Sep
03

Two relievers, one inning

By

Let me offer you a thinly-veiled comparison between two pitchers.

Pitcher A: 55 G, 55.2 IP, 1.78 ERA, 41 H, 9 BB, 61 K, .199/.233/.316
Pitcher B: 31 G, 39.1 IP, 1.14 ERA, 22 H, 10 BB, 48 K, .162/.218/.204

Bite your tongue if you picked Pitcher B over Pitcher A. Don’t tell Yankee fans that, in this admittedly tiny sample size, Phil Hughes‘ numbers look, if not a little bit better than Mariano Rivera‘s, just as good as Mo’s. Just don’t.

News broke after the game last night that the Sandman is out with a sore left groin. While I’m holding my breath, Rivera isn’t too concerned. “That’s good, because it’s not my pushing leg,” Rivera said of his left leg. “You don’t want to have that kind of injury, especially in your legs, but it’s nothing we’re worried about. We will take care of it and work at it. Everything will be fine.”

The Yankees, enjoying their 7.5-game lead over Boston, plan to take it slow with Mo. We saw a glimpse of that strategy last night. With the Yanks holding to a two-run lead, Joe Girardi altered the pattern. Brian Bruney pitched some of the 8th, and the Phils joined him. Mr. Hughes stayed in for the final three outs of a blow out, and due to the intricacies of baseball’s rule book, he walked away with his second save of the season. It probably won’t be his last.

According to Girardi and Rivera, Mo first felt the pain in his leg while the Yanks were visiting Seattle a few weeks ago, but it had subsided. It came back on Tuesday night after Rivera appeared in his second straight game. It seems as though every year, Rivera goes through a slight malady. This one is a little late in the season for my tastes, but the Yanks are downplaying the injury. “I don’t even know if I would call it a strain,” Girardi said. “So you just kind of give him a few days and see if he can get rid of it. We’ll get it right, get him healthy and make sure it’s 100 percent.”

For the weekend as the Yanks head to Toronto, Rivera won’t pitch. “It’s a concern for you to run him out there,” Girardi said. “We don’t want to hurt him. We’ll probably give him a few days off and see if we can nip it.”

In his stead, then, the Yanks’ closer will be Phil Hughes. And you know what? I have no problem with that. As Hughes’ numbers show, he has been more than up for the task this year out of the pen. He has allowed one double, one triple and one home run while giving up 18 singles in 31 innings. His strike-out numbers are off the charts, and while he can’t quite match Mariano in the control department, that 4.80 K/BB ratio is right in line with Mo’s 2005 season.

So now, the Yankees will use the luxury of the lead to their advantage. The expanded rosters provide them with added bullpen depth, and the emergence of Phil Hughes as a force gives them, in effect, a second closer. He hasn’t wilted under pressure and wants the ball every day. Phil might run into a hiccup at some point this season, but after watching him mow down the Orioles in the 9th last night, I can sleep easy with the game in his hands.

Still, get well really soon, Mo. I want a seven-inning game come October.

Categories : Pitching

80 Comments»

  1. Bo says:

    But I thought you wanted Hughes to spot start to get innings in Sept???

    Glad you can finally realize that a shutdown bullpen is actually a nice thing to have.

  2. RichYF says:

    I’d really like to see what Melancon and Robertson have to offer in that 8th inning role while He is recovering.

    I don’t trust Coke or Bruney at this point. I like both, but the HRs scare me.

    Coke might just be getting used too often. I’d have to look up some numbers to confirm, but he was being used an awful lot for a while there.

    Either way, there are plenty of fresh arms in the pen and getting Him some rest really isn’t a terrible idea at this point.

  3. Andy Hawkins says:

    Bruney has been truly terrible for a while now, he keeps this up I dont see him making the post season roster

  4. Makavelli says:

    Do you think perhaps Phil Hughes, as unlikely as it seemed even yesterday, could be groomed to succeed The Great Mariano Rivera?

  5. matt k says:

    Can someone help me make sense of the rotation for the toronto series. Gaudin – Joba- Andy – Mitre. why both Gaudin and Mitre?

  6. Raf says:

    i cant wait to read/hear the “Phil could be groomed to be Mo’s replacement” comments. should be fun.

    as long as its nothing major, this could give some other guys in the bullpen work and different looks for Girardi.

  7. Chris says:

    Of the 5 ER that Hughes has given up as a reliever 2 were inherited runners that Mo allowed to score (Aug 4 against Toronto). If you take out those two runs, Hughes ERA drops to 0.69.

  8. GG says:

    Mo has had this look of pain on his face all year, I guess now we know, since SEA it has been the leg, I feel like he’s been nagged by a lot of little things throughout the year, which makes his ridiculous season look more ridiculous….can’t believe the division is down to 23…..in other news, I just got a Mac (my first), and I don’t know if I like it, I thnk RABing is better with a PC?? I might bring it back. Anyone got some little tricks to point out to me that I don’t know about?

  9. donttradecano says:

    If Bruney, Marte or Roberston can catch fire come playoff time, it could be 6 inning games in october.

  10. miketotheg says:

    Remember that chart about games left to play against above .500 teams? about half i think.

    This might get a little hairy. But we need mo for October.

    I see more grey hairs in my future.

  11. Accent Shallow says:

    Awaiting with trepidation a second offseason where the press deems a promising young starter more valuable as a setup man . . .

  12. Tom Zig says:

    My only concern is whether we’ll win 100 games or not

  13. TLVP says:

    We pay Mo more than Pettitte so a God like closer is supposdely worth more than a no 3-4 starter…

    The problem with looking at it like that however is that an okeyish closer is not worth much at all but even a mediocre starter has a value as an innings eater (and of course if he’s really bad you can always trade him to a NL team and he’ll become a CY candidate).

    The difference between Mo and everyone else is that he is always solid and most of the time he is great.

    Just because Hughes looks great this year and maybe even better than Mo there is no way you’d feel comfortable that he’d be able to repeat it next year or the year after that. If you knew he’d have a Mo like career turning him into a closer wouldn’t be a horribly bad decision for the Yankees.

    I’ve argued before that for the Yankees a great closer has a higher relative value compared to a no 4 starter than for any other. We build for the post season where every win counts so much more.

    I think Hughes could be better than a no 4 starter so I’m opposed to putting him in the penn, but the argument is different when losing in the WS is seen as a failed season (i.e. Yankees)rather than a great season (everyone else)

  14. Mike says:

    Two relievers one cup?

Leave a Reply

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

If this is your first time commenting on River Ave. Blues, please review the RAB Commenter Guidelines. Login for commenting features. Register for RAB.