then they’d have around $18M left for two outfielders, the DH and the bullpen.
There doesn’t seem to be any way that the Yankees can get under $189M with Robinson Cano, Curtis Granderson and Cole Hamels all under contract at market rates. From a financial perspective, the “easiest” solution would be for the Yankees to acquire a cheap, cost-controlled outfielder (like a Domonic Brown) who could step in and fill Swisher’s role for cheap. This would allow the Yankees to move Gardner to center and allow Granderson to walk, replacing Gardner with a relatively cheap left fielder and spending big on Hamels and the bullpen.
Personally, I’d very much like for them to spend on Hamels, probably even at the expense of Curtis Granderson. The offense would take a bit of a hit, but the idea of a Sabathia-Hamels-Pineda-Nova rotation is enticing. That’s just me, though, so I’m providing the link to my Google Doc with all the relevant numbers. If you save your own version, you can edit and mess around with various roster scenarios and post your version in the comments. Any way you cut it, though, there are some very hard decisions ahead for the Yankees front office.
Report: Indians, others have interest in Swisher
Posted by: | CommentsVia Ken Rosenthal, the Indians are one of several clubs with interest in trading for Nick Swisher. The Tribe is apparently in the hunt for Carlos Beltran, and they see Swisher as a backup plan. Sounds great in theory, but Cleveland has little to offer the Yankees. Justin Masterson isn’t happening, and Fausto Carmona isn’t an upgrade over what they already have in their rotation. He probably isn’t even available anyway.
Josh Willingham is a very similar player to Swisher as Joe wrote last week, and last year he got traded for two Grade-B prospects when he had one year left before free agency like Swisher does now. Hard to see how that would help the Yankees more than their current right fielder in 2012. The Indians are just doing their due diligence more than anything, but it’s really tough to find a trade match involving Swisher that makes sense for both sides.
How good has Nick Swisher been compared to previous Yankee right-fielders?
Posted by: | CommentsWhile I’m sure Nick Swisher doesn’t need defending among RAB’s audience, his name has continued to arise this offseason due to a variety of factors: (a) As the Yankees’ only position-player free agent among the starting nine next offseason, he would seem to be the most tradeable; (b) Some folks are still irrationally mad at Swish for underperforming in three separate and completely unrelated small sample sizes; and (c) the Yankees need pitching, which is basically an extension of (a).
Here’s the problem with any trade speculation involving Swish: Nick Swisher is (as I mentioned in the above-linked piece) the living and breathing embodiment of the ideal New York Yankee on offense, a sabermetrician’s dream of patience and power who led the team in OBP in 2011 with a .374 mark despite starting the season in a horrid slump, notched the best BB% on the team, at 15% — a massive jump from 2010′s 9.1% not to mention the third-best mark in the American League — and finished 11th in the AL in pitches per plate appearance (20th in 2010 and 2nd in the league in 2009).
He’s really quite good at what he does, random postseason struggles aside. This becomes even clearer when taking a quick scan of the 2013 outfield free agent class:
Left fielders
Josh Hamilton (32)
Eric Hinske (35)
Mark Kotsay (37)
Carlos Lee (37)
Juan Rivera (34) – $4MM club option for 2013 with a $500K buyout
Luke Scott (35)
Delmon Young (27)
Center fielders
Michael Bourn (30)
Marlon Byrd (35)
Melky Cabrera (28)
Curtis Granderson (32) – $13MM club option with a $2MM buyout
Angel Pagan (31)
B.J. Upton (28)
Shane Victorino (32)
Right fielders
Matt Diaz (35)
Andre Ethier (31)
Torii Hunter (37)
Mark Kotsay (37)
Carlos Quentin (30)
Juan Rivera (34) – $4MM club option for 2013 with a $500K buyout
Ryan Spilborghs (33)
Ichiro Suzuki (39)
Nick Swisher (32)
Before the Dodgers extended Matt Kemp, fine, I’d have been alright with letting Swish walk in favor of Kemp patrolling whichever section of Yankee Stadium’s outfield he wanted. However, as it currently stands, none of next year’s pending free agent outfielders are better than Swish. The only names on that list that I would maybe think twice about are Carlos Quentin and Shane Victorino, and Swish has been a better offensive player (.370 wOBA) than both outfielders over the last three seasons (both Victorino and Quentin have matching .354 wOBAs during that same timeframe). Yes, we all know Josh Hamilton’s been a beast (.388 wOBA over the last three seasons), but he also can’t stay healthy and will presumably be looking for a huge deal. With all of these players essentially the same age, I’d go with the devil you know who has also played in 150 games in each of his three seasons in pinstripes.
But wait, there’s more. Here’s a rundown of Yankee right-fielders over the last 20 individual seasons, sorted by OPS+:
| Rk | Player | PA | Year | Age | G | AB | 2B | HR | BB | IBB | SO | HBP | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paul O’Neill | 176 | 443 | 1994 | 31 | 103 | 368 | 25 | 21 | 72 | 13 | 56 | 0 | .359 | .460 | .603 | 1.064 |
| 2 | Danny Tartabull | 152 | 526 | 1992 | 29 | 123 | 421 | 19 | 25 | 103 | 14 | 115 | 0 | .266 | .409 | .489 | .898 |
| 3 | Gary Sheffield | 141 | 684 | 2004 | 35 | 154 | 573 | 30 | 36 | 92 | 7 | 83 | 11 | .290 | .393 | .534 | .927 |
| 4 | Bobby Abreu | 138 | 248 | 2006 | 32 | 58 | 209 | 16 | 7 | 33 | 1 | 52 | 1 | .330 | .419 | .507 | .926 |
| 5 | Gary Sheffield | 137 | 675 | 2005 | 36 | 154 | 584 | 27 | 34 | 78 | 7 | 76 | 8 | .291 | .379 | .512 | .891 |
| 6 | Paul O’Neill | 137 | 637 | 1997 | 34 | 149 | 553 | 42 | 21 | 75 | 8 | 92 | 0 | .324 | .399 | .514 | .912 |
| 7 | Paul O’Neill | 137 | 543 | 1995 | 32 | 127 | 460 | 30 | 22 | 71 | 8 | 76 | 1 | .300 | .387 | .526 | .913 |
| 8 | Paul O’Neill | 136 | 547 | 1993 | 30 | 141 | 498 | 34 | 20 | 44 | 5 | 69 | 2 | .311 | .367 | .504 | .871 |
| 9 | Paul O’Neill | 130 | 672 | 1998 | 35 | 152 | 602 | 40 | 24 | 57 | 2 | 103 | 2 | .317 | .372 | .510 | .882 |
| 10 | Nick Swisher | 129 | 635 | 2010 | 29 | 150 | 566 | 33 | 29 | 58 | 0 | 139 | 6 | .288 | .359 | .511 | .870 |
| 11 | Paul O’Neill | 123 | 660 | 1996 | 33 | 150 | 546 | 35 | 19 | 102 | 8 | 76 | 4 | .302 | .411 | .474 | .885 |
| 12 | Nick Swisher | 122 | 607 | 2009 | 28 | 150 | 498 | 35 | 29 | 97 | 2 | 126 | 3 | .249 | .371 | .498 | .869 |
| 13 | Bobby Abreu | 120 | 684 | 2008 | 34 | 156 | 609 | 39 | 20 | 73 | 2 | 109 | 1 | .296 | .371 | .471 | .843 |
| 14 | Nick Swisher | 117 | 635 | 2011 | 30 | 150 | 526 | 30 | 23 | 95 | 6 | 125 | 5 | .260 | .374 | .449 | .822 |
| 15 | Bobby Abreu | 113 | 699 | 2007 | 33 | 158 | 605 | 40 | 16 | 84 | 0 | 115 | 3 | .283 | .369 | .445 | .814 |
| 16 | Raul Mondesi | 110 | 403 | 2003 | 32 | 98 | 361 | 23 | 16 | 38 | 6 | 66 | 2 | .258 | .330 | .471 | .801 |
| 17 | Paul O’Neill | 107 | 675 | 1999 | 36 | 153 | 597 | 39 | 19 | 66 | 1 | 89 | 2 | .285 | .353 | .459 | .812 |
| 18 | Paul O’Neill | 104 | 563 | 2001 | 38 | 137 | 510 | 33 | 21 | 48 | 4 | 59 | 2 | .267 | .330 | .459 | .789 |
| 19 | Raul Mondesi | 96 | 302 | 2002 | 31 | 71 | 270 | 18 | 11 | 28 | 2 | 46 | 2 | .241 | .315 | .430 | .744 |
| 20 | Paul O’Neill | 92 | 628 | 2000 | 37 | 142 | 566 | 26 | 18 | 51 | 2 | 90 | 0 | .283 | .336 | .424 | .760 |
| 21 | Shane Spencer | 86 | 329 | 2002 | 30 | 94 | 288 | 15 | 6 | 31 | 4 | 62 | 4 | .247 | .324 | .375 | .699 |
Swish’s three seasons didn’t end up ranking quite as high as I’d have expected, although that’s really more a tribute to how beastly Paul O’Neill was in pinstripes than any shortcomings on Nick’s part.
However, the case for Nick Swisher as one of the best Yankee right-fielders of the past two decades really comes into focus when we look at the cumulative numbers (minimum 300 PAs, sorted by fWAR), courtesy of FanGraphs:
Who knew Danny Tartabull was a regular OBP machine? The Yankees have gotten some pretty robust offensive production out of their right-fielders for a large chunk of the past 20 years. As you can see, Swish is tied for third-best wOBA with Bobby Abreu and Tartabull, but more importantly, has been considerably more valuable than both men in a similar amount of PAs due to his superior glovework.
While the Yankees may not see another Paul O’Neill for a good while — believe it or not, O’Neill actually has a decent case for one of the top Yankee rightfielders of the last 50 years (2nd-highest fWAR, 3rd-highest OBP, 6th-highest wOBA) — they’ve arguably got the second-best thing in Nick Swisher.
What Josh Willingham’s contract tells us about Swisher’s
Posted by: | CommentsWhile filing the position in right field presents no problems for the 2012 Yankees, the 2013 team could have a vacancy there. After the 2011 season the Yankees exercised Nick Swisher‘s $10.25 million option, keeping him in the Bronx at least one more year. But after this season he reaches free agency, at which time his value on the open market might be more than the Yankees are willing to pay him. After all, if the Yankees really do plan to get under $189 million in 2014, Swisher just might not fit into the plans. That is, if he’s due a raise over his current salary. Given the current market, that might not be the case.
This week the Twins signed Josh Willingham to a three-year, $21 million contract. That looks like a bargain, since they reportedly had a three-year, $25 million out to Michael Cuddyer. Willingham has been a quality hitter in his six major league seasons, compiling a .262/.361/.475 slash line and a .364 wOBA (123 wRC+). He’s had some health issues, and he’s not the greatest outfield defender. But there’s little question about his bat. His worst major league season came last year, when he played half his games at the Oakland Coliseum, and even then he produced a .350 wOBA and 123 wRC+.
If Willingham’s career numbers look familiar, it might be because they resemble someone else’s:

It’s pretty crazy how those numbers match up almost exactly, save for Swisher’s poor 2008 season. They also share eerily similar platoon splits, about .350 wOBA against right-handed pitching and .375 against left-handers. Of course, this doesn’t mean that they’re in line for the same payday. There are a few factors, beyond offense, that separate Willingham and Swisher.
- Willingham is, by the numbers and the eye test, not a very good defender. Swisher might not be a gem, but he’s serviceable in right. That gives him a leg up on Willingham.
- Swisher will be a year younger hitting free agency. Willingham will be 33 next year, while Swisher’s first year after hitting free agency will be his age-32 season.
- Swisher has a far better health record. He’s played in at least 150 games in every season since 2006. Willingham has yet to hit the 150-game mark.
- Swisher already makes $10.25 million, so it’s not likely he gets a pay cut, especially from the Yankees.
Still, even with the advantages Swisher holds over Willingham, it’s not likely he’ll fetch a significantly more lucrative contract next off-season. Perhaps Michael Cuddyer getting three years at $30 million might change the equation, since Swisher is a better hitter than Cuddyer, is younger, and has had fewer poor seasons. But since it’s likely that Cuddyer gets something in Willingham’s range, it’s reasonable to expect Swisher to receive something in that range when he hits the open market.
If the Yankees could lock down right field from 2013 through 2015 at $11 million per season, would that work? One big issue at play here is a potential replacement. There are a few corner outfielders whom the Yankees could pursue, but they’re all flawed in their own ways. Josh Hamilton has injury concerns and will still likely get paid far more than Swisher. Andre Ethier will likely get a decent payday by reputation, but he’s only one year younger than Swisher and has nearly identical career numbers. Carlos Quentin will also hit free agency, but he has longstanding injury issues. Since the Yankees have no viable internal replacements, that means either trading prospects for a right fielder or re-signing Swisher. At $11 million per season that could be a viable proposition.
We can be sure that nothing will come of this until next off-season. The Yankees aren’t eager to deal with any player under contract, and Swisher certainly isn’t a priority. But when the time comes they might find that, even at three years and $33 million, he’s the most reasonable on the market.
Matt Kemp’s Contract And The Yankees
Posted by: | CommentsThe Dodgers’ ownership situation is a total mess at the moment, but that didn’t stop the club from locking up Matt Kemp for the better part of a decade. The center fielder and likely NL MVP agreed to an eight-year contract extension worth $160M yesterday, securing the kind of deal that only comes along when 27-year-old center fielders have MVP-caliber seasons. Funny how that worked out.
Many Yankees fans, myself included, were already fitting Kemp for pinstripes since he was due to become a free agent after next season. Nick Swisher‘s contract also expires then, so naturally the Yankees would just sign one of the very best players in the world to fill the right field void, he’d crush opposite field bombs like this, and we’d all live happily ever after. I had a feeling the Dodgers would find a way to keep Kemp long-term (it’s only a matter of time before they sign Clayton Kershaw long-term as well), but now that dream scenario of signing him after next season is officially the table.
The Yankees still have to figure out what’s going on in right field though, because there isn’t anyone in the farm system coming up to fill the void and the idea of moving Jesus Montero or Derek Jeter out there is just a pipe dream. The free agent market without Kemp still boasts some star caliber names, but none are as young or offensively dominant as the Dodgers’ cornerstone. Josh Hamilton is a great story, but he’ll be 32 shortly after Opening Day 2013 and has had major problems staying healthy in recent years. It’s fair to wonder how his past substance abuse will hinder his ability to stay on the field down the road. Andre Ethier can’t hit lefties (.270 wOBA vs. LHP last three years) and is arguably the worst defensive outfielder in the game. Unless you happen to have a strong affinity for Carlos Quentin or Shane Victorino, there’s not much else to see here.
Without Kemp on the market, it’s entirely possible that the Yankees’ best long-term option in right field is the guy they have out there right now. Swisher certainly isn’t without his faults, but he’s extremely durable, hits for power from both sides of the plate, and catches everything he’s supposed to in the outfield. The Yankees know him (and his medical history) better than anyone else, and he offers a level of certainty that I really don’t see in the other candidates. Hamilton is the high upside play, but he could easily turn into the position player version of Carl Pavano. If a reasonable agreement – say three years or so – can be worked out between the Yankees and Swisher, then that is probably the team’s best bet with Kemp now a non-option.
Thankfully, the right field question isn’t one that needs an answer right now. The Yankees have an above-average player set to man the position in 2012 and twelve months for the market to develop. Trade options could emerge, internal options could emerge, all sorts of stuff can happen. Unfortunately Matt Kemp won’t be the answer, but that’s okay. That’ll give the Yankees more money to spend on pitching anyway.
Cashman Conference Call Notes: Burnett, Yu, Montero, Martin, Cervelli, Posada, More
Posted by: | CommentsBrian Cashman held a conference call with reporters this afternoon following the announcement of his new three-year contract, and he downplayed the significance of running a New York team. “It’s an easier situation for me because I haven’t really been anywhere else,” said the Yankees-lifer. “This is all I know.”
The biggest piece of news to come out of the conference call was Andrew Brackman’s release. You win some and you lose some a lot in the draft, and in Brackman’s case, the Yankees spent nearly $11M (according to Pete Caldera) to have him face 13 big league hitters. Ouch. Cashman also confirmed that the starting rotation will continue to be the team’s priority this offseason (duh), though they could still add a second left-handed reliever as well. Here’s a list of the free agent lefty relievers, in case you’re wondering who might fill Damaso Marte‘s DL spot next season. Here are the rest of the notes from the press conference…
Pitching
- “We’re in a position now to take our time and explore and digest as well as pursue, but at our own pace, not in an emotional or reactive state,” said Cashman when asked about pursuing pitching. “It allows us to survey the landscape in a more conservative way. [Re-signing CC Sabathia] provides us a lot of security.” (Mark Feinsand, Chad Jennings & Marc Carig)
- “He’s had to deal with adversity because of the inconsistent performance,”said Cashman when asked about A.J. Burnett. “He still was able to step up in October.” Cashman did laud Burnett’s ability to take the ball every five days and be accountable after his starts. Unless something unexpected happens, A.J will be in the rotation next season. (Kim Jones)
- As for Yu Darvish, Cashman simply said: “I think like with anything else you learn over time. I think we’re more prepared today than we have been in the past.” I take that to mean the Yankees did more research on Darvish than they did with Kei Igawa, but that’s a quote open to (mis)interpretation. (Jon Lane)
- Cashman confirmed that Rafael Soriano did not exercise his opt-out clause before last night’s deadline and will be with the team in 2012. (Anthony McCarron)
Offense
- When asked about soon-to-be free agents like Albert Pujols and Prince Fielder, Cashman said: “I don’t anticipate a bat being a need at all. Offense is not a problem with this club despite what happened in the Detroit series.” (Bryan Hoch & Feinsand)
- Picking up Nick Swisher‘s option was “an easy call,” and the GM isn’t concerned too much about his right fielder’s third straight poor postseason showing. (Feinsand)
- As for Jesus Montero‘s role with the team next season, Cashman said: “He could be a catcher, he could be a DH, he could be a bat off the bench, depending on how the roster looks.” (Jones)
Miscellaneous
- As for the trade market, Cashman said he’s open “to anybody’s ideas” and is willing to discuss a deal involving Burnett or pretty much anyone else on the roster. “If anybody wants to approach me on anybody on this roster, if they don’t have a full no-trade clause, worst I can tell em is no.” Burnett has a partial no-trade clause, but as yesterday’s Derek Lowe trade showed, A.J. has minimal trade value. (Jones, Hoch & Dan Barbarisi)
- Cashman said that a long-term deal for Russell Martin is possible, but he likes the flexibility that their upper level catching depth provides. “He’s under our control [as an arbitration-eligible player]. He was fantastic, he didn’t disappoint … I’m a big fan.” (Kim Jones)
- Cashman on Jorge Posada‘s future: “That’s something we’ll have to discuss here on the short term … it’s not something I’m prepared to talk about today.” (Barbarisi)
- “[Frankie Cervelli] is fine,” said Cashman. “He’s full-bore, ready to go as a catcher.” That’s good news. Frankie suffered his third concussion in four years in early-September. (Jones)
- Cashman also confirmed that no one big league roster needs any kind of offseason surgery. (Jennings)
Yankees exercise 2012 options for Cano, Swisher
Posted by: | CommentsAs expected, the Yankees have officially exercised their club options for Robinson Cano and Nick Swisher. Cano will earn $14M next season, Swisher $10.25M. Both no-brainers, if you ask me. CC Sabathia has until midnight Monday to opt out of the remaining four years and $92M left on his deal, which he almost certainly will.
Hot Stove Notes: Cashman, Sabathia, Swisher
Posted by: | CommentsYou guys really for Game Seven? I’m stoked, can’t wait. Until the first pitch is thrown, here are some miscellaneous notes from Yankeeland, all courtesy of Joel Sherman (unless otherwise noted)…
- The Yankees and Brian Cashman have yet another three-year contract already in place, they’re just waiting until the end of the World Series to announce it. This will be Cashman’s fourth straight three-year deal. (link)
- The Commissioner’s Office sent out a memo today, letting the teams know that the offseason clock has been moved from noon tomorrow to midnight Sunday. That’s just so the offseason officially begins on a Monday. CC Sabathia will now have until midnight Wednesday to opt out of his contract, and free agents can officially negotiate with new teams at midnight Friday. (link and link)
- Cashman will meet with Sabathia’s agent this weekend to try to finalize a contract extensions for the left-hander. We heard last night that the team has an offer ready to go, and are just waiting to deliver it to CC’s people. (Andrew Marchand)
- Nick Swisher‘s contract contains a limited no-trade clause, and the Yankees have asked him to submit his list of teams he won’t accept a trade to just so they know what their options are should they choose to move him. Once they see the list, they’ll pick up his $10.25M option for 2012. (link and link)
What Went As Expected: Nick Swisher
Posted by: | CommentsThe Yankees have had one of the league’s best offenses for many years running, but they came into the season with a surprising lack of sure things at the plate. How would Derek Jeter and Alex Rodriguez continue to decline? Would Curtis Granderson continue to rake after making adjustments with Kevin Long? Would Mark Teixeira‘s batting average bounce back? Can Brett Gardner do it again with the wrist injury in the rear-view mirror? How would Jorge Posada take to DHing? Is Russell Martin healthy? The only two players with any kind of certainty coming into 2011 were budding star Robinson Cano and the less hyped Nick Swisher.
Oddly enough, Swisher’s season started with a rather prolonged slump, particularly in the power department. He’d gotten off to hot starts in his previous two years as a Yankee, so this was quite the opposite. Swish didn’t hit his first homerun until the team’s 22nd game of the season, at which point he was hitting just .237/.351/.303 in 94 plate appearances. The slump continued into late-May, and the Yankees right fielder carried a weak .206/.321/.288 batting line into the May 29th game in Seattle, the Yankees’ 51st game of the season.
A second inning solo homer off Jason Vargas in that May 29th game set the stage for Swisher’s turn around. He put together a little six-game hitting streak and socked another homer three days later, then hit another one out three days after that. It’s not much, but he managed to raise his season batting line from .204/.321/.289 to .215/.342/.348 during the nine-game west coast trip, and he was the team’s best hitter during June: .326/.445/.651 with seven homers and more walks (20) than strikeouts (16). From that May 29th game through the end of the season, he hit .284/.397/.519 with 23 doubles and 21 homers in 442 plate appearances.
Swisher managed to raise his overall season line from that sub-replacement level garbage he put up through the first 51 games to a much more respectable .260/.374/.449 after 162 games, a .358 wOBA that was his worst as a Yankee but still 19th best among the 62 qualified outfielders in baseball. Swisher did struggle against righties (.335 wOBA) compared to lefties (.412), but it wasn’t enough to stop him from leading the team in OBP and posting the seventh highest walk rate (15.0%) in baseball. At 3.4 bWAR and 3.8 fWAR, he was either the 19th or 25th best outfielder in the game, depending on your statistical preference.
The sluggish start and dreadful postseason showing (4-for-19 with a walk) sort of puts a damper on yet another fine season for Swisher, who at this point has to be considered one of the best pickups of the Brian Cashman era when considering cost. He’s gotten on base and hit for power every season he’s been in New York, and he hasn’t spent a day on the disabled list. The Yankees are very likely to pick up Swisher’s $10.25M option for 2012, bringing him back to Bronx for at least one more season, a season that will almost certainly be productive.










